中国地质调查局 中国地质科学院主办
科学出版社出版

地热规模化开发断层滑动概率评估——以雄安新区深部岩溶热储为例

岳高凡, 王贵玲, 马峰, 朱喜, 张汉雄. 2021. 地热规模化开发断层滑动概率评估——以雄安新区深部岩溶热储为例[J]. 中国地质, 48(5): 1382-1391. doi: 10.12029/gc20210505
引用本文: 岳高凡, 王贵玲, 马峰, 朱喜, 张汉雄. 2021. 地热规模化开发断层滑动概率评估——以雄安新区深部岩溶热储为例[J]. 中国地质, 48(5): 1382-1391. doi: 10.12029/gc20210505
YUE Gaofan, WANG Guiling, MA Feng, ZHU Xi, ZHANG Hanxiong. 2021. Evaluation of fault slip probability of geothermal large-scale development: A case study of deep karst geothermal reservoir in Xiong'an New Area[J]. Geology in China, 48(5): 1382-1391. doi: 10.12029/gc20210505
Citation: YUE Gaofan, WANG Guiling, MA Feng, ZHU Xi, ZHANG Hanxiong. 2021. Evaluation of fault slip probability of geothermal large-scale development: A case study of deep karst geothermal reservoir in Xiong'an New Area[J]. Geology in China, 48(5): 1382-1391. doi: 10.12029/gc20210505

地热规模化开发断层滑动概率评估——以雄安新区深部岩溶热储为例

  • 基金项目:
    中国地质调查局地质调查项目“冀中坳陷深部碳酸盐岩热储调查评价”(DD20190555)及国家自然科学基金项目(41807208)联合资助
详细信息
    作者简介: 岳高凡, 男, 1989年生, 硕士, 助理研究员, 主要从事地热地质、反应溶质运移研究工作; E-mail: gaofan3904@163.com
    通讯作者: 王贵玲, 男, 1964年生, 研究员, 主要从事地热地质研究工作; E-mail: guilingw@163.com
  • 中图分类号: P314.3

Evaluation of fault slip probability of geothermal large-scale development: A case study of deep karst geothermal reservoir in Xiong'an New Area

  • Fund Project: Supported by the project of China Geological Survey (No.DD20190555), China National Natural Science Foundation Project (No.41807208)
More Information
    Author Bio: YUE Gaofan, male, born in 1989, postgraduate, assistant researcher, engaged in the research of geothermal geology; E-mail: gaofan3904@163.com .
    Corresponding author: WANG Guiling, male, born in 1964, researcher, engaged in the research of geothermal geology; E-mail: guilingw@163.com
  • 雄安新区地热资源丰富,具有广阔的规模化开发利用前景,对于实现"绿色雄安"具有重要意义。许多学者的研究集中在地质结构探测、地热资源量评价、地壳稳定性等方面,关于深部岩溶热储规模化开发可能引起的断层滑动研究薄弱。本文在地热地质综合调查的基础上,基于地质力学理论,采用蒙特卡罗随机模拟方法,评价雄安新区主要断层特征(走向、倾角、滑动摩擦系数等)、地应力分布(孔隙压力、最大/最小/垂直主应力大小及方向等),量化雄安新区天然断层在规模化开发利用情况下的激活可能性,结果显示已探明断层在天然、规模化回灌和水力压裂条件下的最大滑动趋势分别为0.26、0.27和0.40,地热开发不会引起断层激活。本研究树立了地热规模化开发的信心,可为雄安新区地热资源安全利用提供支撑。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  雄安新区地理位置和断层分布图

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  蒙特卡洛模拟参数分布图

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  天然断层滑动趋势分布图

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  天然断层滑动趋势累积分布图

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  滑动趋势极坐标统计图

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  孔隙压力扰动(2 MPa)下的滑动趋势累积分布图

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  孔隙压力变化对断层稳定性影响

    Figure 7. 

