-
摘要:
抚顺西露天矿由于长期开采造成地底岩层出露,形成众多顺倾多弱层岩质边坡。鉴于目前对于地震作用下顺倾多弱层岩质边坡的研究较少,选择抚顺西露天矿南帮E1000处顺倾多弱层岩质边坡,分析地震作用下多弱层对边坡动力响应的影响。利用有限差分软件对边坡进行数值建模,分析真实地震动作用下边坡不同弱层的动力响应变化规律,并将双弱层、单一弱层和无弱层四种情况进行对比,发现不同弱层的动力响应和对边坡的影响程度不同,位于边坡下部的弱层无高程放大效应但对边坡起主导作用,与坡面共线的弱层存在趋表放大效应和高程放大效应但对边坡无明显影响。双向地震动对顺倾多弱层边坡的弱层和坡面放大效应不受影响,Z(垂直)方向的加速度和速度显著增加,双向地震动作用下边坡的速度分布差异明显,但位移分布无显著变化。地震作用下顺倾多弱层边坡的动力响应规律与弱层的分布位置和作用机理有关,在边坡的防护和治理过程中应充分考虑弱层对边坡的影响。
Abstract:The long-term mining of the Fushun West Open-pit Mine has resulted in the exposure of underground rock layers, forming numerous down-dip and weak-layer rock slopes. In view of only few studies on the down-dip and multi-weak layer rock slopes under earthquakes, selected the down-dip multi-weak layer rock slope at E1000 in the south bank of the Fushun West Open-pit Mine, the paper analyzed the influence of multiple-weak layers on the dynamic response of the slope under earthquake action. The finite difference software is used to model the slope numerically and analyze the dynamic response of different weak layers of the slope under the real seismic action. Then by comparing the cases of double weak layers, single weak layer and no weak layer, found that different weak layers have different dynamic response and the degree of influence on the slope is also different. The weak layer located at the lower part of the slope has no elevation amplification effect but plays a dominant role in the slope. The weak layer collinear with the slope surface has the surface amplification effect and the elevation amplification effect but hasn’t obvious impact on the slope. Bidirectional ground motions has not affected the weak layers and slope magnification effect of the numerous down-dip and weak-layer slopes. The acceleration and velocity in the Z (vertical) direction increase significantly. The velocity distribution of the slope under the action of bidirectional ground motion has obvious difference, but the displacement distribution does not change significantly.The dynamic response law of numerous down-dip and weak-layer slopes under the action of earthquakes is related to the location and mechanism of the weak layers.The influence of weak layers on the slope should be fully considered in the protection and treatment of slopes.
-
Key words:
- multiple weak layers /
- rocky slope /
- earthquake action /
- dynamic response
-
表 1 岩体物理力学参数
Table 1. Physical and mechanical parameters of rock mass
岩土体分类 密度
/kg·m-3)弹性模量
/GPa泊松比
黏聚力
/MPa内摩擦角
/(°)抗拉强度
/MPa花岗片麻岩 2900 10 0.20 0.20 39.0 3.5 玄武岩 2600 11.9 0.17 1.81 37.2 2.5 回填物料 2040 0.450 0.32 0 25.0 0.2 凝灰岩 2590 17.6 0.17 4.61 38.6 2 弱层(破碎带) 2400 1.076 0.30 0.22 21.6 0.75 -
[1] 郑旭辉, 孙进忠, 邵安阳, 等. 边坡地震动力稳定性研究进展[J]. 华北地震科学,2015,33(4):1 − 5. [ZHENG Xuhui, SUN Jinzhong, SHAO Anyang, et al. Research progress of slope dynamic stability under seismic actions[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences,2015,33(4):1 − 5. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1375.2015.04.001
[2] 宋丹青, 陈志荣, 陈俊栋. 岩质边坡地震动力响应研究进展[J]. 水利与建筑工程学报,2018,16(6):1 − 7. [SONG Danqing, CHEN Zhirong, CHEN Jundong. Advances in the seismic dynamic response of rock slope[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering,2018,16(6):1 − 7. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1144.2018.06.001
[3] SONG J, WU K L, FENG T G, et al. Coupled analysis of earthquake-induced permanent deformations at shallow and deep failure planes of slopes[J]. Engineering Geology,2020,274:105688.
