Multi-element Accurate Analysis of Sulfide Minerals by Low-temperature Ablation LA-ICP-MS
-
摘要:
硫化物矿物中元素含量及其分布可示踪硫化物成矿过程、辨别金属来源和沉积过程的物理化学条件,在地质学、矿床学等领域具有重要的应用价值。激光剥蚀电感耦合等离子体质谱(LA-ICP-MS)已成功应用于硫化物矿物元素微区分析研究,但激光与物质作用产生的热效应严重制约分析结果的可靠性。本文建立了一种高精密度、高准确度的低温剥蚀LA-ICP-MS测定硫化物矿物多元素方法。采用自行研制的Peltier低温剥蚀池可有效抑制硫化物矿物LA-ICP-MS分析中的热效应,提高分析结果的精密度和准确度。扫描电子显微镜(SEM)表明:在低温(−30℃)条件下可在一定程度地抑制激光剥蚀引起的热效应,减少样品熔化和气溶胶气相再沉积;而通过气溶胶颗粒分析发现低温剥蚀可以减小样品气溶胶颗粒的平均尺寸,得到的颗粒粒径分布范围也较小。不同元素信号强度的精密度(RSD)从常温下的20.1%~34.4%改善到11.5%~15.8%,元素的检出限为0.054~0.077μg/g。将该低温LA-ICP-MS系统应用于实验室内部标样黄铜矿Ccp-1分析,测定值与参考值之间的标准偏差在7%以内。
Abstract:BACKGROUND Micro-geochemical information of sulfide minerals plays a crucial role in the field of geochemistry, allowing discovery of the formation mechanism and evolution process of sulfide minerals by analyzing their element composition characteristics. LA-ICP-MS is currently the most popular microanalysis technology used for sulfide analysis, having yielded successful results. Due to their unique physical and chemical properties, sulfide mineral samples show different laser ablation behavior to conventional geological samples. The most intuitive phenomenon is the melting of ablation carters caused by laser thermal effect and the deposition of a large number of material particles around the ablation carters, which is the main factor limiting the precision and accuracy of sulfide sample analysis. Walting et al[13] found that direct quantitation of multi-elements in sulfide minerals by infrared laser (1064-nm Nd:YAG laser) was impossible, which was because the strong thermal effect generated by the infrared laser will lead to severe large particle aerosol redeposition. It is reported that ablation systems with shorter wavelengths, such as ultraviolet lasers, including the 266 and 213nm laser, can be used to obtain acceptable analytical accuracy by reducing the thermal effect and aerosol particle size, but a poor precision was still observed[16-17]. Guillong et al[19] conducted a comparative study of 266, 213 and 193nm lasers and found that there were finer particle sizes of the aerosols and the weaker thermal effect when using 193nm laser ablation, and the RSDs of all elements less than 20% were obtained. In other words, collisions between photons and matter intensify in deep ultraviolet laser ablation systems (193nm) with shorter wavelength[20-21] and can help reduce the melt zone and aerosol particle size. However, there is still a slight thermal effect during 193nm UV laser ablation. Fernández et al[22] found that there is still a melting layer during 193nm laser ablation, and it leads to the formation of large particle aerosols. Different methods have been proposed to improve the thermal effect during laser ablation of sulfide. Muller et al[25] found that the precision of line scanning could be improved by 50% compared to spot ablation. Guillong’s results showed that adding a small amount of hydrogen to the analysis could increase the sensitivity of the 47 elements in the test by two to four times[26]. Moreover, research has focused on improving the thermal effect of sulfide minerals from shorter pulse width lasers and aerosol particle transport[27-31]. However, there are still some thermal effects in the process of deep ultraviolet and short wavelength laser ablation, and how to inhibit the thermal effect in the process of ablation to obtain effective analysis results is still a difficulty in the analysis of sulfide mineral elements. The LA-ICP-MS low temperature ablation cell is an ablation system developed in recent years, whose main function is to provide a low temperature ablation environment to realize the effective analysis of cells, blood and other samples. The low-temperature ablation cell may be a new approach to resolve the thermal effect during sulfide mineral ablation.
OBJECTIVES In order to establish a high precision and high accuracy multi-element analysis method for sulfide minerals.
