中国地质学会岩矿测试技术专业委员会、国家地质实验测试中心主办

安页1井志留系龙马溪组页岩有机质拉曼光谱特征及其地质意义

张聪, 夏响华, 杨玉茹, 白名岗, 代峰, 熊杰. 安页1井志留系龙马溪组页岩有机质拉曼光谱特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩矿测试, 2019, 38(1): 26-34. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201803220025
引用本文: 张聪, 夏响华, 杨玉茹, 白名岗, 代峰, 熊杰. 安页1井志留系龙马溪组页岩有机质拉曼光谱特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩矿测试, 2019, 38(1): 26-34. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201803220025
Cong ZHANG, Xiang-hua XIA, Yu-ru YANG, Ming-gang BAI, Feng DAI, Jie XIONG. Raman Spectrum Characteristics of Organic Matter in Silurian Longmaxi Formation Shale of Well Anye-1 and Its Geological Significance[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2019, 38(1): 26-34. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201803220025
Citation: Cong ZHANG, Xiang-hua XIA, Yu-ru YANG, Ming-gang BAI, Feng DAI, Jie XIONG. Raman Spectrum Characteristics of Organic Matter in Silurian Longmaxi Formation Shale of Well Anye-1 and Its Geological Significance[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2019, 38(1): 26-34. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201803220025

安页1井志留系龙马溪组页岩有机质拉曼光谱特征及其地质意义

  • 基金项目:
    “十三五”国家科技重大专项项目(2016ZX05034003-006);中国地质调查局地质矿产调查评价专项(DD20160094-1)
详细信息
    作者简介: 张聪, 硕士, 高级工程师, 沉积学专业。E-mail:zh_cong520@qq.com
  • 中图分类号: O657.37

Raman Spectrum Characteristics of Organic Matter in Silurian Longmaxi Formation Shale of Well Anye-1 and Its Geological Significance

  • 我国下古生界海相页岩有机质热演化程度普遍高、陆源植物镜质体缺乏,显微组分难以区分,现有镜质体反射率、岩石热解、Tm/Ts等生物标志化合物指标的测试方法难以有效评价泥页岩有机质成熟度。本文以贵州正安地区安页1井志留系龙马溪组页岩为研究对象,利用场发射扫描电镜观察和激光拉曼光谱检测相结合,不依赖于有机质显微组分类型,直接获取高演化页岩中不同赋存状态有机质的拉曼谱图,利用拉曼谱图衍生参数评价高演化页岩的有机质成熟度。结果表明:安页1井志留系龙马溪组页岩发育着生物结构型、脉状或团块状、自形边界填隙状、他形边界填隙状4种类型有机质,其中自形边界填隙状有机质孔径大于80nm,他形边界填隙状有机质孔径小于60nm,这两种填隙状占比在90%以上,是页岩储层的主体储集空间;4种形态的有机质热演化程度不一致。激光拉曼面扫描取谱方式获得大量数据计算的拉曼成熟度主体介于2.8%~3.0%,各类型有机质的拉曼成熟度数量占总数量的比例与场发射扫描电镜观测的半定量统计结果一致。该方法为刻画我国高-过成熟度页岩有机质成熟度提供了一种行之有效的手段。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  安页1井志留系龙马溪组页岩有机质的赋存状态及孔隙发育特征

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  安页1井志留系龙马溪组页岩不同赋存状态有机质的激光拉曼光谱特征

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  页岩面扫描激光拉曼谱图与直方图(取谱面积为20μm×20μm,测点560个)

    Figure 3. 

    表 1  安页1井志留系龙马溪组页岩不同赋存状态有机质的激光拉曼光谱参数及拉曼成熟度

    Table 1.  Raman parameters and maturity of different occurrence of organic matters in Longmaxi Formation shale of Well Anye-1

