中国地质学会岩矿测试技术专业委员会、国家地质实验测试中心主办

龙马溪组页岩不同显微形态有机质成因及其勘探潜力探讨

刘振庄, 白名岗, 杨玉茹, 张聪, 王向华, 陈娟, 谢婷, 方立羽, 秦丽娟. 龙马溪组页岩不同显微形态有机质成因及其勘探潜力探讨[J]. 岩矿测试, 2020, 39(2): 199-207. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201907110100
引用本文: 刘振庄, 白名岗, 杨玉茹, 张聪, 王向华, 陈娟, 谢婷, 方立羽, 秦丽娟. 龙马溪组页岩不同显微形态有机质成因及其勘探潜力探讨[J]. 岩矿测试, 2020, 39(2): 199-207. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201907110100
Zhen-zhuang LIU, Ming-gang BAI, Yu-ru YANG, Cong ZHANG, Xiang-hua WANG, Juan CHEN, Ting XIE, Li-yu FANG, Li-juan QIN. Discussion on the Genesis and Exploration Potential of Different Microscopic Forms of Organic Matters in the Longmaxi Formation Shale[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2020, 39(2): 199-207. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201907110100
Citation: Zhen-zhuang LIU, Ming-gang BAI, Yu-ru YANG, Cong ZHANG, Xiang-hua WANG, Juan CHEN, Ting XIE, Li-yu FANG, Li-juan QIN. Discussion on the Genesis and Exploration Potential of Different Microscopic Forms of Organic Matters in the Longmaxi Formation Shale[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2020, 39(2): 199-207. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201907110100

龙马溪组页岩不同显微形态有机质成因及其勘探潜力探讨

  • 基金项目:
    “十三五”国家科技重大专项项目(2016ZX034003-006)
详细信息
    作者简介: 刘振庄, 硕士研究生, 地质工程专业。E-mail:1758591147@qq.com
    通讯作者: 张聪, 博士, 高级工程师, 石油地质专业。E-mail:397716026@qq.com
  • 中图分类号: P619.227;P575.2

Discussion on the Genesis and Exploration Potential of Different Microscopic Forms of Organic Matters in the Longmaxi Formation Shale

More Information
  • 有机质是页岩中最重要的组分,有机孔更是页岩气重要的储集空间,以扫描电镜为主流的微观分析检测技术成为页岩研究的重要手段,目前对有机质的综合研究正逐步成为页岩气勘探开发研究的重要内容。本次研究选取四川盆地及其外围龙马溪组富有机质页岩,采用氩离子抛光非镀膜样品,利用低电压近距离工作状态,对样品进行了高分辨率场发射扫描电镜检测,观察、总结了有机质显微形态,并依据其内部结构及组成特征对其生烃及储集能力进行了探讨。检测结果揭示:龙马溪组富有机质页岩中有机质主要有三种显微形态,分别是结构型沉积有机质、分异型交生有机质和填隙型运移有机质。结构型沉积有机质形成于沉积及早期成岩演化阶段,保留了部分生物结构特征或沉积定向构造;分异型交生有机质与黏土矿物交互生长并经历演化分异作用,形成了类似于岩浆岩中的“花岗结构”;而填隙型运移有机质形成于晚成岩有机质高演化阶段,为液态烃充填于自生矿物晶间,其周边矿物具有自形特征。龙马溪组页岩以填隙型运移有机质和分异型交生有机质为主,二者都发育丰富的有机质孔隙(孔径10~300nm),是龙马溪组页岩优质的生气母质,并具有优质的储集性能。研究结果为我国海相龙马溪组页岩气生成理论及勘探开发评价提供了较深层次的微观信息。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  龙马溪组页岩中的结构型沉积有机质

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  龙马溪组页岩中的结构型沉积有机质不发育孔隙

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  龙马溪组页岩中的分异型交生有机质

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  龙马溪组页岩中的分异型交生有机质孔隙特征

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  龙马溪组页岩中的填隙型运移有机质

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  填隙型运移有机质孔隙发育特征

    Figure 6. 

    表 1  不同显微形态有机质能谱检测结果

    Table 1.  Energy spectrum detection results of different microscopic forms of organic matter

    有机质显微形态类型 能谱点数 碳质量分数(%)
    区间 平均值
    结构型沉积有机质 生物碎屑 35 80~95 88
    条带状/不规则团块 35 75~95 85
    填隙型运移有机质 60 63~84 74
    分异型交生有机质 55 40~76 60
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    邹才能, 赵群, 董大忠, 等.页岩气基本特征、主要挑战与未来前景[J].天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12):1781-1796. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqdqkx201712001

    Zou C N, Zhao Q, Dong D Z, et al.Basic characteristics, main challenges and future prospects of shale gas[J]. Natural Gas Earth Science, 2017, 28(12):1781-1796. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqdqkx201712001

    [2]

    Loucks R G, Reed R M, Ruppel S C, et al. Morphology, genesis, and distribution of nanometerscale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett shale[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2009, 79(12) :848-861.