METHODS The use of a designed cryogenic ablation cell suppressed the thermal effect and refined aerosol particle sizes, which improved analytical precision and accuracy significantly. To explore the mechanism of sulfide ablation at low temperature, the aerosols ablated at low temperature were collected using an aerosol collection setup consisting of a membrane with an aperture of 0.1μm, which was installed at the outlet of the ablation cell. According to the micro-analysis results, the laser ablation behavior under low temperature ablation environment was further discussed.
RESULTS A precision and accuracy method for multi-elements analysis of sulfide minerals using CLA-ICP-MS (laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry with a cryogenic ablation cell) was described. Ablation craters were investigated via scanning electron microscope (SEM) images to compare the amounts of melt produced. SEM measurements showed significant differences in melting between the low temperature (−30℃) and room temperature (20℃). The diameters and size distribution of particles were measured from nanometer particle potentiometer images of the collected ablated aerosol. Particles ablated using cryogenic ablation cell were smaller in average diameter (190nm and 400nm) and shorter in distribution range (570nm). Compared to the precision of time-resolved signal during laser ablation processes between the two temperatures, the precision was significantly improved and the RSD was reduced from 20.1%-34.4% to 11.5%-15.8% with a cryogenic ablation cell. A designed cryogenic ablation cell in sulfide sample analysis was utilized to minimize the thermal effect and improve analytical precision and signal intensity. In this study, the CRM (MASS-1) sample was analyzed with spot ablation mode at low (−30℃) and room (20℃) temperatures, respectively, and the RSDs of three times parallel analysis at these two temperatures were compared. At room temperature, the RSDs of elemental signals ranged from 20.1% to 34.4%. In contrast, the RSD of elemental signals was less than 15.8% when the sample was ablated at low temperature (Fig.2a). The significant improvements may be attributed to low ablation temperature, which suppress the thermal effect. Moreover, the signal intensities of elements improved by approximately 11% to 52% with the decrease in temperature of the cryogenic ablation cell (Fig.2b). Fig.2c shows the time-resolved signals of the MASS-1 sample at room temperature, the significant fluctuations and spikes could be observed, and the RSDs of all elemental signals was more than 20.1%. Interestingly, the signals at low temperature exhibited ideal stability, and the RSDs of elemental signals were less than 15.8%, as shown in Fig.2d. In order to explore the reasons for improving the analytical performance of low temperature, the morphology of ablation under different temperature conditions of two standard sulfide samples were discussed. SEM images of four ablation craters on chalcopyrite and pyrite were taken to investigate the effect of temperature on the ablation process (Fig.3). The sulfide samples were ablated using a 193nm excimer laser with a spot size of 60nm and a fluence of 8J/cm2. The ablation craters on the chalcopyrite showed a two-layer cyclic structure, in which the inner layer was a light-colored melting zone, and the outer layer was a white aerosol vapor sediment. At low temperature, there were fewer melt layers and thinner grain sediment zone than those at room temperature (Fig.3a, Fig.3b). However, the melting zone around the ablation craters of pyrite were more irregular. More of the unwanted ablation was melted away at room temperature (Fig.3c, Fig.3d). The craters formed at room temperature (Fig.3a, Fig.3c) showed a more serious melting phenomenon than those formed at low temperature (Fig.3b, Fig.3d), as evidenced by the abundance of molten ejecta around the former, especially at high laser energy densities. In contrast, the low temperature craters showed no obvious melting phenomenon and had a flatter bottom with a reduced number of large molten spherical particles. The use of CLA-ICP-MS weakened the melting phenomenon, thereby generating smaller aerosol particles, which further improved the aerosol transport and ionization efficiency. A particle size collection experiment was conducted to explore the distribution of aerosol particles at different temperatures. SEM images were used to analyze the shapes and sizes of particles that were collected on a membrane with an aperture of 0.1μm at room temperature (20℃) and low temperature (−30℃). The same sample chamber and 1m of tubing were used to transport the particles, and the ablation pulses continuously for 2min. The SEM images showed that the particles produced at room temperature were larger and formed large agglomerates (Fig.4a), whereas the particles produced at −30℃ were smaller and there were fewer agglomerations (Fig.4c). The shape of the agglomerates and their connection by filaments suggested strong charge during particle formation, which was more prominent at room temperature. Additionally, there were more single large particles produced at room temperature (Fig.4b), while there were fewer particles at −30℃ (Fig.4d). Comparative measurements were conducted using 193nm laser to investigate the influence of temperatures on particle size distribution. Fig.4 shows a typical size distribution for LA under He atmosphere. The left part of Fig.5 shows a distribution of aerosols produced by ablation of 2min pulses at room temperature. The peak heights of mean diameter in this distribution were determined to be approximately 300nm and 700nm, respectively. Similarly, particle size distribution at −30℃ also presented a bimodal pattern, which was consistent with previous studies. The average diameters were 190nm and 400nm, both smaller than at room temperature, while the peak width was shorter. The chemical composition of fine particles produced at low temperature is closer to the sample body, improving the transport and ionization of aerosol in ICP, reducing element fractionation, and enhancing the signal strength and stability, thereby improving the analytical performance of ICP-MS.
