Numerical runout modeling and dynamic analysis of the ice avalanche-debris flow in Sedongpu Basin along Yarlung Zangbo River in Tibet
-
摘要:
2018年10月17日,西藏自治区雅鲁藏布江西岸色东普沟发生冰崩岩崩,冲刷侵蚀下部冰积堆积体和沟床松散堆积物,形成碎屑流冲入雅鲁藏布江,堆积后形成堰塞坝堵塞河道,严重影响当地居民安全和社会经济发展。本文基于真实遥感影像建立三维数值模型,利用DAN3D分析其动力学特征,选取Frictional-Voellmy复合模型反演得到碎屑流堆积特征、滑体运动速度和铲刮深度等动力特征参数,与实际勘察结果基本一致,具有较好的可靠性。在野外勘察基础上,结合高密度电阻率法揭示了色东普沟崩滑-碎屑流堆积特征,结果表明DAN3D能够较好地模拟滑体的堆积形态和最大厚度,验证了DAN3D模拟的有效性,研究结论及方法对于此类灾害的机理研究及未来防治工程提供了新的研究思路。
Abstract:On October 17, 2018, a massive ice avalanche-debris flow occurred in the Sedongpu Basin on the left bank of the Yarlung Zangbo River in Tibet. The sliding mass scoured the glacial deposits and loose deposits in the gully bed and then transformed into a debris flow. Eventually, a barrier dam was formed and blocked the Yarlung Zangbo River, which seriously affected the safety of residents and social and economic development. In this paper, a three-dimensional numerical simulation of this event was performed based on remote sensing. A dynamic analysis (DAN3D) model was utilized to analyze the dynamic characteristics of sliding mass, and the Frictional-Voellmy composite model was selected to reproduce debris flow accumulation characteristics, movement speed, and scraping depth. The simulation results are consistent with the actual survey results and have good reliability. Based on field investigation, the electrical resistivity tomography method was used to reveal the post-event accumulation characteristics of the ice avalanche-debris flow in Sedongpu gully. The results showed that DAN3D could well simulate the accumulation shape and maximum thickness of sliding mass, which verified the effectiveness of DAN3D simulation. The results of the study can help forecast similar events and provide new research ideas for the mechanism research of such disasters for future prevention and control projects.
-
Key words:
- Sedongpu Basin /
- iceavalanche /
- debris flow /
- DAN3D /
- electrical resistivity tomography method
-
表 1 流变模型和计算参数
Table 1. Rheological model and simulation parameters
模型 容重/
(kN·m−3)摩擦角/
(°)摩擦
系数湍流系数/
m内摩擦角/
(°)最大铲刮
深度/m崩滑区 Frictional 25 28 − − 36 0 流通区 Voellmy 21 − 0.04 1200 24 35 堆积区 Voellmy 21 − 0.05 1000 24 17 表 2 物探解译与DAN3D模拟堆积物最大深度对比(单位: m)
Table 2. Comparison of the maximum deposition depth between the ERT method and DAN3D simulation (Unit: m)
ERT1 ERT2 ERT3 ERT4 ERT5 ERT6 ERT7 物探解译 29 40 19 12 15 20 18 DAN3D模拟 30 25 20 15 15 10 10 -
[1] SHANG YJ, YANG ZF, LI LH, et al. A super-large landslide in Tibet in 2000: background, occurrence, disaster, and origin[J]. Geomorphology,2003,53:225 − 243.
[2] YIN YP, XING AG. Aerodynamic modeling of the Yigong gigantic rock slide-debris avalanche, Tibet, China[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,2012,71:149 − 160.
[3] CUI P, JIA Y. Mountain hazards in the Tibetan Plateau: research status and prospects[J]. National Science Review,2015,2(4):397 − 402.
