小兴安岭北段林海林场花岗岩年代学、地球化学特征及构造意义

牟福权, 许国雨, 卢鸿雁, 崔雪文, 常亮, 娄雨雷, 祁迎圣, 邱信东. 小兴安岭北段林海林场花岗岩年代学、地球化学特征及构造意义[J]. 地质与资源, 2025, 34(1): 1-10, 102. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2025.01.001
引用本文: 牟福权, 许国雨, 卢鸿雁, 崔雪文, 常亮, 娄雨雷, 祁迎圣, 邱信东. 小兴安岭北段林海林场花岗岩年代学、地球化学特征及构造意义[J]. 地质与资源, 2025, 34(1): 1-10, 102. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2025.01.001
MU Fu-quan, XU Guo-yu, LU Hong-yan, CUI Xue-wen, CHANG Liang, LOU Yu-lei, QI Ying-sheng, QIU Xin-dong. Geochronology and geochemistry of granites in Linhai forest farm, northern Xiaoxinganling Mountains: Tectonic implication[J]. Geology and Resources, 2025, 34(1): 1-10, 102. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2025.01.001
Citation: MU Fu-quan, XU Guo-yu, LU Hong-yan, CUI Xue-wen, CHANG Liang, LOU Yu-lei, QI Ying-sheng, QIU Xin-dong. Geochronology and geochemistry of granites in Linhai forest farm, northern Xiaoxinganling Mountains: Tectonic implication[J]. Geology and Resources, 2025, 34(1): 1-10, 102. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2025.01.001

小兴安岭北段林海林场花岗岩年代学、地球化学特征及构造意义

  • 基金项目:
    黑龙江省国土资源厅项目"黑龙江省逊克县福民林场、永胜经营所幅1:5万区域地质矿产调查"(HLJKD2006-10)
详细信息
    作者简介: 牟福权(1982-), 男, 硕士研究生, 工程师, 主要从事区域地质调查、矿产勘查等工作, 通信地址吉林省长春市北湖科技开发区光机路4855号, E-mail//mufuquan@mail.cgs.gov.cn
    通讯作者: 许国雨(1992-), 男, 硕士, 工程师, 主要从事固体矿产勘查及相关成矿理论研究, 通信地址吉林省长春市北湖科技开发区光机路4855号, E-mail//xuguoyu@mail.cgs.gov.cn
  • 中图分类号: P597

Geochronology and geochemistry of granites in Linhai forest farm, northern Xiaoxinganling Mountains: Tectonic implication

More Information
  • 小兴安岭-张广才岭林海林场地区发育一套高分异Ⅰ型花岗岩, 主要由边缘相细粒二长花岗岩和中心相细中粒二长花岗岩组成.岩石高Si和全碱(Na2O+K2O), 富Al, 贫Fe、Mg、Ca、Ti, 属于准铝质、高钾钙碱性系列岩石, 并且富集大离子亲石元素(LILE)、轻稀土元素(LREE), 亏损高场强元素(HFSE), 具中等强度Eu负异常.花岗岩的LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄表明其形成于191.6±2.9 Ma.根据地球化学组成认为, 花岗岩主要起源于早中生代浅源陆壳物质的部分熔融.高分异Ⅰ型花岗岩的发现表明, 区内早侏罗世发生过规模较大的岩浆侵入活动, 可能与古太平洋板块西向俯冲背景下的区域伸展环境密切相关.

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  研究区构造地质图

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  研究区早侏罗世二长花岗岩野外照片和显微照片

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  花岗岩成分判别图解

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  花岗岩微量元素蛛网图和稀土元素配分曲线

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  PM04-28号样品锆石U-Pb同位素年龄测定结果谐和图和阴极发光图

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  花岗岩成因类型Ca-Fe-Mg图解(据文献[24])

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  R1-R2构造环境判别图解(据文献[28])

    Figure 7. 

