Division of hydrocarbon accumulation assemblage and prediction of favorable accumulation assemblage in ZhuⅠDepression
-
摘要:
针对珠江口盆地（东部）寻找接替勘探领域、降低勘探风险的需要，采用成藏组合分析方法，从油气充注条件分析入手，研究珠一坳陷不同成藏组合油气优势运移聚集方向，研究表明：区域盖层的岩性组合与断裂活动强度共同决定了珠一坳陷油气在不同成藏组合间的分配与富集，恩平组砂地比在50%以上，且断层断距在140 m以上时，油气主要在T70界面之上的珠海-粤海组成藏组合富集，反之则主要在T70界面之下的成藏组合富集。长期活动型及叠加复合A型洼陷，油气以垂向运移为主，主力成藏组合及成藏带多位于烃源灶之上；早期活动型及叠加复合B型洼陷，油气以侧向运移为主，源内和近源的成藏组合最为有利，远源的珠海-粤海组成藏组合，其有利成藏带通常位于洼陷边缘及隆起区。
Abstract:In order to find the further exploration target and reduce the exploration risk in the eastern Pearl River Mouth Basin, this paper analyzed hydrocarbon accumulation assemblage and hydrocarbon charging conditions to study the dominant migration and accumulation direction of oil and gas in different hydrocarbon accumulation assemblages in the ZhuⅠDepression. According to the study, the lithologic combination of the regional caprock and fault activity intensity control the distribution and enrichment of oil and gas. Oil and gas mainly accumulate in strata above the Enping Formation, when the sand/formation ratio of the direct caprock on the source, is greater than 50% and the fault displacement is greater than 140 m; The main hydrocarbon accumulation assemblage and accumulation zones are usually located above the source-kitchen in sags with long-term fault activities and superimposed activities of multi-episodic fault where oil and gas is mainly migrated vertically; for the sags where the faults are only active in the early stage and the degree of fault superimposition in different periods is low, the hydrocarbon accumulation assemblage in source and near source is more favorable, the favorable accumulation zones are usually located at the edge of depressions and uplifted areas in Zhuhai-Yuehai Formation accumulation assemblage where is far away from the source rock.
-
-
[1] MAGOON L B,DOW D W G. The Petroleum System:from source to trap[J]. AAPG Memoir,1994:60.
[2] 赵文智, 何登发. 石油地质综合研究导论[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1998: 9-17.
[3] 童晓光,李浩武,肖坤叶,等. 成藏组合快速分析技术在海外低勘探程度盆地的应用[J]. 石油学报,2009,30(3):317-323. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2009.03.001
[4] 童晓光. 论成藏组合在勘探评价中的意义[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2009,31(6):1-8.
[5] 张强,吕福亮,贺晓苏,等. 南海成藏组合发育特征及勘探潜力评价[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2017,37(6):158-167.
[6] 施和生. 论油气资源不均匀分布与分带差异富集:以珠江口盆地珠一坳陷为例[J]. 中国海上油气,2013,25(5):1-8.
[7] 施和生, 舒誉, 杜家元, 等. 珠江口盆地古近系石油地质[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2016: 1-39.
[8] 施和生,何敏,张丽丽,等. 珠江口盆地(东部)油气地质特征、成藏规律及下一步勘探策略[J]. 中国海上油气,2014,26(3):11-22.
[9] 于水明,陈雪芳,梅廉夫,等. 珠一坳陷断层特征及对油气成藏的作用[J]. 石油天然气学报,2012,34(1):50-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9752.2012.01.011
[10] 吴智平,胡阳,钟志洪. 珠一坳陷番禺4洼新生代断裂特征及其区域动力背景[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2015,39(4):1-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2015.04.001
[11] 朱明,张向涛,黄玉平,等. 珠江口盆地烃源岩特征及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报,2019,40(S1):53-68. doi: 10.7623/syxb2019S1005
[12] 朱俊章,龙祖烈,张志琳,等. HZ25-4-1井文昌组混源储层烃的发现及其石油地质意义[J]. 中国海上油气,2010,22(4):232-236. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1506.2010.04.004
[13] 吴克强,刘志峰,王升兰,等. 珠一坳陷北部洼陷带始新统半深—深湖相烃源岩综合判识[J]. 中国海上油气,2015,27(3):10-15.
[14] 张水昌,龚再升,梁狄刚,等. 珠江口盆地东部油气系统地球化学—Ⅰ:油组划分、油源对比及混源油确定[J]. 沉积学报,2004,22(增刊):15-26.
[15] 傅宁,朱雷. 珠一坳陷惠州西凹混源油研究[J]. 中国石油勘探,2007,12(2):20-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2007.02.004
[16] 张向涛,朱俊章,熊万林,等. 番禺4洼文昌组烃源岩生物标志化合物特征与油源判识[J]. 中国海上油气,2020,32(4):12-23.
[17] 张金泉,王兰州. 龙脑香科植物的地理分布[J]. 植物学通报,1985,3(5):1-8.
[18] 陈维涛,杜家元,施和生,等. 珠江口盆地珠一坳陷惠西南地区复式油气成藏特征及富集规律[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2015,42(2):194-199. doi: 10.11698/PED.2015.02.08
[19] 刘从印,周平兵,曾驿,等. 番禺4洼地区新近系油气成藏主控因素分析[J]. 中国海上油气,2009,21(2):91-94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1506.2009.02.004
[20] 许新民,刘丽华,陈胜红,等. 珠江口盆地恩平凹陷新近系油气成藏主控因素分析[J]. 地质科技情报,2015,34(1):100-106.
-
下载:
图(8)
计量
- 文章访问数: 967
- PDF下载数: 225
- 施引文献: 0