中国地质学会岩矿测试技术专业委员会、国家地质实验测试中心主办

浙江省江山市猕猴桃果园土壤环境质量与生态风险评价

贺灵, 孙彬彬, 吴超, 成晓梦, 吴正丰, 周荣强, 候树军. 浙江省江山市猕猴桃果园土壤环境质量与生态风险评价[J]. 岩矿测试, 2019, 38(5): 524-533. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201901080003
引用本文: 贺灵, 孙彬彬, 吴超, 成晓梦, 吴正丰, 周荣强, 候树军. 浙江省江山市猕猴桃果园土壤环境质量与生态风险评价[J]. 岩矿测试, 2019, 38(5): 524-533. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201901080003
Ling HE, Bin-bin SUN, Chao WU, Xiao-meng CHENG, Zheng-feng WU, Rong-qiang ZHOU, Shu-jun HOU. Assessment of Soil Environment Quality and Ecological Risk for Kiwifruit Orchards in Jiangshan City, Zhejiang Province[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2019, 38(5): 524-533. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201901080003
Citation: Ling HE, Bin-bin SUN, Chao WU, Xiao-meng CHENG, Zheng-feng WU, Rong-qiang ZHOU, Shu-jun HOU. Assessment of Soil Environment Quality and Ecological Risk for Kiwifruit Orchards in Jiangshan City, Zhejiang Province[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2019, 38(5): 524-533. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201901080003

浙江省江山市猕猴桃果园土壤环境质量与生态风险评价

  • 基金项目:
    中国地质调查局地质调查项目(DD20160320-02)
详细信息
    作者简介: 贺灵, 硕士, 高级工程师, 主要从事生态地球化学调查与评价方面的工作。E-mail:heling@igge.cn
  • 中图分类号: O657.31;O657.63;X825

Assessment of Soil Environment Quality and Ecological Risk for Kiwifruit Orchards in Jiangshan City, Zhejiang Province

  • 果园土壤环境与果品产量和质量及食用安全性关系密切。已有研究表明目前我国猕猴桃果园土壤中普遍存在养分含量不足、分布不均的问题,个别地区发现有重金属含量超标的现象。浙江省近年来猕猴桃种植面积连年扩大,已是我国重要的猕猴桃产区之一。为查明该省江山市猕猴桃果园土壤环境质量现状,本文选择了两处典型猕猴桃果园采集土壤、岩石、果实样品,采用原子荧光光谱、电感耦合等离子体发射光谱等技术测定土壤和岩石样品中的重金属、养分元素、土壤理化指标和果实样品中的重金属含量。以果园土壤中养分元素丰缺与影响因素、重金属元素含量与果实食用安全性为主要研究内容,开展了猕猴桃果园土壤环境质量与生态风险评价。结果表明:①两处果园土壤中Ag、Bi、Co、Cr、Ni、Sb、Se、V、SiO2等含量低于衢州市和浙江省土壤背景值,Pb、Al2O3等高于衢州市和浙江省土壤背景值,土壤中元素含量受自然地质背景控制的特征明显;②土壤pH值范围为4.61~6.30,按DZ/T 0295-2016《土地质量地球化学评价规范》中土壤酸碱度分级标准,属于强酸性和酸性土壤;③养分元素K、Ge、Mo、Zn较丰富,但N、P、Mn、S较缺乏;④土壤中As、Cd、Cr、Cu、Hg、Ni、Pb、Zn含量最大值分别为21.84、0.22、23.53、20.47、0.06、8.82、53.84、133mg/kg,远低于农用地土壤污染风险筛选值(pH ≤ 5.5时标准限值分别为40、0.3、150、150、1.3、60、70、200mg/kg),土壤污染风险低;⑤猕猴桃果实中的重金属含量低于绿色食品限值和食品卫生标准限值,如As含量最高为0.009mg/kg,其限值分别为0.2mg/kg和0.5mg/kg。整体上,研究区土壤具有养分分布不均匀、重金属含量低、酸性强的特点,建议采取科学措施补充和平衡土壤养分,防范土壤酸化导致的重金属活化风险。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  果园土壤养分等级

    Figure 1. 