    表 1  花岗岩主量元素和微量元素分析结果

    Table 1.  Contents of major and trace elements in granite

    样品号 PM04-26 PM04-27 PM04-28 PM04-29 样品号 PM04-26 PM04-27 PM04-28 PM04-29
    SiO2 76.230 73.970 68.170 74.670 Zr 113 196 51.4 82.6
    TiO2 0.081 0.087 0.420 0.110 Hf 4.41 5.89 1.72 2.83
    Al2O3 12.560 13.830 14.410 12.410 Sm 2.1 6.21 1.12 3.44
    Fe2O3 0.310 0.320 3.020 1.390 Y 18.8 33.5 3.56 14.2
    FeO 0.520 0.630 1.430 0.550 Yb 2.87 4 0.483 1.72
    MnO 0.074 0.061 0.084 0.051 Lu 0.419 0.56 0.059 0.254
    MgO 0.170 0.130 0.140 0.120 La 14.5 38.5 17.1 30.2
    CaO 0.580 0.820 0.790 0.470 Ce 40.4 113 24.8 53.9
    Na2O 3.490 3.710 4.060 3.090 Pr 3.03 8.52 2.41 6.08
    K2O 5.750 6.180 6.920 6.610 Nd 10.7 31.4 7.91 21.4
    P2O5 0.020 0.021 0.041 0.025 Sm 2.1 6.21 1.12 3.44
    LOI 0.170 0.170 0.360 0.450 Eu 0.174 0.99 0.159 0.743
    99.955 99.929 99.845 99.946 Gd 1.85 5.34 0.859 2.71
    Na2O+K2O 9.260 9.914 11.037 9.749 Tb 0.394 1.11 0.144 0.502
    A/CNK 0.963 0.967 0.922 0.946 Dy 2.79 5.86 0.609 2.33
    DI 96.130 95.530 92.090 95.990 Ho 0.591 1.18 0.111 0.45
    A/NK 1.048 1.080 1.016 1.013 Er 1.98 3.47 0.307 1.28
    R1 2472.000 2150.000 1361.000 2289.000 Tm 0.404 0.58 0.047 0.233
    R2 318.000 359.000 376.000 301.000 Yb 2.87 4 0.483 1.72
    Rb 168 191 228 154 Lu 0.419 0.56 0.059 0.254
    Ba 174 762 376 583 Y 18.8 33.5 3.56 14.2
    Th 19 24.9 3.6 21 ∑REE 82.202 220.72 56.12 125.24
    U 4.02 8.66 0.775 5.66 LREE 70.9 198.62 53.5 115.76
    Ta 0.933 0.875 0.547 1.09 HREE 11.3 22.1 2.62 9.48
    Nb 15 14 9.69 12.3 LREE/HREE 6.28 8.99 20.43 12.21
    La 14.5 38.5 17.1 30.2 LaN/YbN 3.62 6.9 25.4 12.59
    Ce 40.4 113 24.8 53.9 δEu 0.26 0.51 0.48 0.72
    Sr 23.8 96.7 31.6 223 δCe 1.42 1.46 0.83 0.92
    含量单位: 主量元素为%, 微量元素为10-6.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  花岗岩同位素分析结果

