Geochronological and Geochemical Dataset of Late Paleozoic Granitoids in the Hazhu Area of Beishan, Inner Mongolia
-
摘要:
本数据集依托中国地质调查局“内蒙古1∶50 000哈珠幅、哈珠东山幅、哈珠南山幅和砾石滩幅区域地质矿产调查”项目，在详细开展野外地质调查的基础上，进行岩石分析测试整理而成。本文汇集了内蒙古北山哈珠地区晚古生代花岗岩类样品的测试数据，岩石类型包括英云闪长岩、花岗闪长岩、二长花岗岩和碱性长石花岗岩。锆石年代学数据显示该类岩石的形成时代为石炭纪–二叠纪，岩石全岩常量和微量元素数据表明石炭纪花岗岩类为准铝质–弱过铝质、中钾钙碱性系列岩石；稀土元素配分曲线呈现右倾分布特征；微量元素富集大离子亲石元素Rb、Ba、K等，亏损Nb、Ta、Ti等高场强元素，反映了岩浆形成于与俯冲带有关的陆缘弧环境。而二叠纪花岗岩类则表现为高硅、富碱、准铝、贫镁的特征，为中钾–高钾钙碱性系列岩石；该类岩石同样表现为富集大离子亲石元素，亏损高场强元素，但碱性长石花岗岩内发育文象结构，且花岗闪长岩内发育大规模水晶晶洞，指示二叠纪岩体就位于伸展环境。两者相结合可以为研究北山地区红石山–百合山洋的俯冲极性及构造演化提供依据与基础数据支持。本数据集为Excel表格型数据，包括2个.xls类型文件（Geochemistry data_HZ.xls，Zircon U–Pb dating data_HZ.xls），分别记录了27件样品的地球化学数据与11件样品的锆石U–Pb测年数据。本数据集测试样品均在中国地质调查局天津地质调查中心实验室完成，数据质量可靠。
Abstract:Under the project of ‘1∶5 000 Regional Geological and Mineral Survey of the Hazhu, Hazhudongshan, Hazhunanshan and Lishitan Map-sheet’ by China Geological Survey, this dataset was compiled though rock analysis and tests based on detailed geological field surveys. This paper presents the test data of Late Paleozoic granite samples in the Hazhu area in Beishan, Inner Mongolia. The rock types include tonalite, granodiorite, monzonitic granite and alkaline feldspar granite. Zircon chronological data show that the formative era of these kind of rocks are Carboniferous–Permian. The whole-rock macroelement and trace element data show that Carboniferous granitoids are of the metaluminous-weak peraluminous and medium-K calc-alkaline series. The distribution curve of rare earth elements displays right-leaning characteristics. Trace elements are rich in large-ion lithophile elements including Rb, Ba and K; and deficient in high field-strength elements including Nb, Ta and Ti; thus, indicating that magma was formed in a continental marginal arc environment related to the subduction belt. In contrast, Permian granitoids display high-silicon, alkali-rich, metaluminous and magnesium-deficient features, and constitute a medium-high-K calc-alkaline series. They are also rich in large-ion lithophile elements and deficient in high-field strength elements. However, graphic texture is developed within alkaline feldspar granite and crystal caves are developed on a large scale in granodiorite, indicating that the Permian rock mass is situated in an extensional environment. The combination of the two can provide a basis and fundamental data support for studying the subduction polarity and tectonic evolution of the Hongshishan–Baiheshan Ocean in the Beishan area. This dataset is presented in the form of Excel tables, including two. xls files (Geochemistry data_HZ. Xls and Zircon U–Pb dating data_HZ. xls), which record the 27 samples’ geochemical data and 11 samples’ zircon U–Pb dating results of the samples, respectively. The samples of this dataset were all tested at the Tianjin Center laboratory of China Geological Survey, with reliable data quality.
