大兴安岭巴雅尔吐胡硕地区碎斑熔岩锆石U-Pb年龄、地球化学特征及其地质意义

申亮, 赵胜金, 于海洋, 柳志辉, 周颖帅, 苏建国, 杨海星, 高利东. 大兴安岭巴雅尔吐胡硕地区碎斑熔岩锆石U-Pb年龄、地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 地质通报, 2019, 38(8): 1314-1326.
引用本文: 申亮, 赵胜金, 于海洋, 柳志辉, 周颖帅, 苏建国, 杨海星, 高利东. 大兴安岭巴雅尔吐胡硕地区碎斑熔岩锆石U-Pb年龄、地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 地质通报, 2019, 38(8): 1314-1326.
SHEN Liang, ZHAO Shengjin, YU Haiyang, LIU Zhihui, ZHOU Yingshuai, SU Jianguo, YANG Haixing, GAO Lidong. Geochemical characteristics and zircon U-Pb ages of porphyroclastic lava in the Bayaerhushuo area, the south-central segment of Great Xing'an Range, and its geological significance[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2019, 38(8): 1314-1326.
Citation: SHEN Liang, ZHAO Shengjin, YU Haiyang, LIU Zhihui, ZHOU Yingshuai, SU Jianguo, YANG Haixing, GAO Lidong. Geochemical characteristics and zircon U-Pb ages of porphyroclastic lava in the Bayaerhushuo area, the south-central segment of Great Xing'an Range, and its geological significance[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2019, 38(8): 1314-1326.

大兴安岭巴雅尔吐胡硕地区碎斑熔岩锆石U-Pb年龄、地球化学特征及其地质意义

  • 基金项目:
    中国地质调查局项目《内蒙古1:5万吐卜钦、巴雅尔吐胡硕、哈达营子、阿拉哈达、乙旦架拉嘎幅区域地质调查》(编号:DD20160048-15)、《大兴安岭成矿带突泉-翁牛特地区地质矿产调查》(编号:DD20160048)、《内蒙古1:5万包尔呼吉塔拉等八幅区域地质调查》(编号:DD20160048-11)和《地学信息产品开发与社会化服务》(编号:DD20190405)
详细信息
    作者简介: 申亮(1983-), 女, 博士, 工程师, 从事区域地质和显微构造研究。E-mail:2547163401@qq.com
    通讯作者: 赵胜金(1982-), 男, 在读博士生, 高级工程师, 矿物学、岩石学、矿床学专业, 从事区域地质矿产调查工作。E-mail:zhshjin2008@163.com
  • 中图分类号: P588.12+1;P534.53

Geochemical characteristics and zircon U-Pb ages of porphyroclastic lava in the Bayaerhushuo area, the south-central segment of Great Xing'an Range, and its geological significance

More Information
  • 在大兴安岭中南段巴雅尔吐胡硕地区发现一套碎斑熔岩。根据野外调查,可分为中心相的细微粒斑状石英二长岩(-石英二长斑岩)和边缘相的英安流纹质碎斑熔岩。通过SHRIMP锆石U-Pb测年,获得细微粒斑状石英二长岩的年龄加权平均值为137.4±0.9Ma(MSWD=1.13),英安流纹质碎斑熔岩的年龄加权平均值为135.2±0.8Ma(MSWD=1.17),二者的形成时代均属于早白垩世早期。由元素地球化学分析可知,6件样品均属于过铝质的高钾钙碱性A型花岗岩,且具有完全一致的微量元素蛛网图和稀土元素配分曲线,均具有明显的负Eu异常,均富集大离子亲石元素Rb、Pb和轻稀土元素,亏损高场强元素Nb,Th较富集,Ba、Sr、Eu具有一定亏损,Pb强烈富集,表明岩石来源于地壳部分熔融。在构造环境判别分析的基础上,提出研究区碎斑熔岩属于碰撞后或造山期后的张性构造环境花岗岩(A2型花岗岩),形成于拉张环境,代表了伸展的大地构造背景。结合大兴安岭地区的大地构造演化特征,其形成与蒙古-鄂霍茨克闭合造山后的岩石圈伸展作用有关。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  研究区大地构造位置(a,据参考文献[9]修改)和地质简图(b)

    Figure 1. 