    Table 2.  Isotopic analysis results of granite

    样品点 同位素比值 锆石年龄/Ma
    207Pb/206Pb 207Pb/235U 206Pb/238U 208Pb/232Th 207Pb/235U 206Pb/238U
    1 0.0526 0.002 0.22 0.01 0.0303 0.0004 0.0159 0.0007 202 9 193 3
    2 0.0551 0.003 0.2244 0.0149 0.0295 0.0007 0.0142 0.0015 205 14 187 5
    3 0.0494 0.0034 0.2056 0.0166 0.0302 0.0008 0.0138 0.0021 190 15 192 5
    4 0.0508 0.0036 0.219 0.0162 0.0313 0.0002 0.0163 0.0014 201 15 199 1
    5 0.0579 0.0032 0.2056 0.0138 0.0258 0.0007 0.0112 0.0007 190 13 164 4
    6 0.0447 0.0025 0.1949 0.012 0.0316 0.0003 0.0144 0.0007 181 11 201 2
    7 0.0563 0.0032 0.1972 0.0126 0.0254 0.0003 0.0086 0.0004 183 12 162 2
    8 0.0504 0.005 0.2089 0.0225 0.0301 0.0004 0.0135 0.0013 193 21 191 3
    9 0.05 0.0027 0.2109 0.0141 0.0306 0.0011 0.0137 0.0013 194 13 194 7
    10 0.0479 0.0022 0.195 0.0109 0.0295 0.0009 0.0128 0.0009 181 10 187 5
    11 0.0527 0.0026 0.2122 0.0111 0.0292 0.0001 0.0103 0.0004 195 10 186 1
    12 0.0509 0.0025 0.207 0.0109 0.0295 0.0002 0.0103 0.0002 191 10 187 1
    13 0.0545 0.001 0.223 0.005 0.0297 0.0004 0.0104 0.0004 204 5 189 3
    14 0.0516 0.0041 0.212 0.0186 0.0298 0.0005 0.0121 0.0011 195 17 189 3
    15 0.0655 0.0032 0.1795 0.0103 0.0199 0.0004 0.0089 0.0004 168 10 127 2
    16 0.0495 0.0021 0.1976 0.0102 0.0289 0.0007 0.0128 0.0007 183 9 184 5
    17 0.0515 0.0016 0.2131 0.0077 0.03 0.0003 0.0119 0.0003 196 7 191 2
    18 0.0507 0.0018 0.2219 0.01 0.0317 0.0007 0.0123 0.0003 203 9 201 5
    19 0.0522 0.0022 0.2273 0.0108 0.0316 0.0003 0.012 0.0003 208 10 200 2
    20 0.0555 0.003 0.2303 0.0129 0.0301 0.0001 0.0127 0.0003 211 12 191 1
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Liu K, Zhang J J, Wilde S A, et al. U-Pb dating and Lu-Hf isotopes of detrital zircons from the southern Sikhote-Alin Orogenic Belt, Russian Far East: Tectonic implications for the Early Cretaceous evolution of the northwest Pacific margin[J]. Tectonics, 2017, 36(11): 2555-2598. doi: 10.1002/2017TC004599

    [2]

    Wu F Y, Sun D Y, Ge W C, et al. Geochronology of the Phanerozoic granitoids in northeastern China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2011, 41(1): 1-30.

    [3]

    许文良, 孙晨阳, 唐杰, 等. 兴蒙造山带的基底属性与构造演化过程[J]. 地球科学, 2019, 44(5): 1620-1646.

    Xu W L, Sun C Y, Tang J, et al. Basement nature and tectonic evolution of the Xing'an-Mongolian Orogenic Belt[J]. Earth Science, 2019, 44(5): 1620-1646.

    [4]

    Xu W L, Pei F P, Wang F, et al. Spatial-temporal relationships of Mesozoic volcanic rocks in NE China: Constraints on tectonic overprinting and transformations between multiple tectonic regimes [J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2013, 74: 167-193.

    [5]

    陈会军, 付俊彧, 钱程, 等. 东北地区前中生代花岗岩类年龄与时空分布[J]. 地质通报, 2021, 40(6): 827-844.

    Chen H J, Fu J Y, Qian C, et al. Chronology and spatiotemporal distribution of Pre-Mesozoic granites in Northeast China[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2021, 40(6): 827-844.

    [6]

    张超, 吴新伟, 刘永江, 等. 大兴安岭中段早二叠世A型花岗岩成因及对扎兰屯地区构造演化的制约[J]. 岩石学报, 2020, 36(4): 1091-1106.

    Zhang C, Wu X W, Liu Y J, et al. Genesis of Early Permian A-type granites in the middle of the Great Xing'an Range and constraints on tectonic evolution of the Zhalantun area[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2020, 36(4): 1091-1106.

    [7]

    Wu F Y, Jahn B M, Wilde S, et al. Phanerozoic crustal growth: U-Pb and Sr-Nd isotopic evidence from the granites in northeastern China [J]. Tectonophysics, 2000, 328(1/2): 89-113.

    [8]

    曹正琦, 侯光久. 大兴安岭北段晚中生代碱性侵入岩岩石地球化学特征及其意义[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2009, 28(3): 209- 216.

    Cao Z Q, Hou G J. The Late Mesozoic alkaline intrusive rocks at the north of the Da Hinggan Mountains: Lithogeochemical characteristics and their implications[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2009, 28(3): 209-216.

    [9]

    葛文春, 吴福元, 周长勇, 等. 大兴安岭中部乌兰浩特地区中生代花岗岩的锆石U-Pb年龄及地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2005, 21(3): 749-762.