-
Key words:
- Beishan /
- Hazhu /
- granite /
- Carboniferous–Permian /
- whole-rock geochemical data /
- zircon U-Pb data
-
-
图 1 北山地区构造单元划分及研究区位置（图a据Xiao et al., 2010；图b据牛文超等,2019）
表 1 数据集元数据简表
条目 描述 数据集名称 内蒙古北山哈珠地区晚古生代花岗岩类年代学与地球化学测试数据集 数据集作者 任邦方，中国地质调查局天津地质调查中心
段连峰，中国地质调查局天津地质调查中心
李 敏，中国地质调查局天津地质调查中心
牛文超，中国地质调查局天津地质调查中心
任云伟，中国地质调查局天津地质调查中心数据时间范围 2014–2016年 地理区域 42°00′00″～42°20′00″，98°30′00″～99°00′00″ 数据格式 *.xls 数据量 140 KB 数据服务系统网址 http://dcc.cgs.gov.cn 基金项目 中国地质调查局地质调查项目（DD20160039，DD20190382） 语种 中文 数据库（集）组成 数据集由2部分组成：（1）Geochemistry data_HZ.xls，为全岩地球化学数据，包括27件样品以及样品编号与岩石类型；（2）Zircon U–Pb dating data_HZ.xls，为锆石U-Pb测年数据，包括11件样品，每个样品为一个单独的工作表（sheet），每个工作表包含样品编号、采样点、岩石类型、分析点号、同位素比值、年龄及误差等数据 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 哈珠地区花岗岩类样品采样地点及矿物组合
样品号 采集地点 岩石类型 矿物组合 PM02YQ19-2 内蒙古哈珠地区砾石滩 二长花岗岩 kfs(40%±), pl(35%), qtz(20%±), bt(3%±), hbl(2%±) PM02YQ24-1 内蒙古哈珠地区砾石滩 二长花岗岩 pl(40%±), kfs(30%±), qtz(20%±), bt(5%±), hbl(2%±) PM02YQ25-2 内蒙古哈珠地区砾石滩 花岗闪长岩 pl(45%±), kfs(25%±), qtz(20%±), hbl(5%±), bt(3%±) PM02YQ31-1 内蒙古哈珠地区砾石滩 花岗闪长岩 pl(45%±), qtz(35%±), kfs(15%±), hbl(5%±) PM02YQ32-1 内蒙古哈珠地区砾石滩 花岗闪长岩 pl(50%±), qtz(25%±), kfs(15%±), hbl(5%±), bt(2%±) PM02YQ32-2 内蒙古哈珠地区砾石滩 花岗闪长岩 pl(50%±), kfs(20%±), qtz(20%±), hbl(5%±), bt(3%±) PM02YQ33-2 内蒙古哈珠地区砾石滩 花岗闪长岩 pl(45%±), qtz(25%±), kfs(20%±), bt(5%±), hbl(3%±) PM02YQ38-1 内蒙古哈珠地区砾石滩 花岗闪长岩 pl(50%±), kfs(25%±), qtz(20%±), hbl(5%±), bt(2%±) PM02YQ39-1 内蒙古哈珠地区砾石滩 二长花岗岩 pl(40%±), kfs(30%±), qtz(20%±), hbl(5%±), bt(3%±) PM02YQ40-2 内蒙古哈珠地区砾石滩 二长花岗岩 pl(35%±), kfs(35%±), qtz(25%±), hbl(3%±), bt(2%±) PM02YQ42-1 内蒙古哈珠地区砾石滩 英云闪长岩 pl(55%±), qtz(30%±), bt(8%±), kfs(5%±), hbl(2%±), PM02YQ44-1 内蒙古哈珠地区砾石滩 英云闪长岩 pl(60%±), qtz(25%±), kfs(5%±), hbl(5%±), bt(5%±) PM02YQ45-1 内蒙古哈珠地区砾石滩 英云闪长岩 pl(55%±), qtz(30%±), kfs(5%±), hbl(5%±), bt(5%±) YQ7907-1 内蒙古哈珠地区砾石滩 花岗闪长岩 pl(50%±), qtz(25%±), kfs(20%±), hbl(5%±), bt(2%±) YQ7965-2 内蒙古哈珠地区砾石滩 花岗闪长岩 pl(45%±), qtz(25%±), kfs(20%±), hbl(5%±), bt(3%±) PM06YQ20-1 内蒙古哈珠南山 花岗闪长岩 pl(60%±), qtz(20%±), kfs(15%±), bt(5%±) PM06YQ27-1 内蒙古哈珠南山 花岗闪长岩 pl(55%±), qtz(25%±), kfs(15%±), bt(5%±) PM10YQ32-1 内蒙古哈珠地区砾石滩 碱性长石花岗岩 af(60%±), qtz(35%±), bt(5%±) PM16YQ1-1 内蒙古哈珠南山 花岗闪长岩 pl(40%±), qtz(30%±), hbl(15%±), kfs(10%±), bt(5%±) PM16YQ2-1 内蒙古哈珠南山 花岗闪长岩 pl(50%±), qtz(20%±), kfs(10%±), hbl(10%±), bt(8%±) PM16YQ3-1 内蒙古哈珠南山 花岗闪长岩 pl(50%±), qtz(20%±), kfs(15%±), hbl(10%±), bt(5%±) PM16YQ10-1 内蒙古哈珠南山 花岗闪长岩 pl(55%±), qtz(20%±), kfs(10%±), hbl(10%±), bt(5%±) PM16YQ10-2 内蒙古哈珠南山 花岗闪长岩 pl(50%±), qtz(20%±), kfs(10%±), bt(10%±), hbl(8%±) PM23YQ15-1 内蒙古哈珠东山 花岗闪长岩 pl(50%±), qtz(20%±), kfs(15%±), hbl(10%±), bt(5%±) YQ11 内蒙古哈珠地区砾石滩 二长花岗岩 pl(35%±), kfs(35%±), qtz(25%±), hbl(3%±), bt(2%±) YQ12 内蒙古哈珠地区砾石滩 二长花岗岩 pl(40%±), kfs(30%±), qtz(20%±), hbl(5%±), bt(3%±) YQ2005-1 内蒙古哈珠东山 花岗闪长岩 pl(40%±), qtz(30%±), hbl(15%±), kfs(10%±), bt(5%±) 注：af–碱性长石；bt–黑云母；hbl–角闪石；kfs–钾长石；pl–斜长石；qtz–石英
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 岩石地球化学数据表