CONCLUSIONS A new high-precision and accuracy method for determination of trace elements in sulfide minerals has been developed using the CLA-ICP-MS system. This method reduces thermal effect and decreases particle size during the ablation process, improving precision by freezing sulfide samples with a designed cryogenic ablation cell. Low temperature results in better data because fewer large particles are produced; sedimentation around the ablation crater and during transport is reduced, while ionization efficiency in ICP is higher. The precision calculated for transient signals decreases obviously if the sample is kept at low temperature (−30℃) compared to room temperature (20℃), while the sensitivity improved slightly. The deviation of all elements between the test values and the standard values falls within 7% by CLA-ICP-MS. In future work, it will be necessary to investigate even lower temperatures, as low temperatures can increase aerosol viscosity and affect analysis results. It is also worth exploring whether the performance of a long pulse width laser can be improved by lowering the temperature to match that of a short pulse width laser.
-
Key words:
- low temperature ablation cell /
- sulfide mineral /
- laser ablation behavior /
- thermal effect /
- LA-ICP-MS
-
-
表 1 LA-ICP-MS仪器工作参数
Table 1. The operating conditions of LA-ICP-MS.
电感耦合等离子体质谱
ICP-MS(7700x)激光剥蚀系统
Laser system(GeoLas HD)参数 工作条件 参数 工作条件 RF功率 1550W 激光波长 193nm 反馈功率 8W 能量密度 6J/cm2 RF电压 1.60W 剥蚀斑径 60μm 采样深度 7.5mm 激光频率 5Hz 载气(Ar)流速 0.85L/min 剥蚀气(He)流速 0.4L/min 元素 55Mn,57Fe,59Co,60Ni,63Cu,66Zn,71Ga,74Ge,75As,111Cd,208Pb 表 2 黄铜矿Ccp-1中多元素分析结果(n=3)
Table 2. The results of elemental analysis in Ccp-1 (n=3).
元素 参考值
(μg/g)测定值(−30℃ )
(μg/g)测定值(20℃ )
(μg/g)Mn 7.35±0.43 7.23±0.55 6.15±0.92 Co 5.30±0.36 5.15±0.36 4.76±0.66 Ni 7.75±0.64 7.44±0.53 6.64±0.96 Ga 8.20±0.56 8.34±0.63 7.31±1.25 Ge 8.53±1.29 8.47±0.66 6.82±1.37 As 16.51±1.19 16.96±1.32 13.47±2.56 Cd 0.24±0.01 0.26±0.03 0.21±0.05 表 3 硫化物矿物的元素分析结果(n=3)
Table 3. The analytical results of elements in sulfide samples (n=3)
元素 黄铁矿-1 黄铁矿-2 黄铁矿-3 测定值
(μg/g)SD
(μg/g)参考值
(μg/g)测定值
(μg/g)SD
(μg/g)参考值*
(μg/g)测定值
(μg/g)SD
(μg/g)参考值*
(μg/g)Mn 2.62 0.03 2.68 12.85 1.38 13.58 23.98 0.65 24.69 Co 42.04 2.53 43.76 50.07 5.91 53.1 57.25 2.68 59.33 Ni 247.2 12.11 256.36 256.04 37.01 273.86 257.58 10.29 266.36 Ga 2.95 0.18 2.89 15.76 1.23 14.66 29.61 1.44 28.72 Ge 48.05 4.65 47.25 45.97 23.14 39.04 42.03 2.5 41.04 As 13 1.92 11.26 24.77 3.36 23.49 36.52 5.72 35.01 Cd 0.09 0.01 0.09 0.55 0.03 0.56 1.05 0.09 1.07 元素 方铅矿-1 方铅矿-2 方铅矿-3 测定值
(μg/g)SD
(μg/g)参考值*
(μg/g)测定值
(μg/g)SD
(μg/g)参考值*
(μg/g)测定值
(μg/g)SD
(μg/g)参考值*
(μg/g)Mn 0.47 0.06 0.5 3.52 0.53 3.77 7.1 0.53 7.42 Co 0.37 0.05 0.41 2.7 0.21 2.82 5.58 0.26 5.78 Ni 0.52 0.06 0.55 3.29 0.52 3.72 7.89 0.84 10.92 Ga 0.64 0.06 0.63 4.93 0.35 5.15 10.59 0.53 10.81 Ge 0.57 0.06 0.48 4.39 0.12 3.62 9.65 0.47 7.33 As 0.48 0.03 0.42 3.9 0.58 3.54 7.34 0.47 8.69 Cd 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.24 0.04 0.24 0.48 0.09 0.49 元素 闪锌矿-1 闪锌矿-2 闪锌矿-3 测定值
