Characteristics and ages of uplift-rapid extension deformation of Lushan magmatic core complex
-
摘要:
华南板块中东部晚中生代广泛发育伸展构造变形事件, 不仅发育沉积红盆、伸展穹窿、变质核杂岩、韧性拆离断层带等, 也发育大规模的同构造岩浆和成矿作用, 但是快速伸展时限仍然存在争议。选取庐山岩浆核杂岩, 针对岩浆核杂岩两侧的晚中生代韧性剪切带及周缘开展野外地质调查及同构造变形分析。构造变形的运动学解析结果表明, 庐山岩浆核杂岩拆离正断层的伸展方向为NW—SE向, 同构造40Ar-39Ar测年获得白云母主坪视年龄为105.20±0.23 Ma和黑云母主坪视年龄95.84±0.09 Ma, 限定了庐山岩浆核杂岩隆升-快速伸展时限集中于95~105 Ma。庐山岩浆核杂岩本期伸展构造变形特征及形成时代与华南板块区域性的隆升-伸展变形特征一致, 代表了华南板块晚中生代以来快速的伸展构造变形事件, 形成机制可能与古太平洋板块向华南板块俯冲后的板块弯转后撤有关。
Abstract:The extensional tectonic events during the Late Mesozoic were widely distinguished in the east central part of the South China Plate.These events are characterized by red sedimentary basins, dome extensional structure, metamorphic core complex, ductile detachment fault zone, and simultaneous large-scale of syntectonic magma and metallogenic processes.But the late Mesozoic extensional deformation sequence of the region is still controversial, especially the formation ages of rapid extension.In this paper, the authors focus on the time of intensive extension of the Lushan magmatic core complex(LMCC)in middle-east part of the South China Plate.Field investigation was carried out to analyze the syntectonic deformation of the ductile shear zone on both sides of the LMCC and its periphery.The new results show that the detachment normal fault of shear zone has NW-SE extensional direction, and 40Ar-39Ar dated the apparent main plateau ages of muscovite and biotite at 105.20±0.23 Ma and 95.84±0.09 Ma, respectively.The uplift-rapid extension formation age of LMCC is thus concentrated at 95~105 Ma.It is noticeable that the extensional deformation of the characteristics and formation age of the LMCC is consistent with the regional extensional deformation of the Southern China Plate.The uplift-rapid extension formation of LMCC represents a rapid extensional tectonic deformation event in the South China Plate since the Late Mesozoic.The formation mechanism of the uplift-rapid extension formation of LMCC may be associated with rollback after the Paleo-Pacific Plate had subducted into the Southern China Plate.
-
-
图 3 庐山岩浆核杂岩快速隆升时期伸展构造变形及地质背景模式图(据Li et al.，2014修改)
Figure 3.
表 1 庐山岩浆核杂岩糜棱岩中云母样品39Ar-40Ar年龄测定结果
Table 1. The dating results of 39Ar-40Ar of the micas in the mylonite of Lushan magmatic core complex
空白校正
拦截强度36Ar 36Ar_err 37Ar 37Ar_err 38Ar 38Ar_err 39Ar 39Ar_err 40Ar 40Ar_err 40Ar* 40Ar*/39Ar(K) 样品Jr190-2 1 2.00% 0.001030 0.000047 0.000000 0.000056 0.000196 0.000042 0.001560 0.000054 0.329000 0.000743 3.20 6.74 2 2.50% 0.000799 0.000047 0.000000 0.000048 0.000311 0.000045 0.015600 0.000054 0.437000 0.000444 43.60 12.05 3 3.00% 0.001280 0.000042 0.000000 0.000048 0.000771 0.000044 0.056800 0.000089 1.190000 0.001730 66.70 13.76 4 3.70% 0.004140 0.000041 0.000000 0.000045 0.003860 0.000046 0.308000 0.000141 5.750000 0.002180 77.80 14.32 5 4.40% 0.002590 0.000042 0.000003 0.000051 0.005160 0.000051 0.471000 0.000165 7.600000 0.003080 89.50 14.27 6 5.10% 0.002070 0.000041 0.000000 0.000055 0.004990 0.000054 0.463000 0.000143 7.300000 0.002300 91.30 14.21 7 5.80% 0.002030 0.000042 0.000000 0.000053 0.004600 0.000056 0.425000 0.000222 6.730000 