FAULT-SAND COUPLING AND ITS APPLICATION TO HYDROCARBON MIGRATION: A CASE FROM OILFIELD CFD A
-
摘要:
断-砂耦合接触关系决定了输导体系有效性及油气分布规律,是目前渤中凹陷西斜坡明下段构造-岩性油气勘探中的关键问题。利用西斜坡曹妃甸A油田多口钻井的录井、测井数据及三维地震资料,确定了断层-砂体的剖面、平面接触关系,并总结出顺向型、侧向型和复合型3种类型断层-砂体油气运移方式。尝试建立了断-砂耦合接触关系半定量描述思路与方法,明确了本区顺向型与侧向型油气运移效率的相对比值约为1.7,在此基础上探讨了断-砂有效接触面积与砂体中油柱高度之间的关系。实践证实,该方法用于判别曹妃甸A油田潜力砂体的油柱高度是可行的,对成熟探区构造-岩性油气勘探具有重要参考意义。
Abstract:The coupling contact relationship between fault and sand reservoir determines the validity of the hydrocarbon migration and transportation system. It is a key problem in shallow oil and gas exploration and evaluation on the western slope of the Bozhong Sag. Based on the logging data from 6 evaluation wells and the 3-D seismic data from the Oilfield CFD A, the connectivity boundaries of reservoir sand bodies and the types of fault-sand coupling contact are studied in this paper. Three types of oil and gas migration systems, namely the forward, lateral and compositeare, classified. Using the quantitative description method for the fault-sand coupling system, it is clear that the relative efficiency of oil and gas forward migration in the shallow sand bodies in this area is about 1.7, compared to the efficiency of lateral migration. On this basis, the quantitative relationship between fault-sand contact area and oil column height is established. Practice has proved that this method is feasible for predicting the oil column height of shallow undrained sand body in similar blocks, and has important significance for reference of the exploration and evaluation of subsequent reservoirs.
-
-
表 1 曹妃甸A油田断层与砂体耦合数据统计表
Table 1. A statistic of fault and sand body couples in Oilfield CFD A
砂体名称 含油气性质 砂体厚
度H/mL1(顺向)/km 顺向运移
效率aL2(侧向)/km 侧向运移
效率bL/km 断-砂有效接
触面积A/m·km油柱高
度h/mA2d-954.6 顶油底水 12.0 0.12 1.70 1.31 1.00 1.51 18.17 21 A2d-1037.6 顶油底水 27.6 2.18 1.70 0.92 1.00 4.63 127.68 41 A3d-921.8 顶油底水 12.7 0.32 1.70 0.38 1.00 0.93 11.78 24 A3d-944.2 顶油底水 22.0 1.82 1.70 1.84 1.00 4.93 108.55 42 A3d-1049.1 顶油底水 26.9 0.57 1.70 1.60 1.00 2.57 69.11 31 A3d-1113.0 顶油底水 10.6 — — 0.81 1.00 0.81 8.59 16 A4d -867.5 顶油底水 4.0 — — 1.51 1.00 1.51 6.04 12 A4d -1018.5 顶油底水 16.0 1.72 1.70 1.87 1.00 4.79 76.70 42 A4d -1050.6 顶油底水 10.1 — — 1.82 1.00 1.82 18.38 28 表 2 曹妃甸A油田A5d井断-砂耦合预测与实钻结果对比
Table 2. Prediction of coupled fracture-sand in well A5d in Oilfield CFD A and comparison with actual drilling results
砂体 砂体厚度/m 断-砂接触
长度(顺向)L1/km顺向运
移效率断-砂接触
长度(侧向)L2/km侧向运
移效率断-砂有效接
触面积/m·km油柱高度/m 预测 实钻 预测 实钻 预测 实钻 预测 实钻 预测 实钻 A5d-1 10.0 5.9 2.22 2.22 1.7 1.51 1.51 1.0 52.84 31.18 28.6 5.5 A5d-2 8.0 5.3 0.79 0.79 1.7 0.93 0.93 1.0 18.18 12.05 21.5 11.3 A5d-3 25.0 21.2 1.17 1.17 1.7 1.04 1.04 1.0 75.73 64.21 33.3 27.9 A5d-4 10.0 7.1 1.84 1.84 1.7 0.92 0.92 1.0 40.48 28.74 26.1 20.4 A5d-5 11.0 9.7 1.38 1.38 1.7 0.45 0.45 1.0 41.76 36.82 26.3 31.0 -