数据项 数据类型 示例 数据项 数据类型 示例 岩石类型 字符型 二长花岗岩 Sc 浮点型 6.50 样品编号 字符型 PM02YQ19-2 Nb 浮点型 7.47 SiO2 浮点型 73.94 Ta 浮点型 0.70 TiO2 浮点型 0.33 Zr 浮点型 141.00 Al2O3 浮点型 13.11 Hf 浮点型 4.32 Fe2O3 浮点型 0.67 Ga 浮点型 14.30 FeO 浮点型 1.54 U 浮点型 1.82 MnO 浮点型 0.06 Th 浮点型 10.50 MgO 浮点型 0.73 La 浮点型 19.60 CaO 浮点型 1.32 Ce 浮点型 36.00 Na2O 浮点型 3.64 Pr 浮点型 4.42 K2O 浮点型 4.15 Nd 浮点型 15.70 P2O5 浮点型 0.08 Sm 浮点型 3.11 LOI 浮点型 0.27 Eu 浮点型 0.45 H2O+ 浮点型 0.20 Gd 浮点型 3.21 CO2 浮点型 0.05 Tb 浮点型 0.52 δ 浮点型 1.96 Dy 浮点型 3.19 Mg# 浮点型 0.38 Ho 浮点型 0.66 A/CNK 浮点型 1.02 Er 浮点型 1.96 Cr 浮点型 4.29 Tm 浮点型 0.32 Ni 浮点型 3.17 Yb 浮点型 2.27 Co 浮点型 3.67 Lu 浮点型 0.37 Rb 浮点型 135.00 Y 浮点型 20.00 Cs 浮点型 6.20 REE 浮点型 111.78 Sr 浮点型 134.00 δEu 浮点型 0.43 Ba 浮点型 535.00 (La/Yb)N 浮点型 5.83 V 浮点型 31.20 注：常量元素单位为%；微量元素单位为10−6。
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 锆石U–Pb同位素测年数据表
数据项 数据类型 示例 样品编号 字符型 PM02TW32.2 采样点 字符型 内蒙古哈珠地区砾石滩一带 岩石类型 字符型 花岗闪长岩 分析点位 字符型 PM02TW32.2.1 含量/×10−6 Th 浮点型 447 Pb 浮点型 24 U 浮点型 500 同位素比值 206Pb/238U 浮点型 0.89 1σ 浮点型 0.0413 207Pb/235U 浮点型 0.0005 1σ 浮点型 0.2957 207Pb/206Pb 浮点型 0.0056 1σ 浮点型 0.0519 年龄/Ma 206Pb/238U 浮点型 0.0009 1σ 浮点型 261 207Pb/235U 浮点型 3 1σ 浮点型 263 207Pb/206Pb 浮点型 5 1σ 浮点型 280
下载: 导出CSV
Table 1. Metadata Table of Database (Dataset)
Items Description Database (dataset) name Geochronological and Geochemical Dataset of Late Paleozoic Granitoids in the Hazhu Area of Beishan, Inner Mongolia Database (dataset) authors Ren Bangfang, Tianjin Center, China Geological Survey
Duan Lianfeng, Tianjin Center, China Geological Survey
Li Min, Tianjin Center, China Geological Survey
Niu Wenchao, Tianjin Center, China Geological Survey
Ren Yunwei, Tianjin Center, China Geological SurveyData acquisition time 2014—2016 Geographic area 42°00′00″ – 42°20′00″N, 98°30′00″ – 99°00′00″E Data format *.xls Data size 140 kB Data service system URL http://dcc.cgs.gov.cn Fund project China Geological Survey Project (DD20160039, DD20190382) Language Chinese Database (dataset) composition The dataset consists of two parts: (1) geochemical data_HZ.xls (whole-rock geochemical data) includes 27 samples and their sample codes and rock types; (2) Zircon U–Pb dating data_HZ.xls includes 11 samples for zircon U–Pb dating, where each sample represents a separate sheet containing the data of sample code, sampling point, rock type, analysis point number, isotope ratio, age and error
下载: 导出CSV
Table 2. Sampling sites and mineral associations of the granitoids in the Hazhu area
Sample No. Sampling site Rock type Mineral associations PM02YQ19-2 Lishitan, Hazhu area, Inner Mongolia Monzonitic granite kfs(40%±), pl(35%), qtz(20%±), bt(3%±), hbl(2%±) PM02YQ24-1 Lishitan, Hazhu area, Inner Mongolia Monzonitic granite pl(40%±), kfs(30%±), qtz(20%±), bt(5%±), hbl(2%±) PM02YQ25-2 Lishitan, Hazhu area, Inner Mongolia Granodiorite pl(45%±), kfs(25%±), qtz(20%±), hbl(5%±), bt(3%±) PM02YQ31-1 Lishitan, Hazhu area, Inner Mongolia Granodiorite pl(45%±), qtz(35%±), kfs(15%±), hbl(5%±) PM02YQ32-1 Lishitan, Hazhu area, Inner Mongolia Granodiorite pl(50%±), qtz(25%±), kfs(15%±), hbl(5%±), bt(2%±) PM02YQ32-2 Lishitan, Hazhu area, Inner Mongolia Granodiorite pl(50%±), kfs(20%±), qtz(20%±), hbl(5%±), bt(3%±) PM02YQ33-2 Lishitan, Hazhu area, Inner Mongolia Granodiorite pl(45%±), qtz(25%±), kfs(20%±), bt(5%±), hbl(3%±) PM02YQ38-1 Lishitan, Hazhu area, Inner Mongolia Granodiorite pl(50%±), kfs(25%±), qtz(20%±), hbl(5%±), bt(2%±) PM02YQ39-1 