中国地质调查局主办
高级检索

在大数据背景下看TAS分类的不足及可能的解决方案

,  ,  ,  ,  , 

文章导航 > 地质通报 > 2019 > 38(12): 1943-1954

上一篇

下一篇

张旗, 葛粲, 焦守涛, 袁峰, 张明明, 刘惠云. 在大数据背景下看TAS分类的不足及可能的解决方案[J]. 地质通报, 2019, 38(12): 1943-1954.
引用本文: 张旗, 葛粲, 焦守涛, 袁峰, 张明明, 刘惠云. 在大数据背景下看TAS分类的不足及可能的解决方案[J]. 地质通报, 2019, 38(12): 1943-1954.
shu
ZHANG Qi, GE Can, JIAO Shoutao, YUAN Feng, ZHANG Mingming, LIU Huiyun. The deficiencies and possible solutions of TAS classification in the context of big data[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2019, 38(12): 1943-1954.
Citation: ZHANG Qi, GE Can, JIAO Shoutao, YUAN Feng, ZHANG Mingming, LIU Huiyun. The deficiencies and possible solutions of TAS classification in the context of big data[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2019, 38(12): 1943-1954.
shu

在大数据背景下看TAS分类的不足及可能的解决方案

  • 1.

    中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所, 北京 100029

  • 2.

    中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所岩石圈演化国家重点实验室, 北京 100029

  • 3.

    合肥工业大学资源与环境工程学院, 安徽 合肥 230009

  • 4.

    合肥工业大学矿集区立体探测实验室, 安徽 合肥 230009

  • 5.

    合肥工业大学安徽省矿产资源与矿山环境工程技术研究中心, 安徽 合肥 230009

  • 6.

    中国地质调查局发展研究中心, 北京 100037

  • 基金项目:
    中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所岩石圈演化国家重点实验室项目《镁铁-超镁铁岩大数据研究》（编号：81300001）、国家青年科学基金项目《地震和重力数据联合约束下的苏鲁皖地区壳幔结构反演研究》（批准号：41504042）、国家重点研发计划项目《基于“地质云”平台的深部找矿知识挖掘》（编号：2016YFC0600510）和《基于地质云的地质灾害基础信息提取与大数据分析挖掘》（编号：2018YFC1505501）
详细信息
    作者简介: 张旗(1937-), 男, 研究员, 岩石学和地球化学专业。E-mail:zq1937@126.com

  • 中图分类号: P588.14;P628

The deficiencies and possible solutions of TAS classification in the context of big data

  • 1.

    Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China

  • 2.

    State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China

  • 3.

    School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, Anhui, China

  • 4.

    Laboratory of Three-Dimensional Exploration for Mineral District, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, Anhui, China

  • 5.

    Anhui Provincial Engineering Research Center for Mineral Resources and Mine Environments, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, Anhui, China

  • 6.

    Development Research Center, China Geological Survey, Beijing 100037, China

    摘要

  • 火山岩TAS分类是国际地质科学联合会在1989年第28届国际地质大会上通过的，迄今已经40年了。该分类对推进岩石学和地球化学的研究起了积极的作用，规范了岩石（尤其火山岩）的命名，方便了学术界的交流。但是，不能不承认，早先的研究，由于分析方法、分析技术以及数据量的限制，是存在某些局限性的。现在，全球已积累了海量的数据，应当有条件对火山岩的分类做一个新的探讨了。文中讨论了TAS分类的初衷、分类的原则及存在的问题，推出了新的TAS分类方案。早先的分类一共划分了15个岩区，新的方案压缩为10个，其中9个保留了早先的命名，新增一个碱流岩区。新的TAS图最大的变化在碱性岩系列，在新的TAS图中，碱性岩系列呈"人"字形分布，把粗玄岩系列封闭起来，弥补了早先的TAS分类在酸性岩部分的不足，还发现TAS图理论上可能存在的一些问题。本文的探讨是初步的，只是抛砖引玉，希望能够引起学术界的关注，开启利用大数据方法对TAS分类的新的研究。

    The TAS diagram, which is widely used in academia, is a classification scheme for volcanic rocks approved by IUGS in 1989. This classification has been active in advancing the research on petrology and geochemistry, regulating the naming of rocks (especially volcanic rocks) and facilitating the exchange of academia. However, it cannot be denied that earlier studies had some limitations due to analytical methods, analytical techniques and data volume limitations. Now that the world has accumulated a huge amount of data, researchers should have the conditions for making new discussion on the classification of volcanic rocks. In this study, the authors have developed a new TAS classification scheme for volcanic rocks using a probability density function. The original TAS diagram defines 15 root names, among which 9 are preserved in this paper. With the addition of one new root name, the authors define a total of 10 root names. The biggest change in the new TAS diagram is in the alkaline rock series. In the new TAS diagram, the trachybasalt series is closed up, thus making up for the earlier TAS classification in the acidic rock part of the deficiency. The authors have also found that the TAS diagram may have some problems. The classification scheme presented in this study is subject to further discussions and tests.

    • HTML全文
  • 加载中

  • 图 1  TAS火山岩分类命名图[20]

    Figure 1. 