0.004150 90.70 14.20 8 6.50% 0.001370 0.000045 0.000002 0.000046 0.003400 0.000050 0.319000 0.000234 5.020000 0.004870 91.50 14.23 9 7.20% 0.001120 0.000044 0.000005 0.000046 0.002880 0.000056 0.272000 0.000107 4.280000 0.001710 91.90 14.29 10 7.90% 0.001280 0.000036 0.000007 0.000055 0.002990 0.000055 0.278000 0.000212 4.410000 0.004070 91.00 14.29 11 8.60% 0.001770 0.000039 0.000000 0.000051 0.003370 0.000046 0.296000 0.000124 4.820000 0.001480 88.70 14.28 12 9.30% 0.001480 0.000043 0.000000 0.000053 0.003690 0.000047 0.344000 0.000155 5.420000 0.002600 91.60 14.26 13 10.00% 0.001140 0.000040 0.000017 0.000050 0.004120 0.000053 0.395000 0.000284 6.010000 0.003660 94.20 14.16 14 10.70% 0.001280 0.000039 0.000000 0.000053 0.004390 0.000055 0.416000 0.000108 6.380000 0.002560 93.80 14.21 15 11.40% 0.001330 0.000039 0.000000 0.000050 0.003820 0.000052 0.361000 0.000152 5.570000 0.001770 92.60 14.13 16 12.10% 0.000877 0.000048 0.000000 0.000052 0.002180 0.000051 0.204000 0.000108 3.200000 0.001610 91.50 14.21 17 13.50% 0.000834 0.000042 0.000000 0.000046 0.002490 0.000050 0.230000 0.000120 3.600000 0.001750 92.80 14.32 18 16.00% 0.000219 0.000036 0.000000 0.000050 0.001220 0.000044 0.120000 0.000091 1.790000 0.000556 96.20 14.21 19 20.00% 0.000008 0.000043 0.000000 0.000056 0.000141 0.000040 0.015900 0.000065 0.230000 0.000504 98.80 14.10 样品Jr191-1 1 2.00% 0.001180 0.000053 0.000000 0.000044 0.000275 0.000053 0.000762 0.000058 0.367000 0.000466 2.60 12.44 2 2.50% 0.001140 0.000052 0.000015 0.000050 0.000355 0.000054 0.010100 0.000062 0.403000 0.000564 14.00 5.57 3 3.00% 0.002070 0.000047 0.000001 0.000047 0.001080 0.000047 0.047600 0.000075 1.150000 0.001080 45.10 10.77 4 3.70% 0.002900 0.000047 0.000000 0.000048 0.003620 0.000046 0.225000 0.000331 3.690000 0.005940 76.10 12.41 5 4.40% 0.001650 0.000039 0.000009 0.000049 0.005920 0.000047 0.412000 0.000259 5.760000 0.005020 91.30 12.64 6 4.80% 0.000656 0.000048 0.000000 0.000052 0.004610 0.000060 0.334000 0.000433 4.390000 0.005680 95.40 12.44 7 5.20% 0.000399 0.000047 0.000020 0.000052 0.004070 0.000049 0.295000 0.000174 3.890000 0.002760 96.90 12.66 8 5.70% 0.000269 0.000051 0.000000 0.000051 0.003310 0.000050 0.242000 0.000168 3.170000 0.002690 97.40 12.64 9 6.30% 0.000200 0.000051 0.000000 0.000048 0.003000 0.000051 0.217000 0.000234 2.830000 0.003690 97.80 12.64 10 7.10% 0.000209 0.000043 0.000000 0.000045 0.002970 0.000054 0.216000 0.000226 2.830000 0.003420 97.70 12.66 11 7.90% 0.000220 0.000043 0.000008 0.000051 0.003400 0.000051 0.244000 0.000240 3.190000 0.003240 97.90 12.67 12 8.70% 0.000263 0.000048 0.000017 0.000052 0.003960 0.000050 0.288000 0.000175 3.770000 0.002980 97.90 12.69 13 9.50% 0.000323 0.000045 0.000000 0.000049 0.004780 0.000058 0.348000 0.000244 4.550000 0.004060 97.80 12.68 14 10.30% 0.000310 0.000043 0.000019 0.000045 0.004900 0.000044 0.357000 0.000375 4.660000 0.005790 98.00 12.70 15 11.00% 0.000275 0.000045 0.000049 0.000043 0.004080 0.000051 0.298000 0.000258 3.890000 0.004260 97.90 12.68 16 11.60% 0.000197 0.000046 0.000048 0.000049 0.002960 0.000067 0.215000 0.000195 2.810000 0.002800 97.90 12.66 17 12.20% 0.000152 0.000050 0.000070 