Implication of in situ Sr Isotope of Scheelite for Tungsten Mineralization: A Case Study of the Nanyangtian Scheelite Deposit, Southeast Yunnan, China
-
摘要: 南秧田钨矿床位于滇东南老君山W-Sn矿集区,地处扬子地块和印支地块的结合部位,地质背景复杂并遭受了多期岩浆活动和区域变质事件,其成矿时代和成因一直存在争议。本文对矽卡岩型和长石-石英脉型白钨矿开展了年代学、原位微量元素、Sr同位素研究,分析了两类白钨矿年龄、成因以及物质来源的差异。结果表明,长石-石英脉内与白钨矿共生辉钼矿的Re-Os同位素等时线年龄为151.0±1.3Ma,明显晚于矽卡岩矿体年龄,属于后期成矿事件。矽卡岩型白钨矿的轻稀土富集、重稀土强烈亏损,Eu呈明显负异常(δEu=0.46),∑REE平均含量为65.60μg/g,Mo平均含量为240.16μg/g,Sr平均含量为883.43μg/g;长石-石英脉型白钨矿稀土呈Eu正异常(δEu=2.8)的平坦型,∑REE平均含量为194.40μg/g,Mo平均含量为16.01μg/g,Sr平均含量为129.26μg/g。以上两者微量、稀土元素含量的差别显示它们具有性质明显不同的流体来源,Eu异常指示矽卡岩型白钨矿形成于氧逸度较高的环境,长石-石英脉型白钨矿形成于还原性环境。矽卡岩白钨矿87Sr/86Sr值相对较低,并且比较均一,介于0.71319~0.71491之间,表明成矿流体主要来自岩浆热液;长石-石英脉型白钨矿87Sr/86Sr值较高且变化范围大,介于0.71537~0.72803之间,平均0.72079,呈现出变质流体特征。两种不同类型白钨矿Sr同位素都具有二元混合的特征,显示长石-石英脉型白钨矿对矽卡岩型白钨矿有叠加改造作用,成矿流体与围岩的强烈交代作用是白钨矿形成的关键。Abstract:
BACKGROUNDThe Nanyangtian scheelite deposit is an important skarn scheelite deposit in Yunnan Province, which is located in Laojunshan W-Sn deposit area, Southeast Yunnan. Due to its complex geological background and multi-stage metallogenic characteristics, its mineralization age and genesis remain controversial. OBJECTIVESTo explore the metallogenic age, genesis and material origins of two types of scheelite deposits in order to explore formation patterns. METHODSMolybdenum Re-Os isotope dating was used to constrain the age, whereas in situ trace element and in situ Sr isotopes of scheelite were used to determine the composition of trace elements and Sr isotopes in scheelite. RESULTSThe Re-Os isochron age of molybdenite associated with scheelite in the feldspar-quartz mineral vein of Nanyantian was 151.0±1.3Ma, younger than the age of skarn mineralization, indicating a later mineralization event. The skarn-type scheelite was enriched in light rare earth elements with negative Eu anomaly (δEu=0.46). The average content of ∑REE, Mo and Sr in skarn scheelite were 65.60, 240.16 and 883.43μg/g, respectively. Feldspar-quartz vein-type scheelite showed a flat rare earth pattern with positive Eu anomaly (δEu=2.8) and average content of ∑REE, Mo and Sr were 194.40, 16.01 and 129.26μg/g, respectively. respectively. The skarn scheelite had a relatively low and uniform 87Sr/86Sr value of 0.71319 to 0.71491, indicating that the ore-forming fluids were mainly magmatic-hydrothermal in origin, whereas feldspar-quartz vein type scheelite had a wide 87Sr/86Sr range of 0.71537 to 0.72803, with an average of 0.72079, characteristic of metamorphic fluids. CONCLUSIONSThe differences in trace and rare earth element contents between two types of mineralization indicate that they have different fluid sources. The negative Eu anomaly of the skarn-type scheelite indicates a high oxygen fugacity environment, whereas the feldspar-quartz vein-type scheelite is formed in a reductive environment in terms of positive Eu anomaly. Sr isotopes of two different types of scheelite display a feature of binary mixing, indicating that feldspar-quartz vein-type scheelite has a superimposed transformation effect on skarn-type scheelite, and the strong metasomatism of ore-forming fluids and surrounding rocks is the key to the formation of scheelite. -
Key words:
- scheelite /
- in situ Sr isotope /
- mineralization epoch /
- source of ore-forming fluid /
- Nanyangtian
-
-
图 4 白钨矿稀土、微量元素以及Sr同位素比值特征(含矿矽卡岩稀土数据来源文献[22])
Figure 4.
