基于动态残余强度的不同含水率条件下滑坡稳定性研究

魏占玺, 谢东武, 毋远召, 马文礼, 李元, 李万花. 基于动态残余强度的不同含水率条件下滑坡稳定性研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2022, 49(2): 126-136. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202104055
引用本文: 魏占玺, 谢东武, 毋远召, 马文礼, 李元, 李万花. 基于动态残余强度的不同含水率条件下滑坡稳定性研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2022, 49(2): 126-136. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202104055
WEI Zhanxi, XIE Dongwu, WU Yuanzhao, MA Wenli, LI Yuan, LI Wanhua. Research on landslide stability under different water content conditions based on the dynamic residual strength[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2022, 49(2): 126-136. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202104055
Citation: WEI Zhanxi, XIE Dongwu, WU Yuanzhao, MA Wenli, LI Yuan, LI Wanhua. Research on landslide stability under different water content conditions based on the dynamic residual strength[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2022, 49(2): 126-136. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202104055

基于动态残余强度的不同含水率条件下滑坡稳定性研究

  • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(41977227)
详细信息
    作者简介: 魏占玺(1977-),男,本科,高级工程师,研究方向为地基及地质灾害防治。E-mail:si17939108307@163.com
    通讯作者: 谢东武(1980-),男,博士,高级工程师,研究方向为地下建筑工程。E-mail:yenuo557478941@163.com
  • 中图分类号: P642.2

Research on landslide stability under different water content conditions based on the dynamic residual strength

More Information
  • 长时降雨会引起斜坡发生累进性破坏,在此过程中,滑带土将随含水率的变化达到不同含水状态下的残余强度。传统应变软化模型不能准确表达这一变化过程中滑带土残余强度的动态特征, 而引入动态残余强度的应变软化模型能更加真实地模拟含水率变化时滑坡稳定性的发展。基于此,文章对四川中江县垮梁子滑坡开展了野外调查工作,通过现场竖井获取滑带土,采用环剪试验研究了滑带土力学参数与含水率的关系,在此基础上建立了基于动态残余强度的应变软化模型,模拟了垮梁子滑坡在滑带土处于不同含水率阶段的发展情况。结果表明:含水率的增加使得滑带土抗剪性能显著衰减,峰值及残余抗剪强度呈近乎线性降低,残余强度参数则表现出三次函数型衰减特征。应用基于残余强度参数衰减规律建立的应变软化模型模拟了垮梁子滑坡的变形破坏过程,结果表明在滑带土含水率低于20%时,斜坡仅在前缘局部产生塑性区;当含水率达到22%时,斜坡中上部开始产生塑性区及未贯通滑动面;当含水率达到24%时,塑性区趋于贯通,滑坡进入加速变形状态,并于坡表产生张拉裂缝;当含水率达到26%时,滑坡处于失稳状态,坡表张拉塑性区及破坏面的发展与滑坡现状破坏特征高度吻合。该成果可为相关滑坡的稳定性研究提供一定的理论依据。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  垮梁子滑坡平面图

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  滑带土矿物X射线粉晶衍射矿物成分[15]

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  ICL-2型环剪仪

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  不同含水率滑带土抗剪强度

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  滑带土残余抗剪强度参数与含水率的关系

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  岩土材料强度劣化的线性应变软化模型

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  基于动态残余强度的多段线性应变软化模型

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  计算网格

    Figure 8. 

    图 9  垮梁子滑坡塑性区分布

    Figure 9. 

    图 10  垮梁子滑坡破坏区发展过程

    Figure 10. 

    图 11  垮梁子滑坡破坏形态

    Figure 11. 

    图 12  垮梁子斜坡安全系数动态变化特征

    Figure 12. 

    表 1  滑带土抗剪强度参数

    Table 1.  Shear strength parameters of the slip zone soil

    拟合公式含水率峰值抗剪强度参数残余抗剪强度参数
    cpφpcrφr
    y=a+bx18%33.6714.0623.0611.33
    20%25.0411.1221.068.92
    22%20.338.2416.407.38
    24%14.594.5212.463.91
    26%7.994.317.693.45
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  各岩土层物理力学参数

