Influence of soil layer structure on unsaturated capillary water and salt transport
-
摘要:
层状土层之间孔隙结构和水力学性质的不连续性对土体水盐运移有显著影响。基于现场调查,设计了两种不同粒径土层二元结构组合(黄土-砂质粉土和黄土-粉质黏土)的室内土柱试验,通过模型试验讨论了不同地下水补给条件下土层结构对毛细水分布和盐分累积的影响。试验结果表明:在毛细水补给条件下,黄土-砂质粉土构成的上细下粗型土层结构有利于毛细水盐运移,经过60 d蒸发后,其表层
含量是上粗下细型土柱的两倍。在无毛细水补给条件下,砂质粉土层中水盐向上迁移总量和迁移速率大于粉质黏土层,最终上细下粗型土柱中上覆土层各层位离子含量均大于上粗下细型土柱。研究结果为层状土区盐渍土病害的防治提供了试验参考。${\rm{SO}}_{\rm{4}}^{{\rm{2 - }}}$ Abstract:The discontinuity of pore structure and hydraulic properties between layered soils has a significant influence on the transportation of water and salt. Based on the field investigation, the laboratory soil column tests of two soil layer binary structure combinations (loess-sandy silt and loess-silty clay) were designed. Through the model tests, the influence of soil layer structure on capillary water distribution and salt accumulation under different groundwater supply conditions was discussed. The test results show that under the condition of capillary water supply, the upper-fine and lower-coarse soil layer structure composed of loess-sandy silt is beneficial to capillary water and salt transportation. After 60 days of evaporation, the surface content of the upper-fine and lower-coarse soil column is twice of the upper-coarse and lower-fine soil column. Under the condition of no capillary water supply, the total amount and rate of upward migration of water and salt in the sandy silt layer is greater than that of the silty clay layer, and finally the ion content of each of the overlying soil layer in the upper-fine and lower-coarse soil column is greater than the upper-coarse and lower-fine soil column. The research results provide experimental reference for the prevention of saline soil disease in layered soil areas.
-
Key words:
- soil layer structure /
- capillary action /
- soil column test /
- water and salt transport
-
表 1 试验组设计
Table 1. Test group design
土柱编号 ΙA IB ⅡA ⅡB 上覆土层 黄土 黄土 黄土 黄土 下伏土层 砂质粉土 粉质黏土 砂质粉土 粉质黏土 隔断层 标准砂层 标准砂层 卵砾石层 卵砾石层 表 2 试验土样的物理性质
Table 2. Physical properties of soil samples
土样 液限/% 塑限/% 塑性指数 最大干密度/(g·cm−3) 最优含水率/% 黄土 27.2 18.2 9.0 1.80 15.0 砂质粉土 21.4 13.5 7.9 2.00 12.0 粉质黏土 30.6 19.5 11.1 1.73 17.0 -
[1] MILLER D E, GARDNER W H. Water infiltration into stratified soil[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,1962,26(2):115 − 119. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1962.03615995002600020007x
[2] B C S, PARKIN G W, DYCK M. Flow and transport in layered soils[J]. Canadian Journal of Soil Science,2011,91:127 − 132. doi: 10.4141/cjss11501
[3] LI Y, REN X, HILL R, et al. Characteristics of water infiltration in layered water-repellent soils[J]. Pedosphere,2018,28(5):775 − 792. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60414-4
[4] 李韵珠, 胡克林. 蒸发条件下粘土层对土壤水和溶质运移影响的模拟[J]. 土壤学报,2004,41(4):493 − 502. [LI Yunzhu, HU Kelin. Simulation for the effect of clay layer on the transport of soil water and solutes under evaporation[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2004,41(4):493 − 502. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2004.04.001
[5] 史文娟, 沈冰, 汪志荣, 等. 蒸发条件下浅层地下水埋深夹砂层土壤水盐运移特性研究[J]. 农业工程学报,2005,21(9):23 − 26. [SHI Wenjuan, SHEN Bing, WANG Zhirong, et al. Water and salt transport in sand-layered soil underevaporation with the shallow under ground water table[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2005,21(9):23 − 26. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2005.09.006
[6] HUANG M B, BRUCH P G, BARBOUR S L. Evaporation and water redistribution in layered unsaturated soil profiles[J]. Vadose Zone Journal,2013,12(1):1 − 14.