表 1 长石-石英脉中辉钼矿Re-Os同位素分析结果
Table 1. Re-Os isotope analytical results of molybdate in feldspar-quartz veins
样品编号 样品质量
(g)Re(μg/g) 普Os(ng/g) 187Re(μg/g) 187Os(ng/g) 模式年龄(Ma) 测定值 2σ 测定值 2σ 测定值 2σ 测定值 2σ 测定值 2σ NYTS-16-1 0.00304 60.93 0.460 0.0309 0.0024 38.29 0.289 95.71 0.59 149.8 2.1 NYTS-16-2 0.02081 197.6 1.723 0.5608 0.0454 124.2 3.768 313.7 2.1 151.4 2.3 NYTS-16-3 0.01190 235.0 2.141 0.5961 0.0178 147.7 1.346 373.6 2.3 151.7 2.2 NYTS-16-4 0.00309 213.1 1.678 0.1013 0.0077 133.9 1.055 333.9 2.0 149.4 2.1 NYTS-16-5 0.00313 246.2 2.146 0.1744 0.0076 154.8 1.349 390.0 2.8 151.1 2.3 表 2 白钨矿中稀土元素含量测定结果
Table 2. Anaytical results of rare earth elements in scheelite
白钨矿类型 样品编号 元素含量(μg/g) δEu Mo Sr Y La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu ∑REE 矽卡岩型 NYTX-5-01 300.1 1202 0.15 8.21 28.80 5.73 24.13 1.18 0.07 0.73 0.03 0.05 0.01 0.03 < LOD < LOD 0.01 68.98 0.24 NYTX-5-02 295.2 1332 0.24 18.60 52.48 8.57 36.18 2.20 0.15 0.85 0.04 0.07 < LOD < LOD 0.01 0.04 < LOD 119.18 0.36 NYTX-5-03 283.7 1197 0.02 6.54 25.21 4.97 22.30 1.56 0.15 0.45 0.06 < LOD < LOD 0.06 < LOD 0.01 < LOD 61.30 0.60 NYTX-5-04 237.8 1167 0.34 5.71 24.43 5.11 30.62 2.65 0.21 1.33 0.10 0.47 0.03 0.04 < LOD 0.01 < LOD 70.72 0.38 NYTX-5-05 248.8 1167 0.52 8.33 28.80 4.95 23.28 1.73 0.12 0.68 0.03 0.15 0.03 0.09 < LOD < LOD < LOD 68.20 0.37 NYTX-5-06 231.6 1191 1.20 7.33 27.39 5.61 32.38 3.49 0.25 1.90 0.18 0.48 0.10 0.23 0.00 0.07 < LOD 79.41 0.33 NYTX-12-01 246.3 672.1 4.23 4.25 15.53 2.96 18.02 4.17 0.77 3.73 0.38 1.96 0.29 0.62 0.04 0.20 0.02 52.95 0.66 NYTX-12-02 231.3 607.0 3.24 3.96 15.51 3.32 20.00 4.21 0.48 3.07 0.29 1.73 0.17 0.40 0.06 0.07 0.03 53.30 0.45 NYTX-12-03 223.5 588.1 4.43 4.66 17.57 3.47 19.00 4.24 0.68 3.80 0.37 1.67 0.29 0.52 0.04 0.20 0.04 56.55 0.58 NYTX-12-04 191.8 547.5 4.72 4.70 17.99 3.00 15.74 3.04 0.48 2.41 0.18 1.11 0.24 0.46 0.06 0.47 0.03 49.91 0.60 NYTX-12-05 207.9 520.8 4.87 3.25 14.63 3.31 17.82 4.71 0.65 4.42 0.47 2.36 0.37 0.84 0.07 0.11 0.02 53.05 0.49 NYTX-12-06 183.8 407.1 4.57 2.68 14.17 3.34 19.77 5.25 0.55 3.82 0.42 2.26 0.37 0.73 0.06 0.16 0.02 53.60 0.42 长石-石英脉型 NYTS-1-01 19.0 136.0 174.20 7.83 30.75 6.59 41.23 15.67 6.61 16.33 3.50 26.85 5.92 19.34 2.64 15.93 2.16 201.35 1.41 NYTS-1-02 19.4 106.4 52.82 3.31 8.45 1.54 8.32 3.58 1.59 4.26 1.16 6.40 1.96 5.89 0.77 4.71 0.94 52.87 1.39 NYTS-1-03 17.8 150.4 91.45 4.75 23.19 5.68 29.20 8.41 7.19 8.28 1.42 10.27 2.66 7.95 1.38 8.33 1.29 119.98 2.94 NYTS-1-04 21.5 149.9 299.92 41.05 86.35 12.79 62.13 15.88 9.40 17.89 3.64 28.31 7.14 22.83 4.72 34.81 4.72 351.65 1.90 NYTS-1-05 25.4 147.4 115.65 5.13 29.22 6.12 34.18 9.97 9.09 10.18 1.79 12.52 3.31 8.66 1.66 10.33 1.42 143.58 3.08 NYTS-1-06 18.5 156.0 78.63 6.28 29.29 6.54 34.74 8.53 8.80 8.56 1.43 8.57 2.19 6.05 0.91 4.96 0.86 127.71 3.51 NYTS-2-01 17.1 165.3 120.68 16.43 39.71 7.26 42.71 13.38 11.60 16.78 3.98 28.50 6.19 18.28 2.33 11.63 1.44 220.20 2.64 NYTS-2-02 15.8 181.8 82.32 5.44 26.48 5.87 30.35 8.32 8.43 7.77 1.62 12.49 3.11 10.01 1.50 9.37 1.31 132.06 3.58 NYTS-2-03 18.2 138.9 195.53 11.58 36.86 8.00 42.80 10.24 11.37 10.68 2.56 18.15 4.43 17.55 3.84 35.18 5.12 218.36 3.71 NYTS-2-04 17.4 139.1 331.40 50.60 232.17 16.05 63.10 14.95 12.72 14.35 2.84 23.03 6.50 26.72 5.35 54.33 7.82 530.55 2.96 NYTS-2-05 24.2 229.1 379.33 59.31 137.24 19.31 72.11 15.77 9.86 17.64 3.78 33.46 8.80 35.80 6.48 50.59 6.27 476.44 2.02 NYTS-2-06 36.6 233.8 30.11 0.57 2.57 0.71 4.22 3.23 0.83 4.28 0.98 6.18 1.51 4.45 0.62 3.56 0.46 34.16 0.77 NYTS-16-A01 7.2 80.9 104.49 15.83 64.67 9.43 44.49 9.55 8.90 10.71 1.74 12.00 2.89 8.07 0.89 4.63 0.71 194.51 3.00 NYTS-16-A02 9.9 