不同压实度下黄土填方边坡失稳的模型试验研究

陈林万, 裴向军, 张晓超, 张硕, 钟玉健, 罗欣. 不同压实度下黄土填方边坡失稳的模型试验研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2022, 49(2): 137-147. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202104068
引用本文: 陈林万, 裴向军, 张晓超, 张硕, 钟玉健, 罗欣. 不同压实度下黄土填方边坡失稳的模型试验研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2022, 49(2): 137-147. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202104068
CHEN Linwan, PEI Xiangjun, ZHANG Xiaochao, ZHANG Shuo, ZHONG Yujian, LUO Xin. A model test study of the instability of loess fill slope under different compactness[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2022, 49(2): 137-147. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202104068
Citation: CHEN Linwan, PEI Xiangjun, ZHANG Xiaochao, ZHANG Shuo, ZHONG Yujian, LUO Xin. A model test study of the instability of loess fill slope under different compactness[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2022, 49(2): 137-147. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202104068

不同压实度下黄土填方边坡失稳的模型试验研究

  • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(41790445);国家重点研发计划(2018YFC1504702)
详细信息
    作者简介: 陈林万(1996-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事黄土填方边坡稳定性评价研究工作。E-mail:1317783721@qq.com
    通讯作者: 张晓超(1978-),女,教授,主要从事黄土滑坡形成机理研究工作。E-mail: 31685032@qq.com
  • 中图分类号: P642.22

A model test study of the instability of loess fill slope under different compactness

More Information
  • 黄土填方边坡在降雨入渗下容易发生滑坡。为了探讨降雨入渗下压实度对黄土填方边坡变形破坏机制、失稳模式以及滑动机理的影响,基于室内降雨系统,结合传感器监测和三维激光扫描技术,开展了边坡压实度为80%(低压实度)、90%(中压实度)、95%(高压实度)的降雨模型试验研究,分析了压实度对填方边坡体积含水率、基质吸力以及变形破坏过程的影响规律。结果表明:压实度的不同,边坡首先破坏的位置不一。中、高压实度下的边坡最先破坏发生在坡脚处,表现出滑塌破坏;而低压实度则是在坡顶,为湿陷沉降破坏。边坡压实度越大,其变形破坏过程持续时间越长,所需累积雨量就越大,但滑动距离和滑面深度越小。随压实度的增加,边坡破坏模式由深层整体破坏向浅层多级破坏转变。低压实度边坡为湿陷沉降-深层蠕滑拉裂式,中压实度边坡为深层蠕滑拉裂式破坏,而高压实度边坡则为浅层多级后退式失稳。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  试验土样颗粒分布曲线

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  滑坡模型试验装置示意图(单位:cm)

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  低压实度试验边坡传感器读数变化

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  低压实度试验边坡变形破坏过程

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  中压实度试验边坡传感器读数变化

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  中压实度试验边坡变形破坏过程

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  高压实度试验边坡传感器读数变化

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  高压实度试验边坡变形破坏过程

    Figure 8. 

    图 9  低压实度试验边坡破坏模式

    Figure 9. 

    图 10  中压实度试验边坡破坏模式

    Figure 10. 

    图 11  高压实度试验边坡破坏模式

    Figure 11. 

    表 1  试验方案

    Table 1.  Schemes of the model tests

    试验组压实度/%降雨强度/(mm·h−1降雨
    类型
    降雨时间边坡
    角度/(°)
    E18029.8连续
    均匀型
    直到边坡整体失稳45
    E29029.8连续
    均匀型
    直到边坡
    整体失稳
    45
    E39529.8连续
    均匀型
    直到边坡整体失稳45
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    张炜, 张继文, 于永堂. 黄土高填方关键技术问题与工程实践[J]. 岩土工程技术,2016,30(1):12 − 19. [ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Jiwen, YU Yongtang. Key technical issues and engineering practices in project construction of loess deep filled foundation[J]. Geotechnical Engineering Technique,2016,30(1):12 − 19. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2016.01.003

    [2]

    罗先启, 程圣国, 牛恩宽. 滑坡物理模型试验畸变修正及应用研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(增刊 1):3082 − 3088. [LUO Xianqi, CHENG Shengguo, NIU Enkuan. Research on aberration correction and application in landslide geomechanical model test[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2009,28(Sup 1):3082 − 3088. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [3]

    朱才辉, 张世斌. 降雨条件下压实黄土水分入渗规律模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2018,40(6):1117 − 1124. [ZHU Caihui, ZHANG Shibin. Rainfall infiltration laws of compacted loess based on laboratory model tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2018,40(6):1117 − 1124. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11779/CJGE201806018

    [4]

    张世斌, 朱才辉, 袁继国. 降雨条件下重塑黄土中水分迁移模型试验研究[J]. 水利学报,2019,50(5):621 − 630. [ZHANG Shibin, ZHU Caihui, YANG Jiguo. Laboratory model tests on moisture migration in remolded loess under rainfall conditions[J]. Journal ofHydraulic Engineering,2019,50(5):621 − 630. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [5]

    许旭堂, 简文彬, 吴能森, 等. 降雨入渗影响下边坡中的非饱和渗流特性[J]. 地球科学,2018,43(3):922 − 932. [XU Xutang, JIAN Wenbin, WU Nengsen, et al. Unsaturated seepage characteristics of slope under rainfall infiltration[J]. Earth Science,2018,43(3):922 − 932. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [6]