    Table 2.  Physical and mechanical parameters of the rock and soil layer

    地层
    代号
    γ/(kN·m−3)E/MPaμσt0/kPac0/kPacr1/kPcri/kPaφ0/(°)φr1/(°)φri/(°)
    22.50450.3356525.225.2031.518.5018.500.0080.020.002
    λ19.50150.34035.7723.403.1914.9811.513.300.0080.020.002
    23.502.2×1040.261101200120012004242420.0080.020.002
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    马云长, 苏培东, 郑智洋, 等. 基于滑带土应变软化的滑坡渐进破坏研究[C]//2019年全国工程地质学术年会论文集. 北京, 2019: 181 − 187.[MA Yunchang, SU Peidong, ZHENG Zhiyang, et al.Progressive failure research of landslide based on strain fostening of sliding zone soil[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 Engineering Geology Session. Beijing,2019:181-197.(in Chinese with English Abstract)]

    [2]

    Itasca Consulting Group Inc. FLAC3D: Fast lagrangian analysis of continua in 3 dimensions user manual (Version3.0)[M]. Minneapolis: Consulting Group Inc, 2005.

    [3]

    宋雪琳, 谢勋, 齐剑峰, 等. 云南哀牢山某滑坡滑体与滑带土工程性质试验研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2010,37(4):77 − 80. [SONG Xuelin, XIE Xun, QI Jianfeng, et al. A study on the engineering properties of sliding-body and sliding-zone soil at Ailaoshan in Yunnan Province[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2010,37(4):77 − 80. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3665.2010.04.016

    [4]

    张怡颖, 郭长宝, 杨志华, 等. 四川茂县周场坪深层滑坡滑带土环剪试验强度研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2021,29(3):764 − 776. [ZHANG Yiying, GUO Changbao, YANG Zhihua, et al. Study on shear strength of deep-seated sliding zone soil of zhouchangping landslide in Maoxian, Sichuan[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2021,29(3):764 − 776. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [5]

    黄斌, 傅旭东, 谭凡, 等. 含水率对滑带土强度及变形影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2012,33(9):2613 − 2618. [HUANG Bin, FU Xudong, TAN Fan, et al. Experimental study of relationship between water content and strength or deformation of slip soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2012,33(9):2613 − 2618. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [6]

    李文, 龙建辉, 李同录, 等. 陕西泾阳南塬黄土滑坡滑带土残余剪切强度特性[J]. 地球科学与环境学报,2012,34(4):95 − 101. [LI Wen, LONG Jianhui, LI Tonglu, et al. Residual shear strength characteristics of landslide soil in loess landslide of Jingyang southern highland, Shaanxi[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2012,34(4):95 − 101. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6561.2012.04.013

    [7]

    饶鸿, 王金淑, 赵志明, 等. 基于有限元软件自定义本构模型的膨胀土边坡降雨入渗分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2021,48(1):154 − 162. [RAO Hong, WANG Jinshu, ZHAO Zhiming, et al. An analysis of rainfall infiltration of expansive soil slope based on the finite element software custom constitutive model[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2021,48(1):154 − 162. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [8]

    SRBULOV M. A simple method for the analysis of stability of slopes in brittle soil[J]. Soils and Foundations,1995,35(4):123 − 127. doi: 10.3208/sandf.35.4_123

    [9]

    刘忠玉, 陈少伟. 应变软化土质边坡渐进破坏的演化模型[J]. 郑州大学学报(工学版),2002,23(2):37 − 40. [LIU Zhongyu, CHEN Shaowei. Evolution model of progressive failure of strain-softening soil slopes[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University of Technology,2002,23(2):37 − 40. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [10]

    陈国庆, 黄润秋, 周辉, 等. 边坡渐进破坏的动态强度折减法研究[J]. 岩土力学,2013,34(4):1140 − 1146. [CHEN Guoqing, HUANG Runqiu, ZHOU Hui, et al. Research on progressive failure for slope using dynamic strength reduction method[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2013,34(4):1140 − 1146. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [11]

    薛海斌, 党发宁, 尹小涛, 等. 应变软化边坡稳定性分析方法研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2016,38(3):570 − 576. [XUE Haibin, DANG Faning, YIN Xiaotao, et al. Stability analysis methods for strain-softening slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2016,38(3):570 − 576. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11779/CJGE201603022

    [12]

    卢应发, 张凌晨, 张玉芳, 等. 边坡渐进破坏多参量评价指标[J]. 工程力学,2021,38(3):132 − 147. [LU Yingfa, ZHANG Lingchen, ZHANG Yufang, et al. Multi parameter evaluation index of progressive failure of landslide[J]. Engineering Mechanics,2021,38(3):132 − 147. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2020.05.0286