    表 1  断层滑动趋势分析参数分布

    Table 1.  Fault slip trend analysis parameter distribution

    下载: 导出CSV
  • Blanpied M L, Lockner D A, Byerlee J D. 1995. Frictional slip of granite at hydrothermal conditions[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 100(B7): 13045-13064. doi: 10.1029/95JB00862

    Byerlee J. 1978. Friction of Rocks[M]. Byerlee J D, Wyss M. Basel: Birkhäuser Basel.

    Fan Larsheng, Jia Xiaofeng, Wang Guiling, Zhang Tunde, Zhang Ping, Lv Can, Li Junping. 2020. Drilling practice of D03 geothermal exploration well in Xiongan New Area[J]. Exploration Engineering(Rock & Soil Drilling And Tunneling), 47(10): 13-22. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Fan Yulu, Tan Chengxuan, Zhang Peng, Sun Mingqian, Qi Bangshen, Feng Chengjun, Meng Jing, Wang Huiqing. 2020. A Study of current in-situ stress state and its influence on tectonic stability in the Xiongan New Area[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 41(4): 481-491 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Feng Chengjun, Qi Bangshen, Wang Xiaoshan, Zhang Peng, Sun Mingqian, Meng Jing, Tan Chengxuan, Chen Qunze. 2019. Study of fault activity risk in typical strong seismic regions in northern China by in-situ stress measurements and the influence on the Xiong'an New Area[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 26(4): 170-190 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Friberg P, Besana-Ostman G, Dricker I. 2014. Characterization of an earthquake sequence triggered by hydraulic fracturing in Harrison County, Ohio[J]. Seismological Research Letters, 85: 1295-1307. doi: 10.1785/0220140127

    He Dengfa, Shan Shuaiqiang, Zhang Yuying, Lu Renqi, Zhang Ruifeng, Cui Yongqian. 2018. 3-D geologic architecture of Xiong'an New Area: Constraints from seismic reflection data[J]. Science China: Earth Sciences, 48(9): 1207-1222 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-JDXG201808002.htm

    Heidbach O, Rajabi M, Reiter K. 2016. World Stress Map Database Release 2016. V. 1.1[OL]. GFZ Data Services.

    Huang Luyuan, Yang Shuxin, Cui Xiaofeng, Chen Qunce, Yao Rui. 2013. Analysis of characteristics of measured stress and stability of faults in North China[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 34(S1): 204-213 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/287539781_Analysis_of_characteristics_of_measured_stress_and_stability_of_faults_in_North_China

    Jaeger J C, Cook N G W, Zimmerman R. 2007. Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics, 4th Edition[M]. US: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Ma Zhen, Xia YuBo, Wang Xiaodan, Han Bo, Gao Yihang. 2019. Integration of engineering geological investigation data and construction of a 3D geological structure model in the Xiong'an New Area[J]. Geology in China, 46(S2): 123-129(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Ma Zhen, Xia Yubo, Li Haitao, Han Bo, Yu Xuezhong, Zhou Yalong, Wang Yushan, Guo Xu, Li Hong, Pei Yandong. 2021. Analysis of natural resources and environment eco-geological conditions in the Xiong'an New Area[J]. Geology in China, 48(3): 677-696(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Mcgarr A, Barbour A. 2018. Injection-induced moment release can also be aseismic[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 45 (11): 5344. doi: 10.1029/2018GL078422

    Moeck I, Kwiatek G, Zimmerman Gu. 2009. Slip tendency analysis, fault reactivation potential and induced seismicity in a deep geothermal reservoir[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 31(10): 1174-1182. doi: 10.1016/j.jsg.2009.06.012

    Morris A, Ferrill D, Henderson D. 1996. Slip-tendency analysis and fault reactivation[J]. Geology, 24. http://basin.earth.ncu.edu.tw/Course/SeminarII/abstract2014_1/2014.10.16_Yu-Hsuan%20Chiang/Chiang,%20Yu-%20Hsuan_Geology-1996-Morris-275-8.pdf

