OIL AND GAS PROSPECT OF THE CAMBRIAN AT LAOSHAN UPLIFT:A COMPARATIVE STUDY TO SICHUAN AND SUBEI BASINS
-
摘要:
南黄海盆地是下扬子克拉通板块的主体，也是我国唯一尚未获得油气突破的海区。尤其是崂山隆起，目前只有1口钻井，勘探程度极低，制约了油气勘探的进程。然而，南黄海盆地的烃源岩、储层、盖层和成藏条件与四川盆地和苏北盆地存在着相似的地方。对比分析四川盆地和苏北盆地寒武系可以发现：2个盆地的烃源岩丰度高，厚度大，TOC平均含量分别达4%和3.32%，都是较好的烃源岩；储层以震旦系和寒武系白云岩为主，裂隙发育使储层具有较高的孔隙度和渗透率；成藏模式包括新生古储、古生新储和自生自储。在缺少资料的情况下，通过类比四川盆地和苏北盆地来推测南黄海崂山隆起寒武系的油气地质特征和油气勘探前景。对比分析认为，崂山隆起寒武系具有较大的油气勘探前景，应加快勘探进程。
Abstract:As the main part of the Lower Yangtze Craton, the South Yellow Sea Basin has remained as the only area without breakthrough of oil and gas up to date. There is no conclusion being made for the region, especially for the Laoshan uplift, since there are lack of drilling wells. The oldest strata penetrated by drill hole so far are the Carboniferous, and the seismic exploration degree is low. In fact, there is no actual data enough to reach a conclusion on oil and gas potential. However, the South Yellow Sea Basin is similar to some extent to the Sichuan Basin and the Subei Basin in such aspects as hydrocarbon source rocks, reservoirs, cap rocks and accumulation mechanisms. By comparison, it is found that there are abundant and thick source rocks in the South Yellow Sea Basin. The average organic carbon contents are 4% and 3.32% respectively, which belong to the category of good hydrocarbon source rocks. In addition, there are widely distributed Sinian and Cambrian dolomite reservoirs, and the porosity and permeability of the reservoirs are rather high because of dolomitization and tectonic crackings. Moreover, there are three types of oil and gas accumulation models, i. e. the oil and gas generated newly and stored in the old, the oil and gas generated elderly and store in the new, and the oil and gas self generated and self stored. Of course, the Sichuan Basin has better preservation potentials comparing to the Subei Basin because of the influence of tectonic movement. With regard to the lower Paleozoic, the preservation conditions of the two basins are very similar indeed. By basin correlation, it is inferred that the oil and gas geological characteristics of the Cambrian on the Laoshan Uplift are comparable with the Sichuan Basin and the Subei Basin, and is a favorable target for further oil and gas exploration.
-
Key words:
- Laoshan Uplift /
- Sichuan Basin /
- Subei Basin /
- Cambrian /
- oil and gas prospects
-
-
表 1 四川盆地和苏北盆地寒武系烃源岩对比
Table 1. Comparison of Cambrian source rock in Sichuan Basin and Subei Basin
地区 四川盆地 苏北盆地 干酪根类型 Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型 Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型 Ro/% 2.00~4.80
平均2.010.62~4.00
平均1.75有机碳含量/% 2.00~8.00
平均4.000.66~12.10
平均3.32氯仿沥青A/10-6 23~60，平均41 21 综合评价 很好 好-很好 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 四川盆地和苏北盆地震旦系和寒武系储层特征
Table 2. Characteristics of Sinian and Cambrian reservoirs in Sichuan Basin and Subei Basin
地区 四川盆地 苏北盆地 储层 寒武系白云岩 震旦系白云岩 厚度/m 600~800 800~900 孔隙度/% 4.62~6.64(有裂缝)/1.00~2.00(无裂缝) 2.00~4.90(有裂缝)/1.00(无裂缝) 渗透率/μm2 0.07(有裂缝)/0.25×10-3(无裂缝) 33.80×10-3(有裂缝)/0.17×10-3(无裂缝)
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 张抗.中国海上油气形势及展望[J].海洋石油, 2013, 33(3): 1-7. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hysy201303001
[2] 张海啟, 陈建文, 李刚, 等.地震调查在南黄海崂山隆起的发现及其石油地质意义[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2009, 29(3):107-113. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hydzydsjdz200903014
[3] 杨长清, 董贺平, 李刚.南黄海盆地中部隆起的形成与演化[J].海洋地质前沿, 2014, 30(7):17-21. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hydzdt201407003
[4] 孙晶, 王建强, 肖国林.南黄海盆地中部隆起海相上构造层分布及断裂系统特征[J].海洋地质前沿, 2014, 30(10):18-25. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hydzdt201410004
[5] 张家强.南黄海中、古生界油气前景[J].海洋地质动态, 2002, 18(11): 15-27. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hydzdt200211010
[6] 姚永坚, 冯志强, 郝天珧.对南黄海盆地构造层特征及含油气性的新认识[J].地质前缘, 2008, 15(6):232-240. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dxqy200806030
[7] 李刚, 陈建文.南黄海海域的海相中－古生界油气远景[J].海洋地质动态, 2003, 19(8):12-16. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hydzdt200308004
[8] 龚建明, 王建强, 李小昱, 等.南黄海崂山隆起古生界页岩气远景区[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2013, 33(6):115-120. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hydzydsjdz201306013
[9] 王丰, 李慧君, 张银国.南黄海崂山隆起地层属性及油气地质[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2010, 30(2):95-102. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hydzydsjdz201002012
[10] 蔡乾忠.中国海域油气地质学[M].北京:海洋出版社, 2005.
[11] 翟光明, 宋建国.中国石油地质志:卷一[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 1996.
[12] 徐旭辉, 周小进, 彭金宁.从扬子地区海相盆地演化改造与成藏浅析南黄海勘探方向[J].石油实验地质, 2014, 36(5):523-531. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=sysydz201405002
[13] 刘树根, 马永生, 黄文明, 等.四川盆地上震旦统灯影组储集层致密化过程研究[J].天然气地球科学, 2007, 17(4): 485-496. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trqdqkx200704002
[14] 黄籍中, 陈盛吉, 宋家荣, 等.四川盆地烃源岩体系与大中型气田形成[J].中国科学(D辑), 1996, 26(6): 504-510. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199600816670
[15] 吴淑玉, 陈建文, 梁杰, 等.南黄海海相中、古生界碳酸盐岩储层特征及成藏条件预测[J].海洋地质前沿, 2016, 32(1):13-21. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-HYDT201601003.htm
[16] 程青松, 龚建明, 李智高, 等.扬子陆域下寒武烃源岩特征对南黄海油气勘探的借鉴[J].海洋地质前沿, 2016, 32(1):66-72.
[17] 王巍, 陈高.苏北—南黄海盆地区域构造特征分析[J].地震学刊, 1999, 19(1): 47-55. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199900084761
[18] 祁江豪, 温珍河, 张训华, 等.南黄海地区与上扬子地区海相中—古生界岩性地层对比[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2013, 33(1):109-119. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/96122X/20131/45675258.html
[19] 倪新锋, 陈洪德, 韦东晓, 等.中上扬子盆地叠加、改造类型及油气勘探前景[J].地质学报, 2009, 83(4):468-476. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dizhixb200904002
-
图(7)
表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 501
- PDF下载数: 24
- 施引文献: 0