广东三水盆地玄武岩源区特征与南海早期演化

张煜, 方念乔. 广东三水盆地玄武岩源区特征与南海早期演化[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2021, 41(3): 95-113. doi: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2020092902
引用本文: 张煜, 方念乔. 广东三水盆地玄武岩源区特征与南海早期演化[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2021, 41(3): 95-113. doi: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2020092902
ZHANG Yu, FANG Nianqiao. Source characteristics of basalts in Sanshui Basin and the early tectonic evolution stage of the South China Sea[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2021, 41(3): 95-113. doi: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2020092902
Citation: ZHANG Yu, FANG Nianqiao. Source characteristics of basalts in Sanshui Basin and the early tectonic evolution stage of the South China Sea[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2021, 41(3): 95-113. doi: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2020092902

广东三水盆地玄武岩源区特征与南海早期演化

  • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金面上项目“三水盆地及周边地区古近纪火山-沉积组合与南海早期演化”(41572207)
详细信息
    作者简介: 张煜(1992—),男,博士研究生,研究方向为岩石大地构造,E-mail:zhangyu_cugb@foxmail.com
  • 中图分类号: P736.1

Source characteristics of basalts in Sanshui Basin and the early tectonic evolution stage of the South China Sea

  • 南海在扩张前是否经历了陆内裂谷阶段是南海成因研究中一个重要的问题。三水盆地位于南海北部陆缘,其新生代以来喷发的双峰式火山岩具备大陆裂谷的岩石组合特征。通过对其中玄武岩主微量元素分析认为三水盆地玄武岩可以分为亚碱性和碱性玄武岩系列,两者均显示出明显的Nb、Ta正异常,相对于大陆地壳具有较低的Th/Sc、La/Nb和U/Al×1000,陆壳混染程度低;首次对盆地内玄武岩进行40Ar-39Ar测年,结合前人年代学结果表明玄武质岩浆强烈喷发的时段为61~54 Ma,其中亚碱性玄武岩喷发时间(60 Ma)早于碱性玄武岩(56 Ma);通过熔融柱模型反演得到亚碱性岩浆源区起止熔融温压分别为1 517 ℃(3.03 GPa)和1 471 ℃(2.25 GPa),深度为101~76 km,碱性岩浆源区起止熔融温压分别为1 555 ℃(3.33 GPa)和1 506 ℃(2.48 GPa),深度为110~84 km,整体为石榴石-尖晶石橄榄岩过渡区且呈逐渐变深的趋势。综合岩浆源区特征以及岩石组合特征认为三水盆地在古新世具备大陆裂谷特征。通过对比三水盆地与南海扩张期岩浆活动的分布时段及源区特征,发现三水盆地与南海扩张期岩浆活动时间分布存在较长间隔,深部过程差异较大,三水盆地岩浆活动与南海扩张并无直接因果联系。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  三水盆地位置及地质简图

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  三水盆地玄武岩TAS图解

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  三水盆地玄武岩稀土及微量元素分布

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  三水盆地玄武岩40Ar/39Ar测年结果

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  三水盆地玄武岩Haker图解

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  三水盆地亚碱性-碱性玄武岩FeOT、Na2O含量回归校正

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  亚碱性(ZD)-碱性(WJG)玄武岩熔融柱模型FeO-Na2O关系图

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  三水盆地源区性质(La/Yb)N-(Sm/Yb)N图解

    Figure 8. 

    图 9  三水盆地火山岩年龄分布

    Figure 9. 

    图 10  三水盆地演化模式及其与南海演化的关系

    Figure 10. 

    图 11  三水盆地玄武岩与OIB、MORB、玳瑁海山以及U1500样品源区对比

    Figure 11. 

    表 1  三水盆地玄武岩野外及镜下特征

    Table 1.  Field and microscopic characteristics of basalts in Sanshui Basin

    采样地区野外特征镜下结构主要矿物及含量矿物特征
    紫洞(ZD)灰黑色、块状构造,露头呈现明显的柱状节理间粒-间隐结构橄榄石(1%~3%)、单斜辉石(10%~12%)、斜长石(15%~19%)橄榄石无色(0.2~0.3 mm),他形粒状包裹于辉石颗粒中;辉石(2 mm)具筛状熔蚀特征,自形短柱状;斜长石(2~6 mm),发育聚片双晶,可见环带结构。
    王借岗(WJG)黑色、块状构造间隐结构橄榄石(3%~5%)、辉石(10%~15%)、斜长石(20%~36%)橄榄石呈椭圆形粒状(1.5~3 mm)。部分细粒橄榄石被具有环带的辉石包裹在核部。单斜辉石裂隙发育,多见呈八边形的横切面。
    邓群村(DQC)黑色、块状构造间隐结构辉石(5%~10%)、斜长石(约20%)辉石(1 mm)分为两类,一类为未发生变质的新鲜辉石,呈他形,另一类为表面发生滑石化的辉石。
    石头村(STC)黑色、块状构造间粒-间隐结构辉石(约15%)、斜长石(约15%)单斜辉石多见呈八边形的横切面,亦可见发育裂纹,发育较弱的环带。斜长石自形板状,发育清晰、完整的环带结构。部分长石具有熔蚀结构。基质具间隐结构,主要为斜长石微晶。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  三水盆地玄武岩主量元素测试及标准矿物计算结果