0.000042 0.002200 0.000047 0.160000 0.000171 2.090000 0.002150 97.80 12.67 18 13.20% 0.000164 0.000045 0.000044 0.000063 0.001880 0.000046 0.136000 0.000129 1.770000 0.001560 97.20 12.58 19 14.50% 0.000090 0.000040 0.000010 0.000053 0.001030 0.000053 0.075500 0.000091 0.986000 0.000774 97.20 12.58 20 20.00% 0.000189 0.000039 0.000231 0.000047 0.002430 0.000053 0.180000 0.000124 2.360000 0.002040 97.70 12.70 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Dong S W, Wu H L, Xue H M, et al. On Continent-Continent Point-Collision and Ultrahigh-Pressure Metamorphism[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2002, 1: 68-80.
[2] Enkelmann E, Ratschbacher L, Jonckheere R, et al. Cenozoic exhumation and deformation of northeastern Tibet and the Qinling: Is Tibetan lower crustal flow diverging around the Sichuan Basin[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2006, 118(5/6)): 651-671.
[3] Faurem, Sun Y, Shu L S, et al. Extensional tectonics within a subduction-type orogen: The case study of the Wugongshan dome(Jiangxi Province, SE China)[J]. Tectonophysics, 1996, 263: 77-108. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(97)81487-4
[4] Ji W B, Faure M, Lin W, et al. Multiple emplacement processes and tectonic significance of the Late Mesozoic Dayunshan-Mufushan batholith in Southeast China[J]. Journal of Geophyscis Research Solid Earth, 2018, 123: 689-710. doi: 10.1002/2017JB014597
[5] Lapierre H, Jahn B M, Charvet J, et al. Mesozoic felsic arc magmatism and continental olivine tholeiites in Zhejiang Province and their relationship with the tectonic activity in southeastern China[J]. Tectonophysics, 1997, 274(4): 321-338. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(97)00009-7
[6] Li J H, Zhang Y Q, Dong S W, et al. Late Mesozoic-Early Cenozoic deformation history of the Yuanma Basin, central South China[J]. Tectonophysics, 2012, 570/571(11): 163-183.
[7] Li J H, Zhang Y Q, Dong S W, et al. The Hengshan low-angle normal fault zone: Structural and geochronological constraints on the Late Mesozoic crustal extension in South China[J]. Tectonophysics, 2013, 606: 97-115. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2013.05.013
[8] Li J H, Zhang Y Q, Dong S W, et al. Cretaceous tectonic evolution of South China: A preliminary synthesis[J]. Earth Science Reviews, 2014, 134: 98-136. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.03.008
[9] Li J H, Dong S W, Zhang Y Q, et al. New insights into Phanerozoic tectonics of south China: Part 1, polyphase deformation in the Jiuling and Lianyunshan domains of the central Jiangnan Orogen[J]. Journal of Geophysics Research Solid Earth, 2016, 121(4): 3048-3080. doi: 10.1002/2015JB012778
[10] Li X H. Cretaceous magmatism and lithospheric extension in southeast China[J]. J. Asia Earth Sci., 2000, 18: 293-305. doi: 10.1016/S1367-9120(99)00060-7
[11] Lin W, Faure M, Monie P, et al. Tectonic of SE China: New insights from the Lushan massif(Jiangxi Province)[J]. Tectonics, 2000, 19: 852-871. doi: 10.1029/2000TC900009
[12] Ludwig K R. User's manual for Isoplot/Ex[J]. Department of Computer Science University of Canterbury, 2008, 130(3): 206-207.
