Ecological System Service Value Assessment and Improving Countermeasures in Ningxia Yellow River Ecological Economic Zone
-
摘要:
宁夏沿黄生态经济区是自治区各种生产要素最为集中的地区，其生态系统服务价值显得尤为重要。笔者采用修正当量因子法估算了5大生态系统11种生态系统服务价值，明确生态系统服务价值内部结构、时空分布特征及变化趋势，提出价值提升的对策建议，服务黄河流域宁夏段生态保护与高质量发展先行区建设。结果表明：经济区生态系统服务价值呈现出“中间高，四周低；盆地和山区高，荒漠和丘陵低”的空间分布特征；生态系统服务功能以水文调节、气候调节、水资源供给和气体调节服务为主，所占比重分别为59.07%、8.97%、5.02%、4.91%；生态系统服务价值呈增长趋势，与经济发展速度相比仍处于低协调度状态，下一步应在保护生态功能，兼顾美学价值的前提下，加强荒漠和丘陵地带的光伏、风能等清洁能源发展，提升生态系统服务价值。
Abstract:The various production factors of the autonomous region are concentrated in the Ningxia Yellow River Economic Zone. Ecosystem service value of it is more and more significant than ever. Taking the Ningxia Yellow River Economic Zone for example, based on the platform of ArcGIS, this paper adopts the equivalent factor method to estimate the value of 11 ecological service functions for 6 major ecosystems, and clarifies the internal structure, temporal and spatial distribution characteristics and trends of ecosystem service value, then puts forward ecological protection countermeasures to serve the ecological protection and high–quality development of the leading areas in Ningxia section of the Yellow River Basin. The results show that the ecosystem service value is high in the middle and low in the margin of the economic zone, high in the basins and mountains, low in the deserts and hilly area. The amount order of ecosystem services the value is regulation service value > supply service value > support service value > aesthetic value; ecosystem services are mainly dominated by hydrological regulation, climate regulation, water supply and air regulation services, accounting for 59.07%, 8.97%, 5.02% and 4.91%, respectively. In general, ecological services value shows an increasing trend, but compared with the speed of economic development, it is still in a state of low coordination. In the next step, under the premise of protecting ecological functions by taking into account the aesthetic value, the clean energy such as solar and wind energy in the desert and hilly areas should be strengthened to enhance the ecological value for the low ecosystem service value region and fragile ecological areas.
-
-
表 1 单位面积生态系统服务价值当量统计表（万元/hm2·a）
Table 1. Equicalent factor table of ecosystem service value （104 yuan/hm2.a）
生态系统 供给服务 调节服务 支持服务 文化服务 食物
生产原料
生产水资
源供给气体
调节气候
调节净化
环境水文
调节水土
保持维持
养分循环生物
多样性美学
景观旱地 0.5485 0.2581 0.0060 0.4323 0.2323 0.0645 0.0804 1.0300 0.0774 0.0839 0.0387 针阔混交 0.2000 0.4581 0.1102 1.5164 4.5363 1.2841 1.0451 2.8600 0.1420 1.6777 0.7356 灌木 0.1226 0.2775 0.0655 0.9098 2.7295 0.8259 0.9974 1.7200 0.0839 1.0131 0.4452 草原 0.0645 0.0903 0.0238 0.3291 0.8647 0.2839 0.2918 0.6200 0.0323 0.3614 0.1613 水系 0.5162 0.1484 2.4683 0.4969 1.4777 3.5813 30.4410 0.9300 0.0452 1.6454 1.2196 湿地 0.3291 0.3226 0.7711 1.2260 2.3230 2.3230 7.2142 2.3100 0.1161 5.0783 3.0521 荒漠 0.0065 0.0194 0.0060 0.0710 0.0645 0.2000 0.0625 0.1300 0.0065 0.0774 0.0323 裸地 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0129 0.0000 0.0645 0.0089 0.0200 0.0000 0.0129 0.0065 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 程静, 黄越. 宁夏回族自治区生态系统服务价值时空演变及其驱动力[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(2): 1-8 doi: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.20201009.001
CHENG Jing, HUANG Yue. Spatio-temporal evolution of ecosystem services value and its driving forces in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(2): 1-8. doi: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.20201009.001
[2] 李双成, 谢爱丽, 吕春艳, 等. 土地生态系统服务研究进展及趋势展望[J]. 中国土地科学, 2018, 32(12): 82-89 doi: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20181123.103632
LI Shuangcheng, XIE Aili, LYU Chunyan, et al. Research progress and prospect for land ecosystem services[J]. China Land Science, 2018, 32(12): 82-89. doi: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20181123.103632
[3] 梁庆恒. 基于生态系统服务价值的铁力市土地利用结构优化研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2019
LIANG Qingheng. Study on the optimal allocation of land use structure in Tieli City based on the value of ecosystem services[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2019.