Lishitan, Hazhu area, Inner Mongolia Monzonitic granite pl(40%±), kfs(30%±), qtz(20%±), hbl(5%±), bt(3%±) PM02YQ40-2 Lishitan, Hazhu area, Inner Mongolia Monzonitic granite pl(35%±), kfs(35%±), qtz(25%±), hbl(3%±), bt(2%±) PM02YQ42-1 Lishitan, Hazhu area, Inner Mongolia Tonalite pl(55%±), qtz(30%±), bt(8%±), kfs(5%±), hbl(2%±), PM02YQ44-1 Lishitan, Hazhu area, Inner Mongolia Tonalite pl(60%±), qtz(25%±), kfs(5%±), hbl(5%±), bt(5%±) PM02YQ45-1 Lishitan, Hazhu area, Inner Mongolia Tonalite pl(55%±), qtz(30%±), kfs(5%±), hbl(5%±), bt(5%±) YQ7907-1 Lishitan, Hazhu area, Inner Mongolia Granodiorite pl(50%±), qtz(25%±), kfs(20%±), hbl(5%±), bt(2%±) YQ7965-2 Lishitan, Hazhu area, Inner Mongolia Granodiorite pl(45%±), qtz(25%±), kfs(20%±), hbl(5%±), bt(3%±) PM06YQ20-1 Huzhunanshan, Inner Mongolia Granodiorite pl(60%±), qtz(20%±), kfs(15%±), bt(5%±) PM06YQ27-1 Huzhunanshan, Inner Mongolia Granodiorite pl(55%±), qtz(25%±), kfs(15%±), bt(5%±) PM10YQ32-1 Lishitan, Hazhu Area, Inner Mongolia Alkaline feldspar granite af(60%±), qtz(35%±), bt(5%±) PM16YQ1-1 Huzhunanshan, Inner Mongolia Granodiorite pl(40%±), qtz(30%±), hbl(15%±), kfs(10%±), bt(5%±) PM16YQ2-1 Huzhunanshan, Inner Mongolia Granodiorite pl(50%±), qtz(20%±), kfs(10%±), hbl(10%±), bt(8%±) PM16YQ3-1 Huzhunanshan, Inner Mongolia Granodiorite pl(50%±), qtz(20%±), kfs(15%±), hbl(10%±), bt(5%±) PM16YQ10-1 Huzhunanshan, Inner Mongolia Granodiorite pl(55%±), qtz(20%±), kfs(10%±), hbl(10%±), bt(5%±) PM16YQ10-2 Huzhunanshan, Inner Mongolia Granodiorite pl(50%±), qtz(20%±), kfs(10%±), bt(10%±), hbl(8%±) PM23YQ15-1 Hazhudongshan, Inner Mongolia Granodiorite pl(50%±), qtz(20%±), kfs(15%±), hbl(10%±), bt(5%±) YQ11 Lishitan, Hazhu area, Inner Mongolia Monzonitic granite pl(35%±), kfs(35%±), qtz(25%±), hbl(3%±), bt(2%±) YQ12 Lishitan, Hazhu area, Inner Mongolia Monzonitic granite pl(40%±), kfs(30%±), qtz(20%±), hbl(5%±), bt(3%±) YQ2005-1 Hazhudongshan, Inner Mongolia Granodiorite pl(40%±), qtz(30%±), hbl(15%±), kfs(10%±), bt(5%±) Note: af–alkaline feldspar; bt–biotite; hbl–hornblende; kfs–K-feldspar; pl–plagioclase; qtz–quartz
下载: 导出CSV
Table 3. Data structure of the lithogeochemical data
Data item Data type Examples Data item Data type Examples Rock type Character Monzonitic granite Sc Float 6.50 Sample code Character PM02YQ19-2 Nb Float 7.47 SiO2 Float 73.94 Ta Float 0.70 TiO2 Float 0.33 Zr Float 141.00 Al2O3 Float 13.11 Hf Float 4.32 Fe2O3 Float 0.67 Ga Float 14.30 FeO Float 1.54 U Float 1.82 MnO Float 0.06 Th Float 10.50 MgO Float 0.73 La Float 19.60 CaO Float 1.32 Ce Float 36.00 Na2O Float 3.64 Pr Float 4.42 K2O Float 4.15 Nd Float 15.70 P2O5 Float 0.08 Sm Float 3.11 LOI Float 0.27 Eu Float 0.45 H2O+ Float 0.20 Gd Float 3.21 CO2 Float 0.05 Tb Float 0.52 δ Float 1.96 Dy Float 3.19 Mg# Float 0.38 Ho Float 0.66 A/CNK Float 1.02 Er Float 1.96 Cr Float 4.29 Tm Float 0.32 Ni Float 3.17 Yb Float 2.27 Co Float 3.67 Lu Float 0.37 Rb Float 135.00 Y Float 20.00 Cs Float 6.20 REE Float 111.78 Sr Float 134.00 δEu Float 0.43 Ba Float 535.00 (La/Yb)N Float 5.83 V Float 31.20 Note: The unit of macroelements is %; the unit of trace elements is 10-6.