(μg/g)SD
(μg/g)参考值*
(μg/g)测定值
(μg/g)SD
(μg/g)参考值*
(μg/g)测定值
(μg/g)SD
(μg/g)参考值*
(μg/g)Mn 2.86 0.42 3.2 12.41 0.56 12.85 25.14 3.76 26.93 Co 0.93 0.03 0.96 8.64 0.47 8.98 17.49 1.73 18.44 Ni 18.75 2.93 20.23 9.89 0.88 10.36 21.08 8.61 24.44 Ga 1.46 0.18 1.49 14.19 0.53 14.48 28.49 2.23 28.31 Ge 0.84 0.11 0.96 10.03 1.36 10.3 18.49 0.74 17.96 As 4.91 0.67 5.01 16.45 2.15 16.79 28.54 3.96 29.12 Cd 1.82 0.18 1.86 2.09 0.09 2.13 2.47 0.35 2.52 注:“*”表示硫化物实际样品的元素浓度参考值由ICP-MS测试得到。 -
[1] Cook N J, Ciobanu C L, Pring A, et al. Trace and minor elements in sphalerite: A LA-ICPMS study[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2009, 73: 4761−4791. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2009.05.045
[2] Zhao H X, Frimmel H E, Jiang S Y, et al. LA-ICP-MS trace element analysis of pyrite from the Xiaoqinling gold district, China: Implications for ore genesis[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2011, 43: 142−153. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2011.07.006
[3] Deol S, Deb M, Large R R, et al. LA-ICPMS and EPMA studies of pyrite, arsenopyrite and loellingite from the Bhukia—Jagpura gold prospect, Southern Rajasthan, India: Implications for ore genesis and gold remobilization[J]. Chemical Geology, 2012, 326-327: 72−87. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.07.017
[4] 闫巧娟, 魏小燕, 叶美芳, 等. 激光剥蚀电感耦合等离子体质谱-电子探针分析白山堂铜矿中的黄铁矿成分[J]. 岩矿测试, 2016, 35(6): 658−666. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.2016.06.013
Yan Q J, Wei X Y, Ye M F, et al. Determination of composition of pyrite in the Baishantang copper deposit by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry and electron microprobe[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2016, 35(6): 658−666. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.2016.06.013
[5] Ma X H, Zeng Q W, Tao S Y, et al. Mineralogical characteristics and in-situ sulfur isotopic analysis of gold-bearing sulfides from the Qilishan gold deposit in the Jiaodong Peninsula, China[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2021, 32(1): 116−126. doi: 10.1007/s12583-020-1370-2
[6] Zhou C, Yang Z, Sun H, et al. LA-ICP-MS trace element analysis of sphalerite and pyrite from the Beishan Pb-Zn ore district, South China: Implications for ore genesis[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2022, 150: 105128. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2022.105128
[7] 张效瑞, 吴柏林, 雷安贵, 等. 砂岩型铀矿成矿期与非成矿期黄铁矿的微区原位Pb同位素识别特征[J]. 岩矿测试, 2022, 41(5): 717−732.
Zhang X R, Wu B L, Lei A G, et al. In-situ micro-scale Pb isotope identification characteristics of metallogenic and non-metallogenic pyrites in sandstone-type uranium deposits[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2022, 41(5): 717−732.