    Table 2.  Major element and CIPW results of basalts in Sanshui Basin

    主量元素含量/(wt%) 标准矿物计算/%
    样品编号SiO2Al2O3TiO2Fe2O3Fe2O3TFeOCaOMgOK2ONa2OMnOP2O5FeOTQOrAbAnNeDiHyOlMtIlHmAp
    紫洞ZD-201-A51.6615.881.963.437.017.866.631.613.310.160.5010.100.309.4928.0023.740.009.6718.950.004.973.720.001.16
    ZD-20151.7716.201.953.396.767.966.331.643.350.160.509.820.499.6728.3124.350.009.5717.830.004.923.700.001.16
    14SSZD-N50.9815.842.0311.437.965.851.713.570.150.4910.280.0010.1730.4022.310.0011.4114.410.006.273.890.001.15
    14SSZD-S251.3515.631.9110.977.576.282.043.650.150.459.860.0012.1231.1120.380.0011.5811.192.746.183.650.001.05
    ZD-10152.4615.981.892.976.857.516.172.073.500.140.479.520.0012.2429.6221.780.0010.0616.231.114.313.580.001.08
    14SSZD-S152.4416.001.9110.797.465.222.003.560.150.459.712.1511.8730.3521.930.009.9512.940.006.113.660.001.05
    ZD-20251.4416.162.016.314.348.016.041.653.350.160.5110.032.6610.0329.2024.870.009.9312.940.005.243.920.001.22
    ZD-20351.7016.052.005.534.967.685.811.983.630.150.529.940.7311.9231.3722.090.0010.6213.000.005.183.880.001.22
    18SS082-151.3116.252.020.0011.206.878.245.311.663.330.140.5310.081.309.8628.4224.670.0010.5414.880.005.213.870.001.25
    18SS082-251.8416.122.030.0010.827.948.175.151.803.380.150.539.740.0310.7428.8723.690.0011.2517.370.002.933.880.001.24
    王借岗WJG-20147.2616.782.855.354.838.547.171.764.510.150.819.64 0.0010.3926.6620.336.2513.050.008.277.765.420.001.87
    WJG-20347.8017.362.794.705.208.476.581.684.450.140.829.060.009.9228.9222.464.7211.130.008.836.825.300.001.91
    WJG-20447.0517.272.764.815.538.786.781.694.370.150.819.360.009.9825.7422.556.0712.410.009.176.975.250.001.87
    14SS012c46.5216.922.8811.438.607.002.203.580.150.7210.280.0013.1322.3823.744.4311.490.0011.506.155.510.001.69
    14SS012b46.8616.652.8211.048.977.092.203.510.150.729.930.0013.0822.1623.324.2213.320.0010.915.935.390.001.68
    14SS01246.8916.882.7610.998.677.232.243.460.150.739.890.0013.3122.8024.093.6211.440.0011.855.915.280.001.71
    18SS083-347.7317.022.7910.578.438.536.531.903.880.150.889.510.0011.3425.0923.624.3810.790.0015.601.765.360.002.07
    石头村14SS004-247.7417.402.7912.119.705.081.712.830.150.4910.89 0.0010.1724.1329.980.0012.337.233.546.145.340.001.15
    18SS079-247.7417.482.8111.798.049.825.411.372.910.150.5310.610.008.1424.8030.910.0012.046.556.764.185.390.001.23
    17SS060-147.7217.342.8511.956.8310.005.291.342.850.170.5010.750.008.0024.3030.780.0012.759.751.446.375.460.001.17
    17SS060-247.9817.712.8111.698.079.955.131.302.720.170.5310.520.007.7523.2332.570.0011.2311.623.003.985.390.001.23
    18SS079-147.9017.282.8211.758.4110.015.231.362.960.150.5410.570.008.0925.2630.160.0013.445.107.773.515.420.001.26
    18SS081-847.9017.492.8411.867.609.905.131.472.710.160.5410.670.008.7523.1431.490.0011.7411.082.124.985.450.001.26
    18SS081-748.1317.362.8111.838.109.945.281.382.560.160.5510.640.008.2421.8432.100.0011.4814.481.074.135.390.001.28
    邓群村17SS063-248.9416.262.7313.066.048.334.021.803.460.231.1611.75 2.7810.7329.4823.670.008.147.990.009.275.220.002.72
    19SS023-149.2515.832.8313.676.527.734.121.613.510.261.1912.313.959.5629.9322.850.006.319.830.009.405.410.002.78
    17SS063-149.1116.332.7012.907.358.553.951.643.370.201.2511.612.149.7928.7424.790.007.9611.580.006.925.180.002.91
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  三水盆地玄武岩微量元素测试结果

