Stability analysis method for the composite foundation embankment based on pile shear strength
-
摘要: 根据瑞典条分法和简化毕肖普法分析边坡稳定性原理,通过对抗滑桩及桩间土的稳定力矩与滑动力距进行单独分析及计算,提出基于桩体强度的路堤边坡稳定性分析桩-土分算法。采用桩-土分算法和规范法对具有不同加固桩桩径、桩间距和路堤高度的边坡稳定性及滑坡破坏特点进行分析。结果表明,桩-土分算瑞典条分法计算所得稳定系数最大,桩-土分算毕肖普法次之,规范法所得稳定系数最小。基于3种方法的路堤边坡稳定系数均随坡高增大而降低,规范法与桩-土分算法计算所得稳定系数差值,随边坡高度增大呈先增大后减小的抛物线形变化。此外,桩-土分算法分析所得边坡最不利滑面位置出现了“下移”现象,根据规范法边坡最不利圆弧滑面穿过地基加固区中部,但当路堤边坡高度为9~15 m时,桩-土分算法分析所得最不利圆弧滑面绕开了柔性桩加固区域,位于柔性桩加固区底部以下区域,且此时边坡仍然存在不稳定性。Abstract: In the current specification, the stability analysis of the embankment slope is calculated by combining the strength parameters of the two parts of pile and the soil into a single parameter, which will cause the slope stability and the position of the most unfavorable slip surface to deviate from the actual project. Therefore, by using the Swedish strip method and the simplified Bishop method to analyze the slope stability principle, through the separate analysis and calculation of the stability moment and sliding force distance of the anti-slide pile and the soil between the piles, a pile-soil algorithm for embankment slope stability analysis is proposed. The pile-soil division algorithm and the code method are used to analyze the stability and landslide failure characteristics of slopes with different reinforcement pile diameters, pile spacing and embankment heights. The results show that the pile-soil calculation has the largest stability coefficient calculated by the Swedish strip method, followed by the pile-soil calculation Bishop method, and the standard method has the smallest stability coefficient. The embankment slope stability coefficients based on the three methods all decrease as the slope height increases. The difference between the stability coefficients calculated by the standard method and the pile-soil algorithm shows a parabolic change that increases first and then decreases as the slope height increases. The difference between the two pile-soil separation algorithms is approximately linear. In addition, the position of the most unfavorable sliding surface of the slope obtained by the analysis of the pile-soil analysis algorithm shows a “downward” phenomenon. With the code method, the most unfavorable arc sliding surface of the slope passes through the middle of the foundation reinforcement area. However, when the height of the embankment slope is 9~15 m, the pile-soil algorithm analysis indicates that the most unfavorable arc slip surface passes the flexible pile reinforcement area and is located below the bottom of the flexible pile reinforcement area, and the slope is not yet stable.
-
-
[1] 刘燕燕, 李修磊, 冯明珠. 土质边坡失稳破坏的双安全系数稳定性分析方法[J]. 公路工程, 2019, 44(4):118-123.[LIU Y Y, LI X L, FENG M Z. Stability analysis method for double safety factors of soil slope failure[J]. Highway Engineering, 2019, 44(4):118-123.(in Chinese)]
[2] 王根龙,伍法权,张军慧,等.变形体条件的土质边坡稳定性分析[J].工程地质学报,2007,15(增刊2):193-196.[WANG G L, WU F Q, ZHANG J H, et al. Analysis on the stability of soil slope with deformation condition[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geology, 2007,15(Sup 2):193-196.(in Chinese)]
[3] 郑颖人, 赵尚毅. 有限元强度折减法在土坡与岩坡中的应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23(19):3381-3388.[ZHENG Y R, ZHAO S Y. Application of strength reduction fem in soil and rock slope[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 23(19):3381-3388.(in Chinese)]
[4] 郑颖人. 岩土数值极限分析方法的发展与应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(7):1297-1316.[ZHENG Y R. Development and application of numerical limit analysis for geological materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(7):1297-1316.(in Chinese)]
[5] 向钰周, 郑颖人, 阿比尔的, 等. 加筋土破坏面的模型试验与数值模拟[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(增刊1):2977-2982.[XIANG Y Z, ZHENG Y R, ABI Erdi, et al. Model test and numerical simulation of reinforced soil failure surface[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(Sup1):2977-2982.(in Chinese)]
[6] 王江营, 文世新, 曹文贵, 等. 塑性极限分析上限法在边坡安全系数求解中的应用[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2009, 6(5):42-46.[WANG J Y, WEN S X, CAO W G, et al. Application of plastic limit analysis upper bound method on the calculation of safety factor on slope[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2009, 6(5):42-46.(in Chinese)]
[7] 王根龙, 伍法权, 李巨文. 岩质边坡稳定塑性极限分析方法——斜分条法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2007, 29(12):1767-1771.[WANG G L, WU F Q, LI J W. Rock slope stability analysis based on plasticity limit theory-method of slices with inclined interfaces[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(12):1767-1771.(in Chinese)]
[8] 陈子玉, 宋彦辉, 严豪, 等. 双参数强度折减法研究中存在的问题分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2019, 46(2):125-132.[CHEN Z Y, SONG Y H, YAN H, et al. Analyses of the existing problems in the double parameters reduction method[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2019, 46(2):125-132.(in Chinese)]
[9] 陈新泽, 唐辉明, 杨有成, 等. 基于FLAC3D强度折减法滑坡三维稳定性研究——以三峡库区白果树古滑坡群为例[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2008, 35(2):24-29.[CHEN X Z, TANG H M, YANG Y C, et al. 3D analysis of landslide stability based on strength reduction FLAC3D:taking Baiguoshu paleo-landslide group in the Three Gorges Reservoir area as example[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2008, 35(2):24-29.(in Chinese)]
[10] 闫明礼, 罗鹏飞, 佟建兴, 等. 复合地基面积置换率[J]. 工程勘察, 2014, 42(9):30-35.[YAN M L, LUO P F, TONG J X, et al. Area replacement rate of composite foundation[J]. Engineering Investigation, 2014, 42(9):30-35.(in Chinese)]
[11] 高大钊. 土力学与基础工程[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 1998.[GAO D Z. Soil mechanics and foundation engineering[M]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 1998.(in Chinese)]
[12] 曾榕, 陈先华, 谢永健. 红粘土地区深层搅拌水泥土加固机理及应用[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2006, 18(6):46-48.[ZENG R, CHEN X H, XIE Y J. Rein-forcement mechanism and application of deep mixing cement soil in red clay area[J]. West-China Exploration Engineering,2006, 18(6):46-48.(in Chinese)]
-
计量
- 文章访问数: 782
- PDF下载数: 49
- 施引文献: 0