    有机质类型 拉曼位移
    (D)
    半峰宽
    (D)
    峰强度
    (D)
    峰面积
    (D)
    拉曼位移
    (G)
    半峰宽
    (G)
    峰强度
    (G)
    峰面积
    (G)
    位移差
    (G-D)
    峰高比
    (D/G)
    拉曼成熟度
    Ro
    1362.37 247.14 408.63 149391 1605.52 58.63 706.18 65040 243.15 0.58 1.82
    1351.82 236.29 238.61 88309 1604.13 45.38 492.90 35135 252.31 0.48 2.31
    1361.70 290.55 557.10 244035 1605.51 53.52 1013.78 85227 243.81 0.55 1.86
    1346.23 236.00 318.58 118099 1604.74 46.95 668.21 49284 258.51 0.48 2.65
    1347.68 235.74 412.84 146436 1605.04 44.78 804.31 56578 257.36 0.51 2.58
    生物结构型有机质 1346.44 230.93 220.08 77093 1604.24 48.59 444.75 33948 257.80 0.49 2.61
    1357.42 229.82 330.93 109793 1604.21 55.63 730.25 63811 246.79 0.45 2.02
    1347.73 227.92 287.23 102832 1604.74 46.97 589.29 43479 257.01 0.49 2.57
    1363.82 211.99 185.60 58201 1605.03 60.43 403.63 38314 241.21 0.46 1.72
    1345.68 209.85 220.77 72773 1605.34 42.65 491.95 32959 259.66 0.45 2.71
    1345.98 220.28 245.26 84865 1604.25 44.65 502.48 35241 258.27 0.49 2.63
    1347.38 199.68 312.65 98066 1605.12 45.33 710.73 50612 257.74 0.44 2.60
    1347.09 209.35 284.50 91498 1604.85 49.91 590.36 46284 257.76 0.48 2.61
    1339.02 198.29 294.54 91740 1604.16 40.11 638.67 40244 265.14 0.46 3.00
    1340.38 200.53 265.11 83508 1604.04 39.59 563.85 35069 263.66 0.47 2.92
    1340.10 210.61 487.89 161405 1604.51 40.72 983.61 62916 264.41 0.50 2.96
    1337.30 200.39 408.67 128634 1603.85 41.57 802.44 52399 266.55 0.51 3.08
    1338.17 211.33 409.16 135824 1603.98 41.71 818.38 53613 265.81 0.50 3.04
    脉状或团块状有机质 1338.80 204.48 415.06 133316 1604.58 40.09 844.35 53175 265.78 0.49 3.04
    1339.16 206.65 404.29 131233 1604.49 40.56 848.02 54035 265.33 0.48 3.01
    1340.94 202.98 508.39 162093 1604.60 40.39 1058.64 67168 263.66 0.48 2.92
    1339.13 204.20 439.12 140849 1604.59 39.55 921.07 57214 265.46 0.48 3.02
    1338.22 203.00 411.57 131236 1604.29 40.10 850.27 53562 266.07 0.48 3.05
    1338.33 203.01 443.30 141363 1603.70 40.88 894.43 57441 265.37 0.50 3.01
    1338.74 197.91 431.41 134113 1603.96 39.98 884.70 55559 265.22 0.49 3.01
    1338.58 201.41 411.47 130180 1604.51 40.41 844.59 53614 265.93 0.49 3.04
    1339.67 198.43 448.00 139639 1603.97 41.39 906.43 51669 264.30 0.49 2.96
    1340.59 204.36 524.59 168395 1604.96 39.85 1097.15 68676 264.37 0.48 2.96
    自形边界填隙状有机质 1342.53 221.13 798.58 277390 1605.43 42.72 1556.53 104440 262.90 0.51 2.88
    1341.22 226.62 1030.75 366918 1605.45 42.20 1977.25 131074 264.23 0.52 2.95
    1340.89 206.27 288.67 93535 1605.55 40.77 585.95 37522 264.66 0.49 2.98
    1343.18 223.87 635.05 223320 1605.37 42.16 1294.70 85748 262.19 0.49 2.84
    1339.00 213.76 2574.45 864429 1605.14 40.65 5219.87 333284 266.14 0.49 3.06
    1340.81 210.16 707.95 233705 1605.78 39.98 1608.97 101041 264.97 0.44 2.99
    1341.92 222.89 317.31 111094 1602.42 48.95 557.46 42865 260.50 0.57 2.75
    他形边界填隙状有机质 1340.97 215.25 405.10 136967 1605.62 42.59 786.75 52633 264.65 0.51 2.98
    1342.69 212.47 510.71 170446 1605.52 41.28 1033.11 66993 262.83 0.49 2.88
    1342.39 208.97 596.15 195683 1605.38 40.77 1307.35 83733 262.99 0.46 2.89
    1341.52 204.64 589.96 189642 1605.60 39.64 1304.13 81207 264.08 0.45 2.94
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    董大忠, 施振生, 管全中, 等.四川盆地五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气勘探进展、挑战与前景[J].天然气工业, 2018, 38(4):67-77. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201804013.htm