    Table 3.  Trace elements of basalts in Sanshui Basin

    μg/g
    样品编号YLaCePrNdSmEuGdTbDyHoErTmYbLuLiBeScVCrCo
    紫洞ZD-201-A28.7330.1753.386.8828.276.662.176.241.116.051.102.670.462.880.6222.481.8823.08165.40217.6041.94
    ZD-20127.2629.0751.276.5527.066.502.125.951.065.651.062.540.442.770.6021.491.6521.50155.00192.0037.32
    14SSZD-N29.4028.1053.406.6127.406.232.096.231.005.591.062.810.412.420.361.6121.20159.00139.0042.80
    14SSZD-S228.2028.7054.006.5726.706.011.985.910.955.411.022.730.402.450.371.6720.10148.00184.0038.90
    ZD-10127.4629.5651.976.6127.056.342.095.981.065.571.052.580.432.670.6311.141.7522.47164.90199.3040.25
    14SSZD-S128.5029.3054.706.6927.206.112.016.090.975.441.042.780.412.440.371.5620.70151.00196.0040.80
    ZD-20228.8631.2656.356.7827.536.122.155.810.975.821.072.930.442.830.4719.191.6621.52153.10155.7041.29
    ZD-20329.1032.9958.527.0528.696.302.226.091.015.991.123.060.472.930.4810.121.6421.26152.70147.2039.92
    18SS082-130.0027.8051.606.6427.206.442.255.000.995.171.072.400.462.930.3810.501.3522.10177.00165.0062.30
    18SS082-230.6028.1053.606.6927.306.172.175.280.994.901.072.420.472.840.377.571.7121.90185.00173.0060.50
    王借岗WJG-20128.2641.8976.199.0735.987.312.536.721.045.911.072.890.432.660.4228.131.5823.85211.20154.4041.93
    WJG-20329.7042.8677.979.2136.707.432.556.771.045.941.092.980.432.740.4435.391.6822.69206.40116.2043.74
    WJG-20426.4639.9671.278.5233.696.762.336.290.965.470.992.720.402.520.4132.641.5820.69191.00109.7040.45
    14SS012c27.1037.6070.708.6034.707.062.396.691.005.311.002.610.372.070.321.5621.00211.00116.0045.60
    14SS012b28.5039.2074.209.0136.407.512.507.001.065.651.052.800.392.280.341.5123.40217.00153.0043.50
    14SS01226.1037.2070.008.4834.207.022.386.540.995.230.972.530.352.010.301.5020.70197.00119.0038.20
    18SS083-329.5037.1070.209.1035.707.272.425.761.074.991.092.290.382.520.3725.001.5320.60215.00113.0063.10
    石头村14SS004-224.2024.0049.706.4827.406.192.165.960.925.010.912.400.341.980.291.2524.30240.0067.3042.00
    18SS079-225.1023.1046.306.2025.906.092.204.630.914.460.952.090.352.290.3020.001.2024.90256.0066.7055.30
    17SS060-129.2026.2051.806.8429.606.472.176.081.146.001.122.900.462.720.3818.501.3825.40284.0069.3040.40
    17SS060-226.4023.9050.006.2628.806.362.445.030.974.921.012.120.362.220.3021.701.2624.40272.0068.5081.10
    18SS079-125.1022.8048.406.0927.306.342.134.650.934.711.002.120.342.350.3116.501.2024.60263.0072.9058.10
    18SS081-824.5023.0047.606.4427.506.222.254.730.894.440.982.160.372.290.3132.601.1825.40255.0069.8060.30
    18SS081-725.8023.8050.506.1728.006.442.324.850.994.540.992.140.372.360.3016.301.2023.90248.0066.1058.20
    邓群村17SS063-251.4038.0086.3010.5047.8010.903.8610.501.9410.301.935.090.814.790.6714.001.4929.50176.0040.2038.90
    19SS023-150.4032.5070.209.4342.509.853.599.421.789.211.774.650.764.430.6426.101.7730.20169.0056.0066.90
    17SS063-145.9035.1076.2010.2045.0011.004.077.811.588.481.743.750.663.890.5814.301.5030.10168.0043.0064.00
    样品编号NiCuZnGaRbSrNbMoCdInCsBaTaWTlPbBiThUZrHf
    紫洞ZD-201-A113.1066.44113.9021.9220.80418.2452.551.860.110.080.49394.903.280.640.134.600.033.721.20251.806.03
    ZD-20195.2861.32106.3020.7919.03412.2648.291.660.110.080.39374.303.040.600.223.560.033.751.14250.706.02
    14SSZD-N108.0051.10107.0022.4024.30447.0071.800.48402.004.032.413.821.02256.005.82
    14SSZD-S2126.0042.80102.0021.6039.80414.0074.200.36358.004.152.604.271.15276.006.18
    ZD-101108.2067.06113.1022.3740.96412.9655.071.600.130.080.37363.003.410.510.163.890.033.631.29250.805.79
    14SSZD-S1132.0042.90106.0022.0020.50388.0073.200.18370.004.122.914.271.14280.006.22
    ZD-20292.6844.73102.3821.6520.92444.7054.922.640.080.42398.293.170.530.113.120.0216.471.18263.405.72
    ZD-20386.1040.65105.7021.9134.93410.0054.402.810.090.31367.213.130.600.123.290.0110.291.23239.905.35
    18SS082-1101.0064.80156.0022.3020.90451.0048.802.780.250.070.29391.002.84138.000.092.690.023.310.97129.005.40
    18SS082-2108.0062.60161.0022.7024.50437.0050.003.100.220.070.14367.002.91116.000.072.090.013.140.89137.005.68
    下载: 导出CSV
    续表 3
    样品编号NiCuZnGaRbSrNbMoCdInCsBaTaWTlPbBiThUZrHf


