中国地质环境监测院
中国地质灾害防治工程行业协会
主办

基于不同方法的江苏镇江地区下蜀土边坡稳定性分析与评价

瞿婧晶, 陆燕, 吴曙亮, 刘健, 苟富刚. 基于不同方法的江苏镇江地区下蜀土边坡稳定性分析与评价[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2021, 32(1): 35-42. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.01.05
引用本文: 瞿婧晶, 陆燕, 吴曙亮, 刘健, 苟富刚. 基于不同方法的江苏镇江地区下蜀土边坡稳定性分析与评价[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2021, 32(1): 35-42. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.01.05
QU Jingjing, LU Yan, WU Shuliang, LIU Jian, GOU Fugang. Evaluation of Xiashu loess slope stability in Zhenjiang area using different methods[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2021, 32(1): 35-42. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.01.05
Citation: QU Jingjing, LU Yan, WU Shuliang, LIU Jian, GOU Fugang. Evaluation of Xiashu loess slope stability in Zhenjiang area using different methods[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2021, 32(1): 35-42. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.01.05

基于不同方法的江苏镇江地区下蜀土边坡稳定性分析与评价

  • 基金项目: 江苏省地质勘查基金“镇江城市地质资源与环境”(苏财建[2011]425号)
详细信息
    作者简介: 瞿婧晶(1986-),女,江苏南京人,硕士研究生,工程师,主要从事区域地质调查方面的研究。E-mail:nanjinggg@163.com
  • 中图分类号: P642.22

Evaluation of Xiashu loess slope stability in Zhenjiang area using different methods

  • 边坡失稳是一定区域内的地质环境条件相互作用不断演化的结果,对边坡的稳定性评价时需要考虑多种因素。本文以镇江地区下蜀土边坡的稳定性影响因素和评价方法为主要研究对象,采用粗糙集属性约简理论得到对边坡影响较大的6项影响因素;通过建立影响因素相互作用关系矩阵,得出影响因素相互作用对边坡稳定性的影响程度和重要性程度以及权重值。最后建立边坡稳定性评价指标及量化标准,并确定SII指数的计算方法及对应的边坡稳定性分级,从而形成镇江地区下蜀土边坡稳定性的综合评价方法,为该地区边坡稳定评价提供依据。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  影响因素相互关系

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  影响因素的相互作用对边坡稳定性的影响程度

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  影响因素对边坡稳定性的重要性程度

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  样本不稳定指数SII统计

    Figure 4. 

    表 1  土质边坡整体稳定性分级

    Table 1.  Overall stability classification of soil slope

    级别稳定性判别条件
    1边坡变形的可能性很小
    2较好边坡产生局部变形
    3较差边坡局部土体失稳,可能引起整体变形
    4边坡产生整体变形
    5极差边坡产生整体破坏
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  各因素不同类别量化取值

    Table 2.  The quantization value of each factor by category

    类型取值
    1234
    坡面形态平直凸形凹形阶状
    坡度(0,10](10,30](30,50](50,90]
    风化作用一般
    地下水作用一般
    相对河流位置凸岸凹岸其他
    降雨情况一般
    地质构造一般
    人类活动
    类型坡向坡高
    取值1(0,30](0,25]
    2(30,90](25,35]
    3(90,150](35,45]
    4(150,210](45,55]
    5(210,270](55,+∞)
    6(270,330]
    7(330,360]
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  属性约简结果

    Table 3.  Attribute reduction results

    序号约简后的属性集
    1{坡向,坡高,坡面形态,坡度,风化作用,地下水作用,
    降雨情况,地质构造,人类活动}
    2{坡向,坡高,坡度,风化作用,地下水作用,降雨情况,
    地质构造,人类活动}
    3{坡高,坡面形态,坡度,地下水作用,相对河流位置,
    地质构造,人类活动}
    4{坡高,坡度,风化作用,地下水作用,降雨情况,地质构造,人类活动}
    5{坡高,坡度,风化作用,地下水作用,降雨情况,地质构造}
    6{坡度,地下水作用,降雨情况,地质构造,人类活动}
    7{坡高,坡度,地下水作用,地质构造,人类活动}
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4  影响因素相互作用矩阵

    Table 4.  Interaction matrix of influencing factors

    PCC+EC-Eki/%PAPD
    P130001411−316.187.78−2.12
    2P20001315−922.0610.61−6.36
    12P3002510014.717.070.00
    342P40211111116.187.787.78
    1120P5488811.765.665.66
    02100P6313−719.129.19−4.95
    E7125001068
      注:P1-坡高,P2-坡度,P3-地质构造,P4-人类活动,P5-降雨作用,P6-地下水作用。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 5  活动性指数说明表