下载: 导出CSV
Table 4. Data structure of the zircon U–Pb isotopic dating data
Data item Data type Examples Sample code Character PM02TW32.2 Sampling point Character Lishitan, Hazhu Area, Inner Mongolia Rock type Character Granodiorite Analysis point Character PM02TW32.2.1 Content/×10−6 Th Float 447 Pb Float 24 U Float 500 Isotope ratio 206Pb/238U Float 0.89 1σ Float 0.0413 207Pb/235U Float 0.0005 1σ Float 0.2957 207Pb/206Pb Float 0.0056 1σ Float 0.0519 Age/Ma 206Pb/238U Float 0.0009 1σ Float 261 207Pb/235U Float 3 1σ Float 263 207Pb/206Pb Float 5 1σ Float 280
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Andersen T. 2002. Correction of common lead in U-Pb analyses that do not report 204Pb[J]. Chemical Geology, 192: 59−79. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2541(02)00195-X
[2] Jackson Simon E, Pearson Norman J, Griffin William L, Belousova Elena A. 2004. The application of laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry to in situ U–Pb zircon geochronology[J]. Chemical Geology, 211: 47–69.
[3] Liu YS, Gao S, Hu ZC, Gao CG, Zong KQ, Wang DB. 2010. Continental and Oceanic Crust Recycling induced Melt-Peridotite Interactions in the Trans-North China Orogen: U-Pb Dating, Hf Isotopes and Trace Elements in Zircons from Mantle Xenoliths[J]. Journal of Petrology, 51(1–2): 537−571. doi: 10.1093/petrology/egp082
[4] Ludwig KR. 2003. Isoplot/Ex Version 3.00: A Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel[J]. Berkeley Geochronology Center Special Publication, 4: 1−70.
[5] Whitney DL, Evans BW. 2010. Abbreviations for names of rock-forming minerals[J]. American Mineralogist, 95: 185−187. doi: 10.2138/am.2010.3371
[6] Xiao WJ, Mao QG, Windley BF, Han CM, Qu JF, Zhang JE, Ao SJ, Guo QQ, Cleven NR, Lin SF, Shan YH, Li JL. 2010. Paleozoic multiple accretionary and collisional processes of the Beishan orogenic collage[J]. American Journal of Science, 310(10): 1553−1594. doi: 10.2475/10.2010.12
[7] Yuan HL, Gao S, Liu XM, Li HM, Detlef G, Wu FY. 2004. Accurate U-Pb Age and Trace Element Determinations of Zircon by Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry[J]. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, 28(3): 353−370. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-908X.2004.tb00755.x
[8] 耿建珍, 李怀坤, 张健, 周红英, 李惠民. 2011. 锆石Hf同位素组成的LA–MC–ICP–MS测定[J]. 地质通报, 30(10): 1508−1513. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2011.10.004
[9] 龚全胜, 刘明强, 李海林, 梁明宏, 代文军. 2002. 甘肃北山造山带类型及基本特征[J]. 西北地质, 35(3): 28−34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2002.03.004
[10] 龚全胜, 刘明强, 梁明宏, 李海林. 2003. 北山造山带大地构造相及构造演化[J]. 西北地质, 36(1): 11−17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2003.01.002
[11] 何世平, 任秉琛, 姚文光, 付力浦. 2002. 甘肃内蒙古北山地区构造单元划分[J]. 西北地质, 35(4): 30−40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2002.04.004
[12] 何世平, 周会武, 任秉探, 姚文光, 付力浦. 2005. 甘肃内蒙古北山地区古生代地壳演化[J]. 西北地质, 38(3): 6−15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2005.03.002
[13] 胡新茁, 赵国春, 胡新悦, 廖云峰, 程海峰. 2015. 内蒙古北山地区月牙山蛇绿质构造混杂岩带地质特征、形成时代及大地构造意义[J]. 地质通报, 34(2–3): 425−436. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgqydz201502019
[14] 黄增保, 金霞. 2006. 甘肃红石山地区白山组火山岩地质特征及构造背景[J]. 甘肃地质, 15(1): 19−24. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gsdzxb200601003
[15] 贾元琴, 赵志雄, 许海, 王新亮, 刘强, 王金荣. 2016. 北山风雷山地区白山组流纹岩LA–ICP–MS锆石U–Pb年龄及构造环境[J]. 中国地质, 43(1): 91−98. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2016.01.006
[16] 廖云峰, 胡新茁, 程海峰, 徐旭明. 2016. 内蒙古月牙山蛇绿岩的岩石学、地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 地质通报, 35(8): 1243−1254. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2016.08.005
[17] 卢进才, 牛亚卓, 魏仙样, 陈高潮, 李玉宏. 2013. 北山红石山地区晚古生代火山岩LA–ICP–MS锆石U–Pb年龄及其构造意义[J]. 岩石学报, 29(8): 2685−2694. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201308006
[18] 聂风军, 江思宏, 白大明. 2002. 北山地区金属矿床成矿规律及找矿方向[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1–408.