    图 图版Ⅰ   

    Figure 图版Ⅰ. 

    图 2  细微粒斑状石英二长岩(PM26-31)和英安流纹质碎斑熔岩(PM26-40)锆石阴极发光(CL)图像

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  细微粒斑状石英二长岩(PM26-31)和英安流纹质碎斑熔岩(PM26-40)锆石U-Pb年龄谐和图

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  碎斑熔岩TAS(a,底图据参考文献[12])、SiO2-K2O(b,底图据参考文献[13-14])和A/CNK-A/NK(c,底图据参考文献[15])图解

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  碎斑熔岩稀土元素球粒陨石标准化配分模式(a)和微量元素原始地幔标准化蛛网图(b)

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  花岗岩判别图解(底图据参考文献[17])

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  花岗岩构造环境判别图解

    Figure 7. 

    表 1  碎斑熔岩SHRIMP锆石U-Th-Pb测年数据分析结果

    Table 1.  SHRIMIP zircon U-Th-Pb data for the porphyroclastic lava

    点号 元素含量 232Th/238U 同位素比值 年龄/Ma
    206Pbc/% U/10-6 Th/10-6 206Pb*/10-6 207Pb*/206Pb* 207Pb*/235U 206Pb*/238U 206Pb/238U
    细微粒斑状石英二长岩PM26-31
    1 0.47 493 134 9.09 0.28 0.0487 6.7 0.1433 6.8 0.0214 1.4 136.3 1.8
    2 0 467 149 8.61 0.33 0.0498 3.3 0.1477 3.6 0.0215 1.3 137.1 1.8
    3 0.42 746 303 13.6 0.42 0.0469 5.2 0.1369 5.4 0.0212 1.3 135 1.7
    4 0.36 711 274 13.2 0.4 0.0471 4.3 0.1395 4.4 0.0215 1.2 136.9 1.7
    5 0.3 326 118 6.06 0.37 0.0504 6.7 0.15 6.8 0.0216 1.4 137.6 2.0
    6 0.49 612 184 11.3 0.31 0.0475 4 0.1402 4.2 0.0214 1.3 136.5 1.7
    7 0.1 710 226 13.3 0.33 0.0487 4 0.1456 4.2 0.0217 1.2 138.4 1.7
    8 0.36 457 186 8.44 0.42 0.046 4.4 0.1357 4.6 0.0214 1.3 136.6 1.8
    9 0.09 1204 390 23 0.33 0.04881 2 0.1492 2.4 0.0221 1.2 141.4 1.6
    10 10.42 518 160 10.7 0.32 0.053 22 0.157 22 0.0214 1.9 136.7 2.6
    11 0.73 608 305 11 0.52 0.0455 7.3 0.1313 7.4 0.0209 1.3 133.5 1.7
    12 0.23 626 354 11.8 0.58 0.0496 4 0.1497 4.2 0.0219 1.2 139.6 1.7
    13 -- 835 325 15.6 0.4 0.0487 2.3 0.1459 2.6 0.0217 1.2 138.6 1.6
    14 0 636 170 11.8 0.28 0.0472 2.8 0.1406 3.1 0.0216 1.3 137.9 1.7
    15 0 530 194 9.81 0.38 0.0493 3 0.1466 3.3 0.0216 1.3 137.5 1.7
    16 0.26 512 201 9.5 0.41 0.0504 4.5 0.1497 4.7 0.0215 1.3 137.4 1.8
    英安流纹质碎斑熔岩PM26-40
    1 0.15 935 260 17.1 0.29 0.0478 3.1 0.1398 3.3 0.0212 1.2 135.3 1.6
    2 10.15 405 134 8 0.34 0.042 31 0.12 31 0.0207 2.1 131.8 2.7
    3 0 672 295 12.3 0.45 0.0471 2.6 0.1384 2.9 0.0213 1.2 135.9 1.6
    4 0 399 144 7.2 0.37 0.0505 3.3 0.1463 3.6 0.0210 1.3 134.1 1.7
    5 0 478 179 8.89 0.39 0.0499 3 0.149 3.3 0.0217 1.3 138.1 1.7
    6 0.11 381 149 6.98 0.4 0.0515 5.7 0.1513 5.8 0.0213 1.4 135.8 1.9
    7 0.23 1108 342 20.8 0.32 0.0477 2.6 0.1431 2.8 0.0218 1.2 138.8 1.6
    8 0.06 990 454 18.1 0.47 0.0486 4.3 0.1425 4.5 0.0213 1.2 135.6 1.6
    9 0.06 1061 359 19.2 0.35 0.0484 4 0.1406 4.2 0.0211 1.2 134.6 1.6
    10 0.58 577 189 10.4 0.34 0.048 3.8 0.1376 4 0.0208 1.3 132.7 1.7
    11 -- 730 279 13.3 0.4 0.0492 2.5 0.1436 2.8 0.0212 1.2 135.1 1.6
    12 0.28 504 109 9.02 0.22 0.0487 3.7 0.1395 3.9 0.0208 1.3 132.6 1.7
    13 1.41 853 425 15.6 0.52 0.0451 9.8 0.13 9.9 0.021 1.3 133.7 1.7
    14 0.13 360 113 6.53 0.32 0.0478 6.4 0.1388 6.5 0.0211 1.4 134.4 1.9
    15 0.15 1631 552 30 0.35 0.04782 1.9 0.1411 2.2 0.0214 1.1 136.6 1.5
    16 0.08 732 392 13.5 0.55 0.0494 4.8 0.1465 4.9 0.0215 1.3 137.3 1.7
    17 0.13 1107 405 20 0.38 0.0485 2.3 0.1407 2.6 0.0210 1.2 134.1 1.6
    注:Pbc和Pb*分别代表普通铅和放射性成因铅
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  碎斑熔岩主量、微量和稀土元素分析结果

