中国地质调查局 中国地质科学院主办
科学出版社出版
高级检索

河套盆地临河坳陷下白垩统内部不整合的发现及对构造演化的启示

,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

文章导航 > 中国地质 > 2021 > 48(2): 593-604

上一篇

下一篇

刘天顺, 张锐锋, 丁文龙, 焦保程, 王少春, 吴晨林, 杜晓宇, 周志成, 薛明旺. 2021. 河套盆地临河坳陷下白垩统内部不整合的发现及对构造演化的启示[J]. 中国地质, 48(2): 593-604. doi: 10.12029/gc20210217
引用本文: 刘天顺, 张锐锋, 丁文龙, 焦保程, 王少春, 吴晨林, 杜晓宇, 周志成, 薛明旺. 2021. 河套盆地临河坳陷下白垩统内部不整合的发现及对构造演化的启示[J]. 中国地质, 48(2): 593-604. doi: 10.12029/gc20210217
shu
LIU Tianshun, ZHANG Ruifeng, DING Wenlong, JIAO Baocheng, WANG Shaochun, WU Chenlin, DU Xiaoyu, ZHOU Zhicheng, XUE Mingwang. 2021. Discovery of Lower Cretaceous unconformity in Linhe Depression of Hetao Basin and its implication to structural evolution[J]. Geology in China, 48(2): 593-604. doi: 10.12029/gc20210217
Citation: LIU Tianshun, ZHANG Ruifeng, DING Wenlong, JIAO Baocheng, WANG Shaochun, WU Chenlin, DU Xiaoyu, ZHOU Zhicheng, XUE Mingwang. 2021. Discovery of Lower Cretaceous unconformity in Linhe Depression of Hetao Basin and its implication to structural evolution[J]. Geology in China, 48(2): 593-604. doi: 10.12029/gc20210217
shu

河套盆地临河坳陷下白垩统内部不整合的发现及对构造演化的启示

  • 1.

    中国地质大学 能源学院, 北京 100083

  • 2.

    非常规天然气地质评价与开发北京市重点实验室, 中国地质大学, 北京 100083

  • 3.

    自然资源部页岩气资源战略评价重点实验室, 中国地质大学, 北京 100083

  • 4.

    中国石油华北油田分公司, 河北 任丘 062552

  • 基金项目:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41372139)和国家科技重大专项专题(2016ZX05046-003-001、2016ZX05033-002-004、2016ZX05033-002-005、2016ZX05034-004-003)联合资助
详细信息
    作者简介: 刘天顺, 男, 1996年生, 硕士生, 主要从事石油构造分析、非常规油气储层裂缝形成机制与定量表征及工程甜点评价预测等研究; E-mail: 937231974@qq.com
    通讯作者: 张锐锋, 男, 1964年生, 博士, 教授级高级工程师, 主要从事油气勘探工作; E-mail: ktb_zrf@petrochina.com.cn

  • 中图分类号: P542.34

Discovery of Lower Cretaceous unconformity in Linhe Depression of Hetao Basin and its implication to structural evolution

  • 1.

    School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China

  • 2.

    Beijing Key Laboratory of Unconventional Natural Gas Geology Evaluation and Development, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China

  • 3.

    Key Laboratory of Strategy Evaluation for Shale Gas, Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China

  • 4.

    PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Company, Renqiu 062552, Hebei, China

  • Fund Project: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.41372139), Special topics of major national science and technology projects(No.2016ZX05046-003-001、No.2016ZX05033-002-004、No.2016ZX05033-002-005、No.2016 ZX05034-004-003)
More Information
    Author Bio: LIU Tianshun, male, born in 1996, master incandidate, engaged in oil structure analysis, fracture formation mechanism and quantitative characterization of unconventional oil and gas reservoirs, evaluation and prediction of engineering desserts; E-mail: 937231974@qq.com .
    Corresponding author: ZHANG Ruifeng, male, born in 1965, senior engineer, doctor, engaged in oil and gasexploration, E-mail: ktb_zrf@petrochina.com.cn