    Dong D Z, Shi Z S, Guan Q Z, et al.Progress, challenges and prospects of shale gas exploration in the Wufeng Longmaxi reservoirs in the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(4):67-77. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201804013.htm

    [2]

    邹才能, 董大忠, 王玉满, 等.中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景(二)[J].石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(2):1-13. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syktykf201602002

    Zou C N, Dong D Z, Wang Y M, et al.Shale gas in China:Characteristics, challenges and prospects (Ⅱ)[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(2):1-13. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syktykf201602002

    [3]

    罗超, 刘树根, 孙玮, 等.上扬子区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩气基本特征研究[J].天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(3):453-469. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqdqkx201403019

    Luo C, Liu S G, Sun W, et al.Basic characteristics of shale gas in the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in the Upper Yangtze region:Taking Nangao section in Danzhai as an example[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(3):453-469. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqdqkx201403019

    [4]

    王茂林, 肖贤明, 魏强, 等.页岩中固体沥青拉曼光谱参数作为成熟度指标的意义[J].天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(9):1712-1718. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqdqkx201509011

    Wang M L, Xiao X M, Wei Q, et al.Thermal maturation of solid bitumen in shale as revealed by Raman spectroscopy[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(9):1712-1718. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqdqkx201509011

    [5]

    陈尚斌, 左兆喜, 朱炎铭, 等.页岩气储层有机质成熟度测试方法适用性研究[J].天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(3):564-574. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqdqkx201503019

    Chen S B, Zuo Z X, Zhu Y M, et al.Applicability of the testing method for the maturity of organic matter in shale gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(3):564-574. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqdqkx201503019

    [6]

    Kitty L M, Mark R, David N, et al.Organic matter-hosted pore system, Marcellus Formation (Devonian), Pennsylvania[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2013, 97(2):177-200. doi: 10.1306/07231212048

    [7]

    赵文智, 李建忠, 杨涛, 等.中国南方海相页岩气成藏差异性比较与意义[J].石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(4):499-510. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syktykf201604001

    Zhao W Z, Li J Z, Yang T, et al.Geological difference and its significance of marine shale gases in South China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(4):499-510. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syktykf201604001

    [8]

    Li X J, Hayashi J I, Li C Z.FT-Raman spectroscopic study of the evolution of char structure during the pyrolysis of a Victorian brown coal[J].Fuel, 2006, 85(12/13):1700-1707. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=5f1d929e70499f5b83966ba0dfc5e28c

    [9]

    Beyssac O, Goffé B, Chopin C, et al.Raman spectra of carbonaceous material in metasediments:A new geothermometer[J].Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 2002, 20(9):859-871. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1314.2002.00408.x

    [10]

    Kelemen S R, Fang H L.Maturity trends in Raman spectra from kerogen and coal[J].Energy Fuels, 2001, 15:653-658. doi: 10.1021/ef0002039

    [11]

    刘德汉, 肖贤明, 田辉, 等.固体有机质拉曼光谱参数计算样品热演化程度的方法与地质应用[J].科学通报, 2013, 58(13):1228-1241. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QKC20132013061700044360

    Liu D H, Xiao X M, Tian H, et al.Sample maturation calculated using Raman spectroscopic parameters for solid organics:Methodology and geological applications[J].Chinese Science Bulletin, 2013, 58(13):1228-1241. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QKC20132013061700044360

    [12]

    Wilkins R W T, Boudou R, Sherwood N, et al.Thermal maturity evaluation from inertinites by Raman spectroscopy:The "RaMM" technique[J].International Journal of Coal Geology, 2014, 128-129:143-152. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2014.03.006

    [13]

    Wilkins R W T, Wang M, Gan H J, et al.A RaMM study of thermal maturity of dispersed organic matter in marine source rocks[J].International Journal of Coal Geology, 2015, 150-151:252-264. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2015.09.007

    [14]

    王民, Li Zhongsheng.激光拉曼技术评价沉积有机质热成熟度[J].石油学报, 2016, 37(9):1129-1136. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syxb201609006