    Table 2.  Major, trace and REEs data for volcanic rocks of the porphyroclastic lava in the Bayaerhushuo area, the south-central segment of Great Xing' an Range

    元素 细微粒斑状石英二长岩(-石英二长斑岩) 英安流纹质碎斑熔岩
    PM26-31 PM26-26 PM26-23 PM26-57 PM26-40 PM26-17
    SiO2 68.26 68.91 69.04 71.07 71.02 71.38
    TiO2 0.42 0.61 0.48 0.59 0.34 0.43
    Al2O3 15.17 15.13 15.27 14.86 14.93 14.76
    Fe2O3 1.79 2.4 0.78 1.08 0.92 1.43
    FeO 3.26 2.32 3.48 2.36 2 1.76
    MnO 0.1 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.05
    MgO 0.74 0.65 1.07 0.48 0.77 0.48
    CaO 1.58 1.79 1.72 1.55 2.08 1.82
    Na2O 3.52 3.94 4.05 4 4.02 3.92
    K2O 5.04 4.21 3.96 3.94 3.81 3.94
    P2O5 0.11 0.01 0.12 0.02 0.07 0.02
    Li 22.21 26.25 21.53 22.77 16.23 15.26
    Be 2.98 3.43 3.51 3.78 4.04 3.85
    Sc 4.88 4.89 4.9 3.44 3.44 3.41
    Ti 2573.69 2562.46 2564.4 1625.08 1808.61 1675.53
    V 19.55 18.24 18.98 12.96 13.33 12.71
    Cr 2.66 6.08 2.71 3.78 2.83 3.11
    Mn 636.53 206.99 249.42 220.3 265.92 274.95
    Co 2.55 2.74 2.97 2.88 3 2.45
    Ni 2.31 5.02 6.12 5.68 3.43 3.73
    Cu 199.63 41.48 8.36 13.56 8.34 6.97
    Zn 110.4 70.29 98.29 49.84 86.93 80.25
    Ga 22.16 21.14 20.85 20.84 20.86 20.77
    Ge 1.68 1.51 1.55 1.51 1.5 1.56
    As 12.57 26.24 7.32 14.81 16.76 6.69
    Rb 196.1 188.85 175.62 180.36 187.58 178.01
    Sr 200.21 275.98 293.04 226.24 220.23 246.85
    Y 18.55 24.64 24.46 22.11 24.85 22.98
    Zr 107.84 111.6 112.57 103.66 111.91 108.37
    Nb 8.8 8.71 8.75 7.78 8.03 8.08
    Mo 1.43 1.43 0.57 1.31 0.34 0.56
    Cd 0.16 0.58 0.58 0.2 0.65 0.09
    In 0.59 0.13 0.15 0.05 0.05 0.06
    Sn 14.31 15.14 17.35 8.83 7.77 7.75
    Sb 0.72 0.52 0.44 0.64 1.06 0.53