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 2  玄武岩、苦橄质玄武岩和苦橄岩的TAS图（分别为a、b、c图）和SiO2-MgO图（分别为d、e、f图）

    Figure 2. 

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 3  全球玄武岩基于概率密度的数据再清洗结果

    Figure 3. 

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 4  全球火山岩在TAS图解中的分布密度

    Figure 4. 

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 5  全球正常系列火山岩数据分布趋势图（图中代号同图 1）

    Figure 5. 

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 6  正常系列玄武岩、安山岩、英安岩和流纹岩数据分布

    Figure 6. 

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 7  三个系列数据的分布

    Figure 7. 

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 8  新的火山岩TAS分类图解

    Figure 8. 

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
    • 参考文献(49)
  • [1]

    Iddings J P. Origin of Igneous Rocks[M]. Bull. Phil. Soc. Washington, 1892, 12: 89-213.

    [2]

    Chayes F. Alkaline and subalkaline basalts[J]. Am. Jour. Sci., 1966, 264:128-145. doi: 10.2475/ajs.264.2.128

    [3]

    Streckeisen A, Le Maitre R W. A chemical approximation to the modal QAPF classification of the igneous rocks[J]. N. Jb. Miner. Abh., 1979, 136:169-206. http://geosphere.geoscienceworld.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=1980021909&link_type=GEOREF

    [4]

    Fitton J G. Upton B G J. Alkaline Igneous Rocks[M]. Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ., 1987.

    [5]

    Irvine T N, Baragar W R A. A guide to the chemical classification of the common volcanic rocks[J]. Can. J. Earth Sci., 1971, 8, 523-48. doi: 10.1139/e71-055

    [6]

    Le Maitre R W. Some problems of the projection of chemical data into mineralogical classifications[J]. Contr. Miner. Petrol., 1976, 56:181-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00399603

    [7]

    Le Martre R W, Bateman P, Dudek A. A Classification of Igneous Rocka and Glossary of Terms[M]. Oxford:Blackwell, 1989.

    [8]

    Kuno H. High-alumina basalt[J]. J. Petrol., 1960, 1:121-145. doi: 10.1093/petrology/1.2.121

    [9]

    Kuno H. Lateral variation of basalt magma types across continental margins and island arcs[J]. Bull. Volcanol, 1966, 29:195-222. doi: 10.1007/BF02597153

    [10]

    Le bas M J, Le Maitre R W, Streckeisen A, et al. A chemical classification of volcanic rocks based on the total alkali-silica diagram[J]. J. Petrol., 1986, 27:745-750. doi: 10.1093/petrology/27.3.745

    [11]

    Middlemost E A K. A contribution to the nomenclature and classification of volcanic rocks[J]. Geol. Mag., 1980, 117:51-7. doi: 10.1017/S0016756800033094

    [12]

    Murray J W. A Guide to Classification in Geology[M]. Chichester Ellis Horwood Ltd, 1981.

    [13]

    Rollison H R. Using Geochemical Data: Evaluation, Presentation, Interpretation[M]. Longman Scientific and Technical, New York, 1993.

    [14]

    王碧香.国际火成岩分类命名研究现状[J].地质科技情报, 1990, (4):30-31. http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=229448

    [15]

    Cox K G, Bell J D, Pankhurst R J. The Interpretation of Igneous Rocks[M]. London:George Allen & Unwin, 1979.

    [16]

    Carmichael I S E, Turner F J, Verhoogen J V. Igneous Petrology[M]. Department of Geology and Geophysics, Berkeley:University of California, 1982.

    [17]

    邓晋福, 刘翠, 冯艳芳, 等.关于火成岩常用图解的正确使用:讨论与建议[J].地质论评, 2015, 61(4):717-734. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dzlp201504002

    [18]

    都城秋穗, 久城育夫.岩石学[M].北京:科学出版社, 1984:1-344.

    [19]

    Wilson M. Igneous Petrogenesis[M]. London:Unwin Hyman. 1989.

    [20]

    Le Maitre R W. A proposal by the IUGS Subcommission on the Systematics of Igneous Rocks for a chemical classification of volcanic rocks based on the total alkali silica (TAS) diagram[J]. Australian J. Earth Sci., 1984, 31:243-255. doi: 10.1080/08120098408729295

    [21]

    MacDonald G A, Katsura T. Chemical compositions of Hawaiian lavas[J]. J. Petrol., 1964, 5:83-133. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ee77d8f3b62c0e77c8fe6b94a1fe868d

    [22]

    MacDonald G A. Composition and origin of Hawaiian lavas[C]//Coats R R, Hay R L, Anderson C A. Studies in volcanology: a memoir in honour of Howel Willims. Geol. Soc. Am. Mem., 1968, 116: 477-522.

    [23]

    张旗, 周永章.大数据正在引发地球科学领域一场深刻的革命——《地质科学》 2017年大数据专题代序[J].地质科学, 2017, 52(3):637-648. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzkx201703001

    [24]

    Trigor W E. Speiziclle Petrographic der Eruptivgesteine[M]. Berlin, 1935.