    表 1  样品采集信息

    Table 1.  Information of the samples

    果园 位置 面积(亩) 海拔(m) 果实样品编号 土壤样品编号 岩石样品编号
    果园A 坑尾村 400 500~700 M01,M02,M03 MS01,MS02,MS03 MR01
    果园B 柴谷岭村 600 300 M04,M05,M06 MS04,MS05,MS06 MR02
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  各指标分析测试检出限

    Table 2.  Detection limits of the elements

    分析项目 检出限 单位
    Ag 20 ng/g
    As 1 μg/g
    Bi 0.05 μg/g
    Cd 20 ng/g
    Co 1 μg/g
    Cr 5 μg/g
    Cu 1 μg/g
    Ge 0.1 μg/g
    Hg 2 ng/g
    La 1 μg/g
    Mn 10 μg/g
    Mo 0.2 μg/g
    N 20 μg/g
    Ni 2 μg/g
    P 10 μg/g
    Pb 2 μg/g
    S 50 μg/g
    Sb 0.05 μg/g
    Sc 1 μg/g
    Se 0.01 μg/g
    Sn 1 μg/g
    Ti 10 μg/g
    Tl 0.1 μg/g
    V 5 μg/g
    W 0.2 μg/g
    Zn 2 μg/g
    Zr 2 μg/g
    SiO2 0.1 %
    Al2O3 0.1 %
    TFe2O3 0.1 %
    MgO 0.05 %
    CaO 0.05 %
    Na2O 0.05 %
    K2O 0.05 %
    OrgC 0.1 %
    TC 0.1 %
    注:土壤、岩石、果实样品经加工处理后,同一元素采用相同的分析仪器和测试方法,故检出限合并在同一个表中列出。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  土壤和岩石样品元素含量对比

    Table 3.  Comparison of elements concentration in soils and rocks of research area

    分析项目 衢州市背景值 浙江省背景值 MS01 MS02 MS03 MS04 MS05 MS06 MR01 MR02
    Ag* 68.2 257 28.4 31.09 43.51 24.63 36.92 50.67 65.07 34.16
    As 7.66 9.2 3.14 5.32 2.66 12.92 21.84 15.83 1.67 31.56
    Bi 0.35 0.23 0.10 0.18 0.10 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.02 0.06
    Cd* 201 70 219.13 48.22 83 73.94 64.39 119.62 77.90 69.16
    Co 8.1 13.2 5.51 3.66 6.08 6.34 5.97 6.86 1.64 5.25
    Cr 57.5 52.9 10.95 23.53 9.62 7.25 8.42 5.12 5.76 3.32
    Cu 24.8 17.6 11.16 9.5 14.47 7.98 8.93 20.47 3.11 3.95
    Ge 78.6 62 1.53 1.47 1.35 1.61 1.54 1.5 1.29 2.17
    Hg* 78.8 86 56.78 64.18 46.92 44.95 56.29 71.57 5.25 4.19
    La 41.8 33.8 47.94 26.7 66.65 88.73 92.73 108.01 60.85 121.79
    Mn 330 448 214 156 476 543 503 641 488.70 420.58
    Mo 1.16 5.7 1.15 1.68 0.89 0.6 0.72 0.66 1.00 0.95
    pH / / 5.29 4.95 6.30 4.61 4.71 5.92 / /
    N 1187 / 561 640 669 582 709 900 51.35 94.82
    Ni 17.2 24.6 6.48 8.82 6.5 3.77 4.33 3.36 2.10 2.94
    P 583 471 1560 374 687 559 691 1178 202.80 317.82
    Pb 31.5 23.7 53.84 37.14 45.34 45.61 41.72 44.79 35.73 29.95
    S 283 / 172.7 197 185 129 144 144 53.30 68.50
    Sb 0.74 1.53 0.37 0.51 0.35 0.39 0.54 0.41 0.19 0.44
    Sc 8.85 9.45 5.76 6.56 4.92 10.18 10.37 9.65 3.00 7.82
    Se 0.36 0.435 0.23 0.36 0.31 0.13 0.16 0.18 0.03 0.03
    Sn 4.61 3 2.61 3.18 2.54 2.31 2.64 2.73 2.18 2.13
    Ti 4567 3700 1408 2106 1384 2952 3020 2941 1000 2537
    Tl 0.68 0.5 0.79 0.7 1.02 0.55 0.53 0.64 0.79 1.70
    V 78.4 69.3 19.3 32.2 25 26.8 27.2 27.8 10.68 26.36
    W 1.87 2.91 1.67 1.65 1.41 2.43 3.1 2.53 1.39 5.72
    Zn 79.6 70.6 89 66 94 76 83 133 51.71 70.81
    Zr 285 245 186 216 181 327 378 360 154.27 323.62
    SiO2× 74.92 / 71 70.38 69.04 65.94 66.63 65.9 70.61 67.23
    Al2O3× 12.14 12.45 15.26 15.06 14.8 19.91 20.19 18.66 12.85 18.33
    TFe2O3× 4.21 3.19 2.59 3.09 2.25 3.77 4.03 3.54 1.69 2.99
    MgO× 0.65 0.73 0.33 0.28 0.25 0.68 0.63 0.76 0.23 0.51
    CaO× 0.28 0.17 0.26 0.15 0.61 0.12 0.12 0.31 0.90 0.11
    Na2O× 0.28 0.51 0.07 0.05 0.13 0.32 0.25 0.35 1.62 0.33
    K2O× 2.35 1.78 1.85 1.53 2.96 3.73 3.17 4.71 5.11 5.23
    OrgC × / / 0.57 0.82 1.04 0.6 0.75 0.84 0.07 0.08
    TC× 1.36 / 0.56 0.77 1.02 0.58 0.72 0.8 0.19 0.04
    注:元素含量单位为mg/kg,标注“*”的元素含量单位为μg/kg,标注“×”的元素含量单位为%,pH无量纲,“/”表示无数据。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4  农用地土壤污染风险筛选值

