中国地质环境监测院
中国地质灾害防治工程行业协会
主办

考虑抗剪强度衰减特性的膨胀土边坡稳定性分析

李晋鹏, 汪磊, 王俊, 陈洋, 徐永福. 考虑抗剪强度衰减特性的膨胀土边坡稳定性分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2022, 33(6): 29-36. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202109028
引用本文: 李晋鹏, 汪磊, 王俊, 陈洋, 徐永福. 考虑抗剪强度衰减特性的膨胀土边坡稳定性分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2022, 33(6): 29-36. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202109028
LI Jinpeng, WANG Lei, WANG Jun, CHEN Yang, XU Yongfu. Stability analysis of expansive soil slopes considering shear strength decay characteristics[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2022, 33(6): 29-36. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202109028
Citation: LI Jinpeng, WANG Lei, WANG Jun, CHEN Yang, XU Yongfu. Stability analysis of expansive soil slopes considering shear strength decay characteristics[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2022, 33(6): 29-36. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202109028

考虑抗剪强度衰减特性的膨胀土边坡稳定性分析

  • 基金项目: 国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFC1509800)
详细信息
    作者简介: 李晋鹏(1996-),男,四川渠县人,硕士研究生,主要从事膨胀土边坡稳定性研究。E-mail:lijinpeng_CD@163.com
    通讯作者: 汪 磊(1985-),男,陕西延安人,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土工程等方面研究。E-mail:wangleiwangjiang@163.com
  • 中图分类号: P642.22

Stability analysis of expansive soil slopes considering shear strength decay characteristics

More Information
  • 针对传统膨胀土边坡稳定性分析中无法考虑膨胀土在降雨入渗过程中抗剪强度动态衰减的问题,本文开展了室内直剪试验,系统研究了干密度和含水量变化对膨胀土抗剪强度指标的影响;同时,以试验抗剪强度结果为参数,开展了基于强度折减法的膨胀土边坡稳定性分析,获得了抗剪强度动态衰减过程中边坡稳定性的变化规律。结果表明,含水量的增加和干密度降低会造成膨胀土黏聚力和内摩擦角的衰减,黏聚力衰减显著,内摩擦角衰减较少;膨胀土边坡稳定性主要受风化层土体含水量控制,随着膨胀土含水量的增加,膨胀土边坡逐渐由稳定状态演变为欠稳定状态;干密度对膨胀土边坡稳定性的影响则相对较小。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  制样模具

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  配土过程示意图

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  四联直剪仪

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  宁明膨胀土黏聚力随含水量变化规律

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  宁明膨胀土内摩擦角随含水量变化规律

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  不同含水量试样抗剪强度随垂直压力的变化

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  不同荷载下试样抗剪强度随含水量的变化

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  宁明膨胀土黏聚力随干密度变化规律

    Figure 8. 

    图 9  宁明膨胀土内摩擦角随干密度变化规律

    Figure 9. 

    图 10  不同干密度下试样抗剪强度随垂直应力的变化

    Figure 10. 

    图 11  模型示意图

    Figure 11. 

    图 12  1.6 g/cm3干密度不同含水量条件下的边坡位移

    Figure 12. 

    图 13  1.6 g/cm3干密度不同含水量条件下的边坡潜在滑移面

    Figure 13. 

    图 14  边坡安全系数随含水量的变化规律

    Figure 14. 

    图 15  18%含水量不同干密度条件下的边坡位移

    Figure 15. 

    图 16  18%含水量不同干密度条件下的边坡潜在滑移面

    Figure 16. 

    图 17  边坡安全系数随干密度的变化规律

    Figure 17. 