    摘要

  • 河套盆地临河坳陷是一个NE-SW向展布的中—新生代的弧形走滑拉分盆地。依据地层古生物微体化石组合特征、不整合体的测井响应特征(包括声波时差法确定不整合面)、不整合面的地震响应特征等方法综合研究，发现了下白垩统内部不整合。不整合面之上发育固阳组，之下发育乌尔塔组。固阳组全盆普遍发育，地层厚度差异不大。乌尔塔组主要分布在靠近狼山断裂附近的两个小凹陷内，地层厚度整体由西北向东南递减。地震资料的时深转换结果显示：南部小凹陷地层厚度大于北部小凹陷，在南部最厚处约800 m，北部最厚处约600 m。乌尔塔组沉积后，盆地受中燕山运动的影响，受到NW-SE向挤压应力，由于挤压作用差异抬升，地层遭受剥蚀，形成下白垩统内部不整合。该不整合具备从西北往东南由平行不整合逐渐转变为角度不整合的特征。结合不整合的成因特征和地层厚度变化，将早白垩世盆地的构造演化分为早白垩世早期断陷阶段、早白垩世中期挤压抬升剥蚀阶段、早白垩世晚期弱伸展坳陷阶段。

    The Linhe Depression of Hetao Basin is a NE-SW trending Meso-Cenozoic arc-shaped strike-slip pull basin. Based on the combination of microfauna fossils, logging response characteristics (including the method of acoustic wave time difference to determine unconformity) and seismic response characteristics of unconformity, an unconformity within the Lower Cretaceous was identified. The unconformity is distinguished by the overlying Guyang Formation and underlying Urta Formation. The former is generally developed throughout the basin, and its thickness does not change much, and the latter with thickness decreasing from northwest to southeast as a whole is mainly distributed in two small sags close to the Langshan fault. The time and depth conversion results of the seismic data show that the thickness of the Urta Formation in the south is greater than that in the north. The thickest formation in the south is about 800 meters, and the thickest formation in the north is about 600 meters. After the deposition of the Urta Formation, the basin was affected by the Middle Yanshan Movement and subjected to the northwest-southeast compression. Due to the squeezing effect, the strata were uplifted and suffered erosion, resulting in the internal unconformity within the Lower Cretaceous. The unconformity is characterized by gradually changing from parallel unconformity to angular unconformity from northwest to southeast. Combined with the causes of the unconformity and the change of the thickness of the strata, the structural evolution of the basin in the early Cretaceous can be divided into three stages: the fault depression stage in the early Early Cretaceous, the uplift and erosion stage in the middle Early Cretaceous and the weak extension depression stage in the late Early Cretaceous.

    • HTML全文
  • 加载中

  • 图 1  河套盆地构造单元划分图

    Figure 1. 

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 2  河套盆地临河坳陷地层综合柱状图(据付锁堂等，2018；杜晓宇，2019；有修改)

    Figure 2. 

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 3  临河坳陷吉参1-松探1-临深3-临深4连井剖面

    Figure 3. 

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 4  临河坳陷声波时差法确定不整合面

    Figure 4. 

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 5  吉参1井过井地震标定及临河坳陷典型地震剖面(位置见图 6，说明见正文)

    Figure 5. 

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 6  临河坳陷下白垩统内部不整合平面分布图

    Figure 6. 

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 7  河套盆地临河坳陷下白垩统内部角度不整合成因分析模式图

    Figure 7. 

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    表 1  河套盆地下白垩统地层划分

    Table 1.  Division of the lower Cretaceous strata in Hetao Basin

    下载: 导出CSV
    • 参考文献(56)

  • Anadón P, Cabrera L, Colombo F, Marzo M, Riba O. 1986. Syntectonic intraformational unconformities in alluvial fan deposits, eastern Ebro Basin margins (NE Spain)[J]. Foreland Basins, 8: 259-271. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781444303810.ch14/summary

    Bao Chuang, Chen Yuepeng, Li Dapeng. 2013. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb age and Hf isotopic composition of the Paleoproterozoic plagioclase amphibolite in Bayanwula mountain, Inner Mongolia[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 32(10): 1514-1524(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Beer J A, Allmendinger R W, Figueroa D E, Jordan T E. 1990. Seismic stratigraphy of a Neogene Piggyback Basin, Argentina[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 74(8): 1183-1202. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/308482923_Seismic_Stratigraphy_of_a_Neogene_Piggyback_Basin_Argentina_1

    Cai Youxian. 1988. New data of Late Cretaceous strata in Hetao Basin, Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy, (4): 273-280(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Cai Youxian. 1988. Discussion on the Cretaceous stratigraphic sequence and oil-bearing strata in Hetao Basin, Inner Mongolia[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, (3): 31-36(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-SKYK198803004.htm