[4] 王宗太, 刘潮海. 中国冰川分布的地理特征[J]. 冰川冻土,2001,23(3):231 − 237. [WANG Zongtai, LIU Chaohai. Geographical characteristics of the distribution of glaciers in China[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology,2001,23(3):231 − 237. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0240.2001.03.004
[5] 崔鹏, 贾洋, 苏凤环, 等. 青藏高原自然灾害发育现状与未来关注的科学问题[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2017,32(9):985 − 992. [CUI Peng, JIA Yang, SU Fenghuan, et al. Natural hazards in Tibetan Plateau and key issue for feature research[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2017,32(9):985 − 992. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] 曾庆利, 杨志法, 尚彦军, 等. 川藏公路102滑坡群地段基覆界面问题研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2008,3:1 − 6. [ZENG Qingli, YANG Zhifa, SHANG Yanjun, et al. Study on discontinuity between bedrock and quaternary covers in No.102 landslide group section of Sichuan-Tibet highway[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2008,3:1 − 6. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3665.2008.04.002
[7] 胡文涛, 姚檀栋, 余武生, 等. 高亚洲地区冰崩灾害的研究进展[J]. 冰川冻土,2018,40(6):1141 − 1152. [HU Wentao, YAO Tandong, YU Wusheng, et al. Advances in the study of glacier avalanches in High Asia[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology,2018,40(6):1141 − 1152. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] 许强, 郑光, 李为乐, 等. 2018年10月和11月金沙江白格两次滑坡-堰塞堵江事件分析研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2018,26(6):1534 − 1551. [XU Qiang, ZHENG Guang, LI Weile, et al. Study on successive landslide damming events of Jinsha River in Baige Village on Octorber 11 and November[J]. Joumal of Engineering Geology,2018,26(6):1534 − 1551. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 刘传正, 吕杰堂, 童立强, 等. 雅鲁藏布江色东普沟崩滑-碎屑流堵江灾害初步研究[J]. 中国地质,2019,46(2):219 − 234. [LIU Chuanzheng, LYU Jietang, TONG Liqiang, et al. Research on glacial/rock fall-landslide-debris flows in Sedongpu basin along Yarlung Zangbo River in Tibet[J]. Geology in China,2019,46(2):219 − 234. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 童立强, 涂杰楠, 裴丽鑫, 等. 雅鲁藏布江加拉白垒峰色东普流域频繁发生碎屑流事件初步探讨[J]. 工程地质学报,2018,26(6):1552 − 1561. [TONG Liqiang, TU Jienan, PEI Lixin, et al. Preliminary discussion of the frequently debris flow events in Sedongpu Basin at Gyalaperi peak, Yarlung Zangho River[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2018,26(6):1552 − 1561. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] HU KH, ZHANG XP, YOU Y, et al. Landslides and dammed lakes triggered by the 2017 Ms6.9 Milin earthquake in the Tsangpo gorge[J]. Landslides,2019,16(2/3):1 − 9.
[12] WANG WP, YANG JS, WANG YB. Dynamic processes of 2018 Sedongpu landslide in Namcha Barwa–Gyala Peri massif revealed by broadband seismic records[J]. Landslides,2020,17:409 − 418.
[13] HUNGR O. A model for the runout analysis of rapid flow slides, debris flows and avalanches[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1995,32(4):610 − 623.
[14] KEITH B. The 2000 Yigong landslide (Tibetan Plateau), rockslide-dammed lake and outburst flood: Review, remote sensing analysis, and process modelling[J]. Geomorphology,2015,246(1):377 − 393.
[15] 戴兴建, 殷跃平, 邢爱国. 易贡滑坡-碎屑流-堰塞坝溃坝链生灾害全过程模拟与动态特征分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2019,30(5):1 − 8. [DAI Xingjian, YIN Yueping, XING Aiguo. Simulation and dynamic analysis of Yigong rockslide-debris avalanche-dam breaking disaster chain[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2019,30(5):1 − 8. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] 王国章, 李滨, 冯振, 等. 重庆武隆鸡冠岭岩质崩滑-碎屑流过程模拟[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2014,41(5):101 − 106. [WANG Guozhang, LI Bin, FENG Zhen, et al. Simulation of the process of the Jiguanling rock avalanche in Wulong of Chongqing[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2014,41(5):101 − 106. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17] XING AG, YUAN XY, XU Q, et al. Characteristics and numerical runout modelling of a catastrophic rock avalanche triggered by the Wenchuan earthquake in the Wenjia valley, Mianzhu, Sichuan, China[J]. Landslides,2017,14(1):83 − 98.
[18] XING AG, WANG GH, LI B, et al. Long-runout mechanism and landsliding behaviour of large catastrophic landslide triggered by heavy rainfall in Guanling, Guizhou, China[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2015,52(7):971 − 981.
[19] 张远娇, 邢爱国. 汶川地震触发牛圈沟高速远程滑坡-碎屑流动力学特性分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报,2012,46(10):1665 − 1670. [ZHANG Yuanjiao, XING Aiguo. Dynamics analysis of Niujuanhou rockslide-debris flow triggered by Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University,2012,46(10):1665 − 1670. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] LOKE MH, BARKER RD. Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections using a quasi-Newton method[J]. Geophysical prospecting,1996,44:131 − 152.
[21] XINGAG, WANG GH, YIN YP, et al. Dynamic analysis and field investigation of a fluidized landslide in Guanling, Guizhou, China[J]. Engineering Geology,2014,181:1 − 14.