    Table 4.  Screening values of soil pollution risk for agricultural land

    污染物项目 As Cd Cr Cu Hg Ni Pb Zn
    pH≤5.5标准限值(mg/kg) 40 0.3 150 150 1.3 60 70 200
    5.5<pH≤6.5标准限值(mg/kg) 40 0.3 150 150 1.8 70 90 200
    本研究中样品最大值(mg/kg) 21.84 0.22 23.53 20.47 0.06 8.82 53.84 133
    注:重金属和类金属砷均按元素总量计。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 5  果实中元素含量与标准限值对比

    Table 5.  Comparison of element contents in fruits with their standard limits

    分析项目 限量值
    (mg/kg)
    限量值
    (mg/kg)
    测定最大值
    (mg/kg)
    与标准符合情况
    砷(以As计) ≤0.2 0.5 0.009 符合标准
    铅(以Pb计) ≤0.2 0.1 0.01 符合标准
    镉(以Cd计) ≤0.01 0.05 0.0007 符合标准
    汞(以Hg计) ≤0.01 0.01 0.0009 符合标准
    铬(以Cr计) / 0.5 0.01 符合标准
    注:限量值①指标准NY/T 425—2000《绿色食品猕猴桃》中的限值;限量值②指标准GB 2762—2017《食品安全国家标准食品中污染物限量》中的限值。限量值②中As、Hg、Cr的限值为参照新鲜蔬菜的值,“/”表示无相关数据。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 6  果实中元素富集系数

    Table 6.  Element enrichment coefficient in fruits

    样品编号 富集系数
    As Cd Cr Cu Hg Ni Pb Zn
    M01 0.0005 0.0033 0.0013 0.0436 0.0002 0.0060 0.0002 0.0029
    M02 0.0005 0.0047 0.0003 0.1195 0.0008 0.0048 0.0003 0.0011
    M03 0.0009 0.0050 0.0006 0.0243 0.0003 0.0041 0.0001 0.0032
    M04 0.0002 0.0065 0.0010 0.0487 0.0019 0.0104 0.0002 0.0033
    M05 0.0001 0.0089 0.0006 0.0358 0.0007 0.0082 0.0002 0.0049
    M06 0.0006 0.0049 0.0027 0.0256 0.0008 0.0108 0.0002 0.0069
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Carey P L, Benge J R, Haynes R J.Comparison of soil quality and nutrient budgets between organic and conventional kiwifruit orchards[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2009, 132:7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.02.017

