中国地质环境监测院
中国地质灾害防治工程行业协会
主办

基于Mein-Larson入渗模型的凹形边坡稳定性分析

胡庆, 吴益平, 苗发盛, 张龙飞, 李麟玮. 基于Mein-Larson入渗模型的凹形边坡稳定性分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2021, 32(6): 26-35. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.06-04
引用本文: 胡庆, 吴益平, 苗发盛, 张龙飞, 李麟玮. 基于Mein-Larson入渗模型的凹形边坡稳定性分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2021, 32(6): 26-35. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.06-04
HU Qing, WU Yiping, MIAO Fasheng, ZHANG Longfei, LI Linwei. Stability analysis of concave slope based on Mein-Larson infiltration model[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2021, 32(6): 26-35. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.06-04
Citation: HU Qing, WU Yiping, MIAO Fasheng, ZHANG Longfei, LI Linwei. Stability analysis of concave slope based on Mein-Larson infiltration model[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2021, 32(6): 26-35. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.06-04

基于Mein-Larson入渗模型的凹形边坡稳定性分析

  • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目( 41977244; 42007267)
详细信息
    作者简介: 胡 庆(1996-),男,安徽安庆人,硕士研究生,研究方向为岩(土)体稳定性。E-mail:761261545@qq.com
    通讯作者: 吴益平(1971-),女,湖北武汉,教授,博导,研究方向为岩(土)体稳定性、地质灾害预测评价、治理和GIS技术在地质灾害预测中的应用。E-mail:ypwu@cug.edu.cn
  • 中图分类号: P642

Stability analysis of concave slope based on Mein-Larson infiltration model

More Information
  • 坡面形态对边坡表面应力状态影响显著,而应力状态与边坡稳定性密切相关。以往的降雨入渗模型仅考虑直线形态的边坡,并没有考虑边坡为曲线形态的情况。将Mein-Larson入渗模型与坡形函数相结合,推导降雨作用下凹形边坡的入渗函数,结合极限平衡分析方法,提出一种凹形边坡稳定性计算模型。同时根据坡形拟合与坡形简化的思路,将实际边坡分别当作成凹形边坡和直线边坡进行研究。研究结果表明:湿润锋入渗深度与降雨时间呈线性关系,湿润锋面在不同降雨时刻下均与坡面平行。将实际边坡当作凹形边坡进行分析时,其降雨入渗规律更符合实际情况;当降雨时间为10天时,浅层斜坡模型得到的计算结果为0.95,而本文计算模型与数值模拟得到的稳定性系数分别为1.004和1.003,相对误差不超过1%。因此与以往提出的计算模型相比,该模型不仅考虑了实际边坡的坡面形态,而且具有计算简便、可靠度较高等特点。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  坡面函数曲线

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  降雨入渗规律曲线

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  降雨入渗模型计算简图

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  边坡稳定性计算示意图

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  稳定性系数变化曲线

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  坡面与水平距离关系曲线

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  湿润锋入渗深度随时间变化曲线

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  不同降雨时刻湿润锋面与坡面的关系图

    Figure 8. 

    图 9  边坡稳定性系数随时间变化曲线图

    Figure 9. 

    图 10  坡面与水平距离关系曲线

    Figure 10. 

    图 11  湿润锋入渗深度随时间变化曲线

    Figure 11. 

    图 12  不同降雨时刻湿润锋面与坡面的关系图

    Figure 12. 

    图 13  边坡稳定性系数随时间变化曲线图

    Figure 13. 

    图 14  边坡数值模型

    Figure 14. 

    图 15  不同降雨时长下边坡的体积含水率等值线云图

    Figure 15. 

    图 16  不同降雨时间下边坡不同部位的概化湿润锋深度

    Figure 16. 

    图 17  边坡不同部位的湿润锋入渗深度随时间的变化曲线

    Figure 17. 

    图 18  边坡稳定性系数随时间变化曲线

    Figure 18. 

    表 1  边坡岩土及水文参数表

    Table 1.  Geotechnical and hydrological parameters of slope

    参数饱和黏聚力
    c´/kPa
    饱和内摩擦角
    φ´/(°)
    天然黏聚力
    c/kPa
    天然内
    摩擦角φ/(°)
    土体天然重度
    γt/(kN·m−3)
    土体饱和重度
    γsat/(kN·m−3)
    饱和渗透系数
    Ks/(m·d−1)
    粉质黏土15211824.620220.072
    变质粉砂岩40003524
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    李媛, 孟晖, 董颖, 等. 中国地质灾害类型及其特征: 基于全国县市地质灾害调查成果分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2004,15(2):29 − 34. [LI Yuan, MENG Hui, DONG Ying, et al. Main types and characterisitics of geo-hazard in China—Based on the results of geo-hazard survey in 290 counties[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2004,15(2):29 − 34. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8035.2004.02.005

    [2]

    张明, 胡瑞林, 谭儒蛟, 等. 降雨型滑坡研究的发展现状与展望[J]. 工程勘察,2009,37(3):11 − 17. [ZHANG Ming, HU Ruilin, TAN Rujiao, et al. State-of-the-art study on landslides due to rainfall and the prospect[J]. Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying,2009,37(3):11 − 17. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [3]

    GREEN W H, AL E. Studies of soil physics, part I - the flow of air and water through soils[J]. Journal of Agricultual Science,1911,4:1 − 24. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600001441