    [13]

    何怡, 郭力, 马冲. 考虑软弱夹层中岩土体应变软化特性的矿山边坡变形体渐进破坏分析[J]. 安全与环境工程,2020,27(2):162 − 167. [HE Yi, GUO Li, MA Chong. Progressive failure of deformed rock body on the mine slope considering strain softening characteristics of rock and soil in weak interlayer[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering,2020,27(2):162 − 167. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [14]

    罗忠行, 雷宏权. 基于FLAC3D的米贝复式滑坡稳定性分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2020,31(4):52 − 62. [LUO Zhongxing, LEI Hongquan. Study on Mibei landslide analysis based on FLAC3D[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2020,31(4):52 − 62. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [15]

    陈思娇. 四川中江垮梁子滑坡滑带土强度特性及滑坡变形机理研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2014.

    CHEN Sijiao. Study on shear strength properties of slip soils and deformation mechanism of Kualiangzi landslide in Zhongjiang of Sichuan[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [16]

    吉随旺, 张倬元, 王凌云, 等. 近水平软硬互层斜坡变形破坏机制[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2000,11(3):49 − 52. [JI Suiwang, ZHANG Zhuoyuan, WANG Lingyun, et al. The mechanism of deformation and failure for the slope composed of nearly horizontal competent and incompetent intercalated rock mass strata[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2000,11(3):49 − 52. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8035.2000.03.012

    [17]

    许成顺, 尹占巧, 杜修力, 等. 黏性土的抗剪强度特性试验研究[J]. 水利学报,2013,44(12):1433 − 1438. [XU Chengshun, YIN Zhanqiao, DU Xiuli, et al. Experimental study of shear strength of clay[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,2013,44(12):1433 − 1438. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [18]

    王永璐, 刘顺青, 姜朋明. 含水率及吸力对非饱和下蜀土强度特性影响试验研究[J]. 三峡大学学报(自然科学版),2020,42(4):48 − 52. [WANG Yonglu, LIU Shunqing, JIANG Pengming. Experimental study on the influence of moisture content and suction on the strength characteristics of Xiashu soil[J]. Journal of China Three Gorges University (Natural Sciences),2020,42(4):48 − 52. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [19]

    朱兆波, 王新刚, 朱荣森, 等. 甘肃黑方台黄土滑坡滑带土剪切特性环剪试验研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2021,35(5):144 − 150. [ZHU Zhaobo, WANG Xingang, ZHU Rongsen, et al. Ring shear test on the shear characteristics of sliding zone soil of loess in Heifangtai, Gansu[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2021,35(5):144 − 150. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [20]

    赵蕊, 左双英, 王嵩, 等. 不同含水量贵阳重塑红黏土三轴抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2015,42(5):90 − 95. [ZHAO Rui, ZUO Shuangying, WANG Song, et al. Experiment and mechanism analysis of water contents on triaxial shear strength of the remodeled red clay of Guiyang[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2015,42(5):90 − 95. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [21]

    夏志皋. 塑性力学[M]. 上海: 同济大学出版社, 1991.

    XIA Zhigao. Plastic mechanics [M]. Shanghai: Tongji University Press, 1991. (in Chinese)

    [22]

    郑颖人, 孔亮. 岩土塑性力学[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.

    ZHENG Yingren, KONG Liang. Geotechnical plastic mechanics[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2010. (in Chinese)

    [23]

    HAJIABDOLMAJID V, KAISER P. Brittleness of rock and stability assessment in hard rock tunneling[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2003,18(1):35 − 48. doi: 10.1016/S0886-7798(02)00100-1

    [24]

    王伟, 陈国庆, 郑水全, 等. 考虑张拉-剪切渐进破坏的边坡矢量和法研究[J]. 岩土力学,2019,40(增刊 1):468 − 476. [WANG Wei, CHEN Guoqing, ZHENG Shuiquan, et al. Study on the vector sum method of slope considering tensile-shear progressive failure[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2019,40(Sup 1):468 − 476. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [25]

    王伟. 考虑张拉-剪切渐进破坏的”三段式“边坡稳定性研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2019.

    WANG Wei. Study on the stability of “three sections” slope considering tension and shear progressive failure[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • 加载中

(12)

(2)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  718
  • PDF下载数:  8
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2021-04-20
修回日期:  2021-08-18
刊出日期:  2022-03-15

目录