板块俯冲变形过程二维离散元模拟—对东海陆架盆地成因启示

王一丹, 于福生, 刘志娜, 王于恒, 王逸群. 板块俯冲变形过程二维离散元模拟—对东海陆架盆地成因启示[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2019, 39(5): 163-173. doi: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2019070306
引用本文: 王一丹, 于福生, 刘志娜, 王于恒, 王逸群. 板块俯冲变形过程二维离散元模拟—对东海陆架盆地成因启示[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2019, 39(5): 163-173. doi: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2019070306
WANG Yidan, YU Fusheng, LIU Zhina, WANG Yuheng, WANG Yiqun. Two-dimensional discrete element simulation of plate subduction deformation process: An insight into the genesis of East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2019, 39(5): 163-173. doi: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2019070306
Citation: WANG Yidan, YU Fusheng, LIU Zhina, WANG Yuheng, WANG Yiqun. Two-dimensional discrete element simulation of plate subduction deformation process: An insight into the genesis of East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2019, 39(5): 163-173. doi: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2019070306

板块俯冲变形过程二维离散元模拟—对东海陆架盆地成因启示

  • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金“分期异向分层伸展断裂系统叠加过程模拟研究——以渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷为例”(41472116)
详细信息
    作者简介: 王一丹(1997—),女,硕士生,主要从事构造数值模拟研究,E-mail:18813085990@163.com
    通讯作者: 于福生(1969—),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事盆地构造分析、板块构造与盆地动力学方面的教学与研究工作,E-mail:fushengyu@cup.edu.cn
  • 中图分类号: P736.1

Two-dimensional discrete element simulation of plate subduction deformation process: An insight into the genesis of East China Sea Shelf Basin

More Information
  • 俯冲变形作用是板块汇聚过程中存在的构造地质现象,是当前构造地质研究的热点。目前对板块俯冲变形的研究尚不完善,俯冲角度变化对变形过程造成的影响还需进一步研究。位于欧亚板块东南部的中国东海大陆架盆地的构造演化特征及动力学机制与菲律宾板块向欧亚板块的俯冲作用有关。利用构造地质领域中新兴的离散元模拟方法,通过构建离散元模型模拟研究板块俯冲变形演化过程,并将实验结果与菲律宾板块向中国东海俯冲部位地层相比较,结果表明:① 板块俯冲变形特征与俯冲角度有关,俯冲角度不同,其最终形成的变形样式也不同;② 断层数目随着俯冲角度的减缓而增加,断层所扩展的水平距离随俯冲角度的减缓而增大,且不同俯冲角度下相同位置所形成的断距不同;③ 俯冲楔高度随着俯冲角度的减缓而增大,地壳变形幅度越大,且最终形成俯冲楔形态类型不同;④ 反冲断层形成时间随着俯冲角度的减缓而越来越晚;⑤ 实验模拟结果与实例具有相似的构造特征。研究结果解析了不同俯冲角度下板块俯冲变形的演化过程,有助于对板块汇聚过程中俯冲变形作用的进一步认识。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  离散元数值模拟俯冲变形实验装置示意图

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  30°俯冲角离散元数值模拟实验变形过程解释图

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  15°俯冲角数值模拟实验变形过程解释图

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  5°俯冲角离散元模拟实验变形过程解释图

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  离散元模拟实验累计位移量图

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  3组实验中F1断层断距随俯冲量变化图

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  3组实验中俯冲楔高度随俯冲量变化图

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  东海陆架盆地及地震剖面地理位置平面图(a)及地震剖面反射图(b, c, d)b图左下方为P波速度剖面图(据文献[22-23]修改)

    Figure 8. 

    图 9  实验结果与实际地震剖面对比

    Figure 9. 

    图 10  实验结果与马克兰增生楔对比

    Figure 10. 

    图 11  东海陆架盆地南部演化模式图(据文献[30]修改)

    Figure 11. 

    表 1  离散元数值模型参数

    Table 1.  Parameters of the discrete element numerical simulation

    实验数据弹性模量/Pa摩擦系数法向与切向黏结强度/Pa速度/(m·s−1俯冲角/(°)
    实验1陆壳地层2×107
    洋壳地层4×108
    0.63.6×1050.530
    实验2陆壳地层2×107
    洋壳地层4×108
    0.63.6×1050.515
    实验3陆壳地层2×107
    洋壳地层4×108
    0.63.6×1050.55
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Cundall P A. A computer model for simulating progressive large scale movements in blocky rock systems[C]//Proceedings of International Proceedings Symposium on Rock Fracture. Nancy, France, 1971: 128-132.