    WJG-20179.5738.12101.9119.0734.53774.8069.841.770.080.97693.932.920.440.108.750.037.991.10181.804.13
    WJG-20377.0638.4788.0419.8633.45825.2074.202.900.081.01739.073.540.470.103.190.0212.401.23202.704.37
    WJG-20472.9434.1687.3718.7831.68829.5070.361.730.070.90742.933.700.450.093.000.0217.891.13192.304.32
    14SS012c93.7036.8083.4019.3046.10895.0090.200.55572.005.072.513.781.09155.003.94
    14SS012b98.3040.3082.3019.7046.90901.0098.000.56605.005.312.713.891.67168.004.34
    14SS01290.7037.2078.4019.0045.80874.0089.700.50572.004.922.443.811.36150.003.94
    18SS083-382.0052.30162.0019.1045.90876.0064.602.830.230.080.71579.003.58116.000.061.780.003.690.83101.004.69


    14SS004-240.7045.60100.0022.6032.40768.0053.100.32318.003.132.572.550.73187.004.56
    18SS079-241.8059.20167.0021.1028.80871.0038.101.990.210.071.90291.002.3096.700.131.380.012.270.6294.504.30
    17SS060-134.7049.00116.0021.4022.50914.0041.101.770.090.071.23699.002.570.350.062.030.012.710.75258.005.55
    17SS060-243.0063.60177.0023.2023.60756.0038.102.070.170.071.01519.002.44201.000.061.600.012.530.6798.804.60
    18SS079-140.0062.20171.0022.0027.20693.0039.902.030.170.071.61329.002.24109.000.104.080.002.410.6398.804.17
    18SS081-841.8066.10172.0022.9025.70610.0038.801.980.210.080.37919.002.24128.000.071.540.002.290.6097.504.48
    18SS081-742.8063.80167.0021.5026.80603.0037.701.900.210.070.58407.002.33107.000.071.480.012.440.6793.304.51


    17SS063-226.6039.20138.0023.1036.20507.0045.702.100.140.093.07498.002.690.470.323.870.012.830.92322.006.75
    19SS023-131.1035.70143.0022.7023.00447.0041.102.160.270.1211.50411.002.99177.000.366.700.034.170.85266.007.16
    17SS063-135.5050.50200.0025.0030.20490.0044.902.510.220.092.50464.002.56129.000.493.390.012.710.85128.005.56
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4  三水盆地玄武岩稀土元素特征值