    表 1  宁明膨胀土基本土体参数

    Table 1.  Basic soil parameters of Ningming expansive soil

    参数Gs/(g.cm−3wL/%wP/%IPσf/%
    取值2.8059.1124.6834.4342.8
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  宁明膨胀土抗剪强度试验结果表

    Table 2.  Results of shear strength of Ningming expensive soils

    试验参数w/%φ/(°)c/kPa
    试验结果8.8027.3100.36
    11.724.5693.28
    14.621.8067.34
    17.519.8254.64
    20.817.9241.22
    23.315.2030.86
    26.112.389.90
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  宁明膨胀土黏聚力衰减率计算结果表

    Table 3.  Results of cohesion decay rate of Ningming expansive soil

    试验参数w/%c/kPaη/%
    试验结果8.8100.36
    11.793.287.05
    14.667.3427.81
    17.554.6418.86
    20.841.2224.56
    23.330.8625.13
    26.19.967.92
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4  不同干密度下试样试验结果记录表

    Table 4.  Record table of test results under different dry densities

    试验参数ρd/(g·cm−3c/(kPa)φ/(°)
    试验结果1.797.2626.5
    1.654.6419.82
    1.540.3417.82
    1.437.5716.87
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 5  土层相关参数

    Table 5.  Soil layer related parameters

    地层岩性厚度
    /m
    重度
    /(kN·m−3
    内摩擦角
    /(°)
    黏聚力
    /kPa
    其它
    填土①10.2~118.0524成分黏土
    填土①22.5~3.318.8307上层砾砂,
    下层碎石
    黏土②0.3~418.48.435.6中等膨胀土
    强风化泥岩③0.6~119.32545质量等级Ⅴ级
    中风化泥岩④未钻穿19.63565质量等级Ⅴ级
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    谭波,杨和平. 有限元强度折减法在膨胀土堑坡滑坍分析中的应用[J]. 长沙理工大学学报(自然科学版),2006,3(4):18 − 22. [TAN Bo,YANG Heping. Strength reduction method with FEM for analyzing the expansive soil cutting slope collapse and slide[J]. Journal of Changsha University of Science & Technology (Natural Science),2006,3(4):18 − 22. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9331.2006.04.004

    [2]

    ZIEKIEWICZ O C,HUMPHESON C,LEWIS R W. Associated and nonassociated visco-plasticity in soil mechanics[J]. Géotechnique,1975,25(4):689 − 691.

    [3]

    张硕,蒋良潍,罗强,等. 增湿条件下膨胀土边坡稳定性影响因素有限元分析[J]. 铁道标准设计,2018,62(10):31 − 36. [ZHANG Shuo,JIANG Liangwei,LUO Qiang,et al. Finite element analysis of influencing factors on stability of expansive soil slope subject to humidification induction[J]. Railway Standard Design,2018,62(10):31 − 36. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [4]

    黄盛锋,陈志波,郑道哲. 基于灰色关联度法和强度折减法的边坡稳定性影响因素敏感性分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2020,31(3):35 − 40. [HUANG Shengfeng,CHEN Zhibo,ZHENG Daozhe. Sensitivity analysis of factors influencing slope stability based on grey correlation and strength reduction method[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2020,31(3):35 − 40. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2020.03.05

    [5]

    吴珺华,杨松. 超固结膨胀土抗剪强度特性及边坡稳定研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2016,35(4):70 − 74. [WU Junhua,YANG Song. Study on shear strength property of over-consolidated expansive soil and slope stability[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science),2016,35(4):70 − 74. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [6]

    陈星,李建林. 基于ADINA、ANSYS、FLAC的强度折减法[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2010,37(3):69 − 73. [CHEN Xing,LI Jianlin. The strength reduction method based on ADINA,ANSYS and FLAC[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2010,37(3):69 − 73. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3665.2010.03.015

    [7]

    蒋武军,李得建,瞿拓宇. 基于强度折减法的浅埋隧道掌子面三维主动稳定性上限解析[J]. 现代隧道技术,2020,57(6):55 − 62. [JIANG Wujun,LI Dejian,QU Tuoyu. Upper bound analysis of three-dimensional active stability of a shallow tunnel face based on the strength reduction method[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology,2020,57(6):55 − 62. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [8]