    刘德仁, 徐硕昌, 肖洋, 等. 浸水入渗条件下压实黄土水-气运移规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2021,42(12):3260 − 3270. [LIU Deren, XU Shuochang, XIAO Yang, et al. Experimental study on the law of water-air migration in compacted loess under the condition of immersion infiltration[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2021,42(12):3260 − 3270. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [7]

    李仁杰, 王旭, 张延杰, 等. 大气作用下浅层非饱和黄土温度变化及其影响因素研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2019,27(4):766 − 774. [LI Renjie, WANG Xu, ZHANG Yanjie, et al. Experimental tests on temperature change of shallow unsaturated loess under atmospheric action and its influencing factors[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2019,27(4):766 − 774. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [8]

    周春梅, 王宇, 吕雷, 等. 雨滴溅蚀下压实黄土变形破坏规律研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2018,45(6):93 − 98. [ZHOU Chunmei, WANG Yu, LYU Lei, et al. Research on deformation of compacted loess under raindrop splash erosion[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2018,45(6):93 − 98. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [9]

    孙吉书, 邱博超, 肖田. 降雨作用下路堤边坡水毁机理及影响因素分析[J]. 河北科技大学学报,2021,43(4):415 − 423. [SUN Jishu, QIU Bochao, XIAO Tian. Analysis on water damage mechanism and influencing factors of embankment slope under rainfall[J]. Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology,2021,43(4):415 − 423. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [10]

    韩晓, 张孟喜, 李嘉洋, 等. 高强土工格室加筋砂土地基模型试验研究[J]. 长江科学院院报,2014,31(3):27 − 33. [HAN Xiao, ZHANG Mengxi, LI Jiayang, et al. Model test of sand foundation reinforced with high-strength geocell[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute,2014,31(3):27 − 33. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2014.03.004

    [11]

    孙州, 张孟喜, 姜圣卫. 条形荷载下土工格室加筋砂土路堤模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2015,37(增刊 2):170 − 175. [SUN Zhou, ZHANG Mengxi, JIANG Shengwei. Model tests on sand embankment reinforced with geocell subjected to strip loading[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2015,37(Sup 2):170 − 175. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [12]

    郑建国, 曹杰, 张继文, 等. 基于离心模型试验的黄土高填方沉降影响因素分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2019,38(3):560 − 571. [ZHANG Jianguo, CAO Jie, ZHANG Jiwen, et al. Analysis of influencing factors of high loess-filled foundations based on centrifugal model tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2019,38(3):560 − 571. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [13]

    林宇亮, 杨果林, 钟正. 不同压实度铁路路堤边坡地震响应振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2012,33(11):3285 − 3291. [LIN Yuliang, YANG Guolin, ZHONG Zheng. Shaking table test on seismic response of railway embankment slopes with different compaction degrees[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2012,33(11):3285 − 3291. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [14]

    林宇亮, 杨果林. 不同压实度路堤边坡的地震残余变形特性[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版),2012,43(9):3631 − 3638. [LIN Yuliang, YANG Guolin. Seismic residual deformation behavior of embankment slopes of different compaction degrees[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology),2012,43(9):3631 − 3638. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [15]

    张硕, 裴向军, 黄润秋, 等. 黄土填方边坡降雨入渗特征及变形破坏模式的模型试验[J]. 中国公路学报,2019,32(9):32 − 41. [ZHANG Shuo, PEI Xiangjun, HUANG Runqiu, et al. Model test on seepage characteristics and deformation failure modes of loess fill slope under rainfall[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport,2019,32(9):32 − 41. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [16]

    ZHANG Shuo, ZHANG Xiaochao, PEI Xiangjun, et al. Model test study on the hydrological mechanisms and early warning thresholds for loess fill slope failure induced by rainfall[J]. Engineering Geology,2019,258:105135. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.05.012

    [17]

    CHANG Zhilu, HUANG Faming, HUANG Jinsong, et al. Experimental study of the failure mode and mechanism of loess fill slopes induced by rainfall[J]. Engineering Geology,2021,280:105941. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105941

    [18]

    陈林万, 张晓超, 裴向军, 等. 降雨诱发直线型黄土填方边坡失稳模型试验[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2021,48(6):151 − 160. [CHEN Linwan, ZHANG Xiaochao, PEI Xiangjun, et al. Model test of the linear loess fill slope instability induced by rainfallFull text replacement[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2021,48(6):151 − 160. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [19]

    CHEN H, LEE C F, LAW K T. Causative mechanisms of rainfall-induced fill slope failures[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2004,130(6):593 − 602. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:6(593)

    [20]

    李华, 李同录, 张亚国, 等. 不同干密度压实黄土的非饱和渗透性曲线特征及其与孔隙分布的关系[J]. 水利学报,2020,51(8):979 − 986. [LI Hua, LI Tonglu, ZHANG Yaguo, et al. Relationship between unsaturated permeability curve and pore-size distribution of compacted loess with different dry density[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,2020,51(8):979 − 986. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [21]

    马亚维, 谌文武, 毕骏, 等. 干密度对黄土渗透系数的影响[J]. 岩土工程学报,2018,40(增刊 1):165 − 170. [MA Yawei, CHEN Wenwu, BI Jun, et al. Influence of dry density on coefficient of permeability of unsaturated loess[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2018,40(Sup 1):165 − 170. (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • 加载中

(11)

(1)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1445
  • PDF下载数:  8
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2021-04-26
修回日期:  2021-11-23
刊出日期:  2022-03-15

目录