    Table 4.  The characteristic values for REE of basalts in Sanshui Basin

    样品编号 ΣREE ΣLREE ΣHREE LREE/HREE δEu δCe (La/Sm)N (La/Yb)N (Sm/Nd)N (Gd/Yb)N
    ZD-201-A148.66127.5321.136.0354951.0137540.8595642.8495357.0626460.7248781.748391
    ZD-201142.64122.5720.076.1071251.0245220.8605972.8132267.0753810.7390981.73334
    14SSZD-N143.71123.8319.886.2288731.0154990.9126722.8372087.8284460.6996072.077396
    14SSZD-S2143.2123.9619.246.4428271.0044460.9127953.0038657.8976960.6925961.946561
    ZD-101143.59123.6219.976.1902851.0228250.8602572.9328387.4641050.7211721.807326
    14SSZD-S1145.55126.0119.546.4488230.9972110.9065553.0164728.0958490.6911762.014067
    ZD-202150.53130.1920.346.4006881.0870790.8917463.2129987.4470990.6840091.656671
    ZD-203156.92135.7721.156.4193851.0821720.8821313.2939327.5910050.6756581.677244
    18SS082-1140.33121.9318.46.626631.1699540.8863262.7153886.3967850.7285071.377047
    18SS082-2142.37124.0318.346.7628141.1349390.9119612.8647986.6707180.6954071.500245
    WJG-201194.11172.9721.148.1821191.0852930.9003013.60467310.617280.6251342.03861
    WJG-203198.15176.7221.438.2463841.0801070.9029013.62857610.545960.622931.993814
    WJG-204182.29162.5319.768.2252021.0754670.887653.71836210.690780.6173942.014172
    14SS012c180.42161.0519.378.3144041.048340.9124943.35008712.246220.6260252.607968
    14SS012b189.39168.8220.578.2070981.0379520.9169233.28336411.59140.6348272.477477
    14SS012178.2159.2818.928.4186051.0573210.91433.33333312.477610.6315792.625598
    18SS083-3180.26161.7918.478.759611.106330.8944493.2100559.9256270.6265891.844457
    14SS004-2133.74115.9317.816.5092641.0734240.9424342.4388978.1720430.6951152.429
    18SS079-2125.77109.7915.986.8704631.2190460.9143752.3859846.8008170.7234931.631519
    17SS060-1143.88123.0820.85.9173081.0422430.9120522.547246.494070.6725571.80377
    17SS060-2134.69117.7616.936.95571.2759290.963822.3638167.258210.6794871.828359
    18SS079-1129.47113.0616.416.8897011.1484690.970322.2621356.5411120.7145671.59673
    18SS081-8129.18113.0116.176.9888681.2205840.9278742.3260046.7713760.6959441.666757
    18SS081-7133.77117.2316.547.0876661.2198530.9815632.3246846.7990710.7076921.65835
    17SS063-2233.39197.3636.035.4776581.0891351.0238092.1929565.3485080.7016411.768888
    19SS023-1200.73168.0732.665.146051.1243460.9540372.0754874.9461150.7131221.715907
    17SS063-1210.06181.5728.496.3731131.279370.9582462.0071856.083340.7521371.620123
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 5  三水盆地岩浆熔融柱计算结果

    Table 5.  Calculation results of mantle melting column in Sanshui Basin

    FeO8.0/%Na2O8.0/%FeOprim/%Na2Oprim/%P0 /GPaPf /GPaT0 /℃Tf /℃F/ %Z0 /kmZf /km
    ZD10.033.4210.092.923.032.251 5171 4719.22101.287376.6719
    WJG10.723.2510.682.723.322.481 5551 50610.06110.392584.01884
      注:FeO8.0、Na2O8.0分别表示样品中的FeO、Na2O在MgO=8%时的含量;FeOprim、Na2Oprim分别表示样品所代表的母岩浆在未发生橄榄石分离结晶时FeO、Na2O的含量;P0T0Z0分别表示部分熔融作用发生时的初始压力、温度及深度;PfTfZf分别表示部分熔融作用结束时的终止压力、温度及深度;F表示压力从P0下降至Pf的过程中的总部分熔融程度。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 6  地幔源区矿物组成及La、Yb、Sm总分配系数

    Table 6.  Mineral composition in mantle source and total partition coefficients of La, Yb and Sm

    岩石类型矿物相/% 总分配系数
    橄榄石单斜辉石斜方辉石石榴石尖晶石LaYbSm
    石榴石橄榄岩0.540.090.170.200.005112780.868120.129968
    尖晶石橄榄岩0.460.180.2800.080.009839220.116340.05835
    三水盆地源区0.510.140.240.060.050.007717570.3361550.075927
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Tapponnier P, Peltzer G, Le Dain A Y, et al. Propagating extrusion tectonics in Asia: new insights from simple experiments with plasticine [J]. Geology, 1982, 10(12): 611-616. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1982)10<611:PETIAN>2.0.CO;2

    [2]

    Mai H A, Chan Y L, Yeh M W, et al. Tectonic implications of mesozoic magmatism to initiation of cenozoic basin development within the passive south China Sea margin [J]. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 2018, 107(3): 1153-1174. doi: 10.1007/s00531-017-1537-y

    [3]

    Sun W D. Initiation and evolution of the South China Sea: an overview [J]. Acta Geochimica, 2016, 35(3): 215-225. doi: 10.1007/s11631-016-0110-x

    [4]

    Holloway N H. North palawan block, philippines - its relation to asian mainland and role in evolution of South China Sea [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1982, 66(9): 1355-1383.

    [5]

    Wu J, Suppe J. Proto-South China Sea plate tectonics using subducted slab constraints from tomography [J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2018, 29(6): 1304-1318. doi: 10.1007/s12583-017-0813-x

    [6]

    Xu Y G, Wei J X, Qiu H N, et al. Opening and evolution of the South China Sea constrained by studies on volcanic rocks: preliminary results and a research design [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2012, 57(24): 3150-3164. doi: 10.1007/s11434-011-4921-1

    [7]

    Chen L, Hu J W, Yang D H, et al. Kinematic models for the opening of the South China Sea: an upwelling divergent flow origin [J]. Journal of Geodynamics, 2017, 107: 20-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jog.2017.03.002

    [8]

    林间, 李家彪, 徐义刚, 等. 南海大洋钻探及海洋地质与地球物理前沿研究新突破[J]. 海洋学报, 2019, 41(10):125-140

    LIN Jian, LI Jiabiao, XU Yigang, et al. Ocean drilling and major advances in marine geological and geophysical research of the South China Sea [J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2019, 41(10): 125-140.