[1] 何登发. 断裂—岩性体油气藏特征[J]. 石油学报,2007,28(2):22-28,34. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2007.02.004
[2] 金之钧,张发强. 油气运移研究现状及主要进展[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2005,26(3):263-270. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2005.03.001
[3] 杜春国,郝 芳,邹华耀,等. 断裂输导体系研究现状及存在的问题[J]. 地质科技情报,2007,26(1):51-56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7849.2007.01.009
[4] Gudmundsson A,Berg S S,Lyslo K B,et al. Fracture networks and fluid transport in active fault zones[J]. Journal of Structural Geology,2001,23(2/3):343-353.
[5] 葛建党. 郯庐断裂在渤中凹陷的构造特征与油气成藏的关系[J]. 海洋石油,2001(1):14-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2336.2001.01.003
[6] 沈 朴,张善文,林会喜,等. 油气输导体系研究综述[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2010,17(4):4-8,111. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2010.04.002
[7] 赵忠新,王 华,郭齐军,等. 油气输导体系的类型及其输导性能在时空上的演化分析[J]. 石油实验地质,2002,24(6):527-532,536. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2002.06.009
[8] 武芳芳,朱光有,张水昌,等. 塔里木盆地油气输导体系及对油气成藏的控制作用[J]. 石油学报,2009,30(3):332-341. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2009.03.003
[9] 张新涛,牛成民,黄江波,等. 黄河口凹陷渤中34区明化镇组下段油气输导体系[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2012,19(5):27-30,113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2012.05.007
[10] 牛成民,杜晓峰,邹华耀,等. 渤海海域石臼坨凸起油气输导体系与运聚模式[J]. 中国海上油气,2016,28(3):44-49.
[11] 钱 赓,牛成民,杨 波,等. 渤海南部莱西构造带新近系油气优势输导体系[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2016,43(1):34-41,50.
[12] 杜学斌,解习农,任建业,等. 济阳坳陷中生界古潜山油藏输导体系及成藏模式[J]. 地质科技情报,2005,24(2):22-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7849.2005.02.005
[13] 徐长贵,周心怀,杨 波,等. 渤中凹陷石南陡坡带构造-岩性复合圈闭的形成及分布规律[J]. 现代地质,2009,23(5):887-893. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2009.05.018
[14] 黄 雷. 渤海海域新近纪以来构造特征与演化及其油气赋存效应[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2014.
[15] 刘 华,任景伦,蒋有录. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷现河庄油田河31断块区输导体系特征与成藏规律[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2009,30(1):41-46. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2009.01.006
[16] 张宗峰. 东营凹陷北部陡坡带砂体输导体系与油气成藏研究[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学, 2009.
[17] 刘 震,张善文,赵 阳,等. 东营凹陷南斜坡输导体系发育特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2003,30(3):84-86. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2003.03.023
[18] 付 广,孙同文,吕延防. 南堡凹陷断-砂配置侧向输导油气能力评价方法[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,2014,43(1):79-87.
[19] 孙建军. 不同类型断-砂配置输导的油气特征及成藏控制作用[J]. 东北石油大学学报,2013,37(1):57-63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2013.01.009
[20] 徐春双,徐淑艳,孙建军. 断裂与砂泥组合的配置类型及对油气运移的控制作用[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发,2015,34(3):36-41. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-3754.2015.03.006
-