Types and their characteristics of geological hazards triggered by “6·17” earthquake in Changning, Sichuan Province
-
摘要:
为研究四川长宁“6·17”地震烈度与震后地质灾害发育之间的关系,笔者将研究区地震前后地质灾害排查结果进行对比分析、统计梳理。本文在宜宾市3区7县地震前后地质灾害调查成果的基础上,结合四川省地震局发布的地震烈度图以及新闻稿件,经梳理统计分析,得出不同地震烈度区内震后地质灾害的发育与分布特征、地震前后地质灾害变化规律如下:①宜宾长宁“6·17”地震震级6.0级,级数不大,但是诱发的地质灾害种类较多;②新增地质灾害隐患点以震中长宁县双河镇为中心,集中于高烈度区,且高烈度区地质灾害发育密度远大于低烈度区。③高烈度区地灾隐患点有成倍增加的趋势,中烈度区增幅不明显,低烈度区无变化。对处于多发地震区的四川省,尤其是川南片区震后应急救灾、地质灾害形势预测、建设规划、地质灾害防治等方面有一定的参考意义。
Abstract:The epicenter of the Ms6.0 earthquake occurred near Shuanghe Town in the southeast of Changning County, Yibin, Sichuan Province On June 17, 2019 is with the intensity of VIII degree. Immediately after the earthquake, field investigation of geological disasters were conducted, and it was found that Changning County and Gongxian County were greatly affected by the earthquake, while other districts and counties were slightly impacted. Based on the survey before and after the earthquake in three districts and seven counties in Yibin City, combined with the seismic intensity map and news articles issued by Sichuan Provincial Seismological Bureau, the development and distribution characteristics of post earthquake geological disasters in different seismic intensity areas, are as follows: ① The magnitude of the “6·17” earthquake in Changning, Yibin is 6.0, and the order of magnitude is 6.0. But there are many kinds of geological disasters. ②New geological hazards mainly distributed in Shuanghe Town, Changning County. The density of geological hazards in high intensity area is much larger than that in low intensity area. ③ The potential disaster points increased in high intensity areas, but slightly increase in medium intensity areas and had no change in low intensity areas. The conclusion of this paper could be reference for Sichuan Province, especially for the emergency relief, construction planning and geological disaster prevention and control.
-
图 6 四川长宁6.0级地震烈度图①
Figure 6.
-
[1] 高会会, 裴向军, 崔圣华, 等. 汶川震区震后地质灾害发育分布及演化特征统计分析[J]. 长江科学院院报,2019,36(8):73 − 80. [GAO Huihui, PEI Xiangjun, CUI Shenghua, et al. Geological hazards after earthquake in Wenchuan earthquake area: distribution and evolvement features[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute,2019,36(8):73 − 80. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11988/ckyyb.20180109
[2] 王佳运, 张成航, 高波, 等. 玉树震区地质灾害分布规律与发育特征[J]. 工程地质学报,2013,21(4):508 − 515. [WANG Jiayun, ZHANG Chenghang, GAO Bo, et al. Distribution regularity and development characteristics of geohazards in Yushu earthquake area[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2013,21(4):508 − 515. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2013.04.005
[3] 杨秀元, 姚亚辉, 田运涛. 云南鲁甸 “8·3” 震后地质灾害发育 特征与分布规律[J]. 科学技术与工程,2018,18(24):16 − 21. [YANG Xiuyuan, YAO Yahui, TIAN Yuntao. Development law and distribution characteristics of geological hazards after “8· 3” earthquake in Ludian, Yunnan[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2018,18(24):16 − 21. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2018.24.003
[4] 蒋忠信. 震后山地地质灾害治理工程勘查设计实用技术 [M], 成都: 西南交通大学出版社, 2018: 21−26
JIANG Zhongxin. Practical technology for exploration and design of mountainous area geological disaster control engineering after earthquake[M]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University Press 2018: 21−26. (in Chinese)
[5] 申通, 王运生. 汶川地震震中区崩塌发育规律[J]. 科学技术与工程,2016,16(9):7 − 14. [SHEN Tong, WANG Yunsheng. Development pattern of collapses in Wenchuan earthquake epicentral area[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2016,16(9):7 − 14. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2016.09.002
[6] 许强. 汶川大地震诱发地质灾害主要类型与特征研究[J]. 地质灾害与环境保护,2009,20(2):86 − 93. [XU Qiang. Main types and characteristics of the geo-hazards triggered by the Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Journal of Geological Hazards and Environment Preservation,2009,20(2):86 − 93. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4362.2009.02.019
[7] 姚远, 胡伟华, 吴国栋, 等. 2015年7月3日新疆皮山MS6.5地震烈度与地震地质灾害特点[J]. 地震工程学报,2016,38(4):663 − 668. [YAO Yuan, HU Weihua, WU Guodong, et al. Geological hazard characteristics and seismic intensity of July 3, 2015, Pishan, Xinjiang, MS6.5 earthquake[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal,2016,38(4):663 − 668. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0844.2016.04.0663
[8] 陈宁生, 刘丽红, 邓明枫, 等. “4·20”芦山地震后的四川地质灾害形势预测与防治对策[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2013,40(4):371 − 378. [CHEN Ningsheng, LIU Lihong, DENG Mingfeng, et al. Tendency prediction and prevention strategy of geohazards triggered by Lushan Ms 7 earthquake, Sichuan Province, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition),2013,40(4):371 − 378. (in Chinese with English abstract)