TRIGGERING FACTORS OF SUBMARINE LANDSLIDE IN THE YELLOW RIVER DELTA: TAKE THE CHENGDAO AREA AS AN EXAMPLE
-
摘要:
2003年11月,黄河水下三角洲2条海底电缆断裂,推测与该区域冲蚀沟较为发育有关。通过多波束测深、浅地层剖面探测、侧扫声呐调查等物探调查方法对埕岛海区开展地质调查,以揭示黄河三角洲地区海底滑坡诱发条件。研究发现:埕岛海区海底存在多条冲蚀沟,软弱土层较为发育,冲蚀沟地层扰动较为明显;通过波浪海流对海底土体的影响分析,判断不同水深和不同土体在浪潮流作用下海底冲蚀沟的发育程度,得出海底滑坡的诱发条件,结合人类活动和海底自然坡度等因素的影响,分析研究区仍然具有发生海底滑坡的可能性。
Abstract:Two submarine cables at the Yellow River underwater delta broke in November 2003, presumably owing to the relatively developed erosion ditches and landslide in the area. Geological survey was undertaken later in the Chengdao area in order to find out the reasons and conditions of the event. Various geophysical methods, such as multi-beam sounding, shallow profile exploration and side scan sonar survey, are applied. It is found that there do occur many erosional gullies on the sea bottom in the Chengdao area. Soft soil layers are common. Sediment disturbance are obvious in erosional trenches by the actions of wave and current. Based on the analysis of wave and current influences on seabed soil, the development degree of the erosional ditches and their relationship with water depth and soil properties are revealed. Upon the basis, triggering conditions of the seabed landslide are worked out. Increasing human activity is also the factor to be considered for the submarine landslide happened in the study area.
-
Key words:
- Yellow River Delta /
- submarine landslide /
- erosion ditch /
- sediment disturbance
-
表 1 调查用设备参数
Table 1. Parameters of research equipment
序号 设备名称 型号 性能 1 多波束测深仪 Kongsberg EM2040C 工作频率:250 kHz;工作水深:0~500 m;工作精度:1 cm 2 浅地层剖面仪 Innomar SES2000 能量输出:50 J;穿透能力:约30 m;分辨率:10 cm 3 侧扫声呐 Klein3000 工作频率:100 kHz、500 kHz;工作水深:0~1 500 m;扫宽:10~150 m 4 双频测深仪 EchotrackMKⅢ 工作频率:100~1 000 kHz,35~50 Hz;工作水深:0.22 m;分辨率:0.01 m -
[1] Locat J,Lee H J. Submarine landslides:advances and challenges[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2002,39(39):193-212.
[2] Masson D G,Harbitz C B,Wynn R B,et al. Submarine landslides:processes,triggers and hazard prediction[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A,2006,364(1845):2009-2039. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2006.1810
[3] 冯秀丽,林 霖,庄振业,等. 现代黄河水下三角洲全新世以来土层岩土工程参数与沉积环境之间的关系[J]. 海岸工程,1999(4):1-7.
[4] 周良勇,刘 健,刘锡清,等. 现代黄河三角洲滨浅海区的灾害地质[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2004,24(3):19-27.
[5] 李安龙,杨荣民,曹立华,等. 黄河水下三角洲海底斜坡波致稳定性分析[J]. 中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版),2004,34(2):273-280.
[6] 蒲高军, 冯秀丽, 赵维霞. 现代黄河三角洲埕北海域海底滑坡分析[C]//渤海湾油气勘探开发工程技术论文集(第十集), 东营: 中国石化出版社, 2005: 167-171.
[7] 李海东,杨作升,王厚杰,等. 现代黄河水下三角洲地质灾害现象的空间分布[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2006,26(4):37-43.
[8] 彭 俊,陈沈良,陈一强,等. 黄河三角洲侵蚀性岸段水下岸坡地质灾害及其空间分布[J]. 海洋通报,2014,33(1):1-6. doi: 10.11840/j.issn.1001-6392.2014.01.001
[9] 肖 鹏,李安龙. 基于GIS的黄河水下三角洲海底滑坡稳定性预测[J]. 地质科技情报,2016,35(3):221-226.
[10] 赵景蒲,贺 淼,张建英,等. 东营市近海海域灾害地质类型及特征分析[J]. 山东国土资源,2018,34(7):55-60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6979.2018.07.009
[11] 曹成林. 波浪作用下埕岛海域海底冲刷预测评价[D]. 青岛: 自然资源部第一海洋研究所, 2010.
[12] 文明征, 王振豪, 张博文, 等. 黄河水下三角洲浮泥层分布与扰动地层调查研究[C]//2018年全国工程地质学术年会论文集, 西安: 科学出版社, 2018: 686-692.
[13] 翟 科. 埕岛海区海底不稳定性差异对工程设施的影响[D]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2010.
[14] 马 云. 南海北部陆坡区海底滑坡特征及触发机制研究[D]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2014.
[15] Prior D B,Coleman J M. Submarine landslides-geometry and nomenclature[J]. Zeitschriftfür Geomorphologie N F,1979,23:415-426.
[16] 朱超祁,贾永刚,刘晓磊,等. 海底滑坡分类及成因机制研究进展[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2015,35(6):153-163.
[17] Schwab W C,Lee H J,Twichell D C. Submarine landslides:selected studies in the U. S. exclusive economic zone[J]. U. S. geological Survey Bulletin,1993.
[18] 何 叶,钟广法. 海底滑坡及其反射地震识别综述[J]. 海洋科学,2015,39(1):116-125. doi: 10.11759/hykx20130714001
[19] 刘 敏. 复杂环境下海底斜坡稳定性解析[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2016.
[20] Hampton M,Lee H. Submarine landslides[J]. Reviews of Geophysics,1996,34(1):33-59. doi: 10.1029/95RG03287