    Cs 3.95 5.22 3.67 3.89 4.13 3.53
    Ba 794.05 659.02 615.76 500.36 477.23 532.78
    La 22.01 26.33 30.78 22.33 28.66 29.35
    Ce 55.23 55.28 55.6 54.87 54.75 57.48
    Pr 5.01 6.08 6.46 5.37 6.29 6.23
    Nd 17.18 21.72 23.75 18.9 22.29 22.13
    P 480.11 43.65 523.75 87.29 305.52 87.29
    Sm 3.46 4.46 4.43 3.77 4.13 4.26
    Eu 0.66 0.95 0.91 0.69 0.65 0.78
    Gd 4.19 5 5.3 4.46 4.57 4.98
    Tb 0.62 0.75 0.75 0.65 0.7 0.7
    Dy 3.41 4.1 4.13 3.58 4.02 3.73
    Ho 0.64 0.81 0.79 0.71 0.78 0.74
    Er 2.15 2.62 2.53 2.4 2.55 2.43
    Tm 0.31 0.38 0.37 0.37 0.38 0.36
    Yb 2.22 2.73 2.66 2.66 2.7 2.61
    Lu 0.35 0.4 0.42 0.39 0.43 0.39
    Hf 3.46 3.48 3.56 3.46 3.75 3.76
    Ta 0.9 0.93 0.89 0.98 0.94 1.05
    K 41838.55 34948.47 32873.15 32707.12 31627.95 32707.12
    W 3.62 0.91 0.93 1.31 1.34 0.82
    Tl 1.68 1.37 1.35 0.98 1.00 0.83
    Pb 29.53 28.25 49.92 18.50 28.12 26.01
    Bi 0.17 0.58 0.26 0.57 0.84 0.30
    Th 18.67 20.28 18.87 24.88 23.08 25.70
    U 3.85 2.87 3.04 5.12 3.07 4.59
    A/CNK 1.07 1.06 1.09 1.09 1.03 1.05
    A/NK 1.35 1.37 1.39 1.37 1.39 1.38
    ∑REE 140.87 161.14 168.24 146.70 161.19 162.56
    ∑LREE 126.98 144.35 151.29 131.48 145.06 146.62
    ∑HREE 13.89 16.79 16.95 15.22 16.13 15.94
    ∑LREE/∑HREE 9.14 8.60 8.93 8.64 8.99 9.20
    δEu 0.53 0.61 0.57 0.51 0.46 0.52
    (La/Yb)N 6.68 6.50 7.80 5.66 7.16 7.58
    (Ce/Yb)N 6.44 5.24 5.41 5.34 5.25 5.70
    注:主量元素含量单位为%,微量和稀土元素含量单位为10-6
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    陶奎元, 黄光昭, 王美星, 等.中国东南部碎斑熔岩基本特征及成因基理的探讨[J].中国地质科学院南京地质矿产研究所所刊, 1985, 6(1):1-19. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=HY000002490483

    [2]

    赖绍聪, 徐海江.内蒙古镶白旗碎斑熔岩长石特征及其岩石学意义[J].矿物学报, 1990, 12(1):26-35.