    Nelson P, Gianoutsos N, Drake II R. 2015. Underpressure in Mesozoic and Paleozoic rock units in the Midcontinent of the United States[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 99: 1861-1892. doi: 10.1306/04171514169

    Niu Linlin. 2018. Study on the Tectonic Stress Field and Seismogenic Environment in Beijing Tianjin Hebei Region[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Norbeck J H, Horne R N. 2018. Maximum magnitude of injection-induced earthquakes: A criterion to assess the influence of pressure migration along faults[J]. Tectonophysics, 733: 108-118. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2018.01.028

    Pang Jumei, Pang Zhonghe, Lü Min, Tian Jiao. 2018. Geochemical and isotopic characteristics of fluids in the Niutuozhen geothermal field, North China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 77(1): 12. doi: 10.1007/s12665-017-7171-y

    Seithel R, Gaucher E, Mueller B, Steiner U, Kohl T. 2019. Probability of fault reactivation in the Bavarian Molasse Basin[J]. Geothermics, 82: 81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2019.06.004

    Schoenball M, Walsh F R, Weingarten M. 2018. How faults wake up: The Guthrie-Langston, Oklahoma earthquakes[J]. The Leading Edge, 37(2): 100-106. doi: 10.1190/tle37020100.1

    Shang Shijie, Feng Chengjun, Tan Chengxuan, Qi Bangshen, Zhang Peng, Meng Jing, Wang Miaomiao, Sun Mingqian, Wan Jiawei, Wang Huiqing, Xiang Xinxuan. 2019. Quaternary activity study of major buried faults near Xiongan New Area[J]. Acta Geoscientia Sinica, 40(6): 836-846 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DQXB201906007.htm

    Walsh F R, Zoback M D. 2015. Oklahoma's recent earthquakes and saltwater disposal[J]. Science Advances, 1(5): 1-9. http://www.ourenergypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/e1500195.full_.pdf

    Walsh F R, Zoback M D. 2016. Probabilistic assessment of potential fault slip related to injection-induced earthquakes: Application to north-central Oklahoma, USA[J]. Geology, 44(12): 991-994. doi: 10.1130/G38275.1

    Xu Jie, Gao Zhanwu, Song Changqing, Sun Jiangbao. 2000. Tectonic features of the Taihang Mountains pre-mountain rift zone[J]. Seismology and Geology, (2): 111-122(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Zhang Yi, Dai Junsheng, Wang Ke, Zou Juan, Zhang Dandan. 2014. Characteristics of Paleoproterozoic fracture activity in the Baxian Depression of the Jizhong Depression[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science), 29(1): 27-33, 5(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Zhu Xi, Wang Guiling, Ma Feng, Zhang Wei, Zhang Qinglian, Zhang Hanxiong. 2020. Hydrogeochemistry of geothermal maters from Taihang Mountain-Xiong'an New Area and its indicating significance[J]. Earth Science, 46(7): 15(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Zoback M D, Harhes H P. 1997. Injection-induced earthquakes and crustal stress at 9 km depth at the KTB deep drilling site, Germany[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 102(B8): 18477-18491(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1029/96JB02814

    陈墨香. 1988. 华北地热[M]. 北京: 科学出版社.

    樊腊生, 贾小丰, 王贵玲, 张统得, 张平, 吕灿, 李俊萍. 2020. 雄安新区D03地热勘探井钻探施工实践[J]. 探矿工程(岩土钻掘工程), 47(10): 13-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TKGC202010003.htm

    范玉璐, 谭成轩, 张鹏, 孙明乾, 戚帮申, 丰成君, 孟静, 王惠卿. 2020. 雄安新区现今地应力环境及其对构造稳定性影响研究[J]. 地球学报, 41(4): 481-491. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB202004003.htm

    丰成君, 戚帮申, 王晓山, 张鹏, 孙明乾, 孟静, 谭成轩, 陈群策. 2019. 基于原地应力实测数据探讨华北典型强震区断裂活动危险性及其对雄安新区的影响[J]. 地学前缘, 26(4): 170-190. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201904024.htm