[13] Northrup C J, Royden L H, Burchfiel B C. Motion of the Pacific plate relative to Eurasia and its potential relation to Cenozoic extension along the eastern margin of Eurasia[J]. Geology, 1995, 23(8): 719-722. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<0719:MOTPPR>2.3.CO;2
[14] Pichon X L, Angelier J. The Hellenic arc and trench system: A key to the neotectonic evolution of the eastern Mediterranean area[J]. Tectonophysics, 1979, 60: 1-42. doi: 10.1016/0040-1951(79)90131-8
[15] Ratschbacher L, Franz L, Enkelmann E, et al. The Sino-Korean-Yangtze suture, the Huwan detachment, and the Paleozoic-Tertiary exhumation of(ultra)high-pressure rocks along the Tongbai-Xinxian-Dabie Mountains[J]. Geological Society of America Special paper, 2006, 403: 45-75.
[16] Roddick J C. The application of isochron diagrams in 40Ar-39Ar dating: a discussion[J]. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 1978, 41: 233-244. doi: 10.1016/0012-821X(78)90014-6
[17] Shu L S, Zhou X M, Deng P, et al. Mesozoic tectonic evolution of the Southeast China Block: New insights from basin analysis[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2009, 34(3): 376-391. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2008.06.004
[18] Sun Y, Shu L S, Zhu W B, et al. Mesozoic tectonic events and geochronological dating in the Lushan massif, Jiangxi Province[J]. Journal of Nanjing University, 2000, 36(3): 363-366. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0469-5097.2000.03.015
[19] Wang T, Guo L, Zheng Y D, et al. Timing and processes of late Mesozoic mid-lower-crustal extension in continental NE Asia and implications for the tectonic setting of the destruction of the North China Craton: Mainly constrained by zircon U-Pb ages from metamorphic core complexes[J]. Lithos, 2012, 154: 315-345. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2012.07.020
[20] Wang T, Zheng Y D, Zhang J J, et al. Pattern and kinematic polarity of late Mesozoic extension in continental NE Asia: Perspectives from metamorphic core complexes[J]. Tectonics, 2011, 30(6): TC6007.
[21] Wang Y H, Cui J J, Zhang Y Q, et al. Two-stage Cretaceous exhumation of Hengshan Complex in Hunan Province, SE China: Constraints arising from 40Ar-39Ar geochronology and Cretaceous tectonic implications[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2015, 89(6): 1869-1881. doi: 10.1111/1755-6724.12604
[22] Wei W, Chen Y, Faure M, et al. An early extensional event of the South China Block during the Late Mesozoic recorded by the emplacement of the Late Jurassic syntectonic Hengshan Composite Granitic Massif (Hunan, SE China)[J]. Tectonophysics, 2016, 672/673: 50-67. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2016.01.028
[23] Wei W, Song C, Hou Q L, et al. The Late Jurassic extensional event in the central part of the South China Block-evidence from the Laoshan'ao shear zone and Xiangdong Tungsten deposit (Hunan, SE China)[J]. International Geology Review, 2017, 60(11/14): 1-21.
[24] Yang Z, Ratschbacher L, Jonckheere1 R, et al. Late-stage foreland growth of China's largest orogens(Qinling, Tibet): Evidence from the Hannan-Micang crystalline massifs and the northern Sichuan Basin, central China[J]. Lithophere, 2013, 5(4): 420-437. doi: 10.1130/L260.1
[25] Zhou X M, Li W X. Origin of Late Mesozoic igneous rocks in southeastern China: Implications for lithosphere subduction and underplating of mafic magmas[J]. Tectonophysics, 2000, 326: 269-287. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(00)00120-7
[26] 毕华, 项新葵, 朱元松. 庐山隆起-滑脱构造[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 1998, 22(1): 21-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK199801003.htm
[27] 陈勤五. 华南铀成矿期及其特征的初步探讨[J]. 矿床地质, 1989, 8(3): 14-20. doi: 10.16111/j.0258-7106.1989.03.002
[28] 陈文, 张彦, 张岳桥, 等. 青藏高原东南缘晚新生代幕式抬升作用的Ar-Ar热年代学证据[J]. 岩石学报, 2006, 22(4): 867-872. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200604010.htm
[29] 陈伟, 杨洲畬, 廖志权, 等. 赣南九龙脑矿田成矿地质特征与成矿预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 403-417. doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20210098
[30] 程彦博, 童祥, 武俊德, 等. 华南西部地区晚中生代与W-Sn矿有关花岗岩的年代学格架及地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2010, 26(3): 809-818. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201003014.htm
[31] 崔建军, 张岳桥, 董树文, 等. 华南陆缘晚中生代造山及其地质意义[J]. 中国地质, 2013, 40(1): 86-105.