    [4]

    MEIN R G, LARSON C L. Modeling infiltration during a steady rain[J]. Water Resources Research,1973,9(2):384 − 394. doi: 10.1029/WR009i002p00384

    [5]

    CHU S T. Infiltration during an unsteady rain[J]. Water Resources Research,1978,14(3):461 − 466. doi: 10.1029/WR014i003p00461

    [6]

    PHILIP J R. Hillslope infiltration: planar slopes[J]. Water Resources Research,1991,27(1):109 − 117. doi: 10.1029/90WR01704

    [7]

    MUNTOHAR A S, LIAO H J. Rainfall infiltration: infinite slope model for landslides triggering by rainstorm[J]. Natural Hazards,2010,54(3):967 − 984. doi: 10.1007/s11069-010-9518-5

    [8]

    饶鸿, 王金淑, 赵志明, 等. 基于有限元软件自定义本构模型的膨胀土边坡降雨入渗分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2021,48(1):154 − 162. [RAO Hong, WANG Jinshu, ZHAO Zhiming, et al. An analysis of rainfall infiltration of expansive soil slope based on the finite element software custom constitutive model[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2021,48(1):154 − 162. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [9]

    常金源, 包含, 伍法权, 等. 降雨条件下浅层滑坡稳定性探讨[J]. 岩土力学,2015,36(4):995 − 1001. [CHANG Jinyuan, BAO Han, WU Faquan, et al. Discussion on stability of shallow landslide under rainfall[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2015,36(4):995 − 1001. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [10]

    李秀珍, 何思明. 基于Mein-Larson入渗模型的浅层降雨滑坡稳定性研究[J]. 灾害学,2015,30(2):16 − 20. [LI Xiuzhen, HE Siming. A study on stability of shallow rainfall-induced landslide based on Mein-Larson infiltration model[J]. Journal of Catastrophology,2015,30(2):16 − 20. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-811X.2015.02.004

    [11]

    李秀珍, 张小红. 基于Mein-Larson入渗模型的降雨滑坡失稳破坏概率研究[J]. 水土保持通报,2017,37(1):219 − 223. [LI Xiuzhen, ZHANG Xiaohong. A study of instability probability of rainfall-induced landslides based on Mein-Larson infiltration model[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,37(1):219 − 223. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [12]

    孟庆成, 王明, 齐欣, 等. 水力滞回性对降雨入渗边坡稳定性的影响[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2018,29(4):23 − 29. [MENG Qingcheng, WANG Ming, QI Xin, et al. Influence of hydraulic hysteresis on the slope stability under rainfall infiltration condition[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2018,29(4):23 − 29. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [13]

    王进, 冷先伦, 阮航, 等. 强降雨作用下浅层滑坡的入渗及稳定性[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 46(增刊1): 153−158.

    WANG Jin, LENG Xianlun, RUAN Hang, et al. Infiltration and stability of shallow landslide under intensive rainfall conditions[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 46(Sup 1): 153−158. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [14]

    唐扬, 殷坤龙, 汪洋, 等. 斜坡降雨入渗的改进Mein-Larson模型[J]. 地球科学,2017,42(4):634 − 640. [TANG Yang, YIN Kunlong, WANG Yang, et al. The landslide rain infiltration based on the improved Mein-Larson model[J]. Earth Science,2017,42(4):634 − 640. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [15]

    匡野. 降雨诱发堆积体滑坡预警模型研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2014.

    KUANG Ye. Early warning model of rainfall-induced colluviums landslides[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [16]

    乔建平, 吴彩燕, 田宏岭. 三峡库区云阳-巫山段坡形因素对滑坡发育的贡献率研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2006,14(1):18 − 22. [QIAO Jianping, WU Caiyan, TIAN Hongling. Contributing ratios of the slope shape toward the landslide development from Yunyang to Wushan in Three Gorges Reservoir area[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2006,14(1):18 − 22. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2006.01.004

    [17]

    PUZRIN A M, GRAY T E, HILL A J. Significance of the actual nonlinear slope geometry for catastrophic failure in submarine landslides[J]. Proc Math Phys Eng Sci,2015,471(2175):20140772.

    [18]

    毕仲辉, 翟亚飞, 唐彧杰, 等. 基于有限元强度折减法的降雨入渗基岩型边坡可靠度分析[J]. 水利水电技术,2020,51(9):187 − 192. [BI Zhonghui, ZHAI Yafei, TANG Yujie, et al. Finite element strength reduction method-based reliability analysis on rainfall-infiltrated bedrock-typed slope[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering,2020,51(9):187 − 192. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [19]

    李全文, 常金源, 徐文刚, 等. Geostudio软件模拟降雨入渗过程中边界条件的探讨[J]. 水利规划与设计,2019(2):54 − 57. [LI Quanwen, CHANG Jinyuan, XU Wengang et al. Discussion on boundary conditions of simulating rainfall infiltration process by Geostudio software[J]. Water Resources Planning and Design,2019(2):54 − 57. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2469.2019.02.017

    [20]

    高博. 大戛高速公路水敏性软岩高填方路基稳定性及其控制研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2019.

    GAO Bo. Study on stability and control of water-sensitive soft rock high fill subgrade in daga highway[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • 加载中

(18)

(1)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1125
  • PDF下载数:  53
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2021-02-04
修回日期:  2021-05-18
刊出日期:  2021-12-25

目录