    Wang M, Li Z S.Thermal maturity evaluation of sedimentary organic matter using laser Raman spectroscopy[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(9):1129-1136. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syxb201609006

    [15]

    曾庆辉, 钱玲, 刘德汉, 等.富有机质的黑色页岩和油页岩的有机岩石学特征与生、排烃意义[J].沉积学报, 2006, 24(1):114-122. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/cjxb200601015

    Zeng Q H, Qian L, Liu D H, et al.Organic prteological study on hydrocarbon generation and expulsion from organic rich black shale and oil shale[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2006, 24(1):114-122. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/cjxb200601015

    [16]

    张慧, 焦淑静, 庞起发, 等.中国南方早古生代页岩有机质的扫描电镜研究[J].石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(4):675-680. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syytrqdz201504018

    Zhang H, Jiao S J, Pang Q F, et al.SEM observation of organic matters in the Eopaleozoic shale in South China[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(4):675-680. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syytrqdz201504018

    [17]

    张慧, 李贵红, 晋香兰.南方下古生界页岩中有机质赋存状态及其成因[J].煤田地质与勘探, 2018, 46(1):51-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.01.009

    Zhang H, Li G H, Jin X L.Organic matters and their occurrence state in Lower Paleozoic shale in South China[J].Coal Geology & Exploration, 2018, 46(1):51-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.01.009

    [18]

    蔡潇, 王亮, 靳雅夕, 等.渝东南地区页岩有机孔隙类型及特征[J].天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(3):513-519. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqdqkx201603013

    Cai X, Wang L, Jin Y X, et al.Types and characteristics of organic pore in shale gas reservoir of Southeastern Chongqing area[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(3):513-519. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqdqkx201603013

    [19]

    Zhang T W, Geoffrey S E, Stephen C R, et al.Effect of organic-matter type and thermal maturity on methane adsorption in shale-gas systems[J].Organic Geochemistry, 2012, 47:120-131. doi: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.03.012

    [20]

    范文斐, 侯读杰, 底萌卿.渝东南地区下古生界富有机质页岩有机岩石学特征[J].地质与勘探, 2016, 52(2):346-356. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dzykt201602018

    Fan W F, Hou D J, Di M Q.Organic petrology characteristics of organic rich shale of Lower Palaeozoic in Southeast Chongqing[J].Geology and Exploration, 2016, 52(2):346-356. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dzykt201602018

    [21]

    Christoph S T, David W H, Robert C J.Kerogen matura-tion and incipient graphitization of hydrocarbon source rocks in the Arkoma Basin, Oklahoma and Arkansas:A combined petrographic and Raman spectrometric study[J].Organic Geochemistry, 1998, 28(9-10):535-542. doi: 10.1016/S0146-6380(98)00021-7

    [22]

    左兆喜, 陈尚斌.激光拉曼法在高-过成熟页岩及煤成熟度评价中的应用[J].岩矿测试, 2016, 35(2):193-198. http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/article/doi/10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.2016.02.012

    Zuo Z X, Chen S B.Application of laser Raman spectroscopy to the evaluation of the high-and overhigh-maturity of shale and coal[J].Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2016, 35(2):193-198. http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/article/doi/10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.2016.02.012

    [23]

    何谋春, 吕新彪, 刘艳荣.激光拉曼光谱在油气勘探中的应用研究初探[J].光谱学与光谱分析, 2004, 24(11):1363-1366. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0593.2004.11.023

    He M C, Lü X B, Liu Y R.Elementary investigation on the application of laser Raman microprobe in petroleum exploration[J].Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2004, 24(11):1363-1366. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0593.2004.11.023

    [24]

    李志明, 施伟军.激光拉曼光谱法分析多种显微组分荧光变化及其应用[J].岩矿测试, 2008, 27(5):341-345. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5357.2008.05.006 http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/article/id/ykcs_20080506

    Li Z M, Shi W J.Laser Raman spectrometric analysis for fluorescence alteration of multiple macerals and its application[J].Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2008, 27(5):341-345. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5357.2008.05.006 http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/article/id/ykcs_20080506

  • 加载中

(3)

(1)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1668
  • PDF下载数:  43
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2018-03-22
修回日期:  2018-06-24
录用日期:  2018-08-10

目录