[4] 徐光兴, 姚令侃, 高召宁, 等. 边坡动力特性与动力响应的大型振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2008(3):624 − 632. [XU Guangxing, YAO Lingkan, GAO Zhaoning, et al. Large-scale shaking table model test study on dynamic characteristics and dynamic responses of slope[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2008(3):624 − 632. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2008.03.025
[5] 杨国香, 伍法权, 董金玉, 等. 地震作用下岩质边坡动力响应特性及变形破坏机制研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2012,31(4):696 − 702. [YANG Guoxiang, WU Faquan, DONG Jinyu, et al. Study of dynamic response characters and failure mechanism of rock slope under earthquake[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2012,31(4):696 − 702. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6915.2012.04.008
[6] SONG D Q, CHE A L, CHEN Z, et al. Seismic stability of a rock slope with discontinuities under rapid water drawdown and earthquakes in large-scale shaking table tests[J]. Engineering Geology,2018,245:153 − 168. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.08.011
[7] 毕鹏程, 车爱兰, 袁刚烈. 基于振动台试验的地震作用下岩质边坡位移演化特征[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2020,31(3):11 − 19. [BI Pengcheng, CHE Ailan, YUAN Ganglie. Displacement evolution of rock slope under earthquake based on shaking table test[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2020,31(3):11 − 19. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] NAKAJIMA S, ABE K, SHINODA M, et al. Dynamic centrifuge model tests and material point method analysis of the impact force of a sliding soil mass caused by earthquake-induced slope failure[J]. Soils and Foundations,2019,59(6):1813 − 1829. doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2019.08.004
[9] 刘彪. 边坡地震动力放大与永久位移分析[D]. 北京: 中国水利水电科学研究院, 2019.
LIU Biao. Seismic dynamic amplification and permanent displacement analysis of slope[D]. Beijing: China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 王雪艳, 刘超, 尹超, 等. 地震波斜入射下土质边坡的稳定性分析[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报,2020,40(4):589 − 595. [WANG Xueyan, LIU Chao, YIN Chao, et al. Stability analysis of soil slopes with oblique incident seismic waves[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering,2020,40(4):589 − 595. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 张昆祥. 地震诱发层状岩质斜坡动力响应数值模拟研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2020.
ZHANG Kunxiang. Study on dynamic response of layered rock slope induced by earthquake through numerical simulation[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 靳飞飞, 言志信, 翟聚云, 等. 地震作用下多级高边坡动力响应数值分析[J]. 河南城建学院学报,2019,28(6):1 − 6. [JIN Feifei, YAN Zhixin, ZHAI Juyun, et al. Numerical analysis of dynamic response of multistage high slope under earthquake[J]. Journal of Henan University of Urban Construction,2019,28(6):1 − 6. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 柏威伟, 石磊, 吴福宝, 等. 地震作用下多级平台路堑边坡的动力响应研究[J]. 水力发电,2020,46(9):63 − 68. [BAI Weiwei, SHI Lei, WU Fubao, et al. Study on dynamic response of cutting slope of multistage platform under earthquake[J]. Water Power,2020,46(9):63 − 68. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0559-9342.2020.09.013
[14] 赵金, 吴红刚, 杨涛. 滑坡对不同特性地震波的动力响应规律[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2018,29(6):47 − 52. [ZHAO Jin, WU Honggang, YANG Tao. Dynamic response of landslides to different seismic wave[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2018,29(6):47 − 52. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] 王学伍, 张彦君, 万驰, 等. 地震作用下含软弱夹层的顺倾岩质边坡加速度放大效应探究[J]. 水利与建筑工程学报,2019,17(3):37 − 41. [WANG Xuewu, ZHANG Yanjun, WAN Chi, et al. Acceleration amplification effects of bedding rock slope with weak interlayer under earthquake[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering,2019,17(3):37 − 41. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1144.2019.03.006
[16] 周逸飞, 刘汉香, 朱星, 等. 含软弱夹层岩质边坡的模态分析及其对边坡地震动力响应影响的初步研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,2020,40(1):223 − 232. [ZHOU Yifei, LIU Hanxiang, ZHU Xing, et al. Modal analysis of rock slope with a weak interlayer and its influence on seismic dynamic response of slope[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics,2020,40(1):223 − 232. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17] 王彤. 抚顺西露天矿北帮边坡动力响应分析[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2016.
WANG Tong. Dynamic response of the north slope of Fushun west open pit[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] 王建国. 残采期抚顺西露天矿边坡动力响应研究[D]. 阜新: 辽宁工程技术大学, 2006.
WANG Jianguo. Study on dynamic response of Fushun west open pit mine slope in remaining coal mining period[D]. Fuxin: Liaoning Technical University, 2006. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] KAWAMURA S, KAWAJIRI S, HIROSE W, et al. Slope failures/landslides over a wide area in the 2018 Hokkaido Eastern Iburi earthquake[J]. Soils and Foundations,2019,59(6):2376 − 2395. doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2019.08.009