78.8 84.31 24.08 49.34 8.61 40.72 9.13 10.06 8.91 1.57 10.65 2.45 6.68 0.75 3.72 0.54 177.21 3.80 NYTS-16-A03 8.0 75.5 216.48 17.77 78.41 11.97 60.53 17.28 10.48 20.42 3.80 27.34 6.30 17.84 2.13 11.33 1.80 287.41 1.90 NYTS-16-A04 8.5 74.2 117.84 20.31 100.61 18.61 78.68 15.98 10.67 14.52 2.58 16.47 3.58 9.60 1.11 5.74 0.71 299.17 2.39 NYTS-16-A05 9.1 69.0 93.65 22.56 68.14 10.58 46.13 15.18 10.49 9.47 1.57 10.35 2.69 6.78 0.87 3.83 0.62 209.26 2.99 NYTS-16-A06 9.3 69.1 164.20 58.80 122.66 17.72 73.98 14.31 13.80 13.55 2.26 15.54 3.49 10.22 1.16 6.81 1.05 355.37 3.38 NYTS-16-B01 14.7 115.9 39.49 1.42 6.00 1.16 7.47 2.46 6.46 3.25 0.67 5.20 1.21 4.01 0.60 4.23 0.72 44.87 7.79 NYTS-16-B02 12.9 139.4 58.82 3.64 13.09 2.72 18.22 6.37 5.01 8.18 1.53 10.89 2.43 7.31 0.90 5.19 0.72 86.22 2.37 NYTS-16-B03 13.5 133.5 44.99 2.01 8.90 1.98 14.00 4.96 5.60 6.88 1.30 8.96 2.05 5.56 0.71 4.33 0.66 67.90 3.27 NYTS-16-B04 11.8 115.6 79.60 5.51 20.36 4.57 34.26 10.83 4.33 12.07 1.88 12.31 2.82 7.75 0.99 6.86 1.11 125.64 1.29 NYTS-16-B05 12.9 106.3 57.57 4.57 17.56 3.47 25.36 7.21 4.69 8.98 1.53 9.00 2.03 5.58 0.71 4.44 0.79 95.90 1.99 NYTS-16-B06 15.4 110.0 50.36 14.57 30.26 4.50 26.18 6.14 5.79 6.50 0.97 6.32 1.48 4.32 0.63 4.62 0.85 113.13 3.13 注:“ < LOD”表示低于检出限。 表 3 白钨矿原位Sr同位素分析结果
Table 3. in situ Sr isotope analytical results of scheelite
白钨矿类型 样品编号 85Rb信号强度(V) 88Sr信号强度(V) 87Rb/86Sr 2 σ 87Sr/86Sr 2 σ 矽卡岩型 NYTX-5-01 0.0003 10.34 0.00009 0.00004 0.71383 0.00008 NYTX-5-02 0.0000 10.48 0.00001 0.00001 0.71352 0.00007 NYTX-5-03 0.0001 9.74 0.00004 0.00004 0.71359 0.00007 NYTX-5-04 0.0003 9.58 0.00009 0.00005 0.71351 0.00007 NYTX-5-05 0.0007 10.26 0.00021 0.00004 0.71353 0.00006 NYTX-5-06 0.0072 11.08 0.00227 0.00041 0.71364 0.00008 NYTX-5-07 0.0000 11.32 0.00000 0.00001 0.71356 0.00006 NYTX-5-08 0.0000 11.25 0.00001 0.00001 0.71356 0.00007 NYTX-5-09 0.0001 11.23 0.00002 0.00001 0.71351 0.00007 NYTX-5-10 0.0002 7.25 0.00009 0.00001 0.71359 0.00007 NYTX-5-11 0.0000 10.88 0.00000 0.00001 0.71354 0.00006 NYTX-5-12 0.0003 10.44 0.00008 0.00003 0.71358 0.00007 NYTX-5-13 0.0006 9.95 0.00021 0.00005 0.71359 0.00007 NYTX-5-14 0.0098 8.76 0.00393 0.00060 0.71384 0.00010 NYTX-5-15 0.0014 9.61 0.00048 0.00006 0.71354 0.00008 NYTX-12-01 0.0002 3.32 0.00021 0.00004 0.71491 0.00011 NYTX-12-02 0.0002 6.12 0.00011 0.00002 0.71339 0.00007 NYTX-12-03 0.0004 6.43 0.00019 0.00003 0.71336 0.00007 NYTX-12-04 0.0001 5.28 0.00008 0.00002 0.71354 0.00008 NYTX-12-05 0.0003 3.02 0.00036 0.00004 0.71429 0.00011 NYTX-12-06 0.0003 4.85 0.00021 0.00003 0.71349 0.00010 NYTX-12-07 0.0001 5.53 0.00008 0.00001 0.71319 0.00010 NYTX-12-08 0.0002 5.13 0.00013 0.00002 0.71349 0.00011 NYTX-12-09 0.0002 2.57 0.00032 0.00003 0.71478 0.00015 NYTX-12-10 0.0005 4.17 0.00044 0.00013 0.71374 0.00013 NYTX-12-11 0.0003 3.39 0.00034 0.00006 0.71385 0.00012 NYTX-12-12 0.0929 3.59 0.08473 0.01206 0.71401 0.00014 NYTX-12-13 0.0003 5.54 0.00020 0.00003 0.71357 0.00010 NYTX-12-14 0.0007 4.42 0.00051 0.00011 0.71389 0.00011 NYTX-12-15 0.0007 5.15 0.00044 0.00003 0.71353 0.00009 长石-石英脉型 NYTS-1-A01 0.0026 1.41 0.00589 0.00039 0.72027 0.00021 NYTS-1-A02 0.0033 1.33 0.00804 0.00071 0.72014 0.00027 NYTS-1-A03 0.0025 0.90 0.00968 0.00198 0.72135 0.00035 NYTS-1-A04 0.0050 1.18 0.01394 0.00101 0.72072 0.00032 NYTS-1-A05 0.0046 1.34 0.01109 0.00094 0.72043 0.00023 NYTS-1-A06 0.0014 1.29 0.00369 0.00028 0.72094 0.00022 NYTS-1-A07 0.0019 1.24 0.00506 0.00036 0.72106 0.00025 NYTS-1-A08 0.0014 1.18 0.00409 0.00032 0.72061 0.00026 NYTS-1-A09 0.0038 1.09 0.01114 0.00090 0.72085 0.00030 NYTS-1-A10 0.0017 1.11 0.00518 0.00020 0.72104 0.00031 NYTS-1-A11 