    Table 5.  Table of activity index

    影响因素权重值 k
    坡度(P2)0.2206
    地下水作用(P6)0.1912
    坡高(P1)0.1618
    人类活动(P4)0.1618
    地质构造(P3)0.1471
    降雨作用(P5)0.1176
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 6  评价指标量化标准

    Table 6.  Quantitative standard of evaluation index

    评价指标012
    坡高/m<2525~55>55
    坡度/(°)<3030~50>50
    地质构造一般
    降雨一般
    人类活动一般
    地下水作用一般
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 7  边坡稳定性分级表

    Table 7.  Slope stability classification table

    级别稳定性判别条件SII取值
    1边坡变形可能性很小<90
    2较好边坡产生局部变形90~110
    3较差边坡局部土体失稳,可能引起整体变形110~140
    4边坡产生整体变形140~170
    5极差边坡产生整体破坏>170
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    李荣伟, 侯恩科. 边坡稳定性评价方法研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 西部探矿工程,2007,19(3):4 − 7. [LI Rongwei, HOU Enke. Research status and development trend of slope stability evaluation methods[J]. West-China Exploration Engineering,2007,19(3):4 − 7. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5716.2007.03.002

    [2]

    杨学堂, 王飞. 边坡稳定性评价方法及发展趋势[J]. 岩土工程技术,2004,18(2):103 − 106. [YANG Xuetang, WANG Fei. Evaluation method of slope stability and its developing trend[J]. Geotechnical Engineering Technique,2004,18(2):103 − 106. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2004.02.014

    [3]

    周维垣, 寇晓东. 无单元法及其在岩土工程中的应用[J]. 岩土工程学报,1998,20(1):5 − 9. [ZHOU Weiyuan, KOU Xiaodong. Element free method and its application in geotechnique engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1998,20(1):5 − 9. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.1998.01.003

    [4]

    王勖成, 邵敏. 有限单元法基本原理和数值方法[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2003.

    WANG Xuncheng, SHAO Min. Basic principle of the FEM and numerical method[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 1999.(in Chinese)

    [5]

    GHABOUSSI J, BARBOSA R. Three-dimensional discrete element method for granular materials[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics,1990,14(7):451 − 472. doi: 10.1002/nag.1610140702

    [6]

    裴觉民. 数值流形方法与非连续变形分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,1997,16(3):279 − 292. [PEI Juemin. Numerical manifold method and discontinue deformation analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,1997,16(3):279 − 292. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.1997.03.012

    [7]

    黄润秋, 许强. 显式拉格朗日差分分析在岩石边坡工程中的应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,1995,14(4):346 − 354. [HUANG Runqiu, XU Qiang. Application of explicit Lagrangian finite-difference method in rock slope engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,1995,14(4):346 − 354. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [8]

    孙玉科, 姚宝魁. 矿山边坡稳定性研究的回顾与展望[J]. 工程地质学报,1998,6(4):305 − 311. [SUN Yuke, YAO Baokui. Research of stability of slope on the open pit in China[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,1998,6(4):305 − 311. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [9]

    许宝田, 阎长虹, 罗国煜, 等. 优势面等级灰色聚类评价[J]. 工程地质学报,2003,11(3):239 − 243. [XU Baotian, YAN Changhong, LUO Guoyu, et al. Gray cluster evaluation of preferred plane grade[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2003,11(3):239 − 243. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2003.03.003

    [10]

    刘沐宇, 朱瑞赓. 基于模糊相似优先的边坡稳定性评价范例推理方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(8):1188 − 1193. [LIU Muyu, ZHU Ruigeng. Case-based reasoning approach to slope stability evaluation based on fuzzy analogy preferred ratio[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2002,21(8):1188 − 1193. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2002.08.017

    [11]

    王艳霞. 模糊数学在边坡稳定分析中的应用[J]. 岩土力学,2010,31(9):3000 − 3004. [WANG Yanxia. Application of fuzzy mathematics to slope stability analysis[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2010,31(9):3000 − 3004. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2010.09.053

    [12]

    许江, 李克钢. 模糊理论在公路边坡稳定性分析中的应用[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2006,17(2):61 − 64. [XU Jiang, LI Kegang. Application of fuzzy theory on slope stability assessement for expressway[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2006,17(2):61 − 64. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8035.2006.02.014

    [13]

    刘焕喜, 刘涌江. 可靠性数学在斜坡稳定性分析中的应用[J]. 西北地质,2001,34(2):37 − 42. [LIU Huanxi, LIU Yongjiang. The reliability mathematics' applications on analyzing stability of slope[J]. Northwestern Geology,2001,34(2):37 − 42. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2001.02.007

    [14]

    罗文强, 张倬元, 黄润秋, 等. 斜坡系统可靠性分析研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2008, 7(增刊): 105-111.