    Ge W C, Wu F Y, Zhou C Y, et al. Zircon U-Pb ages and its significance of the Mesozoic granites in the Wulanhaote region, central Da Hinggan Mountain[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2005, 21(3): 749-762.

    [10]

    葛茂卉, 张进江, 刘恺. 小兴安岭-张广才岭铁力地区侏罗纪辉绿岩年代学、地球化学、锆石Hf同位素特征及其构造意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2020, 36(3): 726-740.

    Ge M H, Zhang J J, Liu K. Geochronology, geochemistry and zircon Hf isotope of the Jurassic diabase from the Tieli area, Lesser Xing'an- Zhangguangcai Range, and its geological implications[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2020, 36(3): 726-740.

    [11]

    李仰春, 张克信, 吴淦国, 等. 大-小兴安岭接合部早-中侏罗世侵入岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年及成因[J]. 地质通报, 2013, 32(5): 717-729.

    Li Y C, Zhang K X, Wu G G, et al. Zircon U-Pb ages and causes of the Early-Middle Jurassic granites in the Da-Xiao Xinganling copula [J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2013, 32(5): 717-729.

    [12]

    张立仕, 孙丰月, 李碧乐, 等. 小兴安岭-张广才岭成矿带福安堡钼矿区花岗岩类的岩石成因和构造背景: 元素地球化学、锆石U-Pb年龄和Sr-Nd-Hf同位素约束[J]. 地质学报, 2021, 95(8): 2471- 2492.

    Zhang L S, Sun F Y, Li B L, et al. Petrogenesis and tectonic setting of granitoids in the Fu'anpu molybdenum deposit, Lesser Xing'an- Zhangguangcai Range metallogenic belt: Constraints from element geochemistry, zircon U-Pb geochronology and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopes[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2021, 95(8): 2471-2492.

    [13]

    张海洪, 许文良, 王枫, 等. 吉林中部小蜂蜜顶子组火山岩的形成时代及其地质意义: 锆石U-Pb年代学和Hf同位素组成证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(5): 1418-1429.

    Zhang H H, Xu W L, Wang F, et al. Formation timing of the volcanic rocks from the Xiaofengmidingzi Formation in central Jilin Province and its geological implications: Evidence from zircon U-Pb dating and Hf isotope compositions[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(5): 1418-1429.

    [14]

    杨言辰, 韩世炯, 孙德有, 等. 小兴安岭-张广才岭成矿带斑岩型钼矿床岩石地球化学特征及其年代学研究[J]. 岩石学报, 2012, 28(2): 379-390.

    Yang Y C, Han S J, Sun D Y, et al. Geological and geochemical features and geochronology of porphyry molybdenum deposits in the Lesser Xing'an Range-Zhangguangcai Range metallogenic belt[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2012, 28(2): 379-390.

    [15]

    Andersen T. Correction of common lead in U-Pb analyses that do not report 204Pb[J]. Chemical Geology, 2002, 192(1/2): 59-79.

    [16]

    Ludwig K R. User's manual for Isoplot 3.00: A geochronological toolkit for Microsoft Excel[M]. Berkeley: Berkeley Geochronology Center, 2003: 1-71.

    [17]

    Irvine T N, Baragar W R A. A guide to the chemical classification of the common volcanic rocks[J]. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 1971, 8(5): 523-548.

    [18]

    Rickwood P C. Boundary lines within petrologic diagrams which use oxides of major and minor elements[J]. Lithos, 1989, 22(4): 247- 263.

    [19]

    Maniar P D, Piccoli P M. Tectonic discrimination of granitoids[J]. GSA Bulletin, 1989, 101(5): 635-643.

    [20]

    徐美君, 许文良, 王枫, 等. 小兴安岭中部早侏罗世花岗质岩石的年代学与地球化学及其构造意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2013, 29(2): 354-368.

    Xu M J, Xu W L, Wang F, et al. Geochronology and geochemistry of the Early Jurassic granitoids in the central Lesser Xing'an Range, NE China and its tectonic implications[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2013, 29(2): 354-368.

    [21]

    Ge M H, Zhang J J, Li L, et al. Geochronology and geochemistry of the Heilongjiang complex and the granitoids from the Lesser Xing'an- Zhangguangcai Range: Implications for the Late Paleozoic-Mesozoic tectonics of eastern NE China[J]. Tectonophysics, 2017, 717: 565- 584.