    Cai Youxian. 1990. Cretaceous paleoclimate, sedimentary environment and prospect of oil and gas exploration in Hetao Basin, Inner Mongolia[J]. Geological Review, 36(2): 105-115(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP199002001.htm

    Chen Fajing, Zhang Guangya, Chen Zhaonian. 2004. Unconformity analysis and its significance in the study of continental basin tectonics[J]. Modern Geology, 18(3): 269-275 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/xddz200403001

    Chen Shiyue, Li Cong, Zhang Pengfei, Wang Yuejun. 2011. The unconformable distribution of Caledonian and Indosinian strata in Jiangnan-Xuefeng area[J]. Geology in China, 38(5): 1212-1219(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201105009.htm

    Du Xiaoyu, Ding Wenlong, Jiao Baocheng, Zhou Zhicheng, Xue Mingwang. 2019. Fluid potential characteristics and hydrocarbon migration-accumulation unit classification in Linhe Depression of Hetao Basin[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 26(4): 9-14(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-TZCZ201904002.htm

    Fu Suotang, Fu Jinhua, Yu Jian, YaoJingli, Zhang Caili, Ma Zhanrong, Yang Yajuan, Zhang Yan. 2018. Petroleum geological characteristics and exploration prospects of Linhe Depression in Hetao Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 45(5): 5-18(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876380418300843

    Ghienne J, Moreau J, Degermann L, Rubino J. 2013. Lower Palaeozoic unconformities in an intracratonic platform setting: Glacial erosion versus tectonics in the eastern Murzuq Basin (southern Libya)[J]. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 102: 455-482. doi: 10.1007/s00531-012-0815-y

    Guan Wei, Xu Huaimin, Li Han, Cheng Lei, Ma Yonghui. 2019. Study on structural characteristics of unconformity: Take Jurassic-Cretaceous unconformity in Yong 1 well area as an example[J]. Geoscience, 33 (2): 153-163(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-XDDZ201902016.htm

    Guo Zhongming, Yu Zhongping. 1990. Structural characteristics and evolution mechanism of Hetao arced tectonic system and its petroleum exploration[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, (3): 15-24(in Chinese with English abstract).

    He Bizhu, Jiao Cunli, Xu Zhiqin, Liu Shilin, Cai Zhihui, Li Haibing, Zhang Miao. 2013. Unconformity structure and tectonic paleogeographic environment: A case study of the northern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and the Tarim Basin in the middle Caledonian[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 29(6): 2184-2198(in Chinese with English abstract). http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=265509

    He Dengfa. 2007. Structure and hydrocarbon accumulation of unconformity surface[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 34(2): 142-149(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200702002.htm

    Jin Jiuqiang. 2005. Discussion on the formation mechanism of the Cenozoic fault depression in the Ordos block[C]//Analysis of the Mesozoic-Cenozoic evolutionary dynamics and its resource-environment effects in the Ordos Basin and its adjacent areas, 1(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Li Huiqiong, Pu Renhai, Qu Hongjun, Zhao Deyong. 2017. Discussion on logging recognition method of Triassic and Jurassic unconformity in Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), (4): 577-583(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-XBDZ201704017.htm

    Lin C, Yang H, Liu J, Rui Z, Cai Z, Zhu Y. 2012. Distribution and erosion of the Paleozoic tectonic unconformities in the Tarim Basin, Northwest China: Significance for the evolution of paleo-uplifts and tectonic geography during deformation[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 46, 1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2011.10.004

    Liu Jingyan, Lin Changsong, Peng Li, Chen Qingqing, Zhang Xiangxiang, Zhou Xiaojun. 2008. Distribution patterns of structural unconformity and their constraints on stratigraphic traps——a case study of the end of the middle Devonian in the Tarim Basin[J]. Oil and Gas Geology, 29(2): 268-275(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200802016.htm

    Men Xiangyong, Zhao Wenzhi, Li Xiaodi, Zhang Yijie, Chen Qian. 2006. Analysis of petroleum geological conditions of key targets for strategic petroleum area selection in Petrochina and suggestions of exploration[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 25(9): 1064-1067(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/296906753_Analysis_of_petroleum_geological_conditions_of_key_targets_for_strategic_petroleum_area_selection_in_PetroChina_and_suggestions_of_exploration