    [2]

    Briones M J I, Barreal M E, Harrison A C, et al.Earthworms and nitrogen applications to improve soil health in an intensively cultivated kiwifruit orchard[J].Applied Soil Ecology, 2011, 49:158-166. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.06.002

    [3]

    Todd J H, Poulton J, Richards K, et al.Effect of orchard management, neighbouring land-use and shelterbelt tree composition on the parasitism of pest leafroller (Lepidoptera:Tortricidae) larvae in kiwifruit orchard shelterbelts[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2018, 260:27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2018.03.016

    [4]

    Todd J H, Malone L A, McArdle B H, et al.Invertebrate community richness in New Zealand kiwifruit orchards under organic or integrated pest management[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2011, 141:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.02.007

    [5]

    Wardle D A, Yeates G W, Bonner K I, et al.Impacts of ground vegetation management strategies in a kiwifruit orchard on the composition and functioning of the soil biota[J].Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2001, 33:893-905. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=c7307a056c8b104a76c5610ef3dead31&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn

    [6]

    雷宝佳, 杨联安, 张林森, 等.猕猴桃果园土壤养分空间变异性分析——以陕西周至县为例[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 45(2):323-326. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xbdxxb201502028

    Lei B J, Yang L A, Zhang L S, et al.Analysis on spatial variability of soil nutrition of kiwifruit orchards:Taking Zhouzhi County of Shannxi Province as a case[J].Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 45(2):323-326. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xbdxxb201502028

    [7]

    李晓彤, 岳田利, 胡仲秋, 等.陕西省猕猴桃园土壤重金属含量及污染风险评价[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 43(2):173-178. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xbnydxxb201502025

    Li X T, Yue T L, Hu Z Q, et al.Concentrations of soil heavy metals in kiwifruit orchards in Shaanxi and risk evaluation[J].Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 43(2):173-178. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xbnydxxb201502025

    [8]

    康婷婷, 张晓佳, 陈竹君, 等.秦岭北麓猕猴桃园土壤养分状况研究——以周至县余家河小流域为例[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 43(11):159-164. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xbnydxxb201511024

    Kang T T, Zhang X J, Chen Z J, et al.Soil nutrients status of kiwifruit orchards in the northern foothills of Qinling Mountains-A case study in Yujia River catchment of Zhouzhi County[J].Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 43(11):159-164. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xbnydxxb201511024

    [9]

    潘俊峰, 曾华, 李志国, 等.都江堰猕猴桃主产区果园土壤肥力状况调查与评价[J].中国农学通报, 2014, 30(10):269-275. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2367

    Pan J F, Zeng H, Li Z G, et al.An investigation and assessment on the soil fertility status of kiwifruit orchards in Dujiangyan[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(10):269-275. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2367

    [10]

    张承, 周开拓, 龙友华.贵州省修文县猕猴桃果园土壤养分分析[J].湖北农业科学, 2013, 52(17):4083-4086. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0439-8114.2013.17.015

    Zhang C, Zhou K T, Long Y H.Analysis on soil nutrient availability of kiwifruit orchards in Xiuwen County of Guizhou Province[J].Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 52(17):4083-4086. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0439-8114.2013.17.015

    [11]

    刘晗, 何腾兵, 党华美.贵州修文土壤-猕猴桃系统重金属富集特征[J].山地农业生物学报, 2017, 36(2):53-56. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/sdnyswxb201702011

    Liu H, He T B, Dang H M.Characteristics of accumulation of heavy metals in soil-kiwi system in Guizhou[J].Journal of Mountain Agriculture and Biology, 2017, 36(2):53-56. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/sdnyswxb201702011

    [12]

    卜范文, 汤佳乐, 杨玉, 等.湖南省猕猴桃果园土壤镉含量及镉吸收规律研究[J].江西农业大学学报, 2017, 39(3):468-475. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jxnydxxb201703007

