Grain Size Distribution Patterns ofthe Rizhao Coast and Their Bearing on Coastal Erosion
-
摘要:
通过对日照市海岸带2个重点沙滩的现场调查和沉积物粒度计算，综合分析了沙滩的侵蚀现状和粒度参数特征。海滨国家森林公园沙滩北部和南部处于侵蚀状态，中部为缓慢淤积状态；万平口海水浴场沙滩北部、中部总体呈侵蚀趋势，南部为淤积状态。海滨国家森林公园沙滩的平均粒径总体要小于万平口海水浴场沙滩，这与两沙滩的坡度不同有关，平均粒径从滩肩到低潮线逐渐变小。海滨国家森林公园沙滩的分选性要好于万平口海水浴场沙滩，分选系数具有由陆向海、由北向南逐渐变小的趋势。沙滩的滩肩和滩面处频率曲线主要为双峰，峰态平坦，物质来源复杂，低潮线处频率曲线主要为单峰，峰态尖锐，物质来源单一。
Abstract:Field survey and grain size analysis have been carried out for two beaches of the Rizhao coast to reveal the current status of beach erosion. It is found that both the northern and southern parts of the National Seaside Forest Park are under erosion, except the middle part which remains under weak siltation. On the Wanpingkou beach, however, the northern and middle parts are under erosion, except the southern part which is slightly under siltation. The mean grain size of the National Seaside Forest Park is smaller than that of the Wanpingkou, owing to the difference in slope angles of the two beaches. The mean grain size decreases gradually from beach berm to low tide level. The sorting of particle in the National Seasside Forest Park beach is better than that of Wanpingkou. The sorting coefficient becomes smaller from land to sea or from north to south. The frequency distribution of the beach berm and shore face are dominated by double peak curves with flaty kurtosis, indicating a rather complicated sediment source. However, the frequency curve in low tide level is mainly dominated by single peak with sharp kurtosis, indicating a simple sediment source.
-
Key words:
- current status of coastal erosion /
- grain size analysis /
- beach /
- Rizhao coastal zone
-
-
[1] 王琦, 吕亚男, 张建华.山东省日照县近岸沉积物的物质来源及扩散方向[J].山东海洋学院学报, 1978, 8(2):41-50, 104. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000005504481
[2] 崔承琦.石臼湾及其附近海岸地貌特征.山东海洋学院学报[J], 1983, 13(2):67-80. http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=15123614
[3] 宋红瑛, 刘金庆, 印萍, 等.日照近海表层沉积物粒度特征与沉积环境[J].中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 46(3):96-104. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/qdhydxxb201603013
[4] 庄振业, 印萍, 吴建政, 等.鲁南沙质海岸的侵蚀量及其影响因素[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2000, 20(3):15-21. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hydzydsjdz200003003
[5] 李广雪, 宫立新, 杨继超, 等.山东滨海沙滩侵蚀状态与保护对策[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2013, 33(5):35-46. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hydzydsjdz201305004
[6] 宫立新.山东半岛东部海滩侵蚀现状与保护研究[D].青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2014: 1-93.
http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=degree&id=D548550 [7] 王永红, 孙静, 褚智慧.海滩质量评价体系建立和应用——以山东半岛南部海滩为例[J].海洋通报, 2017, 36(3):260-267. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hytb201703003
[8] 单锐.日照北部沙滩近期演化过程及未来发展研究[D].青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2018: 1-87.
[9] 国家海洋局北海分局.日照港海域海洋水文气象资料汇编[R].青岛: 国家海洋局北海分局, 1997: 1-110.
[10] 中国海湾志编纂委员会.中国海湾志第4分册(山东半岛南部和江苏省海湾)[M].北京:海洋出版社, 1993:1-448.
[11] 王松涛, 印萍, 吴振.山东日照海岸带地质[M].北京:海洋出版社, 2014:1-179.
[12] 岳保静, 廖晶, 高茂生, 等.山东半岛砂质海滩动力地貌演化特征[J].海洋科学, 2017, 41(4):118-126. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hykx201704016
[13] Folk R L, Andrews P B, Lewis D W. Detrital sedimentary rock classification and nomenclature for use in New Zealand[J].New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysies, 1970, 13(4):937-968. doi: 10.1080/00288306.1970.10418211
[14] 蔡锋.中国海滩养护技术手册[M].北京:海洋出版社, 2015:1-379.
[15] 师沙沙, 任旭光, 李娜.北戴河浅水湾浴场岸滩侵淤机理研究[J].中国环境管理干部学院学报, 2018, 28(3):54-57. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zghjglgbxyxb201803015
[16] 黄广, 陈沈良, 胡静.南汇东滩沉积物粒度特征及其与水动力的关系[J].海洋湖沼通报, 2008, 26(1):32-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6482.2008.01.005
[17] 王琦, 朱而勤.海洋沉积学[M].北京:科学出版社, 1989:1-247.
[18] 金秉福.粒度分析中偏度系数的影响因素及其意义[J].海洋科学, 2012, 36(2):129-135.
[19] 黄银洲.鄂尔多斯高原近2000年沙漠化过程与成因研究[D].兰州: 兰州大学, 2009: 1-110.
http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Thesis/Y1517557 [20] 窦衍光.长江口邻近海域沉积物粒度和元素地球化学特征及其对沉积环境的指示[D].青岛: 国家海洋局第一海洋研究所, 2007: 1-74.
http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-85301-2007184425.htm -
下载:
图(13)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1135
- PDF下载数: 330
- 施引文献: 0