中国地质环境监测院
中国地质灾害防治工程行业协会
主办

四川长宁“6·17”地震诱发的次生地质灾害类型及其发育特征

廖勇, 徐闯, 陈军, 周世文. 四川长宁“6·17”地震诱发的次生地质灾害类型及其发育特征[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2021, 32(1): 77-83. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.01.11
引用本文: 廖勇, 徐闯, 陈军, 周世文. 四川长宁“6·17”地震诱发的次生地质灾害类型及其发育特征[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2021, 32(1): 77-83. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.01.11
LIAO Yong, XU Chuang, CHEN Jun, ZHOU Shiwen. Types and their characteristics of geological hazards triggered by “6·17” earthquake in Changning, Sichuan Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2021, 32(1): 77-83. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.01.11
Citation: LIAO Yong, XU Chuang, CHEN Jun, ZHOU Shiwen. Types and their characteristics of geological hazards triggered by “6·17” earthquake in Changning, Sichuan Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2021, 32(1): 77-83. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.01.11

四川长宁“6·17”地震诱发的次生地质灾害类型及其发育特征

详细信息
    作者简介: 廖 勇(1980-),男,四川荣县人,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事工程勘察、地质灾害勘查设计。E-mail:38732464@QQ.com
  • 中图分类号: P694

Types and their characteristics of geological hazards triggered by “6·17” earthquake in Changning, Sichuan Province

  • 为研究四川长宁“6·17”地震烈度与震后地质灾害发育之间的关系,笔者将研究区地震前后地质灾害排查结果进行对比分析、统计梳理。本文在宜宾市3区7县地震前后地质灾害调查成果的基础上,结合四川省地震局发布的地震烈度图以及新闻稿件,经梳理统计分析,得出不同地震烈度区内震后地质灾害的发育与分布特征、地震前后地质灾害变化规律如下:①宜宾长宁“6·17”地震震级6.0级,级数不大,但是诱发的地质灾害种类较多;②新增地质灾害隐患点以震中长宁县双河镇为中心,集中于高烈度区,且高烈度区地质灾害发育密度远大于低烈度区。③高烈度区地灾隐患点有成倍增加的趋势,中烈度区增幅不明显,低烈度区无变化。对处于多发地震区的四川省,尤其是川南片区震后应急救灾、地质灾害形势预测、建设规划、地质灾害防治等方面有一定的参考意义。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  震区地质灾害分布

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  珙县底洞镇顶古村5社滑坡全貌

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  长宁县硐底镇红旗村九组飞仙洞崩塌

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  珙县珙泉镇张永村7、8社尖山子地裂缝

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  地震前后地质灾害隐患点数量变化统计对比

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  四川长宁6.0级地震烈度图

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  各地震烈度区新增、变形加剧地质灾害点统计对比

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  Ⅷ度地震烈度区地质灾害地震前后统计对比

    Figure 8. 

    图 9  Ⅶ度地震烈度区地质灾害地震前后统计对比表

    Figure 9. 

  • [1]

    高会会, 裴向军, 崔圣华, 等. 汶川震区震后地质灾害发育分布及演化特征统计分析[J]. 长江科学院院报,2019,36(8):73 − 80. [GAO Huihui, PEI Xiangjun, CUI Shenghua, et al. Geological hazards after earthquake in Wenchuan earthquake area: distribution and evolvement features[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute,2019,36(8):73 − 80. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11988/ckyyb.20180109

    [2]

    王佳运, 张成航, 高波, 等. 玉树震区地质灾害分布规律与发育特征[J]. 工程地质学报,2013,21(4):508 − 515. [WANG Jiayun, ZHANG Chenghang, GAO Bo, et al. Distribution regularity and development characteristics of geohazards in Yushu earthquake area[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2013,21(4):508 − 515. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2013.04.005

    [3]

    杨秀元, 姚亚辉, 田运涛. 云南鲁甸 “8·3” 震后地质灾害发育 特征与分布规律[J]. 科学技术与工程,2018,18(24):16 − 21. [YANG Xiuyuan, YAO Yahui, TIAN Yuntao. Development law and distribution characteristics of geological hazards after “8· 3” earthquake in Ludian, Yunnan[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2018,18(24):16 − 21. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2018.24.003

    [4]

    蒋忠信. 震后山地地质灾害治理工程勘查设计实用技术 [M], 成都: 西南交通大学出版社, 2018: 21−26

    JIANG Zhongxin. Practical technology for exploration and design of mountainous area geological disaster control engineering after earthquake[M]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University Press 2018: 21−26. (in Chinese)

    [5]

    申通, 王运生. 汶川地震震中区崩塌发育规律[J]. 科学技术与工程,2016,16(9):7 − 14. [SHEN Tong, WANG Yunsheng. Development pattern of collapses in Wenchuan earthquake epicentral area[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2016,16(9):7 − 14. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2016.09.002

    [6]

    许强. 汶川大地震诱发地质灾害主要类型与特征研究[J]. 地质灾害与环境保护,2009,20(2):86 − 93. [XU Qiang. Main types and characteristics of the geo-hazards triggered by the Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Journal of Geological Hazards and Environment Preservation,2009,20(2):86 − 93. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4362.2009.02.019

    [7]

    姚远, 胡伟华, 吴国栋, 等. 2015年7月3日新疆皮山MS6.5地震烈度与地震地质灾害特点[J]. 地震工程学报,2016,38(4):663 − 668. [YAO Yuan, HU Weihua, WU Guodong, et al. Geological hazard characteristics and seismic intensity of July 3, 2015, Pishan, Xinjiang, MS6.5 earthquake[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal,2016,38(4):663 − 668. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0844.2016.04.0663

    [8]

    陈宁生, 刘丽红, 邓明枫, 等. “4·20”芦山地震后的四川地质灾害形势预测与防治对策[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2013,40(4):371 − 378. [CHEN Ningsheng, LIU Lihong, DENG Mingfeng, et al. Tendency prediction and prevention strategy of geohazards triggered by Lushan Ms 7 earthquake, Sichuan Province, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition),2013,40(4):371 − 378. (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • 加载中

(9)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1039
  • PDF下载数:  36
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2020-03-06
修回日期:  2020-05-06
刊出日期:  2021-02-25

目录