    [2]

    蔡申阳, 尹宏伟, 李长圣, 等. 基于离散元数值模拟的应变分析和裂缝预测技术[J]. 高校地质学报, 2016, 22(1):183-193

    CAI Shenyang, YIN Hongwei, LI Changsheng, et al. Technology of strain analysis and fracture prediction based on DEM numerical simulation [J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2016, 22(1): 183-193.

    [3]

    Iwashita K, Oda M. Micro-deformation mechanism of shear banding process based on modified distinct element method [J]. Powder Technology, 2000, 109(1-3): 192-205. doi: 10.1016/S0032-5910(99)00236-3

    [4]

    Strayer L M, Suppe J. Out-of-plane motion of a thrust sheet during along-strike propagation of a thrust ramp: a distinct-element approach [J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2002, 24(4): 637-650. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8141(01)00115-8

    [5]

    Finch E, Hardy S, Gawthorpe R. Discrete element modelling of contractional fault-propagation folding above rigid basement fault blocks [J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2003, 25(4): 515-528. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8141(02)00053-6

    [6]

    Strayer L M, Erickson S G, Suppe J. Influence of Growth Strata on the Evolution of Fault-Related Folds—Distinct-Element Models[M]//McClay K R. Thrust Tectonics and Hydrocarbon Systems. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 2004: 413-437.

    [7]

    Hardy S, Finch E. Discrete-element modelling of detachment folding [J]. Basin Research, 2005, 17(4): 507-520. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2117.2005.00280.x

    [8]

    González G, Gerbault M, Martinod J, et al. Crack formation on top of propagating reverse faults of the Chuculay Fault System, northern Chile: insights from field data and numerical modelling [J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2008, 30(6): 791-808. doi: 10.1016/j.jsg.2008.02.008

    [9]

    张洁, 尹宏伟, 徐士进. 用离散元方法讨论岩石强度对主动底辟盐构造断层分布模式的影响[J]. 南京大学学报: 自然科学, 2008, 44(6):642-652

    ZHANG Jie, YIN Hongwei, XU Shijin. Influence of rock strength on fault patterns above active salt domes: insights from 2D discrete element simulations [J]. Journal of Nanjing University: Natural Sciences, 2008, 44(6): 642-652.

    [10]

    Abe S, Van Gent H, Urai J L. DEM simulation of normal faults in cohesive materials [J]. Tectonophysics, 2011, 512(1-4): 12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2011.09.008

    [11]

    Egholm D L, Sandiford M, Clausen O R, et al. A new strategy for discrete element numerical models: 2. Sandbox applications [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2007, 112(B5): B05204.

    [12]

    Hardy S. The Devil truly is in the detail. A cautionary note on computational determinism: Implications for structural geology numerical codes and interpretation of their results [J]. Interpretation, 2015, 3(4): SAA29-SAA35. doi: 10.1190/INT-2015-0052.1

    [13]

    Botter C, Cardozo N, Hardy S, et al. Seismic characterisation of fault damage in 3D using mechanical and seismic modelling [J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2016, 77: 973-990. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.08.002

    [14]

    De Franco R, Govers R, Wortel R. Nature of the plate contact and subduction zones diversity [J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2008, 271(1-4): 245-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jpgl.2008.04.019

    [15]

    Lallemand S, Heuret A, Boutelier D. On the relationships between slab dip, back-arc stress, upper plate absolute motion, and crustal nature in subduction zones [J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2005, 6(9).

    [16]

    Billen M I, Hirth G. Rheologic controls on slab dynamics [J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2007, 8(8): Q08012.

    [17]

    Hardy S, McClay K, Muñoz J A. Deformation and fault activity in space and time in high-resolution numerical models of doubly vergent thrust wedges [J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2009, 26(2): 232-248. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2007.12.003

    [18]

    Burbidge D R, Braun J. Numerical models of the evolution of accretionary wedges and fold-and-thrust belts using the distinct-element method [J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2002, 148(3): 542-561. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-246x.2002.01579.x

    [19]

    Naylor M, Sinclair H D, Willett S, et al. A discrete element model for orogenesis and accretionary wedge growth [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2005, 110(B12): B12403. doi: 10.1029/2003JB002940

    [20]

    Egholm D L. A new strategy for discrete element numerical models: 1. Theory [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2007, 112(B5): B05203.