[32] 崔学军, 赵赣, 陈祥云, 等. 江西庐山中生代构造事件的40Ar/39Ar同位素年龄研究[J]. 成都理工学院学报, 2002, 29(6): 646-649. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2002.06.010
[33] 崔学军, 夏斌, 曾佐勋, 等. 赣江断裂与郯庐断裂接合作用及其成矿意义[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2004, 28(1): 1-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2004.01.001
[34] 董树文, 张岳桥, 龙长兴, 等. 中国侏罗纪构造变革与燕山运动新诠释[J]. 地质学报, 2007, 81(11): 1449-1461. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2007.11.001
[35] 董树文, 张岳桥, 陈宣华, 等. 晚侏罗世东亚多向汇聚构造体系的形成与变形特征[J]. 地球学报, 2008, 29(3): 306-317. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-3021.2008.03.005
[36] 董树文, 马立成, 刘刚, 等. 论长江中下游成矿动力学[J]. 地质学报, 2011, 85(5): 612-625. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201105004.htm
[37] 高峰, 王岳军, 刘顺生, 等利用磷灰石裂变径迹研究鄂尔多斯盆地西缘热历史[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2000, 24(1): 87-91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2000.01.014
[38] 胡圣标, 郝杰, 付明希, 等. 秦岭-大别-苏鲁造山带白垩纪以来的抬升冷却史——低温年代学数据约束[J]. 岩石学报, 2005, 21(4): 1167-1173. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200504014.htm
[39] 蒋少涌, 孙岩, 孙明志, 等. 长江中下游成矿带九瑞矿集区叠合断裂系统和叠加成矿作用[J]. 岩石学报, 2010, 26(9): 2751-2767. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201009020.htm
[40] 李建华, 张岳桥, 董树文, 等. 北大巴山凤凰山基底隆起晚中生代构造隆升历史——磷灰石裂变径迹测年约束[J]. 地质科学, 2010, 45(4): 969-986. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0563-5020.2010.04.004
[41] 李武显, 周新民, 李献华, 等. 庐山"星子变质核杂岩"中伟晶岩锆石U-Pb年龄及其地质意义[J]. 地球科学, 2001, 26(5): 491-495. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-2383.2001.05.008
[42] 李学刚, 杨坤光, 朱清波. 庐山变质核杂岩核部岩体锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb年代学研究及其地质意义[J]. 矿物岩石, 2010, 30(4): 36-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6872.2010.04.008
[43] 李中兰, 崔学军, 王冉, 等. 庐山星子地区中生代构造-岩浆事件与赣江断裂多期活动的关系[J]. 岩石学报, 2007, 23(4): 839-848. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200704016.htm
[44] 林伟, 王军, 刘飞, 等. 华北克拉通及邻区晚中生代伸展构造及其动力学背景的讨论[J]. 岩石学报, 2013, 29(5): 1791-1810. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201305025.htm
[45] 林伟, 许德如, 侯泉林, 等. 中国大陆中东部早白垩世伸展穹隆构造与多金属成矿[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2019, 43(3): 409-430. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK201903004.htm
[46] 林伟, 李金雁. 欧亚大陆东部白垩纪两期伸展穹隆构造及其动力学机制探讨[J]. 岩石学报, 2021, 37(8): 2303-2323. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB202108004.htm
[47] 林宗满. 论中国东部中、新生代大地构造的基本特征[J]. 地质力学学报, 2010, 16(3): 246-259. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2010.03.003
[48] 刘武生, 秦明宽, 漆富成, 等. 运用磷灰石裂变径迹分析鄂尔多斯盆地周缘中新生代沉降隆升史[J]. 铀矿地质, 2008, 24(4): 221-232. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0658.2008.04.006
[49] 罗庆坤, 刘国生, 王彪, 等. 庐山—彭山地区伸展构造演化及其对矿产形成的制约[J]. 地质科学, 1995, 30(2): 117-129. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKX502.001.htm
[50] 吕古贤, 曹钟清, 郭涛, 等. 长江中下游中生代构造岩相体系分布与成矿规律——新华夏构造体系的"长江式"构造研究[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2011, 35(4): 495-501. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2011.04.003
[51] 吕古贤, 丁正江, 李秀章, 等. 中国东部中生代"岩浆核杂岩"隆起-拆离带热液蚀变成矿问题——以胶东金矿区为例[J]. 地质论评, 2016, 62(B11): 319-320.