    Men Xiangyong, Zhao Wenzhi, Zhang Yan, Li Xiaodi. 2006. Characteristics of petroleum geology of Linhe Depression in Hetao Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 26(1): 20-24(in Chinese). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200601006.htm

    Shao Haohao, Chen Xuanhua, Zhang Da, Shao Zhaogang, Li Bing, Wang Zengzhen, Zhang Yiping, Xu Shenglin, Shi Jianjie, Miao Huixin. 2019. The Lower Cretaceous tectonic deformation stages and detrital zircon U-Pb ages of Pingshanhu Basin in Hexi Corridor[J]. Geology in China, 46(5): 1079-1093(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DIZI201905010.htm

    Sun Liuyi, Pu Renhai, Ma Zhanrong, Wang Fei. 2018. Source rock distribution and exploration prospect of Jilantai Sag in Hetao Basin, China[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 40(5): 612-626(in Chinese with English abstract). http://search.cnki.net/down/default.aspx?filename=XAGX201805010&dbcode=CJFD&year=2018&dflag=pdfdown

    Wang Fei, Ma Zhanrong, Pu Renhai, Zhang Caili. 2019. Cretaceous stratigraphic division and geological characteristics in Jilantai area, Hetao Basin[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 39(4): 656-664(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Wang Jiangong, Wang Tianqi, Wei Pingsheng, Shi Lanting, Han Xiaoqiang, Liu Caiyan, Shi Yongsu. 2009. Discovery of unconformity at the bottom of the third member of the Qingshankou Formation in the Songliao Basin and its significance in petroleum geology[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, (1): 80-90(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200901008.htm

    Wu Kongyou, Li Linlin, Zha Ming. 2009. Unconformity longitudinal structure and its physical modeling of reservoir formation[J]. Petroleum Experimental Geology, 31(5): 537-541(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Yang Yong, Zha Ming, Hong Taiyuan, Liu Guande. 2007. Progress in unconformity classification and new classification schemes[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy, 31(3): 288-295(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DCXZ200703012.htm

    Zhang Haozhi. 2015. Analysis of Geological Conditions of Hydrocarbon Accumulation in Linhe Depression of Hetao Basin[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an Petroleum University, (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Zhang Yiming, Zhang Ruifeng, Wang Shaochun, Liu Xiheng, Li Yongjun, Liu Jing, Wang Huilai, Wang Jian, Wu Chenlin, Dan Weining. 2018. Practice and understanding of important discoveries in oil and gas exploration in Linhe Depression of Hetao Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 23(5): 5-15(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-KTSY201805001.htm

    Zhao Chongyuan, Guo Zhongming, Hui Binyao. 1984. The arc-shaped arc structure system and its formation and evolution mechanism[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, (4): 349-361(in Chinese with English abstract).

    包创, 陈岳龙, 李大鹏. 2013. 内蒙古巴彦乌拉山古元古代斜长角闪岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄和Hf同位素组成[J]. 地质通报, 32(10): 1514-1524. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201310003.htm

    蔡友贤. 1988. 内蒙古河套盆地白垩纪地层层序及生油层时代讨论[J]. 石油勘探与开发, (3): 31-36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK198803004.htm

    蔡友贤. 1988. 内蒙古河套盆地晚白垩世地层新资料[J]. 地层学杂志, (4): 273-280. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DCXZ198804004.htm

    蔡友贤. 1990. 内蒙古河套盆地白垩纪古气候、沉积环境及油气勘探远景[J]. 地质论评, 36(2): 105-115. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.1990.02.002

    陈发景, 张光亚, 陈昭年. 2004. 不整合分析及其在陆相盆地构造研究中的意义[J]. 现代地质, 18(3): 269-275. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2004.03.001

    陈世悦, 李聪, 张鹏飞, 王岳军. 2011. 江南-雪峰地区加里东期和印支期不整合分布规律[J]. 中国地质, 38(5): 1212-1219. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2011.05.008 http://geochina.cgs.gov.cn/geochina/ch/reader/key_query.aspx

    杜晓宇, 丁文龙, 焦保程, 周志成, 薛明旺. 2019. 河套盆地临河坳陷流体势特征及油气运聚单元划分[J]. 特种油气藏, 26(4): 9-14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2019.04.002

    付锁堂, 付金华, 喻建, 姚泾利, 张才利, 马占荣, 杨亚娟, 张艳. 2018. 河套盆地临河坳陷石油地质特征及勘探前景[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 45(5): 5-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201805002.htm