[19] 聂凤军, 江思宏, 白大明, 刘妍, 张义, 赵月明, 安存杰, 王新亮, 苏新旭. 2003. 蒙甘新相邻(北山)地区金铜矿床时空分布特征及成矿作用[J]. 矿床地质, 22(3): 234−245. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7106.2003.03.003
[20] 牛文超, 辛后田, 段连峰, 王根厚, 赵泽霖, 张国震, 郑艺龙. 2019. 内蒙古北山地区百合山蛇绿混杂岩带的厘定及其洋盆俯冲极性—基于1∶5万清河沟幅地质图的新认识[J]. 中国地质, 46(5): 977−994. doi: 10.12029/gc20190503
[21] 潘志龙, 王硕, 邱振, 张欢, 张金龙, 田粉英, 李庆喆, 季虹. 2017. 内蒙古北山地区咸水沟一带早石炭世红柳园组火山岩地球化学、锆石U–Pb年龄及Hf同位素特征[J]. 地质调查与研究, 40(2): 99−108. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-QHWJ201702003.htm
[22] 任邦方, 段连峰, 李敏, 牛文超, 任云伟. 2020. 内蒙古北山哈珠地区晚古生代花岗岩类年代学与地球化学测试数据集[DB/OL]. 地质科学数据出版系统. (2020-06-30). DOI:10.35080/data.A.2020.P5.
[23] 任云伟, 任邦方, 牛文超, 孙立新, 李敏, 张阔, 张家辉, 段连峰. 2019. 内蒙古哈珠地区石炭纪白山组火山岩: 北山北部晚古生代活动陆缘岩浆作用的产物[J]. 地球科学, 44(1): 312−327. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&filename=DQKX201901024
[24] 孙立新, 张家辉, 任邦方, 牛文超, 任云伟, 张阔. 2017. 北山造山带白云山蛇绿混杂岩的地球化学特征、时代及地质意义[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 36(2): 131−147. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2017.02.001
[25] 王国强, 李向民, 徐学义, 余吉远, 武鹏. 2014. 甘肃北山红石山蛇绿岩锆石U–Pb年代学研究及构造意义[J]. 岩石学报, 30(6): 1685−1694. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201406011
[26] 徐学义, 何世平, 王洪亮, 陈隽璐, 张二朋, 冯益民. 2008. 中国西北部地质概论—秦岭、祁连、天山地区[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1–355.
[27] 杨富林, 邹运鑫, 曹霞, 杨亮, 马刚, 高鉴. 2017. 内蒙古北山地区蓬勃山南石英闪长岩LA–ICPMS锆石U–Pb测年及其意义[J]. 地质调查与研究, 40(2): 109−118. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4135.2017.02.004
[28] 杨合群, 李英, 李文明, 杨建国, 赵国斌, 孙南一, 王小红, 谭文娟. 2008. 北山成矿构造背景概论[J]. 西北地质, 41(1): 22−28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2008.01.002
[29] 杨合群, 李英, 赵国斌, 李文渊, 王小红, 姜寒冰, 谭文娟, 孙楠一. 2010. 北山蛇绿岩特征及构造属性[J]. 西北地质, 43(1): 26−36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2010.01.002
[30] 尹明, 李家熙. 2011. 岩石矿物分析(第二分册)[M]. 第四版次. 北京: 地质出版社, 1–862.
[31] 赵志雄, 贾元琴, 许海, 王金荣, 王新亮, 刘强. 2015. 北山交叉沟石英闪长岩锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb年龄及构造意义[J]. 地质学报, 89(7): 1210−1218. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2015.07.005
[32] 赵志雄, 贾元琴, 王金荣, 许海, 熊煜, 王新亮, 刘强, 高伟, 高鉴, 刘孟合. 2018. 内蒙古小黑山地区二长花岗岩和石英闪长岩的锆石U–Pb年代学、元素地球化学及其地质意义[J]. 地球科学, 43(S2): 49−59. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DQKX2018S2005.htm
[33] 左国朝, 何国琦. 1990. 北山板块构造及成矿规律[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1–226.