    [3]

    Slatt R M, O'Brien N R.Pore types in the Barnett and Woodford gas shales:Contribution to understanding gas storage and migration pathways in fine-grained rocks[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2011, 95(12):2017-2030.

    [4]

    Loucks R G, Reed R M.Scanning-Electron- Microscope Petrographic Evidence for Distinguishing Organic-Matter Pores Associated with Depositional Organic Matter Versus Migrated Organic Matter in Mudrocks[R]. GCAGS Transactions, 2014: 51-60.

    [5]

    Loucks R G, Reed R M, Ruppel S C, et al.Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores[J]. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 2012, 96:1071-1089. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=2b7b6b4b569bed90a064cbc2a6673a7c

    [6]

    董大忠, 王玉满, 李新景, 等.中国页岩气勘探开发新突破及发展前景思考[J].地质勘探, 2016, 36(1):19-32. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqgy201601003

    Dong D Z, Wang Y M, Li X J, et al.New breakthrough and development prospect of shale gas exploration and development in China[J]. Geological Prospecting, 2016, 36(1):19-32. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqgy201601003

    [7]

    马永生, 蔡勋育, 赵培荣.中国页岩气勘探开发理论认识与实践[J].石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(4):561-574. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syktykf201804003

    Ma Y S, Cai X Y, Zhao P R.The oretical understanding and practice of shale gas exploration and development in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(4):561-574. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syktykf201804003

    [8]

    赵建华, 金之钧, 金振奎, 等.岩石学方法区分页岩中有机质类型[J].石油实验地质, 2016, 38(4):514-527. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/sysydz201604015

    Zhao J H, Jin Z J, Jin Z K, et al.The petrological method distinguishes the types of organic matter in shale[J]. Petroleum Experimental Geology, 2016, 38(4):514-527. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/sysydz201604015

    [9]

    王香增, 张丽霞, 雷裕红, 等.低熟湖相页岩内运移固体有机质和有机质孔特征——以鄂尔多斯盆地东南部延长组长7油层组页岩为例[J].石油学报, 2018, 39(2):141-151. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syxb201802002

    Wang X Z, Zhang L X, Lei Y H, et al.Characteristics of migration of solid organic matter and organic pores in low mature lacustrine shale:A case study of Yanchang 7 Formation shale in Southeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Petroleum, 2018, 39(2):141-151. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syxb201802002

    [10]

    张慧, 焦淑静, 林伯伟, 等.扬子板块下寒武统页岩有机质与矿物质的成因关系[J].天然气勘探与开发, 2017, 40(4):25-33. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqktykf201704005

    Zhang H, Jiao S J, Lin B W, et al.The genetic relationship between the organic matter and minerals of the Lower Cambrian shale in the Yangtze Plate[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2017, 40(4):25-33. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqktykf201704005

    [11]

    张慧, 李贵红, 晋香兰.南方下古生界页岩中的有机质赋存状态及其成因[J].煤田地质与勘探, 2018, 46(1):51-55.

    Zhang H, Li G H, Jin X L.Occurrence and genesis of organic matter in the Lower Paleozoic shale in the South[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2018, 46(1):51-55.

    [12]

    白名岗, 夏响华, 张聪, 等.场发射扫描电镜及PerGeos系统在安页1井龙马溪组页岩有机质孔隙研究中的联合应用[J].岩矿测试, 2018, 37(3):225-234. http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/article/doi/10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201803260030

    Bai M G, Xia X H, Zhang C, et al.Study on shale organic porosity in the Longmaxi Formation, AnYe-1 well using field emission-scanning microscopy and PeoGeos system[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2018, 37(3):225-234. http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/article/doi/10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201803260030

    [13]

    张聪, 夏响华, 杨玉茹, 等.安页1井志留系龙马溪组页岩有机质拉曼光谱特征及其地质意义[J].岩矿测试, 2019, 38(1):26-34. http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/article/doi/10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201803220025

    Zhang C, Xia X H, Yang Y R, et al.Raman spectrum characteristics of organic matter in Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale of Well Anye-1 and its geological significance[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2019, 38(1):26-34. http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/article/doi/10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201803220025

    [14]

    帅琴, 黄瑞成, 高强, 等.页岩气实验测试技术现状与研究进展[J].岩矿测试, 2012, 31(6):931-938. http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/article/id/ykcs_20120604

    Shuai Q, Huang R C, Gao Q, et al.Current status and research progress of shale gas experimental testing technology[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2012, 31(6):931-938. http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/article/id/ykcs_20120604

    [15]

    张盼盼, 刘小平, 王雅杰, 等.页岩纳米孔隙研究新进展[J].地球科学进展, 2014, 29(11):1242-1249. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dqkxjz201411004

    Zhang P P, Liu X P, Wang Y J, et al. New progress in the study of shale nano-pores[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2014, 29(11):1242-1249. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dqkxjz201411004

