岩质边坡表层黏性客土抗裂特性试验研究

宋京雷, 何伟, 郝社锋, 蒋波, 刘瑾, 卜凡, 宋泽卓. 岩质边坡表层黏性客土抗裂特性试验研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2021, 48(3): 144-149. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202008025
引用本文: 宋京雷, 何伟, 郝社锋, 蒋波, 刘瑾, 卜凡, 宋泽卓. 岩质边坡表层黏性客土抗裂特性试验研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2021, 48(3): 144-149. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202008025
SONG Jinglei, HE Wei, HAO Shefeng, JIANG Bo, LIU Jin, BU Fan, SONG Zezhuo. An experimental study of the anti-cracking characteristics of foreign-clay based on rock slope[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2021, 48(3): 144-149. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202008025
Citation: SONG Jinglei, HE Wei, HAO Shefeng, JIANG Bo, LIU Jin, BU Fan, SONG Zezhuo. An experimental study of the anti-cracking characteristics of foreign-clay based on rock slope[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2021, 48(3): 144-149. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202008025

岩质边坡表层黏性客土抗裂特性试验研究

  • 基金项目: 江苏省自然资源科技项目(KJXM2019028);自然资源部国土(耕地)生态监测与修复工程技术创新中心开放课题(2020)
详细信息
    作者简介: 宋京雷(1984-),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事地质灾害、水工环地质研究工作。E-mail: 676505165@qq.com
    通讯作者: 刘瑾(1983-),女,教授,博士研究生导师,博士,主要从事环境地质工程、地质灾害监测研究。E-mail: jinliu920@163.com
  • 中图分类号: TU411.91

An experimental study of the anti-cracking characteristics of foreign-clay based on rock slope

More Information
  • 客土喷播是当前对于裸露岩质边坡生态修复的一种常用技术。然而,边坡表层黏性客土在干旱的气候条件下,内部水分大量流失将容易产生干缩、开裂现象,进而影响坡面的整体稳定性,以及表面植被的生长。本文针对边坡表层黏性客土开裂问题,通过改变土体厚度,以及制备不同聚氨酯(PU)浓度的高分子复合黏性客土,开展一系列室内蒸发试验,以分析土体表面裂隙发育特征,并结合数字图像处理技术(PCAS),对裂隙网络的几何形态进行定量分析,进一步探究土体厚度和高分子添加剂浓度对其裂隙发育的影响。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  不同厚度试样的含水率-时间关系曲线

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  不同厚度试样表面分形维数与裂隙节点个数统计

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  不同厚度的试样完全开裂后表面裂隙网络

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  不同聚氨酯浓度试样的蒸发特征参数关系曲线

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  不同聚氨酯掺入浓度试样表面分形维数与裂隙节点个数统计

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  不同聚氨酯浓度的试样完全开裂后表面裂隙网络

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  土体内部的毛细现象示意图

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  厚度影响黏性土体开裂示意图

    Figure 8. 

    图 9  聚氨酯水溶液与土体相互作用示意图

    Figure 9. 

    表 1  不同厚度试样表面开裂参数统计表

    Table 1.  Statistics of cracking parameters on the surface of the samples with different thicknesses

    试样编号
    Rsc/%
    Nf
    Na
    S/像素
    Lav/像素
    Wav/像素
    S1 10.70 400 214 194949 128.15 81.46
    S2 14.14 181 76 257678 207.89 133.27
    S3 16.07 60 34 292922 307.89 170.92
    S4 19.15 35 29 345635 310.49 173.90
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  不同聚氨酯浓度的试样表面开裂参数统计

    Table 2.  Statistics of cracking parameters on the surface of the samples with different CPU

    试样编号
    Rsc/%
    Nf
    Na
    S/像素
    Lav/像素
    Wav/像素
    S4 19.15 35 29 345635 310.49 173.90
    S5 19.02 42 29 348008 276.25 174.6
    S6 19.12 45 25 351756 315.03 171.47
    S7 20.53 44 26 372286 347.75 185.32
    S8 20.55 35 22 351467 355.59 207.05
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    张勇, 温智, 程英建. 四川巴中市滑坡灾害与降雨雨型关系探讨[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2020,47(2):178 − 182. [ZHANG Yong, WEN Zhi, CHENG Yingjian. A discussion of the relationship between landslide disaster and rainfall types in Bazhong of Sichuan[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2020,47(2):178 − 182. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [2]

    郭敏, 苏生瑞, 曾金. 降雨条件下堆积层滑坡变形特征及形成机理研究[J]. 河北工程大学学报(自然科学版),2019,36(3):39 − 45. [GUO Min, SU Shengrui, ZENG Jin. Deformation characteristics and formation mechanism of accumulated landslides under rainfall conditions[J]. Journal of Hebei University of Engineering (Natural Science Edition),2019,36(3):39 − 45. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [3]