    Bu F W, Tang J L, Yang Y, et al.A study of soil cadmium content and its absorption law in kiwifruit orchards in Hunan Province[J].Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2017, 39(3):468-475. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jxnydxxb201703007

    [13]

    王仁才, 石浩, 庞立, 等.湘西猕猴桃种植基地土壤和猕猴桃中重金属积累状况研究[J].农业资源与环境学报, 2017, 34(3):280-285. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nyhjyfz201703011

    Wang R C, Shi H, Pang L, et al.Accumulation of heavy metals in soil and kiwifruit of planting base in Western Hunan Province, China[J].Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environmen, 2017, 34(3):280-285. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nyhjyfz201703011

    [14]

    杨玉, 童雄才, 王仁才, 等.湖南猕猴桃园土壤重金属含量分析及污染评价[J].农业现代化研究, 2017, 38(6):1097-1105. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nyxdhyj201706023

    Yang Y, Tong X C, Wang R C, et al.Analysis and safety evaluation of heavy metal contamination in kiwifruit orchard soils in Hunan Province[J].Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2017, 38(6):1097-1105. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nyxdhyj201706023

    [15]

    张计育, 莫正海, 黄胜男, 等. 21世纪以来世界猕猴桃产业发展以及中国猕猴桃贸易与国际竞争力分析[J].中国农学通报, 2014, 30(23):48-55. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2887

    Zhang J Y, Mo Z H, Huang S N, et al.Development of kiwifruit industry in the world and analysis of trade and international competitiveness in China entering 21st century[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(23):48-55. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2887

    [16]

    胡凡, 石磊, 李茹, 等.陕西关中地区猕猴桃施肥现状评价[J].中国土壤与肥料, 2017(3):44-49. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trfl201703009

    Hu F, Shi L, Li R, et al.Fertilization evaluation of kiwifruit in Guanzhong region of Shaanxi Province[J].Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2017(3):44-49. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trfl201703009

    [17]

    罗时健.江山猕猴桃产业发展现状与对策[J].江西农业学报, 2006, 18(4):212-214. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8581.2006.04.084

    Luo S J.Development status and countermeasures of kiwifruit industry in Jiangshan[J].Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2006, 18(4):212-214. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8581.2006.04.084

    [18]

    Satyanarayanan M, Balaram V, Sawant S S, et al.Rapid determination of REEs, PGEs, and other trace elements in geological and environmental materials by high resolution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry[J].Atomic Spectroscopy, 2018, 39(1):1-15. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=399d63251e1afd27679392d6e00fdd4d

    [19]

    Yuksel B, Arica E.Assessment of toxic, essential, and other metal levels by ICP-MS in Lake Eymir and Mogan in Ankara, Turkey:An environmental application[J].Atomic Spectroscopy, 2018, 39(5):179-184.

    [20]

    赵其国.红壤物质循环及其调控[M].北京:科学出版社, 2002.

    Zhao Q G.Red Soil Material Cycle and Its Regulation[M].Beijing:Science Press, 2002.

    [21]

    顾万帆, 胡敏骏, 许杰, 等.杭州市富阳区猕猴桃种植区域的土壤环境适宜性评价[J].浙江农业科学, 2018, 59(2):178-180. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zjnykx201802006

    Gu W F, Hu M J, Xu J, et al.Evaluation of soil environmental suitability of kiwifruit planting area in Fuyang District of Hangzhou City[J].Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 59(2):178-180. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zjnykx201802006

    [22]

    汪庆华, 董岩翔, 郑文, 等.浙江土壤地球化学基准值与环境背景值[J].地质通报, 2007, 26(5):590-597. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2007.05.012

    Wang Q H, Dong Y X, Zheng W, et al.Soil geochemical baseline values and environmental background values in Zhejiang, China[J].Geological Bulletin of China, 2007, 26(5):590-597. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2007.05.012

    [23]

    林清火, 罗微, 林钊沐, 等.砖红壤地区旱地土壤肥料养分淋失研究进展[J].热带农业科学, 2003, 23(1):61-66. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2196.2003.01.012