    高冯,李小军,迟明杰. 基于有限元强度折减法的单双面边坡稳定性分析[J]. 工程地质学报,2020,28(3):650 − 657. [GAO Feng,LI Xiaojun,CHI Mingjie. Analysis of stability of single and double side soil slopes with fem strength reduction method[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2020,28(3):650 − 657. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2018-080

    [9]

    MANZARI M T,NOUR M A. Significance of soil dilatancy in slope stability analysis[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2000,126(1):75 − 80. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:1(75)

    [10]

    李宁,刘冠麟,许建聪,等. 降雨条件下边坡有限元强度折减法计算平台开发及其应用[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2018,45(3):63 − 70. [LI Ning,LIU Guanlin,XU Jiancong,et al. Development of shear strength reduction method for slope stability analysis under rainfall conditions and its application[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2018,45(3):63 − 70. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [11]

    周健, 徐洪钟, 胡文杰. 干湿循环效应对膨胀土边坡稳定性影响研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(增刊2): 152 − 156

    ZHOU Jian, XU Hongzhong, HU Wenjie. Impact of wetting-drying cycle effects on stability of expansive soil slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(Sup 2): 152 − 156. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [12]

    刘明维, 黄世武, 尹健. 膨胀土斜坡地基路堤失稳破坏有限元极限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2008, 29(增刊1): 426 − 430

    LIU Mingwei, HUANG Shiwu, YIN Jian. Limit analysis of subgrade filling failure on expansive clay slope foundation with finite element method[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008, 29(Sup 1): 426 − 430. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [13]

    程灿宇,罗富荣,戚承志,等. 有限元强度折减法计算边坡稳定的对比分析[J]. 岩土力学,2012,33(11):3472 − 3478. [CHENG Canyu,LUO Furong,QI Chengzhi,et al. Comparative analysis of slope stability by strength reduction method[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2012,33(11):3472 − 3478. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2012.11.023

    [14]

    谭波,郑健龙. 考虑次生裂隙结构面发育条件下的膨胀土边坡稳定分析[J]. 桂林理工大学学报,2010,30(4):561 − 565. [TAN Bo,ZHENG Jianlong. Analysis on expansive soil slope stability of epigenetic fissured structural plane deformation[J]. Journal of Guilin University of Technology,2010,30(4):561 − 565. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9057.2010.04.017

    [15]

    杨才,王世君,丰土根. 基于塑性区开展的边坡失稳判据研究[J]. 中国科技论文,2016,11(13):1461 − 1464. [YANG Cai,WANG Shijun,FENG Tugen. Study on slope's failure criterion based on the development of plastic zone[J]. China Sciencepaper,2016,11(13):1461 − 1464. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-2783.2016.13.005

    [16]

    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 膨胀土地区建筑技术规范: GB 50112—2013[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2013

    Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Technical code for buildings in expansive soil regions: GB 50112—2013[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2013. (in Chinese)

    [17]

    贾磊柱, 胡春林, 杨新. 考虑膨胀土抗剪强度衰减特性的深基坑支护工程设计研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(增刊1): 66 − 71

    JIA Leizhu, HU Chunlin, YANG Xin. Design of supports for deep foundation pits considering attenuation properties of strength of expansive soils shear[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(Sup 1): 66 − 71. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [18]

    何芳婵, 李宗坤. 南水北调南阳段弱膨胀土增湿膨胀与力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(增刊2): 190 − 194

    HE Fangchan, LI Zongkun. Experimental study of wetting expansibility and mechanical properties of weak expansive soil in Nanyang section of South-to-North Water Diversion Project[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(Sup 2): 190 − 194. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [19]

    吕海波, 曾召田, 赵艳林, 等. 胀缩性土强度衰减曲线的函数拟合[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(增刊2): 157 − 162.

    LYU Haibo, ZHENG Zhaotian, ZHAO Yanlin, et al. Function fitting on strength attenuation curve of swell-shrinking soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(Sup 2): 157 − 162. (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • 加载中

(17)

(5)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1209
  • PDF下载数:  65
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2021-09-27
修回日期:  2021-12-07
刊出日期:  2022-12-25

目录