0.0008 1.10 0.00244 0.00013 0.72186 0.00029 NYTS-1-A12 0.0044 1.13 0.01254 0.00145 0.72168 0.00034 NYTS-1-A13 0.0013 1.30 0.00348 0.00037 0.72079 0.00024 NYTS-1-A14 0.0006 1.39 0.00149 0.00026 0.71923 0.00028 NYTS-1-A15 0.0017 1.24 0.00420 0.00039 0.72066 0.00022 NYTS-1-B01 0.0022 2.35 0.00338 0.00125 0.71604 0.00014 NYTS-1-B02 0.0014 2.17 0.00213 0.00021 0.71584 0.00016 NYTS-1-B03 0.0033 2.14 0.00510 0.00031 0.71613 0.00015 NYTS-1-B04 0.0039 2.40 0.00530 0.00042 0.71693 0.00014 NYTS-1-B05 0.0019 2.23 0.00272 0.00010 0.71618 0.00015 NYTS-1-B06 0.0021 2.49 0.00293 0.00036 0.71649 0.00016 NYTS-1-B07 0.0028 2.28 0.00394 0.00038 0.71666 0.00015 NYTS-1-B08 0.0028 2.15 0.00449 0.00093 0.71622 0.00015 NYTS-1-B09 0.0013 2.37 0.00174 0.00009 0.71537 0.00013 NYTS-1-B10 0.0010 2.47 0.00138 0.00016 0.71589 0.00017 NYTS-1-B11 0.0007 2.67 0.00084 0.00007 0.71588 0.00011 NYTS-1-B12 0.0030 2.74 0.00355 0.00031 0.71601 0.00011 NYTS-1-B13 0.0018 2.82 0.00231 0.00026 0.71636 0.00023 NYTS-1-B14 0.0039 1.29 0.00978 0.00060 0.71716 0.00023 NYTS-1-B15 0.0065 1.72 0.01303 0.00185 0.71724 0.00018 NYTS-2-01 0.0018 1.45 0.00402 0.00025 0.72024 0.00018 NYTS-2-02 0.0005 1.45 0.00120 0.00019 0.72020 0.00018 NYTS-2-03 0.0005 1.48 0.00108 0.00007 0.71906 0.00019 NYTS-2-04 0.0006 1.47 0.00126 0.00011 0.71918 0.00020 NYTS-2-05 0.0004 1.27 0.00108 0.00007 0.72151 0.00023 NYTS-2-06 0.0007 1.27 0.00170 0.00014 0.72158 0.00021 NYTS-2-07 0.0016 1.29 0.00412 0.00022 0.72105 0.00021 NYTS-2-08 0.0016 1.30 0.00404 0.00061 0.72108 0.00023 NYTS-2-09 0.0008 1.39 0.00192 0.00020 0.72372 0.00022 NYTS-2-10 0.0015 1.45 0.00351 0.00031 0.72230 0.00019 NYTS-13-01 0.0004 1.05 0.00125 0.00009 0.72803 0.00029 NYTS-13-02 0.0009 0.94 0.00312 0.00031 0.72764 0.00032 NYTS-13-03 0.0001 0.97 0.00039 0.00008 0.72694 0.00026 NYTS-13-04 0.0001 1.02 0.00034 0.00007 0.72614 0.00028 NYTS-13-05 0.0003 0.95 0.00119 0.00007 0.72705 0.00024 NYTS-13-06 0.0003 0.87 0.00096 0.00008 0.72757 0.00028 NYTS-13-07 0.0001 0.82 0.00055 0.00008 0.72719 0.00030 NYTS-13-08 0.0032 0.91 0.01163 0.00189 0.72769 0.00033 NYTS-13-09 0.0007 0.78 0.00271 0.00018 0.72774 0.00036 NYTS-13-10 0.0005 0.75 0.00204 0.00037 0.72756 0.00034 标准样品 XJSSTD(n=8) 0.0000 6.48 0.00001 0.00002 0.72086 0.00015 -
[1] Lecumberri-Sanchez P, Vieira R, Heinrich C A, et al.Fluid-rock interaction is decisive for the formation of tungsten deposits[J].Geology, 2017, 45(7):579-582. doi: 10.1130/G38974.1
[2] Wu D, Liu Y, Chen C, et al.In-situ trace element and Sr isotopic compositions of mantle xenoliths constrain two-stage metasomatism beneath the Northern North China Craton[J].Lithos, 2017, 288-289:338-351. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2017.07.018
[3] Christensen J N, Halliday A N, Lee D C, et al.In situ Sr isotopic analysis by laser ablation[J].Earth & Planetary Science Letters, 1995, 136:79-85. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dqkx-e201802006
[4] Ramos F C, Wolff J A, Tollstrup D L.Measuring 87Sr/86Sr variations in minerals and groundmass from basalts using LA-MC-ICPMS[J].Chemical Geology, 2004, 211(1-2):0-158. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=a071ddcd0b4e05bd8c22894d0b27153d
[5] Schmidberger S S, Simonetti A, Heaman L M, et al.Lu-Hf, in-situ Sr and Pb isotope and trace element systematics for mantle eclogites from the Diavik diamond mine:Evidence for Paleoproterozoic subduction beneath the Slave craton, Canada[J].Earth & Planetary Science Letters, 2007, 254(1-2):0-68. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X06008211
[6] 杨岳衡, 吴福元, 谢烈文, 等.地质样品Sr同位素激光原位等离子体质谱(LA-MC-ICP-MS)测定[J].岩石学报, 2009, 25(12):331-341. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98200912028
