STRUCTURE-CORRECTION METHOD WITH SEISMIC DATA AND ITS APPLICATION TO IGNEOUS ROCK AREAS
-
摘要:
渤海海域BZ油田区新生界广泛发育火成岩。由于不同期次的高速火成岩纵横向分布极不均衡,造成其下伏构造受影响程度存在很大差异,常规的时深转换方法无法真实反映地下的构造形态。笔者提出了一种新的火成岩下构造恢复的方法:首先利用数值模拟分析不同厚度火成岩对下伏构造的影响程度,建立火成岩厚度与时间校正量的数学关系式,然后运用层速度约束反演方法定量识别火成岩的累计厚度,进而得到其引起的时间校正量,最终采用去除火成岩影响的时深关系进行时深转换得到更精确的深度域构造图。实践表明,该方法有效提高了火成岩发育区的构造成图精度,为渤海海域内首次开展新生界火成岩下油田评价提供了有力的技术支撑,具有较好的推广应用价值。
Abstract:Cenozoic igneous rocks are widely and unevenly distributed in the BZ Oilfield of the Bohai Sea. The underground structure of igneous rocks varies with depth. It is not able to correctly describe the underground structure by the conventional time-depth conversion method with seismic data, and as the result it will increase the risk and uncertainty in hydrocarbon exploration and development. In this paper, a new method for structure correction is proposed specifically for igneous rock areas. Firstly, the impact of igneous rock is studied by means of numerical simulation method so as to establish the relationship between the igneous rock thickness and the time span to be corrected. Secondly, the total thickness of igneous rocks is calculated using the interval velocity constrained inversion, then the time-correction for seismic events is obtained. Finally, time-depth relationship is adopted to eliminate the effects of igneous rock, and get more accurate structural maps by time-depth conversion. The drilling results show that this method can effectively improve the precision of structural mapping and may provide strong technical support for the first time to carry out the oilfield evaluation under the Cenozoic igneous rocks in the Bohai Sea.
-
-
表 1 W3、W4井处校正前后结果误差对比
Table 1. The error of traditional method and the new method of Well-W3 and Well-W4
T3层 井名 实钻海拔/m 常规方法/m 本文方法/m 常规方法误差/m 本文方法误差/m 精度提高 T3层 W3 −2 953.2 −2 963.6 −2 951.4 10.4 −1.8 82.6% T4层 W4 −29.6 −2 954.6 −2 942.7 20 8.1 59.5% T4层 W3 −3 055.2 −3 066.6 −3 062.8 11.4 7.6 33.3% T5层 W4 −3 039.9 −3 054.1 −3 036.9 14.2 −3 78.9% T5层 W3 −3 156.2 −3 184 −3 165.3 27.8 9.1 67.3% W4 −31.6 −3 144.7 — — — 27.8% -
[1] 夏步余,谌廷姗. 地震技术在火成岩发育区开发中的应用[J]. 石油物探,2002,41(4):461-465. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2002.04.017
[2] 于宝利,刘新利,范素芳,等. 火山岩相地震研究方法及应用[J]. 新疆石油地质,2009,30(2):264-266.
[3] 钮学民,孟宪军,宋旭,等. 火成岩下储层构造成图校正方法及其应用[J]. 石油物探,2003,42(4):538-540. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2003.04.023
[4] 易远元,李健雄,刘振彪. 特殊地质体的速度恢复技术[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2013,48(2):239-245.
[5] 许海涛,景海璐,阿依努尔,等. 准噶尔盆地南缘复杂构造变速成图方法及效果分析[J]. 特种油气藏,2012,19(2):50-53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2012.02.012
[6] 刘传奇,明君,马奎前,等. 方差技术在“气云区”深度预测中的应用探讨[J]. 中国海上油气,2012,24(5):21-23.
[7] BACKUS G. Long-wave elastic anisotropy produced by horizontal layering[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research,1962,67(11):4427-4440.
[8] 郎晓玲,韩龙,王世瑞,等. XB地区火山岩岩相划分及储层精细刻画[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2010,45(2):271-277.
[9] 胡治华,申春生,刘宗宾,等. 渤海湾盆地火山岩喷发旋回和期次研究的方法及应用[J]. 油气地球物理,2013,11(2):30-33.
[10] 冯子辉,印长海,刘家军,等. 中国东部原位火山岩油气藏的形成机制[J]. 中国科学,2014,44(10):2221-2237.
[11] 谢云喜. 新疆哈巴河县白哈巴村一带火山岩地质特征及构造意义[J]. 四川地质学报,2009,29(S2):70-77. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0995.2009.z1.012
[12] 黄诚,桂红兵,杨飞,等. 基于模型正演的深层砂泥岩薄互层地震分辨率研究[J]. 断块油气田,2014,21(5):594-596.
[13] 周家雄,刘薇薇,孙月成,等. 小于地震分辨率极限的薄储集层预测技术[J]. 新疆石油地质,2010,31(5):554-556.
[14] 黄安敏,李林,王立华,等. 虚拟井技术在深水无井区碎屑岩储层预测中的应用[J]. 石油物探,2011,50(3):281-287. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2011.03.012
[15] 李元平,颜承志,李杰,等. 宽频地震无井反演技术在神狐海域天然气水合物矿体描述中的应用[J]. 中国海上油气,2019,31(1):51-59.
[16] 叶勇. 三维约束Dix反演层速度方法及其应用研究[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2008,43(4):443-446. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7210.2008.04.016
[17] 罗胜元,何生,宋国奇,等. 渤南洼陷井-震速度误差分析和速度模型的建立及应用[J]. 石油物探,2014,53(2):196-205. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2014.02.010
[18] 杜斌山,雍学善,王建功,等. 测井约束下高精度叠前地震速度预测[J]. 岩性油气藏,2019,31(4):92-100.
[19] 李贺,秦童,张笑桀,等. 基于精细迭代建模的速度异常识别方法与应用[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2019,35(12):74-80.
-