    Lin Q H, Luo W, Lin Z M, et al.Research advances on leaching of fertilizer nutrients in the latisol areas[J].Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2003, 23(1):61-66. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2196.2003.01.012

    [24]

    陆若辉, 陈思力, 沈月.降低浙江农田化肥施肥强度对策分析[J].浙江农业科学, 2017, 58(8):1293-1295. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zjnykx201708001

    Lu R H, Chen S L, Shen Y.Countermeasure analysis of reducing fertilization intensity of fertilizer in Zhejiang farmland[J].Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 58(8):1293-1295. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zjnykx201708001

    [25]

    彭勃, 王新平, 孟庆青, 等.猕猴桃需肥特性及施肥技术[J].中国农技推广, 2008, 24(12):30-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-381X.2008.12.017

    Peng B, Wang X P, Meng Q Q, et al.Kiwifruit fertilizer characteristics and fertilization techniques[J].China Agricultural Technology Extension, 2008, 24(12):30-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-381X.2008.12.017

    [26]

    柳检, 罗立强.As、Cd和Pb植物根系吸收途径和影响因素研究现状与进展[J].岩矿测试, 2015, 34(3):269-277. http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/article/doi/10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.2015.03.002

    Liu J, Luo L Q.Research progress on the root uptake pathway of As, Cd and Pb and its influence factors[J].Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2015, 34(3):269-277. http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/article/doi/10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.2015.03.002

    [27]

    廖启林, 金洋, 吴新民, 等.南京地区土壤元素的人为活动环境富集系数研究[J].中国地质, 2005, 32(1):141-147. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2005.01.019

    Liao Q L, Jin Y, Wu X M, et al.Artificial environmental concentration coefficients of elements in soils in the Nanjing area[J].Geology in China, 2005, 32(1):141-147. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2005.01.019

    [28]

    赵庆令, 李清彩, 谢江坤, 等.应用富集系数法和地累积指数法研究济宁南部区域土壤重金属污染特征及生态风险评价[J].岩矿测试, 2015, 34(1):129-137. http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/article/doi/10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.2015.01.017

    Zhao Q L, Li Q C, Xie J K, et al.Characteristics of soil heavy metal pollution and its ecological risk assessment in South Jining District using methods of enrichment factor and index of eoaccumulation[J].Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2015, 34(1):129-137. http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/article/doi/10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.2015.01.017

    [29]

    王腾云, 周国华, 孙彬彬, 等.福建沿海地区土壤-稻谷重金属含量关系与影响因素研究[J].岩矿测试, 2016, 35(3):295-301. http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/article/doi/10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.2016.03.013

    Wang T Y, Zhou G H, Sun B B, et al.The relationship between heavy metal contents of soils and rice in coastal areas, Fujian Province, including influencing factors[J].Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2016, 35(3):295-301. http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/article/doi/10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.2016.03.013

    [30]

    周国华.土壤重金属生物有效性研究进展[J].物探与化探, 2014, 38(6):1097-1106. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/wtyht201406001

    Zhou G H.Recent progress in the study of heavy metal bioavailability in soil[J].Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2014, 38(6):1097-1106. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/wtyht201406001

    [31]

    张忠启, 茆彭, 于东升, 等.近25年来典型红壤区土壤pH变化特征——以江西省余江县为例[J].土壤学报, 2018, 55(6):1545-1553. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trxb201806024

    Zhang Z Q, Mao P, Yu D S, et al.Characteristics of soil pH variation in typical red soil region of South China in the past 25 years-A case study of Yujiang County, Jiangxi Province[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2018, 55(6):1545-1553. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trxb201806024

    [32]

    汪吉东, 许仙菊, 宁运旺, 等.土壤加速酸化的主要农业驱动因素研究进展[J].土壤, 2015, 47(4):627-633. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=tr201504001

    Wang J D, Xu X J, Ning Y W, et al.Progresses in agricultural driving factors on accelerated acidification of soils[J].Soils, 2015, 47(4):627-633. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=tr201504001

  • 加载中

(1)

(6)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  2406
  • PDF下载数:  107
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2019-01-08
修回日期:  2019-05-28
录用日期:  2019-07-16

目录