Yang Y H, Wu F Y, Xie L W, et al.In-situ Sr isotopic measurement of natural geological samples by LA-MC-ICP-MS[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2009, 25(12):331-341. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98200912028
[7] Zhao X F, Zhou M F, Gao J F, et al.In situ Sr isotope analysis of apatite by LA-MC-ICPMS:Constraints on the evolution of ore fluids of the Yinachang Fe-Cu-REE deposit, Southwest China[J].Mineralium Deposita, 2015, 50(7):871-884. doi: 10.1007/s00126-015-0578-z
[8] 谭洪旗, 刘玉平.滇东南猛洞岩群构造环境:变质碎屑岩地球化学约束[J].地质学报, 2017, 91(7):1416-1432. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2017.07.002
Tan H Q, Liu Y P.Tectonic setting of the Mengdong Group Complex, Southeast Yunnan Province:Geochemical constraints from metasedimentary rocks[J].Acta Geologica Sinica, 2017, 91(7):1416-1432. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2017.07.002
[9] 张世涛, 冯明刚, 吕伟.滇东南南温河变质核杂岩解析[J].中国区域地质, 1998, 17(4):390-397. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZQYD804.008.htm
Zhang S T, Feng M G, Lü W.Analysis of the Nanwenhe metamorphic core complex in Southeastern Yunnan[J].Regional Geology of China, 1998, 17(4):390-397. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZQYD804.008.htm
[10] 谭洪旗, 刘玉平.滇东南猛洞岩群变质-变形研究及构造意义[J].地质学报, 2017, 91(1):15-42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2017.01.002
Tan H Q, Liu Y P.Metamorphism and deformation of the Mengdong group-complex in Southeastern Yunnan Province and their tectonic implications[J].Acta Geologica Sinica, 2017, 91(1):15-42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2017.01.002
[11] Xu B, Jiang S Y, Wang R, et al.Late Cretaceous granites from the giant Dulong Sn-polymetallic ore district in Yunnan Province, South China:Geochronology, geochemistry, mineral chemistry and Nd-Hf isotopic compositions[J].Lithos, 2015, 218-219:54-72. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2015.01.004
[12] Zhou X, Yu J H, O'Reilly S Y, et al.Sources of the Nanwenhe-Song Chay granitic complex (SW China-NE Vietnam) and its tectonic significance[J].Lithos, 2017, 290-291:76-93. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2017.07.017
[13] 刘玉平, 李正祥, 李惠民, 等.都龙锡锌矿床锡石和锆石U-Pb年代学:滇东南白垩纪大规模花岗岩成岩-成矿事件[J].岩石学报, 2007, 23(5):967-976. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-YSXB200705011.htm
Liu Y P, Li Z X, Li H M, et al.U-Pb geochronology of cassiterite and zircon from the Dulong Sn-Zn deposit:Evidence for Cretaceous large-scale granitic magmatism and mineralization events in Southeastern Yunnan Province, China[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2007, 23(5):967-976. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-YSXB200705011.htm
[14] 冯佳睿, 毛景文, 裴荣富, 等.云南瓦渣钨矿区老君山花岗岩体的SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年、地球化学特征及成因探讨[J].岩石学报, 2010, 26(3):845-857. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201003017
Feng J R, Mao J W, Pei R F, et al.HRIMP zircon U-Pb dating and geochemical characteristics of Laojunshan granite intrusion from the Wazha tungsten deposit, Yunnan Province and their implications for petrogenesis[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2010, 26(3):845-857. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201003017
[15] 刘艳宾, 莫宣学, 张达, 等.滇东南老君山地区白垩世花岗岩的成因[J].岩石学报, 2014, 30(11):3271-3286. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-YSXB201411013.htm
Liu Y B, Mo X X, Zhang D, et al.Petrogenesis of the Late Cretaceous granite discovered in the Laojunshan Region, Southeastern Yunnan Province[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2014, 30(11):3271-3286. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-YSXB201411013.htm