    [3]

    赵焕利, 韩彦东, 李仰春, 等.大兴安岭北段斯木科流纹质碎斑熔岩特征及成因[J].地质与资源, 2004, 13(4):207-210. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2004.04.003

    [4]

    崔天日, 杨芳林, 司秋亮, 等.大兴安岭中段柴河地区碎斑熔岩的发现及其意义[J].地质与资源, 2012, 21(1):35-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2012.01.006

    [5]

    司秋亮, 崔天日, 王恩德, 等.大兴安岭柴河流纹质碎斑熔岩锆石U-Pb定年及成因探讨[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 35(3):443-446. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3026.2014.03.031

    [6]

    曹光跃, 刘哲, 薛怀民.内蒙古西太仆寺破火山碎斑熔岩与流纹岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄和地球化学特征[J].地质通报, 2018, 37(2/3):397-410. http://dzhtb.cgs.cn/gbc/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2018020318&flag=1

    [7]

    周万蓬, 郭福生, 刘林清, 等.中国东南部碎斑熔岩问题再探讨[J].资源调查与环境, 2015, 36(6):98-103. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hsdzykc201502003

    [8]

    谢家莹, 陶奎元, 谢芳贵, 等.熔离熔结凝灰岩及其成因[J].中国地质科学院南京地质矿产研究所所刊, 1986, 7(4):76-87. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=HY000001799999

    [9]

    徐久磊, 郑常青, 施璐, 等.大兴安岭北段雅尔根楚Ⅰ型花岗岩年代学、岩石地球化学及其地球动力学意义[J].地质学报, 2013, 87(9):1311-1321. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dizhixb201309009

    [10]

    宋彪, 张玉海, 万渝生, 等.锆石SHRIMP样品靶制作、年龄测定及有关现象讨论[J].地质评论, 2002, 48(S1):26-30. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/OA000005931

    [11]

    Ludwig K R. User's Manual for Isoplot 3.00: A Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel[M]. Berkeley: Berkeley Geochronolog-ical Center Special Publication, 2003.

    [12]

    Le Maitre R W. A classification of igneous rocks and glossary of terms[M]. Blackwell, Oxford, 1989: 193.

    [13]

    Peccerillo R, Taylor S R. Geochemistry of eocene calc-alkaline volcanic rocks from the Kastamonu area, Northern Turkey[J]. Con-trib. Mineral Petrol., 1976, 58:63-81. doi: 10.1007/BF00384745

    [14]

    Middlemost E A K. Magmas and Magmatic Rocks[M]. London:Longman, 1985:1-266.

    [15]

    Maniar P D, Piccoli P M. Tectonic discrimination of granitoids[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1989, 101(5):635-643. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1989)101<0635:TDOG>2.3.CO;2

    [16]

    Sun S S, McDongough W F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oce-anic basalts: implications for mantle composition and processes[C]//Saunders A D, Norry M J. Magmatism in Ocean Basins. Geological Society of Special Publication, London, 1989, 42: 313-345.

    [17]

    Whalen J B, Currie K L, Chappell B W. A-type granites:geo-chemical characteristics, discriminatuon and petrogenesis[J]. Contri-butions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1987, 95:407-419. doi: 10.1007/BF00402202

    [18]

    Turner S, Sandiford M, Foden J. Some geodynamic and composi-tional constraints on "postorogenic" magmatism[J]. Geology, 1992, 20(10):931-934. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1992)020<0931:SGACCO>2.3.CO;2

    [19]

    Yang J H, Wu F Y, Chung S L, et al. A hybrid origin for the Qian-shan A-type granite, northeast China:geochemical and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic evidence[J]. Lithos, 2006, 89(1):89-106.

    [20]

    Hofmann A W.Chemical differentiation of the Earth:the relation-ship between mantle, continental crust, and oceanic crust[J]. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 1988, 90:297-314. doi: 10.1016/0012-821X(88)90132-X

    [21]

    Taylor S R, McLennan S M. The continental crust:Its composi-tion and evolution[M]. Oxford:Blackwell, 1985.