    官伟, 徐怀民, 李涵, 程磊, 马永辉. 2019. 不整合体结构特征研究: 以永1井区侏罗系-白垩系不整合为例[J]. 现代地质, 33(02): 153-163. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201902016.htm

    郭忠铭, 于忠平. 1990. 河套弧形地堑系构造特征和演化机制及其油气勘探[J]. 石油勘探与开发, (3): 15-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK199003002.htm

    何碧竹, 焦存礼, 许志琴, 刘士林, 蔡志慧, 李海兵, 张淼. 2013. 不整合结构构造与构造古地理环境——以加里东中期青藏高原北缘及塔里木盆地为例[J]. 岩石学报, 29(6): 2184-2198. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201306024.htm

    何登发. 2007. 不整合面的结构与油气聚集[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 34(2): 142-149. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2007.02.003

    靳久强. 2005. 鄂尔多斯地块周缘新生代断陷形成机制探讨[C]//鄂尔多斯盆地及邻区中新生代演化动力学和其资源环境效应学术研讨会论文摘要汇编, 1.

    李慧琼, 蒲仁海, 屈红军, 赵德勇. 2017. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系与侏罗系不整合面测井识别方法讨论[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), (4): 577-583. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBDZ201704017.htm

    刘景彦, 林畅松, 彭丽, 陈清清, 张响响, 周小军. 2008. 构造不整合的分布样式及其对地层圈闭的制约——以塔里木盆地中泥盆世末为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 29(2): 268-275. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2008.02.017

    门相勇, 赵文智, 李小地, 张义杰, 陈谦. 2006. 中国石油战略选区重点目标油气地质条件分析及勘探建议[J]. 地质通报, 25(9): 1064-1067. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2006.09.013

    门相勇, 赵文智, 张研, 李小地. 2006. 河套盆地临河坳陷油气地质特征[J]. 天然气工业, 26(1): 20-24. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0976.2006.01.006

    邵浩浩, 陈宣华, 张达, 邵兆刚, 李冰, 王增振, 张义平, 徐盛林, 史建杰, 苗慧心. 2019. 河西走廊平山湖盆地早白垩世构造变形期次及其碎屑锆石U-Pb年龄约束[J]. 中国地质, 46(5): 1079-1093. http://geochina.cgs.gov.cn/geochina/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20190509&flag=1

    孙六一, 蒲仁海, 马占荣, 王飞. 2018. 河套盆地吉兰泰凹陷烃源岩展布与勘探潜力[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 40(5): 612-62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6561.2018.05.009

    王飞, 马占荣, 蒲仁海, 张才利. 2019. 河套盆地吉兰泰地区白垩系地层划分及地质特征[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 39(4): 656-664. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XKXB201904014.htm

    王建功, 王天奇, 卫平生, 石兰亭, 韩小强, 刘彩燕, 史永苏. 2009. 松辽盆地青山口组三段底界不整合面的发现及石油地质学意义[J]. 地质学报, (1): 80-90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200901008.htm

    吴孔友, 李林林, 查明. 2009. 不整合纵向结构及其成藏作用物理模拟[J]. 石油实验地质, 31(5): 537-541. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2009.05.019

    杨勇, 查明, 洪太元, 刘冠德. 2007. 不整合分类研究进展与新型分类方案[J]. 地层学杂志, 31(3): 288-295. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4959.2007.03.012

    张昊祉. 2015. 河套盆地临河坳陷油气成藏地质条件分析[D]. 西安: 西安石油大学.

    张以明, 张锐锋, 王少春, 刘喜恒, 李拥军, 刘静, 王会来, 汪剑, 吴晨林, 淡伟宁. 2018. 河套盆地临河坳陷油气勘探重要发现的实践与认识[J]. 中国石油勘探, 23(5): 5-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201805001.htm

    赵重远, 郭忠铭, 惠斌耀. 1984. 河套弧形构造体系及其形成和演化机制[J]. 石油与天然气地质, (4): 349-361. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT198404006.htm

    • 相关文章
  • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)
  • 加载中

图(7)

表(1)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  2710
  • PDF下载数:  114
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2019-12-29
修回日期:  2020-03-12
刊出日期:  2021-04-25

目录

    版权所有：中国地质调查局发展研究中心 copyright @2020
    返回