    [9]

    Sun Z, Lin J, Qiu N, et al. The role of magmatism in the thinning and breakup of the south China sea continental margin: special topic: the South China Sea ocean drilling [J]. National Science Review, 2019, 6(5): 871-876. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwz116

    [10]

    Ebinger C J, Yemane T, Woldegabriel G, et al. Late eocene - recent volcanism and faulting in the Southern Main Ethiopian rift [J]. Journal of the Geological Society, 1993, 150(1): 99-108. doi: 10.1144/gsjgs.150.1.0099

    [11]

    Christiansen R L, Foulger G R, Evans J R. Upper-mantle origin of the yellowstone hotspot [J]. GSA Bulletin, 2002, 114(10): 1245-1256. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(2002)114<1245:UMOOTY>2.0.CO;2

    [12]

    Putirka K D, Perfit M, Ryerson F J, et al. Ambient and excess mantle temperatures, olivine thermometry, and active vs. passive upwelling [J]. Chemical Geology, 2007, 241(3-4): 177-206. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.01.014

    [13]

    阎贫, 刘海龄. 南海及其周缘中新生代火山活动时空特征与南海的形成模式[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2005, 24(2):33-41 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5470.2005.02.005

    YAN Pin, LIU Hailing. Temporal and spatial distributions of meso-enozoic igneous rocks over south China Sea [J]. Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 2005, 24(2): 33-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5470.2005.02.005

    [14]

    Chung S L, Cheng H, Jahn B M, et al. Major and trace element, and Sr-Nd Isotope constraints on the origin of paleogene volcanism in South China Prior to the South China Sea opening [J]. Lithos, 1997, 40(2-4): 203-220. doi: 10.1016/S0024-4937(97)00028-5

    [15]

    董月霞, 肖龙, 周海民, 等. 广东三水盆地双峰式火山岩: 空间展布、岩石学特征及其盆地动力学意义[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2006, 30(1):82-92 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2006.01.010

    DONG Yuexia, XIAO Long, ZHOU Haimin, et al. Spatial distribution and petrological characteristics of the bimodal volcanic rocks from Sanshui Basin, Guangdong Province: implication for basin dynamics [J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2006, 30(1): 82-92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2006.01.010

    [16]

    肖龙, 周海民, 董月霞, 等. 广东三水盆地火山岩: 地球化学特征及成因-兼论火山岩性质的时空演化和南海形成的深部过程[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2006, 30(1):72-81 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2006.01.009

    XIAO Long, ZHOU Haimin, DONG Yuexia, et al. Geochemistry and petrogenesis of cenozoic volcanic rocks from Sanshui basin: implications for spatial and temporal variation of rock types and constraints on the formation of South China Sea [J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2006, 30(1): 72-81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2006.01.009

    [17]

    袁晓博. 三水盆地新生代岩浆记录与南海早期演化[D]. 中国地质大学(北京)博士学位论文, 2019.

    YUAN Xiaobo. The record of cenozoic magmatism in Sanshui basin and its relationship with the early tectonic evolution stage of the South China Sea[D]. Doctor Dissertation of Chian University of Geoscience (Beijing), 2019.

    [18]

    袁晓博, 方念乔. 三水盆地中渐新世火山记录的新建与南海扩张[J]. 地质通报, 2019, 38(4):689-695

    YUAN Xiaobo, FANG Nianqiao. The new volcanics record in sanshui basin and its relationship with the spreading of the South China Sea [J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2019, 38(4): 689-695.

    [19]

    张维, 方念乔. 广东三水盆地始新世火山岩地球化学特征[J]. 地球科学—中国地质大学学报, 2014, 39(1):37-44 doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2014.004

    ZHANG Wei, FANG Nianqiao. Geochemistry characteristics of eocene volcanic rocks in Sanshui basin, Guangdong [J]. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2014, 39(1): 37-44. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2014.004

    [20]

    杨蜀颖. 南海玳瑁海山与相邻陆域玄武岩的地球化学特征及其构造意义[D]. 中国地质大学(北京)博士学位论文, 2015.

    YANG Shuying. Geochemical characteristics of basalts from the daimao seamount in the South China Sea (SCS) and from the SCS's neighboring lands: implications for the regional tectonic evolution[D]. Doctor Dissertation of Chian University of Geoscience (Beijing), 2015.

    [21]

    朱炳泉, 王慧芬, 陈毓蔚, 等. 新生代华夏岩石圈减薄与东亚边缘海盆构造演化的年代学与地球化学制约[J]. 地球化学, 2002, 31(3):213-221 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0379-1726.2002.03.001

    ZHU Bingquan, WANG Huigfen, CHEN Yuwei, et al. Geochronological and geochemical constraint on the cenozoic extension of cathaysian lithosphere and tectonic evolution of the Border Sea Basins in East Asia [J]. Geochimica, 2002, 31(3): 213-221. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0379-1726.2002.03.001

    [22]

    唐忠驭. 广东三水盆地白垩纪—早第三纪裂谷型火山作用[J]. 广东地质, 1994, 9(1):49-57

    TANG Zhongyu. Cretaceous-eogene rift valley-type volcanism in Sanshui Basin, Guangdong [J]. Guangdong Geology, 1994, 9(1): 49-57.