    [22]

    Wedepohl K H. The composition of the continental crust[J]. Geo-chimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1995, 59(7):1217-1232. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(95)00038-2

    [23]

    高山, 骆庭川, 张本仁, 等.中国东部地壳的结构和组成[J].中国科学(D辑), 1999, 29(3):204-213. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgkx-cd199903002

    [24]

    Creaser R A, Price R C, Wormald R J. A-type granites revisited:assessment of a residual-source model[J]. Geology, 1991, 19(2):163-166. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1991)019<0163:ATGRAO>2.3.CO;2

    [25]

    Litvinovsky B A, Steele I M, Wickham S M. Silicic magma forma-tion in Overthickened Crust:melting of Charnockite and Leuco-granite at 15, 20 and 25 kbar[J]. Journal of Petrology, 2000, 41(5):717-737. doi: 10.1093/petrology/41.5.717

    [26]

    Skjerlie K P, Johnston A D. Fluid-absent melting behavior of an F-rich tonalitic gneiss at mid-crustal pressures:implications for the generation of anorogenic granites[J]. Journal of Petrology, 1993, 34(4):785-815. doi: 10.1093/petrology/34.4.785

    [27]

    Douce A E P. Generation of metaluminous A-type granites by low-pressure melting of calc-alkaline granitoids[J]. Geology, 1997, 25(8):743-746. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0743:GOMATG>2.3.CO;2

    [28]

    King P L, White A J R, Chappell B W, et al. Characterization and origin of aluminous A-type granites from the Lachlan Fold Belt, southeastern Australia[J]. Journal of Petrology, 1997, 38(3):371-391. doi: 10.1093/petroj/38.3.371

    [29]

    隋振民, 陈跃民.大兴安岭东部花岗岩类锆石饱和温度及其地质意义[J].世界地质, 2011, 30(2):162-172. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2011.02.003

    [30]

    Shao J A, Zang S X, Mou B L, et al.Extensional tectonics and asthe-nospheric upwelling in the orogenic belt:a case study from Hing-gan-Mongolia Orogenic belt[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 1994, 39:533-537. doi: 10.1360/csb1994-39-6-533

    [31]

    邵济安, 张履桥, 牟保磊.大兴安岭中南段中生代的构造热演化[J].中国科学(D辑), 1998, 28(3):193-200. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-9267.1998.03.003

    [32]

    邵济安, 张履桥, 牟保磊.大兴安岭中生代伸展造山过程中的岩浆作用[J].地学前缘, 1999, 6(4):339-346. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.1999.04.017

    [33]

    邵济安, 张履桥, 贾文, 等.内蒙古喀喇沁变质核杂岩及其隆升机制探讨[J].岩石学报, 2001, 17(2):283-290. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98200102013

    [34]

    林强, 葛文春, 孙德有, 等.中国东北地区中生代火山岩的大地构造意义[J].地质科学, 1998, 33(2):129-139. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199800069875

    [35]

    林强, 葛文春, 曹林, 等.大兴安岭中生代双峰式火山岩的地球化学特征[J].地球化学, 2003, 32(3):208-222. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0379-1726.2003.03.002

    [36]

    Fan W M, Guo F, Wang Y J, et al. Late Mesozoic Calc-alkaline Volcanism of Post-orogenic Extension in the Northern Da Hing-ganMountains, Northeastern China[J]. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 2003, 121(1):115-135.

    [37]

    Zhang J H, Ge W C, Wu F Y, et al. Large-scale Early Cretaceous volcanic events in the northern Great Xing'an Range, northeastern China[J]. Lithos, 2008, 102(1):138-157.]38[Zhang J H, Gao S, Ge W C, et al. Geochronology of the Mesozoic volcanic rocks in the Great Xing'an Range, northeastern China:Implications for subduction-induced delamination[J]. Chemical Geology, 2010, 276(3):144-165. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=d14ba8be8a38a9512101ffec46cee93d

    [38]

    Liu J L, Davis G A, Lin Z Y, et al. The Liaonan metamorphic core complex, Southeastern Liaoning Province, North China:a likely contribution to Cretaceous rotation of Eastern Liaoning, Korea and contiguous areas[J]. Tectonophysics, 2005, 407:65-80. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2005.07.001

    [39]

    Liu J L, Guan H M, Ji M, et al. Late Mesozoic metamorphic core complexes:new constraints on lithosphere thinning in North China[J]. Prog. Nat. Sci., 2006, 16(6):633-638. doi: 10.1080/10020070612330045

    [40]

