New progress of mapping in the continental volcanic terrain: A case study of Cenozoic volcanic edifice in Sumdo area, Tibetan Plateau
-
摘要:
20世纪90年代以来，为了区别传统的沉积岩区填图方法，中国陆相火山岩区地质调查工作普遍采用"火山构造-火山岩相-火山岩性"三位一体的思路与工作方法，并取得重要进展。以西藏松多地区1:5万区域地质调查工作为例，探讨该方法在高原地区新生代火山岩研究中的应用。结合遥感影像与剖面测制，通过野外地质观察与镜下岩性特征分析，对火山机构进行相带划分，从而恢复古火山的基本格架、重溯火山作用过程。同时，松多地区新生代火山机构的建立，为冈底斯岩浆带发育的林子宗火山岩与下伏地层的区域性不整合提供了新的证据，进一步限定了印度-亚洲大陆碰撞的起始时间。
Abstract:In order to distinguish from the traditional mapping method suitable for sedimentary area, the researchers have widely used "volcanic structure-volcanic lithofacies-volcanic lithology" trinity mapping method in the continental volcanic rock area of China since the 1990s, and have made important progress. This paper discussed the applicability of this mapping method in the 1:50000 Sumdo geological mapping program for plateau area of Cenozoic volcanic rocks. Combined with remote sensing images and measured section, the authors divided the volcanic facies by field geological and microscope observation, thus restoring the basic framework of the ancient volcanic and retracing the volcanism process. The establishment of Sumdo Cenozoic volcano edifice provides new evidence of regional unconformity between Linzizong volcanic rocks and underlying strata, which further limits the starting time of the India-Asian continent collision.
-
Key words:
- Tibetan Plateau /
- Sumdo area /
- Cenozoic /
- volcanic edifice /
- volcanic facies
-
-
[1] Coulon C, Maluski H, Bollinger C, et al. Mesozoic and cenozoic volcanic rocks from central and southern Tibet:39Ar-40Ar dating, petrological characteristics and geodynamical significance[J]. Earth & Planetary Science Letters, 1986, 79(3):281-302. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/NSTLQK/10.1016-0012-821X(86)90186-X/
[2] Pearce J A, Mei H. Volcanic Rocks of the 1985 Tibet Geotraverse:Lhasa to Golmud[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1988, 327(1594):169-201. doi: 10.1098/rsta.1988.0125
[3] 莫宣学, 赵志丹, 邓晋福, 等.印度-亚洲大陆主碰撞过程的火山作用响应[J].地学前缘, 2003, 10(3):135-148. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2003.03.013
[4] 董国臣.林周盆地林子宗火山岩及其所含的印度-欧亚大陆碰撞信息研究[D].中国地质大学(北京)博士学位论文, 2002: 1-149.
[5] 李才, 范和平, 徐锋.青藏高原北部新生代火山岩岩石化学特征及其构造意义[J].现代地质, 1989, (1):58-69. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000003313758
[6] 刘鸿飞.拉萨地区林子宗火山岩系的划分和时代归属[J].西藏地质, 1993, (2):59-69. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000005846083
[7] 周肃, 方念乔, 董国臣, 等.西藏林子宗群火山岩氩-氩年代学研究[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2001, 20(4):317-319. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2802.2001.04.031
[8] 董国臣, 莫宣学, 赵志丹, 等.拉萨北部林周盆地林子宗火山岩层序新议[J].地质通报, 2005, 24(6):549-557. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2005.06.012 http://dzhtb.cgs.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=200506109&flag=1
[9] 傅树超, 卢清地.陆相火山岩区填图方法研究新进展—"火山构造-岩性岩相-火山地层"填图方法[J].地质通报, 2010, 29(11):1640-1648. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2010.11.006 http://dzhtb.cgs.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20101106&flag=1
[10] 薛怀民, 曹光跃, 刘哲.陆相火山岩区岩性组合-岩相填图实验—以内蒙古西太仆寺破火山为例[J].地质通报, 2017, 36(11):2030-2035. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2017.11.012 http://dzhtb.cgs.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20171112&flag=1
[11] 褚平利, 邢光福, 洪文涛, 等.陆相火山岩区填图方法的实践—以浙江嵊州新生代玄武岩为例[J].地质通报, 2017, 36(11):2126-2134. http://dzhtb.cgs.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20171113&flag=1
[12] 陈祥云, 刘帮秀, 魏源, 等.陆相红色盆地1:5万填图的一种新方法—构造-岩性-岩相填图法[J].地质通报, 1997, 16(1):75-80. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgqydz200309008
[13] 马金清, 李进堂, 冯宗帜.火山构造组合研究和地质填图方法—以福建闽清测区1:5万区域地质调查为例[J].地质通报, 2000, 19(2):198-204. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2000.02.016
[14] 杨德明, 和钟铧, 黄映聪, 等.西藏墨竹工卡县门巴地区松多岩群变质作用特征及时代讨论[J].吉林大学学报(地), 2005, 35(4):430-435. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/cckjdxxb200504004
[15] 耿全如, 潘桂棠, 王立全, 等.西藏冈底斯带叶巴组火山岩同位素地质年代[J].沉积与特提斯地质, 2006, 26(1):1-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3850.2006.01.001
① 西藏自治区地质调查院. 1∶25 万泽当镇幅区域地质调查报告.2006.
-
下载:
图(4)
计量
- 文章访问数: 502
- PDF下载数: 6
- 施引文献: 0