[16] 冯佳睿, 毛景文, 裴荣富, 等.滇东南老君山地区印支期成矿事件初探——以新寨锡矿床和南秧田钨矿床为例[J].矿床地质, 2011, 30(1):57-73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7106.2011.01.006
Feng J R, Mao J W, Pei R F, et al.A tentative discussion on Indosinian ore-forming events in Laojunshan area of Southeastern Yunnan:A case study of Xinzhai tin deposit and Nanyangtian tungsten deposit[J].Mineral Deposits, 2011, 30(1):57-73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7106.2011.01.006
[17] 李建康, 王登红, 李华芹, 等.云南老君山矿集区的晚侏罗世-早白垩世成矿事件[J].地球科学, 2013, 38(5):1023-1036. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DQKX201305014.htm
Li J K, Wang D H, Li H Q, et al.Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous mineralization in the Laojunshan ore concentration area, Yunnan Province[J].Earth Science, 2013, 38(5):1023-1036. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DQKX201305014.htm
[18] Liu Y S, Hu Z C, Zong K Q, et al.Reappraisement and refinement of zircon U-Pb isotope and trace element analyses by LA-ICP-MS[J].Science Bulletin, 2010, 55(15):1535-1546. doi: 10.1007/s11434-010-3052-4
[19] Li C, Zhou L, Zhao Z, et al.In-situ Sr isotopic measure-ment of scheelite using fs-LA-MC-ICPMS[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2018, 160:38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2018.03.025
[20] 李超, 杨雪, 赵鸿, 等.pg-ng级Os同位素热表面电离质谱高精度分析测试技术[J].岩矿测试, 2015, 34(4):392-398. http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/article/doi/10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.2015.04.003
Li C, Yang X, Zhao H, et al.High precise isotopic measurements of pg-ng Os by negative ion thermal ionization mass spectrometry[J].Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2015, 34(4):392-398. http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/article/doi/10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.2015.04.003
[21] 冯佳睿, 毛景文, 裴荣富, 等.滇东南老君山南秧田钨矿床的成矿流体和成矿作用[J].矿床地质, 2011, 30(3):403-419. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7106.2011.03.003
Feng J R, Mao J W, Pei R F, et al.Ore-forming fluids and metallogenesis of Nanyangtian tungsten deposit in Laojunshan, Southeastern Yunnan Province[J].Mineral Deposits, 2011, 30(3):403-419. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7106.2011.03.003
[22] 曾志刚, 李朝阳, 刘玉平, 等.老君山成矿区变质成因夕卡岩的地质地球化学特征[J].矿物学报, 1999, 19(1):48-55. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4734.1999.01.009
Zeng Z G, Li C Y, Liu Y P, et al.Geology and geochemistry of metamorphogenic skarn from Laojunshan metallogenic province[J].Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 1999, 19(1):48-55. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4734.1999.01.009
[23] 刘玉平, 李正祥, 叶霖, 等.滇东南老君山矿集区钨成矿作用Ar-Ar年代学[J].矿物学报, 2011(增刊1):617-618. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/7684868
Liu Y P, Li Z X, Ye L, et al.Ar-Ar chronology of tungsten mineralization in Laojunshan ore concentration area in Southeast Yunnan[J].Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 2011(Supplement 1):617-618. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/7684868
[24] 谭洪旗, 刘玉平, 叶霖, 等.滇东南南秧田钨锡矿床金云母40Ar-39Ar定年及意义[J].矿物学报, 2011(增刊1):639-640. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/7684858
Tan H Q, Liu Y P, Ye L, et al.40Ar-39Ar dating of metallomica and its significance from the South Yangtian tungsten-tin deposit in Southeast Yunnan[J]. Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 2011(Supplement 1):639-640. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/7684858