    LUO Wenqiang, ZHANG Zhuoyuan, HUANG Runqiu, et al. Advances in the reasearch on reliability of slope system[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2008, 7: 105-111. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [15]

    李元松, 高晖, 陈峰, 等. 乌尉高速公路边坡稳定性综合评价[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2018,45(4):150 − 156. [LI Yuansong, GAO Hui, CHEN Feng, et al. Comprehensive assessment of slope stability in Wu-Yu highway[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2018,45(4):150 − 156. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [16]

    李雪平. 基于的区域斜坡稳定性评价Logistic回归模型研究[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学(武汉), 2005.

    LI Xueping. Study on logistic regression model applied to regional slope stability evaluation based on GIS[D]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences: Wuhan, 2005. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [17]

    李晶. 宁镇地区下蜀土滑坡区域预测预报研究[D]. 南京: 河海大学, 2006.

    [LI Jing. Study On Forecast Of Landslides In Xiashu Loess In Ningzhen Region[D]. Nanjing: Hohai University, 2006. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    [18]

    穆成林, 裴向军, 裴钻, 等. 基于岩体结构特征和未确知测度评价模型的岩质开挖边坡稳定性研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2019, 46(4): 150-158.

    MU Chenglin, PEI Xiangjun, PEI Zuan, et al. A study of the stability of rock excavated slope based on rockmass structure and unascertained measure evaluation models[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2019, 46(4): 150-158.(in Chinese with English abstract)

    [19]

    吴曙亮, 等. 镇江城市规划区地质灾害防治研究报告[R]. 南京: 江苏省地质调查研究院, 2015.

    WU Shuliang, et al. Research report on the prevention and control of geological disasters in Zhenjiang[R]. Nanjing: Geological Survey of Jiangsu Province, 2015. (in Chinese)

    [20]

    赵占群, 杨强国, 谷明成, 等. 四川得荣峡谷公路边坡稳定性评价与防治措施建议[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2016, 27(2): 55-60.

    ZHAO Zhanqun, YANG Qiangguo, GU Mingcheng, et al. Stability evaluation and control measures of the valley highway slope in Sichuan Derong County[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2016, 27(2): 55-60.(in Chinese with English abstract)

    [21]

    PAWLAK Z. Rough sets[J]. International Journal of Computer Information Sciences,1982,11(5):341 − 356. doi: 10.1007/BF01001956

    [22]

    PAWLAK Z. Rough sets and decision tables[M]//Computation Theory. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1985: 187-196.

    [23]

    PAWLAK Z. Rough set approach to knowledge-based decision support[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1997,99(1):48 − 57. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00382-7

    [24]

    PAWLAK Z. Rough set theory and its applications to data analysis[J]. Cybernetics and Systems,1998,29(7):661 − 688. doi: 10.1080/019697298125470

    [25]

    董威. 粗糙集理论及其数据挖掘应用[M]. 沈阳: 东北大学出版社, 2009.

    DONG Wei. Rough set theory and data mining applications[M]. Shenyang: Northeast University Press, 2009. (in Chinese)

    [26]

    宋金龙. 基于数据挖掘技术的强震区公路岩质边坡地质灾害评价体系研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2012: 51-58.

    SONG Jinlong. Study on evaluation system of geological hazard in rock slope along highway in highly seismic region based on data mining technique[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2012: 51-58. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [27]

    杜广印, 尚彦军. 从影响因素相互作用关系分析岩石边坡的稳定性[J]. 江苏地质,2000(1):48 − 54. [DU Guangyin, SHANG Yanjun. Interaction of the factors affecting rock slope stability[J]. Jiangsu Geology,2000(1):48 − 54. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [28]

    赵建军. 公路边坡稳定性快速评价方法及应用研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2007: 95-105.

    ZHAO Jianjun. Study and application on rapid slope stability evaluation method for highway[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2007: 95-105. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [29]

    丁继新, 周圣华, 陈梦熊, 等. 基于多因素相互作用关系矩阵的边坡稳定性定量评价[J]. 工程勘察,2006,34(7):5 − 8. [DING Jixin, ZHOU Shenghua, CHEN Mengxiong, et al. Quantitative evaluation of slope stability based on the multi-factor interaction related matrix[J]. Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying,2006,34(7):5 − 8. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [30]

    贺小黑. 岩质边坡稳定性快速评估系统的构建及其应用[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2019, 30(5): 105-112.

    HE Xiaohei. Construction of a rapid evaluation system for rock slope stability and its application[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2019, 30(5): 105-112. (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • 加载中

(4)

(7)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  637
  • PDF下载数:  25
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2020-02-18
修回日期:  2020-05-06
刊出日期:  2021-02-25

目录