    [23]

    Ackerman L, Ulrych J, Řanda Z, et al. Geochemical characteristics and petrogenesis of phonolites and trachytic rocks from the ceske stredohori volcanic complex, the Ohre Rift, Bohemian Massif [J]. Lithos, 2015, 224-225: 256-271. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2015.03.014

    [24]

    Yoder H S. Citation-Classic Origin of basalt magmas - an experimental-study of natural and synthetic rock systems [J]. Current Contents, 1986(39): 14-20.

    [25]

    Shand S J. The problem of the alkaline rocks [J]. Proceedings of the Geological Society of South Africa, 1922, 25: 19-33.

    [26]

    Middlemost E A K. Naming materials in the magma/igneous rock system [J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 1994, 37(3-4): 215-24. doi: 10.1016/0012-8252(94)90029-9

    [27]

    焦守涛, 张旗, 葛粲, 等. 碱性岩及碱性与亚碱性岩系列的界线: 基于全球火山岩数据的探讨[J]. 地质通报, 2019, 38(12):1955-1962

    JIAO Shoutao, ZHANG Qi, GE Can, et al. Alkaline rock and the distinction between alkaline and sub-alkaline: a discussion on data of global volcanic rocks [J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2019, 38(12): 1955-1962.

    [28]

    McDonough W F, Sun S S, Ringwood A E, et al. Potassium, rubidium, and cesium in the earth and moon and the evolution of the mantle of the earth [J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1992, 56(3): 1001-1112. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(92)90043-I

    [29]

    Gaschnig R M, Rudnick R L, McDonough W F, et al. Compositional evolution of the upper continental crust through time, as constrained by ancient glacial diamictites [J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2016, 186: 316-43. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2016.03.020

    [30]

    Yu X, Liu Z F. Non-mantle-plume process caused the initial spreading of the South China Sea [J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1): 10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56089-4

    [31]

    Frey F A, Green D H, Roy S D. Integrated models of basalt petrogenesis: a study of quartz tholeiites to olivine melilitites from south Eastern Australia utilizing geochemical and experimental petrological data [J]. Journal of Petrology, 1978, 19(3): 463-513. doi: 10.1093/petrology/19.3.463

    [32]

    Langmuir C H, Klein E M, Plank T. Petrological systematics of mid-ocean ridge basalts: constraints on melt generation beneath ocean ridges[M]//Morgan J P, Blackman D K, Sinton J M. Mantle Flow and Melt Generation at Mid-Ocean Ridges. Washington, D. C. : Geophysical Monograph Series, 1992: 183-280.

    [33]

    梁涛, 罗照华, 李德东, 等. 托云盆地新生代幔源岩浆源区起止深度的限定[J]. 岩石学报, 2008, 24(12):2820-2838

    LIANG Tao, LUO Zhaohua, LI Dedong, et al. Source location identification of cenozoic mantle-derived magma in Tuyon Basin [J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2008, 24(12): 2820-2838.

    [34]

    Wang K, Plank T, Walker J D, et al. A mantle melting profile across the basin and range, SW USA [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2002, 107(B1): ECV 5-1-ECV 5-21. doi: 10.1029/2001JB000209

    [35]

    Cheng L L, Liang T, Zeng L, et al. Mantle melting column software named Calmantle 1.0 and the preliminary discussion on the thickness variation of the Tengchong Cenozoic lithosphere [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(4): 126-134.

    [36]

    Jones C H, Wernicke B P, Farmer G L, et al. Variations across and along a major continental rift: an interdisciplinary study of the basin and Range province, Western USA [J]. Tectonophysics, 1992, 213(1-2): 57-96. doi: 10.1016/0040-1951(92)90252-2

    [37]

    黄海波, 郭兴伟, 夏少红, 等. 华南沿海地区地壳厚度与泊松比研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2014, 57(12):3896-3906 doi: 10.6038/cjg20141204

    HUANG Haibo, GUO Xingwei, XIA Shaohong, et al. Crustal thickness and poisson's ratio in the coastal areas of South China [J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2014, 57(12): 3896-3906. doi: 10.6038/cjg20141204

    [38]

    Kelemen P B, Shimizu N, Dunn T. Relative depletion of niobium in some arc magmas and the continental crust: partitioning of K, Nb, La And Ce during melt/rock reaction in the upper mantle [J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1993, 120(3-4): 111-134. doi: 10.1016/0012-821X(93)90234-Z

    [39]

    徐义刚, 钟孙霖. 峨眉山大火成岩省: 地幔柱活动的证据及其熔融条件[J]. 地球化学杂志, 2001, 30(1):1-9

    XU Yigang, ZHONG Sunlin. The Emeishan large Igneous province: evidence for mantle plume activity and melting conditions [J]. Geochimica, 2001, 30(1): 1-9.