[25] 曾志刚, 李朝阳, 刘玉平, 等.滇东南南秧田两种不同成因类型白钨矿的稀土元素地球化学特征[J].地质地球化学, 1998, 26(2):34-38. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199800067376
Zeng Z G, Li C Y, Liu Y P, et al.REE geochemistry of scheelite of two genetic types from Nanyangtian, Southeastern Yunnan[J].Geological Geochemistry, 1998, 26(2):34-38. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199800067376
[26] 谭筱虹, 李志均, 杜再飞.滇东南南温河地区深变质岩中似层状白钨矿[J].云南地质, 2010, 29(4):382-387. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1885.2010.04.002
Tan Y H, Li Z J, Du Z F.On the stratoid scheelite of Kata-Metamorphite in Nanwenhe area of SE Yunnan[J].Yunnan Geology, 2010, 29(4):382-387. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1885.2010.04.002
[27] Sun K K, Chen B.Trace elements and Sr-Nd isotopes of scheelite:Implications for the W-Cu-Mo polymetallic mineralization of the Shimensi Deposit, South China[J].American Mineralogist, 2017, 102:1114-1128.
[28] Zhao W, Zhou M, Williams-Jones A, et al.Constraints on the uptake of REE by scheelite in the Baoshan tungsten skarn deposit, South China[J].Chemical Geology, 2018, 477:123-136. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.12.020
[29] 任云生, 赵华雷, 雷恩, 等.延边杨金沟大型钨矿床白钨矿的微量和稀土元素地球化学特征与矿床成因[J].岩石学报, 2010, 26(12):3720-3726. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201012022
Ren Y S, Zhao H L, Lei E, et al.Trace element and rare earth element geochemistry of the scheelite and ore genesis of the Yangjingou large scheelite deposit in Yanbian area, Northeastern China[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2010, 26(12):3720-3726. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201012022
[30] 刘善宝, 刘战庆, 王成辉, 等.赣东北朱溪超大型钨矿床中白钨矿的稀土、微量元素地球化学特征及其Sm-Nd定年[J].地学前缘, 2017, 24(5):17-30. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dxqy201705003
Liu S B, Liu Z Q, Wang C H, et al.Geochemical characteristics of REEs and trace elements and Sm-Nd dating of scheelite from the Zhuxi giant tungsten deposit in Northeast Jiangxi[J].Earth Science Frontiers, 2017, 24(5):17-30. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dxqy201705003
[31] 聂利青, 周涛发, 张千明, 等.安徽东顾山钨矿床白钨矿主微量元素和Sr-Nd同位素特征及其对成矿作用的指示[J].岩石学报, 2017, 33(11):3518-3530. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201711013
Nie L Q, Zhou T F, Zhang Q M, et al.Trace elements and Sr-Nd isotopes of scheelites:Implications for the skarn tungsten mineralization of the Donggushan deposit, Anhui Province, China[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2017, 33(11):3518-3530. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201711013
[32] 丁腾, 马东升, 陆建军, 等.湘南黄沙坪多金属矿床花岗斑岩的矿物化学及其对矽卡岩白钨矿成矿的指示意义[J].岩石学报, 2017, 33(3):716-728. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201703004
Ding T, Ma D S, Lu J J, et al.Mineral geochemistry of granite porphyry in Huangshaping pollymetallic deposit, Southern Hunan Province, and its implications for metallogensis of skarn scheelite mineralization[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2017, 33(3):716-728. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201703004
[33] Ding T, Ma D, Lu J, et al.Garnet and scheelite as indica-tors of multi-stage tungsten mineralization in the Huangshaping deposit, Southern Hunan Province, China[J].Ore Geology Reviews, 2018, 94:193-211. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2018.01.029
[34] 闫国强, 丁俊, 黄勇, 等.西藏努日白钨矿床微量和稀土元素地球化学特征——对成矿流体与矿床成因的指示[J].矿物学报, 2015, 35(1):87-94. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=kwxb201501014