    [22]

    唐杰, 许文良, 王枫, 等. 张广才岭帽儿山组双峰式火山岩成因: 年代学与地球化学证据[J]. 世界地质, 2011, 30(4): 508-520.

    Tang J, Xu W L, Wang F, et al. Petrogenesis of bimodal volcanic rocks from Maoershan Formation in Zhangguangcai Range: Evidence from geochronology and geochemistry[J]. Global Geology, 2011, 30(4): 508-520.

    [23]

    Yu J J, Wang F, Xu W L, et al. Early Jurassic mafic magmatism in the Lesser Xing'an-Zhangguangcai Range, NE China, and its tectonic implications: Constraints from zircon U-Pb chronology and geochemistry[J]. Lithos, 2012, 142-143: 256-266.

    [24]

    邓晋福, 罗照华, 苏尚国. 岩石成因、构造环境与成矿作用[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2004.

    Deng J F, Luo Z H, Su S G. Petrogenesis, tectonic environment and mineralization[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2004. (in Chinese)

    [25]

    Chappell B W, White A J R. Two contrasting granite types: 25 years later[J]. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2001, 48(4): 489- 499.

    [26]

    Chen J F, Zhou T X, Xie Z, et al. Formation of positive εNd (T) granitoids from the Alataw Mountains, Xinjiang, China, by mixing and fractional crystallization: Implication for Phanerozoic crustal growth[J]. Tectonophysics, 2000, 328(1/2): 53-67.

    [27]

    Griffin W L, Wang X, Jackson S E, et al. Zircon chemistry and magma mixing, SE China: In-situ analysis of Hf isotopes, Tonglu and Pingtan igneous complexes[J]. Lithos, 2002, 61(3/4): 237-269.

    [28]

    王涛, 张磊, 郭磊, 等. 亚洲中生代花岗岩图初步编制及若干研究进展[J]. 地球学报, 2014, 35(6): 655-672.

    Wang T, Zhang L, Guo L, et al. The progress of the preliminary compilation of Map of Mesozoic Granitoid of Asia and the research on related key issues[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2014, 35(6): 655- 672.

    [29]

    孙德有, 吴福元, 林强, 等. 张广才岭燕山早期白石山岩体成因与壳幔相互作用[J]. 岩石学报, 2001, 17(2): 227-235.

    Sun D Y, Wu F Y, Lin Q, et al. Petrogenesis and crust-mantle interaction of Early Yanshanian Baishishan pluton in Zhangguangcai Range[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2001, 17(2): 227-235.

    [30]

    杨东光. 珲春南部中生代侵入岩的时代、成因及构造背景[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2018.

    Yang D G. Geochronology, petrogenesis and tectonic setting of the Mesozoic intrusive rocks in the south Hunchun area[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2018.

    [31]

    韩振哲. 小兴安岭东南段早中生代花岗岩类时空演化特征与多金属成矿[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2011.

    Han Z Z. Characteristics of temporal and spatial evolution and polymetallic mineralization of Early Mesozoic granites in southeastern Xiaoxing'an Mountains[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2011.

    [32]

    王泉, 表尚虎, 李喜明, 等. 黑龙江省孙吴地区早侏罗世火山岩的识别及其地质意义[J]. 矿产与地质, 2017, 31(2): 378-388.

    Wang Q, Biao S H, Li X M, et al. Identification of Early Jurassic volcanic rock and its geological significance in Sunwu district, Heilongjiang Province[J]. Mineral Resources and Geology, 2017, 31(2): 378-388.

    [33]

    尹志刚, 宫兆民, 王春生, 等. 小兴安岭平顶山一带早侏罗世花岗岩类年代学、地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 107-125.

    Yin Z G, Gong Z M, Wang C S, et al. Chronological, geochemical characteristics and geological significance of Early Jurassic granites in Pingdingshan area of Lesser Xing'an Range[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2021, 51(1): 107-125.

  • 加载中

(7)

(2)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  28
  • PDF下载数:  12
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2023-07-10
修回日期:  2023-10-16
刊出日期:  2025-02-25

目录