[8] Zhang Y Y, Chu F Y, Li Z G, et al. Gold enrichment in hydrothermal sulfifides from the Okinawa Trough: An in situ LA-ICP-MS study[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2020, 116: 103255. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.103255
[9] Yang W W, Zhao H, Zhang W, et al. A simple method for the preparation of homogeneous and stable solid powder standards: Application to sulfide analysis by LA-ICP-MS[J]. Spectrochimica Acta Part B:Atomic Spectroscopy, 2021, 178: 106124. doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2021.106124
[10] Qi Y Q, Hu R Z, Gao J F, et al. Trace and minor elements in sulfides from the Lengshuikeng Ag-Pb-Zn deposit, South China: A LA-ICP-MS study[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2022, 141: 104663. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2021.104663
[11] Yang Q, Zhang X J, Ulrich T, et al. Trace element compositions of sulfides from Pb-Zn deposits in the Northeast Yunnan and Northwest Guizhou Provinces, SW China: Insights from LA-ICP-MS analyses of sphalerite and pyrite[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2022, 141: 104639. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2021.104639
[12] 员媛娇, 范成龙, 吕喜平, 等. 电子探针和LA-ICP-MS技术研究内蒙古浩尧尔忽洞金矿床毒砂矿物学特征[J]. 岩矿测试, 2022, 41(2): 211−225. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5357.2022.2.ykcs202202007
Yuan Y J, Fan C L, Lyu X P, et al. Application of EPMA and LA-ICP-MS to study mineralogy of arsenopyrite from the Haoyaoerhudong gold deposit[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2022, 41(2): 211−225. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5357.2022.2.ykcs202202007
[13] Watling R J, Herbert H K, Abell I D. The application of laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) to the analysis of selected sulphide minerals[J]. Chemical Geology, 1995, 124: 67−81. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(95)00025-H
[14] Watling R J. In-line mass transport measurement cell for improving quantification in sulfide mineral analysis using laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 1998, 13: 927−934. doi: 10.1039/a800337h
[15] 吴石头, 许春雪, 肖益林, 等. 193nm ArF准分子激光系统对LA-ICP-MS分析中不同基体的剥蚀行为和剥蚀速率探究[J]. 岩矿测试, 2017, 36(5): 451−459.
Wu S T, Xu C X, Xiao Y L, et al. Study on ablation behaviors and ablation rates of a 193nm ArF excimer laser system for selected substrates in LA-ICP-MS analysis[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2017, 36(5): 451−459.
[16] Bacon J R, Crain J S, Vaeck L V, et al. Atomic mass spectrometry[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 1999, 14: 1633−1659. doi: 10.1039/a905419g
[17] Günther D, Horn I, Hattendorf B. Recent trends and developments in laser ablation ICP mass spectrometry[J]. Fresenius Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2000, 368: 4−14. doi: 10.1007/s002160000495
[18] Hergenröder R. Laser-generated aerosols in laser ablation for inductively coupled plasma spectrometry[J]. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2006, 61: 284−300. doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2006.02.001
[19] Guillong M, Horn I, Günther D. A comparison of 266nm, 213nm and 193nm produced from a single solid state Nd: YAG laser for laser ablation ICP-MS[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2003, 18: 1224−1230. doi: 10.1039/B305434A
[20] Günther D, Heinrich C A. Comparison of the ablation behaviour of 266nm Nd: YAG and 193nm ArF excimer lasers for LA-ICP-MS analysis[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 1999, 14: 1369−1374. doi: 10.1039/A901649J
[21] Liu Y S, Hu Z C, Li M, et al. Applications of LA-ICP-MS in the elemental analyses of geological samples[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2013, 58: 3863−3878. doi: 10.1007/s11434-013-5901-4
[22] Fernández B, Claverie F, Pécheyran C, et al. Direct analysis of solid samples by fs-LA-ICP-MS[J]. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2007, 26: 951−966. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2007.08.008
[23] 柯于球, 张路远, 柴辛娜, 等. 硫化物矿物 LA-ICP-MS 激光剥蚀元素信号响应[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2012, 33(2): 257−262. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0251-0790.2012.02.008
Ke Y Q, Zhang L Y, Chai X N, et al. Elemental signal response of sulfide minerals in LA-ICP-MS microanalysis[J]. Chemical Journal of Chinese Universities, 2012, 33(2): 257−262. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0251-0790.2012.02.008