    [16]

    焦淑静, 张慧, 薛东川, 等.泥页岩孔隙类型、形态特征及成因研究[J].电子显微学报, 2015, 34(5):422-427. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dzxwxb201505012

    Jiao S J, Zhang H, Xue D C, et al.Study on pore types, morphological characteristics and genesis of mud shale[J]. Journal of Chinese Electron Microscopy, 2015, 34(5):422-427. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dzxwxb201505012

    [17]

    魏红霞, 王聚杰, 曾普胜, 等.黔西北骑龙村剖面五峰—龙马溪组黑色页岩孔隙结构特征[J].中国地质, 2018, 45(2):274-285. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgdizhi201802005

    Wei H X, Wang J J, Zeng P S, et al.Micropore structure characteristics of Wufeng—Longmaxi Formation black shale along Qilongcun section in Northwest Guizhou[J]. Geology in China, 2018, 45(2):274-285. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgdizhi201802005

    [18]

    郗兆栋, 田忠斌, 唐书恒.鄂尔多斯盆地东缘海陆过渡相页岩气储层孔隙特征及影响因素[J].中国地质, 2016, 43(6):2059-2069. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgdizhi201606017

    Xi Z D, Tian Z B, Tang S H.Characteristics and main controlling factors of shale gas reservoirs in transitional facies on the eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Geology in China, 2016, 43(6):2059-2069. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgdizhi201606017

    [19]

    戚明辉, 李君军, 曹茜.基于扫描电镜和JMicroVision图像分析软件的泥页岩孔隙结构表征研究[J].岩矿测试, 2019, 38(3):260-269. http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/article/doi/10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201901160008

    Qi M H, Li J J, Cao Q.Characterization of shale pore structure based on scanning electron microscope and JMicroVision image analysis software[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2019, 38(3):260-269. http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/article/doi/10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201901160008

    [20]

    陈义才, 沈忠民, 罗小平, 等.石油与天然气有机地球化学[M].北京:科学出版社, 2007.

    Chen Y C, Shen Z M, Luo X P, et al.Organic Geochemistry of Oil and Gas[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2007.

    [21]

    Wilkin R T, Barnes H L, Brantley S L.The size distribution of framboidal pyrite in modern sediments:An indicator of redox conditions[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1996, 60(20):3897-3912.

    [22]

    冉波, 孙玮, 王世玉, 等.四川盆地东南缘的五峰—龙马溪页岩中石英和黄铁矿的沉积-成岩演化特征及其意义[EB/OL].北京: 中国科技论文在线, 2014.

    Ran B, Sun W, Wang S Y, et al.Sedimentary-diagenetic evolution of quartz and pyrite in Wufeng—Longmaxi shale in the southeastern margin of Sichuan Basin and its significance[EB/OL]. Beijing: Chinese Sci-Tech Papers Online, 2014.

    [23]

    李丹, 欧成华, 马中高, 等.黄铁矿与页岩的相互作用及其对页岩气富集与开发的意义[J].石油物探, 2018, 57(3):332-343. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/sywt201803002

    Li D, Ou C H, Ma Z G, et al.Interaction between pyrite and shale and its significance for shale gas enrichment and development[J]. Petroleum Geophysical Exploration, 2018, 57(3):332-343. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/sywt201803002

    [24]

    傅家谟, 史继扬.石油演化理论与实践(Ⅰ)——石油演化的机理与石油演化的阶段[J].地球化学, 1975(2):87-110. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000000257697

    Fu J M, Shi J Y.Theory and practice of petroleum evolution (Ⅰ) —The mechanism of petroleum evolution and the stage of petroleum evolution[J]. Geochemistry, 1975(2):87-110. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000000257697

    [25]

    傅家谟, 史继扬.石油演化理论与实践(Ⅱ)——石油演化的实践模型和石油演化的实践意义[J].地球化学, 1977(2):87-104.

    Fu J M, Shi J Y.The theory and practice of petroleum evolution (Ⅱ) —The practical model of petroleum evolution and the practical significance of petroleum evolution[J]. Geochemistry, 1977(2):87-104.

    [26]

    肖贤明, 傅家谟, 刘德汉, 等.烃类生成的显微岩石学特征研究[J].石油学报, 1993, 14(3):30-36.

    Xiao X M, Fu J M, Liu D H, et al.Study on micropetrological characteristics of hydrocarbon formation[J]. Journal of Petroleum, 1993, 14(3):30-36.

    [27]

    肖贤明.有机岩石学及其在油气评价中的应用[J].地球科学进展, 1992(2):39-44.

    Xiao X M.Organic petrology and its application in oil and gas evaluation[J]. Advance in Earth Sciences, 1992(2):39-44.

  • 加载中

(6)

(1)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1619
  • PDF下载数:  24
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2019-07-11
修回日期:  2019-08-15
录用日期:  2019-10-21

目录