Yan G Q, Ding J, Huang Y, et al.Geochemical characteristics of rare earth elements and trace elements in the Nuri scheelite deposit, Tibet, China——Indications for ore-forming fluid and deposit genesis[J].Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 2015, 35(1):87-94. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=kwxb201501014
[35] Song G, Qin K, Li G, et al.Scheelite elemental and isotopic signatures:Implications for the genesis of skarn-type W-Mo deposits in the Chizhou area, Anhui Province, Eastern China[J].American Mineralogist, 2014, 99(2-3):303-317. doi: 10.2138/am.2014.4431
[36] 洪为, 张作衡, 蒋宗胜, 等.新疆西天山查岗诺尔铁矿床磁铁矿和石榴石微量元素特征及其对矿床成因的制约[J].岩石学报, 2012, 28(7):2089-2102. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201207011
Hong W, Zhang Z H, Jiang Z S, et al.Magnetite and garnet trace element characteristics from the Chagangnuoer iron deposit in the Western Tianshan Mountains, Xinjiang, NW China:Constrain for ore genesis[J].Ore Geology Reviews, 2012, 28(7):2089-2102. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201207011
[37] Brugger J, Lahaye Y, Costa S, et al.Inhomogeneous dis-tribution of REE in scheelite and dynamics of archaean hydrothermal systems (Mt.Charlotte and Drysdale gold deposits, Western Australia)[J].Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 2000, 139(3):251-264. doi: 10.1007/s004100000135
[38] Brugger J, Maas R, Lahaye Y, et al.Origins of Nd-Sr-Pb isotopic variations in single scheelite grains from Archaean gold deposits, Western Australia[J].Chemical Geology, 2002, 182(2):203-225. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=81a41e5122ad0d4b8120ce4abe7d9003
[39] 王冠, 杜谷, 刘书生, 等.电感耦合等离子体质谱法对白钨矿中稀土元素的准确测定——以云南麻栗坡南秧田白钨矿床的成因探讨为例[J].岩矿测试, 2012, 31(6):1050-1057. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5357.2012.06.025 http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/article/id/ykcs_20120626
Wang G, Du G, Liu S S, et al.Accurate determination of rare earth elements in scheelite using high resolution-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry-An instance of Nanyangtian scheelite mining, Malipo, Yunnan[J].Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2012, 31(6):1050-1057. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5357.2012.06.025 http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/article/id/ykcs_20120626
[40] Ghaderi M, Palin J M, Campbell I H, et al.Rare earth element systematics in scheelite from hydrothermal gold deposits in the Kalgoorlie-Norseman Region, Western Australia[J]. Economy Geology, 1999, 94:423-438. doi: 10.2113/gsecongeo.94.3.423
[41] 蔡倩茹, 燕永锋, 杨光树, 等.滇东南南秧田矽卡岩型钨矿床成矿演化[J].矿床地质, 2018, 37(1):116-136. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/kcdz201801009
Cai Q R, Yan Y F, Yang G S, et al.Evolution of scheelite skarn mineralization at Nanyangtian deposit, Southeast Yunnan Province[J].Mineral Deposits, 2018, 37(1):116-136. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/kcdz201801009
[42] Yan D P, Zhou M F, Wang C Y, et al.Structural and geochronological constraints on the tectonic evolution of the Dulong-Song Chay tectonic dome in Yunnan Province, SW China[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2006, 28(4-6):332-353. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2005.10.011
[43] 张斌辉, 丁俊, 任光明, 等.云南马关老君山花岗岩的年代学、地球化学特征及地质意义[J].地质学报, 2012, 86(4):587-601. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2012.04.005
Zhang B H, Ding J, Ren G M, et al.Geochronology and geochemical characteristics of the Laojunshan granites in Maguan County, Yunnan Province, and its geological implications[J].Acta Geologica Sinica, 2012, 86(4):587-601. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2012.04.005
-