[34] 左国朝, 刘义科, 刘春燕. 2003. 甘新蒙北山地区构造格局及演化[J]. 甘肃地质学报, 12(1): 1−15. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gsdzxb200301001
[1] Andersen T. 2002. Correction of common lead in U-Pb analyses that do not report 204Pb[J]. Chemical Geology, 192: 59−79. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2541(02)00195-X
[2] Geng Jianzhen, Li Huaikun, Zhang Jian, Zhou Hongying, Li Huimin. 2011. Zircon Hf isotope analysis by means of LA-MC-ICP-MS[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 30(10): 1508−1513 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgqydz201110004
[3] Gong Quansheng, Liu Mingqiang, Li Hailin, Liang Minghong, Dai Wenjun. 2002. The type and basic characteristics of Beishan orogenic belt, Gansu[J]. Northwestern Geology, 35(3): 28−34 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xbdz200203004
[4] Gong Quansheng, Liu Mingqiang, Liang Minghong, Li Hailin. 2003. The tectonic facies and tectonic evolution of Beishan Orogenic Belt, Gansu[J]. Northwestern Geology, 36(1): 11−17 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xbdz200301002
[5] He Shiping, Ren Bingshen, Yao Wenguang, Fu Lipu. 2002. The division of tectonic units of Beishan area, Gansu-Inner Mongolia[J]. Northwestern Geology, 35(4): 30−40 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xbdz200204004
[6] He Shiping, Zhou Huiwu, Ren Bingshen, Yao Wenguang, Fu Lipu. 2005. Crustal Evolution of Palaeozoic in Beishan Area, Gansu and Inner Mongona, China[J]. Northwestern Geology, 38(3): 6−15 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-cn_northwestern-geology_thesis/0201254329632.html
[7] Hu Xinzhuo, Zhao Guochun, Hu Xinyue, Liao Yunfeng, Cheng Haifeng. 2015. Geological characteristics, formation epoch and geotectonic significance of the Yueyashan ophiolitic tectonic Mélange in Beishan area, Inner Mongolia[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 34(2-3): 425−436 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/285429947_Geological_characteristics_formation_epoch_and_geotectonic_significance_of_the_Yueyashan_ophiolitic_tectonic_melange_in_Beishan_area_Inner_Mongolia
[8] Huang Zenbao, Jin Xia. 2006. Geological characteristics and its setting for volcanic rocks of Baishan formation in hongshishan area of Gansu province[J]. Gansu Geology, 15(1): 19−24 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gsdzxb200601003
[9] Jackson Simon E, Pearson Norman J, Griffin William L, Belousova Elena A. 2004. The application of laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry to in situ U–Pb zircon geochronology[J]. Chemical Geology, 211: 47−69. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.06.017
[10] Jia Yuanqin, Zhao Zhixiong, Xu Hai, Wang Xinliang, Liu Qiang, Wang Jinrong. 2016. Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating of and tectonic setting of rhyolites from Baishan formation in Fengleishan area of the Beishan orogenic belt[J]. Geology in China, 43(1): 91−98 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgdizhi201601006
[11] Liao Yunfeng, Hu Xinzhuo, Cheng Haifeng, Xu Xuming. 2016. Petrological and petrochemical characteristics and geological significance of Yueyashan ophiolite[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 35(8): 1243−1254 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgqydz201608005
[12] Liu Yongsheng, GaoShan, Hu Zhaochu, Gao Changgui, Zong Keqing, Wang Dongbing. 2010. Continental and Oceanic Crust Recycling induced Melt-Peridotite Interactions in the Trans-North China Orogen: U-Pb Dating, Hf Isotopes and Trace Elements in Zircons from Mantle Xenoliths[J]. Journal of Petrology, 51(1-2): 537−571. doi: 10.1093/petrology/egp082
[13] Lu Jincai, Niu Yazhuo, Wei Xianyang, Chen Gaochao, Li Yuhong. 2013. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating of the Late Paleozoic volcanic rocks from the Hongshishan area of the Beishan orogenic belt and its tectonic significances[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 29(8): 2685−2694 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ysxb98201308006
[14] Ludwing KR. 2003. Isoplot/Ex Version 3.00: A Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel[J]. Berkeley Geochronology Center Special Publication, 4: 1−70.
[15] Nie Fengjun, Jiang Sihong, Bai Daming. 2002. Metallogenic studies and ore prospecting in the conjunctin area of Inner Mongolia autonomous region, Gansu province and Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region(Beishan Mt.), Northwest China[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1–408(in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] Nie Fengjun, Jiang Sihong, Bai Daming, Liu Yan, Zhang Yi, Zhao Yueming, An Chunjie, Wang Xinliang, Su Xinxu. 2003. Temporal-Spatial distribution and metallogenic processes of gold and copper deposits in Inner Mongolia-Gansu-Xinjiang border(Beishan) region[J]. Mineral Deposits, 22(3): 234−245 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=kcdz200303003
[17] Niu Wenchao, Xin Houtian, Duan Lianfeng, Wang Genhou, Zhao Zelin, Zhang Guozhen, Zheng Yilong. 2019. The identification and subduction polarity of the Baiheshan ophiolite mélanges belt in the Beishan area, Inner Mongolia—New understanding based on the geological map of Qinghegou Sheet (1∶50 000)[J]. Geology in China, 46(5): 977−994 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201905004.htm
[18] Pan Zhilong, Wang Shuo, Qiu Zhen, Zhang Huan, Zhang Jinlong, Tian Fenying, Li Qingzhe, Ji Hong. 2017. Geochemistry, zircon U-Pb ages and Hf isotopes of the Early Carboniferous Hongliuyuan volcanic rocks in Xianshuigou, Beishan area, Inner Mongolia[J]. Geological Survey and Research, 40(2): 99−108 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=qhwjyjjz201702003
[19] Ren Bangfang, Duan Lianfeng, Li Min, Niu Wenchao, Ren Yunwei. 2020. Geochronological and Geochemical Dataset of Late Paleozoic Granitoids in the Hazhu Area of Beishan, Inner Mongolia [DB/OL]. Geoscientific Data & Discovery Publishing System. (2020-06-30). DOI: 10.35080/data.A.2020.P5.