    刘俊来, Davis G A, 纪沫, 等.地壳的拆离作用与华北克拉通破坏:晚中生代伸展构造约束[J].地学前缘, 2008, 15(3):72-81. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2008.03.005

    [41]

    刘俊来, 纪沫, 申亮, 等.辽东半岛早白垩世伸展构造组合、形成时代及区域构造内涵[J].中国科学(D辑), 2011, 41(5):618-637. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgkx-cd201105003

    [42]

    关会梅, 刘俊来, 纪沫, 等.辽宁南部万福变质核杂岩的发现及其区域构造意义[J].地学前缘, 2008, 15(3):199-208. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2008.03.016

    [43]

    纪沫, 刘俊来, 胡玲, 等.辽南变质核杂岩饮马湾山和赵房岩体锆石SHRIMPU-Pb年龄及其地质意义[J].地质学报, 2009, 25(1):173-181.

    [44]

    林伟, 王清晨, 王军, 等.辽东半岛晚中生代伸展构造——华北克拉通破坏的地壳响应[J].中国科学(D辑), 2011, 41(5):638-653.

    [45]

    Darby B J, Davis G A, Zhang X H, et al. The newly discovered Waziyu metamorphic core complex, Yiwulü Shan, western Liaon-ing Province, Northwest China[J]. Earth Sci. Front., 2004, 11(3):143-155.

    [46]

    申亮, 刘俊来, 纪沫, 等.辽东半岛大营子拆离断层系及其区域构造意义[J].中国科学(D辑), 2011, 41(4):437-451. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/7241306

    [47]

    张旗.中国东部中生代岩浆活动与太平洋板块向西俯冲有关吗?[J].岩石矿物学杂志, 2013, 32(1):113-128. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2013.01.010

    [48]

    张乐彤, 李世超, 赵庆英, 等.大兴安岭中段白音高老组火山岩的形成时代及地球化学特征[J].世界地质, 2015, 34(1):44-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2015.01.006

    [49]

    许文良, 王枫, 裴福萍, 等.中国东北中生代构造体制与区域成矿背景:来自中生代火山岩组合时空变化的制约[J].岩石学报, 2013, 29(2):339-353. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201302001

    [50]

    Maruyama S, Send T. Orogeny and relative plate motions:Example of the Japanese Islands[J]. Tectonophysics, 1986, 127(3/4):305-329.

    [51]

    Kimura G, Takahashi M, Kono M. Mesozoic collision-extrusion tectonics in eastern Asia[J]. Tectonophysics, 1990, 181(1/4):15-23.

    [52]

    孙德有, 苟军, 任云生, 等.满洲里南部玛尼吐组火山岩锆石UPb年龄与地球化学研究[J].岩石学报, 2011, 27(10):3083-3094.

    [53]

    Tang J, Xu W L, Wang F, et al. Geochronology and geochemistry of Early-Middle Triassic magmatism in the Erguna Massif, NE Chi-na:constraints on the tectonic evolution of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean[J]. Lithos, 2014, 184/187(1):1-16.

    [54]

    Metelkin D V, Vernikovsky V A, Kazansky A Y, et al. Late Meso-zoic tectonics of central Asia based on paleomagnetic evidence[J]. Gondwana Research, 2010, 18(2):400-419.

    [55]

    Eby G N. Chemical subdivision of the A-type granitoids:Petroge-netic and tectonic implications[J]. Geology, 1992, 20:641-644. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1992)020<0641:CSOTAT>2.3.CO;2

    [56]

    Pearce J A, Harris N B W, Tindle A G. Trace element discrimina-tion diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks[J]. Journal of Petrology, 1984, 25:956-983. doi: 10.1093/petrology/25.4.956

    [57]

    Foster H J, Tischendorf G, Trumbull R B. An evaluation of the Rb-(Y+Nb) discrimination diagram to infer tectonic setting of si-licic igneous rocks[J]. Lithos, 1997, 40:261-293. doi: 10.1016/S0024-4937(97)00032-7

  • 加载中

(8)

(2)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  672
  • PDF下载数:  4
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2018-10-12
修回日期:  2019-03-18
刊出日期:  2019-08-15

目录