    何登发, 单帅强, 张煜颖, 鲁人齐, 张锐锋, 崔永谦. 2018. 雄安新区的三维地质结构: 来自反射地震资料的约束[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 48(9): 1207-1222. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK201809007.htm

    胡秋韵, 高俊, 马峰, 赵志宏, 刘桂宏, 王贵玲, 张薇, 朱喜, 张保建, 邢一飞. 2020. 雄安新区容城凸起区地热可采资源量动态预测[J]. 地质学报, 94(7): 2013-2025. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2020.07.010

    黄禄渊, 杨树新, 崔效锋, 陈群策, 姚瑞. 2013. 华北地区实测应力特征与断层稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 34(S1): 204-213. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX2013S1032.htm

    马峰, 王贵玲, 张薇, 朱喜, 张汉雄, 岳高凡. 2020. 雄安新区容城地热田热储空间结构及资源潜力[J]. 地质学报, 94(7): 1981-1990. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2020.07.007

    马震, 夏雨波, 王小丹, 韩博, 高伊航. 2019. 雄安新区工程地质勘查数据集成与三维地质结构模型构建[J]. 中国地质, 46(S2): 123-129. http://geochina.cgs.gov.cn/geochina/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2019S213&flag=1

    马震, 夏雨波, 李海涛, 韩博, 余学中, 周亚龙, 王雨山, 郭旭, 李洪, 裴艳东. 2021. 雄安新区自然资源与环境-生态地质条件分析[J]. 中国地质, 48(3): 677-696. http://geochina.cgs.gov.cn/geochina/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20210301&flag=1

    牛琳琳. 2018. 京津冀地区现代构造应力场与孕震环境研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质科学院.

    商世杰, 丰成君, 谭成轩, 戚帮申, 张鹏, 孟静, 王苗苗, 孙明乾, 万佳威, 王惠卿, 项歆璇. 2019. 雄安新区附近主要隐伏断裂第四纪活动性研究[J]. 地球学报, 40(6): 836-846. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB201906007.htm

    王贵玲, 高俊, 张保建, 邢一飞, 张薇, 马峰. 2020. 雄安新区高阳低凸起区雾迷山组热储特征与高产能地热井参数研究[J]. 地质学报, 94(7): 1970-1980. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2020.07.006

    王贵玲, 蔺文静. 2020. 我国主要水热型地热系统形成机制与成因模式[J]. 地质学报, 94(7): 1923-1937. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2020.07.002

    吴爱民, 马峰, 王贵玲, 刘金侠, 胡秋韵, 苗青壮. 2018. 雄安新区深部岩溶热储探测与高产能地热井参数研究[J]. 地球学报, 39(5): 523-532. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB201805002.htm

    徐杰, 高战武, 宋长青, 孙建宝. 2000. 太行山山前断裂带的构造特征[J]. 地震地质, (2): 111-122. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2000.02.003

    张薇, 王贵玲, 刘峰, 邢林啸, 李曼. 2019. 中国沉积盆地型地热资源特征[J]. 中国地质, 46(2): 255-268. http://geochina.cgs.gov.cn/geochina/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20190204&flag=1

    张艺, 戴俊生, 王珂, 邹娟, 张丹丹. 2014. 冀中坳陷霸县凹陷古近纪断裂活动特征[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 29(1): 27-33, 5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-064X.2014.01.005

    赵佳怡. 2020. 雄安新区深部热储空间结构与水热分异过程研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质科学院.

    朱喜, 王贵玲, 马峰, 张薇, 张庆莲, 张汉雄. 2020. 太行山-雄安新区蓟县系含水层水文地球化学特征及意义[J]. 地球科学, 46(7): 15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX202107025.htm

  • 加载中

(7)

(1)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  2221
  • PDF下载数:  100
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2021-04-06
修回日期:  2021-07-20
刊出日期:  2021-10-25

目录