[52] 吕古贤, 霍庆龙, 袁月蕾, 等. 胶东金矿陆内构造岩浆核杂岩隆起-拆离带蚀变成矿[J]. 地学前缘, 2017, 24(2): 95-103. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201702016.htm
[53] 吕古贤. 构造物理化学学科建设回顾、应用与展望[J]. 地质力学学报, 2021, 27(4): 491-496. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLX202104001.htm
[54] 毛景文, 谢桂青, 李晓峰, 等. 华南地区中生代大规模成矿作用与岩石圈多阶段伸展[J]. 地学前缘, 2004, 11(1): 45-55. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2004.01.003
[55] 毛景文, 谢桂青, 郭春丽, 等. 华南地区中生代主要金属矿床时空分布规律和成矿环境[J]. 高校地质学报, 2008, 14(4): 510-526. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2008.04.005
[56] 倪培, 潘君屹, 迟哲. 华南燕山期大规模铜成矿作用的成矿模式及找矿方向[J]. 矿床地质, 2020, 39(5): 754-784 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KCDZ202005002.htm
[57] 裴柳宁, 郭春影, 邹明亮. 粤北下庄矿田仙石铀矿床沥青铀矿电子探针化学年龄及其地质意义[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2021, 43(5): 814-828. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGX202105004.htm
[58] 任升莲, 张妍, 杨帆, 等. 庐山变质核杂岩基底拆离的变形特征及形成条件[J]. 地质科学, 2014, 49(2): 529-541. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKX201402014.htm
[59] 商岳男, 康永尚, 岳来群, 等. 东亚地区区域构造演化与构造域划分[J]. 地质力学学报, 2011, 17(3): 211-222. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLX201103002.htm
[60] 沈晓明, 张海祥, 张伯友. 华南中生代变质核杂岩构造及其与岩石圈减薄机制的关系初探[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2008, 32(1): 11-19. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK200801003.htm
[61] 史志刚, 高林志, 李廷栋, 等. 庐山汉阳峰组变流纹岩锆石U-Pb同位素定年及其地质意义[J]. 中国地质, 2014, 41(2): 326-334. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201402002.htm
[62] 舒良树, 孙岩, 王德滋, 等. 华南武功山中生代伸展构造[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 1998, 28(5): 431-438. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK199805006.htm
[63] 舒良树, 周新民, 邓平, 等. 中国东南部中、新生代盆地特征与构造演化[J]. 地质通报, 2004, 23(9): 876-884. http://dzhtb.cgs.cn/gbc/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=200409158&flag=1
[64] 舒良树, 王德滋. 北美西部与中国东南部盆岭构造对比研究[J]. 高校地质学报, 2006, 12(1): 1-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXDX200601002.htm
[65] 舒良树. 华南构造演化的基本特征[J]. 地质通报, 2012, 31(7): 1035-1053. http://dzhtb.cgs.cn/gbc/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20120703&flag=1
[66] 宋超, 卫巍, 侯泉林, 等. 湘东茶陵地区老山坳剪切带特征及其与湘东钨矿的关系[J]. 岩石学报, 2016, 32(5): 1571-1580. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201605021.htm
[67] 汪新文. 伸展褶皱作用及其油气勘探意义[J]. 现代地质, 2008, 22(1): 60-69. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ200801009.htm
[68] 王继林, 何斌, 关俊朋. 江西庐山地区星子群变质时代及变质机制探讨[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2013, 37(3): 143-152. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK201303015.htm
[69] 王晓娜, 刘瑞强, 阮昆. 浅评江西九瑞地区构造与成矿[J]. 吉林地质, 2014, 33(1): 4-7, 10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JLDZ201401002.htm
[70] 王志成, 郑大瑜. 华南中生代不整合型铀矿成因模式[J]. 地质论评, 2002, 48(4): 365-371. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP200204005.htm