    [40]

    陈盼盼. 三水盆地晚白垩世-始新世火山-沉积序列对南海北缘构造演化的响应[D]. 博士学位论文中国地质大学(北京), 2018.

    CHEN Panpan. The response of late cretaceous-eocene epoch volcanic and sedimentary sequence in sanshui basin to the tectonic evolution of the Northern margin of Southe China Sea[J]. Doctor Dissertation of Chian University of Geoscience (Beijing), 2018.

    [41]

    邹和平, 李平鲁, 饶春涛. 珠江口盆地新生代火山岩地球化学特征及其动力学意义[J]. 地球化学, 1995, 24(S1):33-45

    ZOU Heping, LI Pinglu, RAO Chuntao. Geochemistry of cenozoic volcanic rocks in zhu jiangkou basin and its geodynamic significance [J]. Geochimica, 1995, 24(S1): 33-45.

    [42]

    张斌, 王璞珺, 张功成, 等. 珠—琼盆地新生界火山岩特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(6):657-665 doi: 10.11698/PED.2013.06.03

    ZHANG Bin, WANG Pujun, ZHANG Gongcheng, et al. Cenozoic volcanic rocks in the pearl river mouth and southeast Hainan Basins of South China Sea and their implications for petroleum geology [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(6): 657-665. doi: 10.11698/PED.2013.06.03

    [43]

    李思伟. 珠江口盆地惠州凹陷新生代火山岩: 从岩石成因到火山岩储层[D]. 吉林大学博士学位论文, 2020.

    LI Siwei. Cenozoic volcanic rocks in Huizhou Sag of the Pearl River mouth basin: from petrogenesis to volcanic reservoir[D]. Doctor Dissertation of Jilin University, 2020.

    [44]

    汪云亮, 张成江, 修淑芝. 玄武岩类形成的大地构造环境的Th/Hf-Ta/Hf图解判别[J]. 岩石学报, 2001, 17(3):413-421 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0569.2001.03.009

    WANG Yunliang, ZHANG Chengjiang, XIU Shuzhi. Th/Hf-Ta/Hf identification of tectonic setting of basalts [J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2001, 17(3): 413-421. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0569.2001.03.009

    [45]

    Fitton J G, Saunders A D, Norry M J, et al. Thermal and Chemical Structure of the Iceland Plume [J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1997, 153(3-4): 197-208. doi: 10.1016/S0012-821X(97)00170-2

    [46]

    Bevins R E, Kokelaar B P, Dunkley P N. Petrology and geochemistry of lower to middle ordovician igneous rocks in wales: a volcanic arc to marginal basin transition [J]. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 1984, 95(4): 337-347. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7878(84)80064-4

    [47]

    Weaver B L. The origin of ocean island basalt end-member compositions: trace element and isotopic constraints [J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1991, 104(2-4): 381-391. doi: 10.1016/0012-821X(91)90217-6

    [48]

    Hart S R, Hauri E H, Oschmann L A, et al. Mantle plumes and entrainment: isotopic evidence [J]. Science, 1992, 256(5056): 517-520. doi: 10.1126/science.256.5056.517

    [49]

    阙晓铭, 李元森, 陈会霞, 等. 深部地幔在白云凹陷的岩浆记录: 基于BY7火山岩的地球化学研究[J]. 华南地质与矿产, 2013, 29(2):105-115

    QUE Xiaoming, LI Yuansen, CHEN Huixia, et al. Geochemistry research on the deep mantle activity in baiyun sag during the cenozoic from the volcanic rocks of well By7 [J]. Geology and Mineral Resources of South China, 2013, 29(2): 105-115.

    [50]

    Zhang G L, Sun W D, Seward G. Mantle source and magmatic evolution of the dying spreading ridge in the South China Sea [J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2018, 19(11): 4385-4399. doi: 10.1029/2018GC007570

    [51]

    Zou H B, Fan Q C. U-Th isotopes in Hainan basalts: Implications for sub-asthenospheric origin of EM2 mantle endmember and the dynamics of melting beneath Hainan Island [J]. Lithos, 2010, 116(1-2): 145-152. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2010.01.010

    [52]

    Lee C T A, Luffi P, Plank T, et al. Constraints on the depths and temperatures of basaltic magma generation on Earth and other terrestrial planets using new thermobarometers for mafic magmas [J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2009, 279(1-2): 20-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jpgl.2008.12.020

    [53]

    Katz R F, Spiegelman M, Langmuir C H. A new parameterization of hydrous mantle melting [J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2003, 4(9): 1073.

  • 加载中

(11)

(7)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1797
  • PDF下载数:  33
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2020-09-29
修回日期:  2020-12-23
刊出日期:  2021-06-28

目录