[7] 李毅, 任鑫, ROBERT H. 不同质地和夹层位置对层状土入渗规律的影响[J]. 排灌机械工程学报,2012,30(4):485 − 490. [LI Yi, REN Xin, ROBERT H. Influence of various soil textures and layer positions on infiltration characteristics of layered soils[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering,2012,30(4):485 − 490. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8530.2012.04.021
[8] 赵宇龙, 李明思, 陈绍民, 等. 滴灌条件下层状土壤滞盐作用的试验研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报,2015,34(6):29 − 34. [ZHAO Yulong, LI Mingsi, CHEN Shaomin, et al. Retardation effect of layered soil to salt transfer under drip irrigation[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage,2015,34(6):29 − 34. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 范严伟, 黄宁, 马孝义, 等. 应用HYDRUS-1D模拟砂质夹层土壤入渗特性[J]. 土壤,2016,48(1):193 − 200. [FAN Yanwei, HUANG Ning, MA Xiaoyi, et al. Simulation of infiltration characteristics in soil with sand interlayer using HYDRUS-1D[J]. Soils,2016,48(1):193 − 200. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 张莉, 丁国栋, 王翔宇, 等. 隔沙层对盐碱地土壤水盐运动的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2010,28(2):197 − 200. [ZHANG Li, DING Guodong, WANG Xiangyu, et al. Effect of sand layer on soil water and salt movement in saline land[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas,2010,28(2):197 − 200. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] ALIMI ICHOLA I, GAIDI L. Study of the hydric behaviour of double-layered columns of unsaturated soils - Analysis of water and suction profiles during infiltration tests[J]. E3S Web of Conferences,2016,9:11014. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/20160911014
[12] LIU B X, WANG S Q, KONG X L, et al. Soil matric potential and salt transport in response to different irrigated lands and soil heterogeneity in the North China Plain[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments,2019,19(12):3982 − 3993. doi: 10.1007/s11368-019-02331-5
[13] ZETTL J D, BARBOUR S L, HUANG MINGBIN, et al. Influence of textural layering on field capacity of coarse soils[J]. Canadian Journal of Soil Science,2011,91(2):133. doi: 10.4141/cjss09117
[14] 吴福, 江思义, 刘庆超, 等. 广西桂林市规划中心城区岩溶塌陷易发性评价[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2019,30(5):83 − 91. [WU Fu, JIANG Siyi, LIU Qingchao, et al. Evaluation of susceptibility of Karst collapse in urban planning area of Guilin City of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2019,30(5):83 − 91. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] 房浩, 李巧灵, 雷晓东, 等. 平原区深层隐伏岩溶塌陷主控因子地球物理调查方法适用性分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2020,47(1):153 − 160. [FANG Hao, LI Qiaoling, LEI Xiaodong, et al. Applicability of geophysical survey methods for the main controlling factors of deep covered Karst collapse in plain areas[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2020,47(1):153 − 160. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] 陈再, 彭述权, 胡毅夫, 等. 上隔下疏型硫酸盐渍土路基盐胀模型试验研究[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版),2015,46(1):248 − 254. [CHEN Zai, PENG Shuquan, HU Yifu, et al. Model test research on salt expansion of partition above and channelize below sulfuric acid saline soil roadbed[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology),2015,46(1):248 − 254. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7207.2015.01.033
[17] ARYA L M, PARIS J F. A physicoempirical model to predict the soil moisture characteristic from particle-size distribution and bulk density data[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,1981,45(6):1023 − 1030. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500060004x
[18] FREDLUND D G, XING A Q. Equations for the soil-water characteristic curve[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1994,31(4):521 − 532. doi: 10.1139/t94-061