[20] Ren Yunwei, Ren Bangfang, Niu Wenchao, Sun Lixin, Li Min, Zhang Kuo, Zhang Jiahui, Duan Lianfeng. 2019. Carboniferous volcanics from the Baishan formation in the Hazhu area, Inner Mongolia: implications for the late Paleozoic active continental margin magmatism in the northern Beishan[J]. Earth Science, 44(1): 312−327 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DQKX201901024.htm
[21] Sun Lixin, Zhang Jiahui, Ren Bangfang, Niu Wenchao, Ren Yunwei, Zhang Kuo. 2017. Geochemical characteristics and U-Pb age of Baiyunshan ophiolite mélange in the Beishan orogenic belt and their geological implications[J]. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 36(2): 131−147 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yskwxzz201702001
[22] Wang Guoqiang, Li Xiangmin, Xu Xueyi, Yu Jiyuan, Wu Peng. 2014. Ziron U−Pb chronological study of the Hongshishan ophiolite in the Beishan area and their tectonic significance[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 30(6): 1685−1694 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/287886519_Ziron_U-Pb_chronological_study_of_the_Hongshishan_ophiolite_in_the_Beishan_area_and_their_tectonic_significance
[23] Whitney DL, Evans BW. 2010. Abbreviations for names of rock-forming minerals[J]. American Mineralogist, 95: 185−187. doi: 10.2138/am.2010.3371
[24] Xiao WJ, Mao QG, Windley BF, Han C M, Qu J F, Zhang J E, Ao S J, Guo Q Q, Cleven N R, Lin S F, Shan Y H, Li J L. 2010. Paleozoic multiple accretionary and collisional processes of the Beishan orogenic collage[J]. American Journal of Science, 310(10): 1553−1594. doi: 10.2475/10.2010.12
[25] Xu Xueyi, He Shiping, Wang Hongliang, Chen Junlu, Zhang Erpeng, Feng Yiming. 2008. Outline of the Geology of NW China—Qinling, Qilian and Tian Shan Areas[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1–355(in Chinese).
[26] Yang Fulin, Zou Yunxin, Cao Xia, Yang Liang, Ma Gang, Gao Jian. 2017. Zircon LA-ICPMS U-Pb dating for the quartz diorite in the south Pengboshan of Beishan area, Inner Mongolia[J]. Geological Survey and Research, 40(2): 109−118 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=qhwjyjjz201702004
[27] Yang Hequn, Li Ying, Li Wenming, Yang Jianguo, Zhao Guobin, Sun Nanyi, Wang Xiaohong, Tan Wenjuan. 2008. General discussion on metallogenitic tectonic setting of Beishan mountain, Northwestern China[J]. Northwestern Geology, 41(1): 22−28 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/283466594_General_discussion_on_metallogenitic_tectonic_setting_of_beishan_mountain_Northwestern_China
[28] Yang Hequn, Li Ying, Zhao Guobin, Li Wenyuan, Wang Xiaohong, Jiang Hanbin, Tan Wenjuan, Sun Nanyi. 2010. Character and structural attribute of the Beishan ophiolite[J]. Northwestern Geology, 43(1): 26−36 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xbdz201001002
[29] Yin Ming, Li Jiaxi. 2011. Rock and mineral analysis(volume Ⅱ)[M]. Fourth Edition. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1–862(in Chinese).
[30] Yuan HL, Gao S, Liu XM, Li HM, Detlef G, Wu FY. 2004. Accurate U-Pb Age and Trace Element Determinations of Zircon by Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry[J]. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, 28(3): 353−370. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-908X.2004.tb00755.x
[31] Zhao Zhixiong, Jia Yuanqin, Xu Hai, Wang Jinrong, Wang Xinliang, Liu Qiang. 2015. LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb age of quartz diorite from the Jiaochagou area in Beishan orogenic belt, Inner Mongolia, and its tectonic significance[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 89(7): 1210−1218 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201507005.htm
[32] Zhao Zhixiong, Jia Yuanqin, Wang Jinrong, Xu Hai, Xiong Yu, Wang Xinliang, Liu Qiang, Gao Wei, Gao Jian. 2018. LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb age of monzonite granite-quartz diorite pluton in Xiaoheishan area of Beishan orogenic belt and its geological significance, Inner Mongolia[J]. Earth Science, 43(S2): 49−59 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DQKX2018S2005.htm
[33] Zuo Guochao, He Guoqi. 1990. Plate tectonics and metallogenic regularities in Beishan region[M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 1–226(in Chinese).
[34] Zuo Guochao, Liu Yike, Liu Chunyan. 2003. Framework and evolution of the tectonic structure in Beishan area across Gansu province, Xinjiang autonomous region and Inner Mongolia autonomous region[J]. Acta Geologica Gansu, 12(1): 1−15 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gsdzxb200301001
-
图(6)
表(8)
计量
- 文章访问数: 633
- PDF下载数: 7
- 施引文献: 0