[71] 韦昌山, 蔡明海, 蔡锦辉, 等. 华南地区中生代构造控矿规律探讨[J]. 地质力学学报, 2004, 10(2): 113-121. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLX200402002.htm
[72] 吴良士, 余忠珍. 江西九瑞地区中生代两次构造事件及其对成岩成矿的控制[J]. 矿床地质, 1999, 18(2): 129-137. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KCDZ902.003.htm
[73] 项新葵, 许建华. 庐山变质核杂岩构造的初步研究[J]. 东华理工大学学报自然科学版, 1994, 17(1): 11-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDDZ401.001.htm
[74] 徐容, 邓军, 程韩宇, 等. 华南板块西缘和腾冲-保山地块晚白垩世岩浆活动及Sn成矿作用对比: 年代学、地球化学和动力学背景[J]. 岩石学报, 2018, 34(5): 1271-1284. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201805004.htm
[75] 许长海, 周祖翼, 马昌前, 等. 大别造山带140~85 Ma热窿伸展作用--年代学约束[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2001, 31(11): 925-937. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK200111006.htm
[76] 杨帆, 宋传中, 任升莲, 等. 庐山变质核杂岩东侧的伸展拆离及构造意义[J]. 地质科学, 2015, 50(3): 785-799.
[77] 杨帆, 宋传中, 任升莲, 等. 庐山变质核杂岩东侧拆离带两期构造性质转换: 锆石U-Pb年代学证据[J]. 地质论评, 2017, 63(3): 581-596. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP201703004.htm
[78] 杨贵才, 葛良胜, 陈晓吾. 华南中生代矿床特征及成矿规律[J]. 矿床地质, 2012, 31(S1): 55-56. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KCDZ2012S1030.htm
[79] 尹国胜, 谢国刚. 江西庐山地区伸展构造与星子变质核杂岩[J]. 中国区域地质, 1996, 1: 17-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD601.002.htm
[80] 余长发, 毛景文, 赵海杰, 等. 粤西大金山钨锡多金属矿床地质特征及成岩成矿年代学研究[J]. 岩石学报, 2012, 28(12): 3967-3979. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201212014.htm
[81] 张海祥, 朱炳泉, 涂湘林, 等. 庐山"星子变质核杂岩"中海会花岗岩的锆石U-Pb年龄及大地构造意义[J]. 矿物岩石, 1999, 19(3): 69-72. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS199903014.htm
[82] 张彦, 陈文, 陈克龙, 等. 成岩混层(I/S)Ar-Ar年龄谱型及39Ar核反冲丢失机理研究——以浙江长兴地区P-T界线粘土岩为例[J]. 地质论评, 2006, 55(4): 556-561. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP200604018.htm
[83] 张岳桥, 董树文, 李建华, 等. 华南中生代大地构造研究新进展[J]. 地球学报, 2012, 33(3): 257-279. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB201203001.htm
[84] 张岳桥, 董树文. 晚中生代东亚多板块汇聚与大陆构造体系的发展[J]. 地质力学学报, 2019, 25(5): 613-641. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLX201905004.htm
[85] 张岳桥, 徐先兵, 贾东, 等. 华南早中生代从印支期碰撞构造体系向燕山期俯冲构造体系转换的形变记录[J]. 地学前缘, 2009, 16(1): 234-247. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200901033.htm
[86] 张赞赞, 吴明安, 杜建国, 等. 庐枞矿集区与钨矿床有关的花岗岩的年代学及地球化学特征: 岩石成因及其对长江中下游晚白垩世成矿的启示[J]. 岩石学报, 2018, 34(1): 217-240. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201801019.htm
[87] 赵红格, 刘池洋, 姚亚明, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘差异抬升的裂变径迹证据[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 37(3): 470-474. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBDZ200703029.htm
[88] 朱清波, 杨坤光, 王艳. 庐山变质核杂岩伸展拆离和岩浆作用的年代学约束[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2010, 34(3): 391-401. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK201003014.htm
-
图(4)
表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1704
- PDF下载数: 61
- 施引文献: 0