[4] 马洪云, 王化齐, 李成柱, 等. 宁夏沿黄生态经济区综合地质调查[R]. 西安: 中国地质调查局西安地质调查中心, 2021.
[5] 马淑花. 基于生态系统服务价值评估的土地利用规划研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2018
MA Shuhua. Research on Land use planning based on ecosystem services evaluation[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2018.
[6] 乔斌. 宁夏党家岔湿地自然保护区生态质量诊断及社区发展路径协同研究[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2016
QIAO Bin. Study on ecological quality diagnosis and community development path coordination in Dangjiacha wetland natural reserye of Ningxia[D]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2016.
[7] 王小莉. 基于生态系统服务价值评估的东江流域生态补偿研究[D]. 开封: 河南大学, 2018
WANG Xiaoli. Study on ecological compensation of Dongjiang River Basin based on evaluation of ecosystem service[D]. Kaifeng: Henan University, 2018.
[8] 王重玲, 朱志玲, 王梅梅, 等. 基于生态服务价值的宁夏隆德县生态补偿研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2014, 21(1): 208-212
WANG Chongling, ZHU Zhiling, WANG Meimei, et al. Research for the ecological function regionalization of ecological compensation based on ecological service value: An example of Longde county in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 21(1): 208-212.
[9] 徐志涛. 基于耦合面向对象与像元分类的中宁县土地利用监测与生态服务价值评价[D]. 南昌: 东华理工大学, 2016
XU Zhitao. Land use monitoring and ecological service value evaluation of Zhongning County based on coupled object-orientedand pixels classification[D]. Nanchang: East China University of Technology, 2016.
[10] 张馨芳. 洱海流域土地利用与生态系统服务价值变化研究[D]. 昆明: 云南财经大学. 2014.
ZHANG Xinfang. Research on the changes of land use and ecosystem service value in Erhai basin[D]. Kunmin: Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, 2014.
[11] 赵海燕. 安徽省生态服务价值核算及其影响因子研究[D]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2019
ZHAO Haiyan. Study on ecosystem service value accounting and itsinfluencing factors in AnnuiProvince [D]. Hefei: Hefei University of Technology, 2019.
[12] 仲俊涛, 米文宝. 基于生态系统服务价值的宁夏区域生态补偿研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2013, 27(10): 19-24
ZHONG Juntao, MI Wenbao. Study on regional ecological compensation based on ecosystem service value in Ningxia[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment. 2013, 27(10): 19-24.
[13] Costanza R. Ecosystem functions and services[J]. Ekonomiai Srodowisko (Economics and Environment), 2012, 2: 8-17.
[14] Costanza R. Visions, values, valuation and the need for an ecological economics[J]. BioScience, 2001, 51: 459-468. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0459:VVVATN]2.0.CO;2
[15] Costanza R. Ecosystem Services: Multiple classification systems are needed[J]. Biological Conservation, 2008, 141: 350-352. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.020
[16] Costanza R. Toward a new sustainable economy[J]. Real World Economics Review, 2009, 49: 20−21.
-
图(6)
表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 459
- PDF下载数: 1
- 施引文献: 0