    [21]

    Liu Z N, Koyi H A. The impact of a weak horizon on kinematics and internal deformation of a failure mass using discrete element method [J]. Tectonophysics, 2013, 586: 95-111. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2012.11.009

    [22]

    Okamura Y, Nishizawa A, Oikawa M, et al. Differential subsidence of the forearc wedge of the Ryukyu (Nansei-Shoto) Arc caused by subduction of ridges on the Philippine Sea Plate [J]. Tectonophysics, 2017, 717: 399-412. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2017.08.025

    [23]

    Nishizawa A, Kaneda K, Oikawa M, et al. Variations in seismic velocity distribution along the Ryukyu (Nansei-Shoto) Trench subduction zone at the northwestern end of the Philippine Sea plate [J]. Earth, Planets and Space, 2017, 69(1): 86. doi: 10.1186/s40623-017-0674-7

    [24]

    Lallemand S, Heuret A, Boutelier D. On the relationships between slab dip, back‐arc stress, upper plate absolute motion, and crustal nature in subduction zones [J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2015, 6(9): Q09006.

    [25]

    Skinner S M, Clayton R W. An evaluation of proposed mechanisms of slab flattening in central Mexico [J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2011, 168(8-9): 1461-1474. doi: 10.1007/s00024-010-0200-3

    [26]

    皇甫鹏鹏, 王岳军, 范蔚茗, 等. 大洋平板俯冲的数值模拟再现: 洋–陆汇聚速率影响[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2016, 40(3):429-445

    HUANGFU Pengpeng, WANG Yuejun, FAN Weiming, et al. Numerical modeling of flat subduction: constraints from the ocean-continent convergence velocity [J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2016, 40(3): 429-445.

    [27]

    Yang C Q, Yang Y Q, Li G, et al. The Mesozoic basin-mountain coupling process of the southern East China Sea shelf basin and its adjacent land area [J]. Acta Geologica Sinica - English Edition, 2016, 90(3): 1051-1052. doi: 10.1111/1755-6724.12748

    [28]

    侯方辉, 张训华, 李刚, 等. 从被动陆缘到主动陆缘——东海陆架盆地中生代构造体制转换的盆地记录[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2015, 50(5):980-990

    HOU Fanghui, ZHANG Xunhua, LI Gang, et al. From passive continental margin to active continental margin: basin recordings of Mesozoic tectonic regime transition of the East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2015, 50(5): 980-990.

    [29]

    Shang L N, Zhang X H, Jia Y G, et al. Late Cenozoic evolution of the East China continental margin: Insights from seismic, gravity, and magnetic analyses [J]. Tectonophysics, 2017, 698: 1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2017.01.003

    [30]

    杨长清, 杨传胜, 李刚, 等. 东海陆架盆地南部中生代构造演化与原型盆地性质[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2012, 32(3):105-111

    YANG Changqing, YANG Chuansheng, LI Gang, et al. Mesozoic tectonic evolution and prototype basin characters in the southern East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2012, 32(3): 105-111.

    [31]

    崔幸, 王亮亮, 罗洪明, 等. 东海陆架盆地南部中生代盆地性质与演化: 砂箱物理模拟检验[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2017, 37(4):181-192

    CUI Xing, WANG Liangliang, LUO Hongming, et al. Sandbox modeling test for Mesozoic basins in southern East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2017, 37(4): 181-192.

    [32]

    Cui X, Dai L M, Li S D, et al. Control of strike‐slip and pull‐apart processes to tectonic transition of the southern East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Geological Journal, 2019, 54(2): 850-561. doi: 10.1002/gj.3363

    [33]

    Liu Z, Dai L M, Li S Z, et al. Mesozoic magmatic activity and tectonic evolution in the southern East China Sea Continental Shelf Basin: thermo‐mechanical modelling [J]. Geological Journal, 2018, 53(S1): 240-251.

    [34]

    Hu M Y, Li S Z, Dai L M, et al. Dynamic mechanism of tectonic inversion and implications for oil–gas accumulation in the Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf basin: insights from numerical modelling [J]. Geological Journal, 2018, 53(S1): 225-239.

    [35]

    Abedi M, Bahroudi A. A geophysical potential field study to image the Makran subduction zone in SE of Iran [J]. Tectonophysics, 2016, 688: 119-134. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2016.09.025

    [36]

    Kopp C, Fruehn J, Flueh E R, et al. Structure of the makran subduction zone from wide-angle and reflection seismic data [J]. Tectonophysics, 2000, 329(1-4): 171-191. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(00)00195-5

    [37]

    Grando G, McClay K. Morphotectonics domains and structural styles in the Makran accretionary prism, offshore Iran [J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2007, 196(1-4): 157-179. doi: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2006.05.030

  • 加载中

(11)

(1)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  2383
  • PDF下载数:  55
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2019-07-03
修回日期:  2019-08-29
刊出日期:  2019-10-25

目录