    周杨, 刘果果, 白兰英, 等. 降雨诱发黄土边坡失稳室内试验研究[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版),2016,49(6):838 − 843. [ZHOU Yang, LIU Guoguo, BAI Lanying, et al. Model test study of loess slope instability induced by rainfall[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University,2016,49(6):838 − 843. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [4]

    李滨, 冯振, 赵瑞欣, 等. 三峡地区“14·9”极端暴雨型滑坡泥石流成灾机理分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2016,43(4):118 − 127. [LI Bin, FENG Zhen, ZHAO Ruixin, et al. Mechanism of “14·9” rainstorm triggered landslides and debris-flows in the Three Gorges area[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2016,43(4):118 − 127. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [5]

    廖一蕾, 张子新, 肖时辉, 等. 水泥加固黏性土微观特征试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2016,35(增刊2):4318 − 4327. [LIAO Yilei, ZHANG Zixin, XIAO Shihui, et al. Microstructure research on cement stabilized clays[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2016,35(Sup2):4318 − 4327. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [6]

    汤怡新, 刘汉龙, 朱伟. 水泥固化土工程特性试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2000,22(5):549 − 554. [TANG Yixin, LIU Hanlong, ZHU Wei. Study on engineering properties of cement-stabilized soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2000,22(5):549 − 554. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2000.05.008

    [7]

    张家明, 陈积普, 杨继清, 等. 中国岩质边坡植被护坡技术研究进展[J]. 水土保持学报,2019,33(5):1 − 7. [ZHANG Jiaming, CHEN Jipu, YANG Jiqing, et al. Advances in biological protection of rock slopes in China[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,33(5):1 − 7. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [8]

    CARAVACA F, LOZANO Z, RODRÍGUEZ-CABALLERO G, et al. Spatial shifts in soil microbial activity and degradation of pasture cover caused by prolonged exposure to cement dust[J]. Land Degradation & Development,2017,28(4):1329 − 1335.

    [9]

    NAJIM K B, MAHMOD Z S, ATEA A K M. Experimental investigation on using Cement Kiln Dust (CKD) as a cement replacement material in producing modified cement mortar[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2014,55:5 − 12. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.015

    [10]

    EL-ATTAR M M, SADEK D M, SALAH A M. Recycling of high volumes of cement kiln dust in bricks industry[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2017,143:506 − 515. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.082

    [11]

    李绍才, 孙海龙. 中国岩石边坡植被护坡技术现状及发展趋势[J]. 资源科学,2004,26(增刊1):61 − 66. [LI Shaocai, SUN Hailong. Developing trend and situations of technique to stabilize rock slope with vegetative cover in China[J]. Resources Science,2004,26(Sup1):61 − 66. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [12]

    方军辉, 朱德滨, 程承, 等. 客土喷播的护坡机理及基材和施工等控制要点[J]. 森林工程,2014,30(3):116 − 119. [FANG Junhui, ZHU Debin, CHENG Cheng, et al. Mechanism of slope protection, base material mixture, and construction technology of soil spray-sowing[J]. Forest Engineering,2014,30(3):116 − 119. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-005X.2014.03.029

    [13]

    LUO C, GUO X P, LIU G H, et al. Green waste compost as a substitute for turfy soil in external-soil spray seeding substrate[J]. Environmental Technology,2019:1 − 13.

    [14]

    唐朝生, 施斌, 崔玉军. 土体干缩裂隙的形成发育过程及机理[J]. 岩土工程学报,2018,40(8):1415 − 1423. [TANG Chaosheng, SHI Bin, CUI Yujun. Behaviors and mechanisms of desiccation cracking of soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2018,40(8):1415 − 1423. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [15]

    曾浩, 唐朝生, 林銮, 等. 土体干缩裂隙发育方向及演化特征的层间摩擦效应研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2019,41(6):1172 − 1180. [ZENG Hao, TANG Chaosheng, LIN Luan, et al. Interfacial friction dependence of propagation direction and evolution characteristics of soil desiccation cracks[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2019,41(6):1172 − 1180. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [16]

    唐朝生, 施斌, 刘春. 膨胀土收缩开裂特性研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2012,20(5):663 − 673. [TANG Chaosheng, SHI Bin, LIU Chun. Study on desiccation cracking behaviour of expansive soil[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2012,20(5):663 − 673. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2012.05.003

    [17]

    孙强, 龚绪龙, 张玉良, 等. 黏土失水干缩裂缝发育动态试验研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2014,41(5):144 − 147. [SUN Qiang, GONG Xulong, ZHANG Yuliang, et al. A study of the dynamic experimental of clay desiccation cracking process[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2014,41(5):144 − 147. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [18]

    王宝军, 施斌, 刘志彬, 等. 基于GIS的黏性土微观结构的分形研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2004,26(2):244 − 247. [WANG Baojun, SHI Bin, LIU Zjibin, et al. Fractal study on microstructure of clayey soil by GIS[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2004,26(2):244 − 247. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2004.02.018

  • 加载中

(9)

(2)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  893
  • PDF下载数:  64
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2020-08-11
修回日期:  2020-09-27
刊出日期:  2021-05-15

目录