    [25]

    Rittmann A. Stable Mineral Assemblages of Igneous Rocks[M]. Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag, 1973.

    [26]

    Streckeisen A. To each plutonic rock its proper name[J]. Earth-Sci. Rev., 1976, 12:1-33. doi: 10.1016/0012-8252(76)90052-0

    [27]

    Hatch F H, Wells A K, Wells M K. The Petrology of the Igneous Rocks[M]. Thomas Murby, London, 1972.

    [28]

    De La Roche H, Leterrier P, Grandclaude P, et al. A classification of volcanic and plutonic rocks using the R1-R2 diagram and major element analyses. Its relationships with current nomenclature[J]. Chem. Geol., 1980, 29:183-210. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(80)90020-0

    [29]

    Zancttin B. Proposed new chemical classification of volcanic rocks[J]. Episodes, 1984, 7:19-20. doi: 10.18814/epiiugs/1984/v7i4/003

    [30]

    Streckeisen A. Classification and nomenclature of volcanic rocks, lamprophyres, carbonatiets, and melilitic roeks, recommendations and suggestions of the IUGS commission on the systmeaties of igneous roeks[J]. Geology (Boulder), 1979, 7:331-335. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1979)7<331:CANOVR>2.0.CO;2

    [31]

    Frolova T I, Petrova M A. The classification diagram of effusive rocks[C]//IUGS Subcommission, 18th circular, Contrib., 1974, 39: 25-30.

    [32]

    Peccerillo A, Taylor S R. Geochemistry of Eocene calc-alkaline volcanic rocks from the Kastamonu area, northern Turkey[J]. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 1976, 58:63-81. doi: 10.1007/BF00384745

    [33]

    邓晋福.火成岩系列划分的回顾与当代含义[J].岩石矿物学杂志, 1991, 10(1):37-42.

    [34]

    葛粲, 顾海欧, 汪方跃, 等.基于数据密度确定分布区域的方法:以TAS图解分析为例[J].地质科学, 2018, 53(4):1240-1253. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dzkx201804006

    [35]

    张旗, 李达周, 张魁武.横断山区镁铁-超镁铁岩[M].北京:科学出版社, 1992.

    [36]

    张旗, 王焰, 熊小林, 等.埃达克岩和花岗岩:挑战与机遇[M].北京:中国大地出版社, 2008.

    [37]

    Streckeisen A. Classification and nomenclature of volcanic rocks, lamprophyres, carbonatites and melilitic rocks[J]. N. Jb. Miner. Abh., 1978, 134:1-14.

    [38]

    王金荣, 陈万峰, 张旗. MORB数据挖掘:玄武岩判别图反思[J].大地构造与成矿学, 2017, 41(2):420-431. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201703023

    [39]

    Carmichael I S E, Turner F J, Verhoogen J. Igneous Petrology[M]. New York:McGraw-HiU, 1974.

    [40]

    Jiao S T, Zhang Q, Ge C et al. Distribution of Picrite Basalt on TAS and the Boundary between Basic and Ultrabasic Rocks: Research and Discovery of Global Volcanic Rock Data (in press).

    [41]

    Yoder H S Jr, Tilley C E. Origin of basalt magmas:an experiment study of natural and synthetic rock systems[J]. J. Petrol., 1962, 3:342-532. doi: 10.1093/petrology/3.3.342

    [42]

    查瓦里茨基A H.火成岩[M].北京:地质出版社, 1958.

    [43]

    曾广策, 邱家骧.碱性岩的概念及其分类命名综述[J].地质科技情报, 1996, 15(1):31-37. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199600970946

    [44]

    赵振华.富碱侵入岩——窥探地幔成分的窗口[C]//欧阳自远.中国矿物岩石地球化学研究进展.兰州: 兰州大学出版社, 1994: 113-114.

    [45]

    黄文龙.滇东南个旧白云山碱性岩年代学和地球化学及成因意义[J].岩石矿物学杂志, 2018, 37(5):716-732. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2018.05.002

    [46]

    吴利仁, 刘若新, 梅厚钧, 等.云南某地基性岩岩石学上的一些问题[J].地质科学, 1959, 2(11):354-364. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DZKX195912001.htm

    [47]

    Harker A. The natural history of igneous rocks:I. Their geographical and chronological distribution[J]. Science Progress (1894-1898), 1896, 6:12-33. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43424034

    [48]

    邓晋福, 肖庆辉, 苏尚国, 等.火成岩组合与构造环境:讨论[J].高校地质学报, 2007, 13(3):392-402. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2007.03.009

    [49]

    葛粲, 张旗, 李修钰, 孙贺, 等.一维到三维密度分布函数及其可视化在大数据分析中的应用——以苦橄质玄武岩等为例[J].地质通报, 2019, 38(12):2043-2052. http://dzhtb.cgs.cn/gbc/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20191212&flag=1

    • 相关文章
  • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)
  • 加载中

图(8)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  2372
  • PDF下载数:  12
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2019-04-23
修回日期:  2019-07-16
刊出日期:  2019-12-15

目录

    版权所有：中国地质调查局发展研究中心 copyright @2020
    返回