[24] Kuhn H R, Günther D. Laser ablation-ICP-MS: Particle size dependent elemental composition studies on fifilter-collected and online measured aerosols from glass[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2004, 19: 1158−1164. doi: 10.1039/B404729J
[25] Mueller W, Shelley J, Rasmussen S. Direct chemical analysis of frozen ice cores by UV-laser ablation ICPMS[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2011, 26: 2391−2395. doi: 10.1039/c1ja10242g
[26] Guillong M, Heinrich C A. Sensitivity enhancement in laser ablation ICP-MS using small amounts of hydrogen in the carrier gas[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2007, 22: 1488−1494. doi: 10.1039/b709489b
[27] Bogaerts A, Chen Z, Gijbels R, et al. Laser ablation for analytical sampling: What can we learn from modeling[J]. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2003, 58: 1867−1893. doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2003.08.004
[28] Poitrasson F, Mao X L, Mao S S, et al. Comparison of ultraviolet femtosecond and nanosecond laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis in glass, monazite, and zircon[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2003, 75: 6184−6190. doi: 10.1021/ac034680a
[29] Liu C, Mao X L, Mao S S, et al. Nanosecond and femtosecond laser ablation of brass: Particulate and ICPMS measurements[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2004, 76: 379−383. doi: 10.1021/ac035040a
[30] Telouk P, Rose-Koga E F, Albarede F. Preliminary results from a new 157nm laser ablation ICP-MS instrument: New opportunities in the analysis of solid samples[J]. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, 2003, 27: 5−11. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-908X.2003.tb00708.x
[31] Wohlgemuth-Ueberwasser C C, Jochum K P. Capability of fs-LA-ICP-MS for sulfide analysis in comparison to ns-LA-ICP-MS: Reduction of laser induced matrix effects[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2015, 30: 2469−2480. doi: 10.1039/C5JA00251F
[32] Reinhardt H, Kriews M, Miller H, et al. Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: A new tool for trace element analysis in ice cores[J]. Fresenius Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2001, 370(5): 629−636. doi: 10.1007/s002160100853
[33] Feldmann J, Kindness A, Ek P. Laser ablation of soft tissue using a cryogenically cooled ablation cell[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2002, 17(8): 813−818. doi: 10.1039/b201960d
[34] Wang Y, Wei X, Liu J H, et al. Cryogenic laser ablation in a rapid cooling chamber ensures excellent elemental imaging in fresh biological tissues[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2022, 94(23): 8547−8553. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c01736
[35] Li F, Lei X Q, Li H L, et al. Direct multi-elemental analysis of whole blood samples by LA-ICP-MS employing a cryogenic ablation cell[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2023, 38: 90−96. doi: 10.1039/D2JA00282E
[36] Li F, Cui H, Zhang D W, et al. Direct multi-elemental analysis of cerebrospinal fuid samples by LA−ICP−MS employing an aerosol local extraction cryogenic ablation cell[J]. Journal of Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2023, 415: 6051−6061. doi: 10.1007/s00216-023-04878-2
[37] Wilson S A, Ridley W I, Koenig A E. Development of sulfide calibration standards for the laser ablation inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry technique[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2002, 17: 406−409. doi: 10.1039/B108787H
[38] Jarošová M, Walaszek D, Wagner B, et al. Influence of temperature on laser ablation fractionation during ICP-MS analysis for 213nm and 266nm laser wavelength micro-sampling[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2016, 31: 2089−2093. doi: 10.1039/C6JA00182C
[39] Koch J, von Bohlen A, Hergenröder R, et al. Particle size distributions and compositions of aerosols produced by near-IR femto- and nanosecond laser ablation of brass[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2004, 19: 267−272. doi: 10.1039/B310512A
[40] Li Z, Hu Z C, Günther D, et al. Ablation characteristic of ilmenite using UV nanosecond and femtosecond lasers: Implications for non-matrix-matched quantification[J]. Geostand Geoanalytical Research, 2016, 40: 477−491. doi: 10.1111/ggr.12117
[41] Longerich H P, Günther D, Jackson S E. Elemental fractionation in laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry[J]. Fresenius Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 1996, 355: 538−542. doi: 10.1007/s0021663550538
-