Stability analysis and hazard prediction of dangerous rock masses in karst mountainous area: A case study of Changchong dangerous rock mass in Songtao County, Guizhou Province
-
摘要:
岩溶地区山体岩石裸露，地形坡度陡，其发育的危岩体一旦失稳，将对威胁区的居民生命财产造成严重危害，故及时准确地分析灾体的稳定及危害性极具意义。文中以贵州省松桃县和平社区长冲组危岩体为对象，结合工程勘查成果，分析了危岩体区的地形地貌、地质构造和水文特征等孕灾背景，并结合危岩体发育特征深入分析论证危岩体变形破坏模式及影响因素。在此基础上对危岩体稳定性进行定性及定量分析，评估了危岩体的危害程度及发展趋势。结果表明：发育于岩溶山区的危岩体，独特的喀斯特地貌、岩溶特征及复杂的结构面是控制其稳定性的关键因素，降雨、风化等作用为主要诱发因素。提出了初步防治方案建议，为后续采取治理措施提供参考依据。
Abstract:In karst areas, the mountains are bare and the terrain is steep. Once the dangerous rock mass developed instability, it will threaten the lives and properties of the residents. So it is significant to analyze the stability and hazards of the disasters in a timely and accurate manner. Taking the dangerous rock mass of Changchong Group in Heping Community, Songtao County, Guizhou Province as the object, combined with the results of engineering survey, the disaster-generating background of the dangerous rock mass areas, such as topography, geological structure and hydrology, were analyzed, and the development characteristics of the dangerous rock mass were analyzed deeply. The failure mode and influencing factors of dangerous rock mass was demonstrated. On this basis, qualitative and quantitative analysis of the stability of the dangerous rock mass was carried out, and the hazard degree and development trend of the dangerous rock mass are evaluated. The results show that the unique karst landforms, karst features and complex structural planes of the dangerous rock mass developed in karst mountainous areas are the key factors controlling the stability, and rainfall and weathering are the main inducing factors. A preliminary prevention plan has been proposed to provide a reference for subsequent treatment measures.
-
-
表 1 危岩体的结构面特征
Table 1. Structural surface characteristics of dangerous rock mass
编号 位置 倾向/（°） 倾角/（°） 切割深度/m 张开度/cm 充填物 裂面形态 裂面粗糙度 裂隙间距/m L1 正面 254 15 2～4 2～10 岩屑、腐殖土 平直 较光滑 1～3 L2 正面 250 14 2～5 2～10 岩屑、腐殖土 平直 较光滑 1～3 L3 正面 315 20 3～6 1～8 岩屑、腐殖土 平直 较粗糙 2～5 L4 正面 24 81 5～9 4～20 岩屑 弯曲 粗糙 1～2 L5 后缘 112 57 3～7 20～30 岩屑、腐殖土 平直 粗糙 1～4 L6 后缘上部 300 42 2～5 10～30 岩屑、腐殖土 平直 较粗糙 2～4 L7 后缘 295 38 2～4 5～20 岩屑、腐殖土 弯曲 较粗糙 1～4 L8 控滑面 321 50 7～9 5～30 泥、岩屑、腐殖土 平直 较光滑 — 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 结构面组合与坡面关系稳定性定性评价结果
Table 2. The stability qualitative evaluation results of the relationship between structural plane combination and the slope surface
组合交梭线 交线产状 坡面产状 交线与坡面
倾角的关系稳定性判别 BP∧L4 303°∠45° 302°∠45° 倾角＝坡角 较稳定 BP∧L8 253°∠34° 倾角＜坡角 欠稳定 L1∧L3 270°∠14° 倾角＜坡角 不稳定 L1∧L8 240°∠15° 倾角＜坡角 不稳定 L2∧L4 296°∠10° 倾角＜坡角 不稳定 L3∧L4 297°∠19° 倾角＜坡角 不稳定 L4∧L6 302°∠42° 倾角＜坡角 欠稳定 L4∧L7 301°∠38° 倾角＜坡角 欠稳定 L4∧L8 310°∠50° 倾角＞坡角 稳定 L6∧L7 239°∠24° 倾角＜坡角 不稳定 L7∧L8 249°∠29° 倾角＜坡角 不稳定
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 危岩体稳定状态划分表
Table 3. Classification table of stability state of dangerous rock mass
危岩类型 危岩稳定状态 不稳定 欠稳定 基本稳定 稳定 滑移式危岩 k<1.0 1.0≤k<1.2 1.2≤k<1.3 k≥1.3
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 危岩体力学性能试验数据统计表
Table 4. Statistical table of mechanical performance testing data of dangerous rock mass
土样编号 密度/（g·cm−3） 黏聚力/kPa 摩擦角/（°） 天然 饱和 天然 饱和 天然 饱和 TY-1 1.71 1.78 36.9 24.4 7.9 6.1 TY-2 1.70 1.77 37.7 25.6 7.3 4.5 TY-3 1.69 1.75 37.5 25.5 8.1 5.7 TY-4 1.69 1.77 36.2 23.9 7.7 5.8 TY-5 1.72 1.78 36.8 24.3 8.0 6.2 TY-6 1.70 1.76 36.0 23.6 5.9 5.2 TY-7 1.71 1.80 37.0 24.5 6.4 4.5 TY-8 1.73 1.81 38.9 26.4 8.7 5.8 TY-9 1.70 1.76 37.8 26.3 7.0 5.6 参数统计 最大值 1.69 1.75 36.00 23.60 5.90 4.50 最小值 1.73 1.81 38.90 26.40 8.70 6.20 平均值 1.70 1.76 37.20 24.94 7.44 5.49 标准值 1.69 1.75 36.64 24.30 6.89 5.10
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 危岩体力学性质指标
Table 5. Mechanical property indexes of dangerous rock mass
岩土类型 重度/（kN·m−3） 黏聚力/kPa 摩擦角/（°） 天然 饱和 天然 饱和 天然 饱和 黏土 17.0 17.6 37.2 25.0 7.5 5.5 中风化基岩（白云岩） 26.7 27.0 1500.0 1350.0 34.2 32.3
下载: 导出CSV
表 6 危岩体稳定性计算结果表
Table 6. Stability calculation resultsof of dangerous rock mass
失稳方式 计算工况 稳定系数 设防安全系数 稳定性评价 滑移 工况1 1.13 1.5 欠稳定 滑移 工况2 1.01 1.5 欠稳定 滑移 工况3 0.99 1.5 不稳定
下载: 导出CSV
表 7 恢复系数取值表
Table 7. Recovery coefficient value
坡面材料 法向恢复系数 切向恢复系数 白云岩 0.42 0.82 含粉质黏土残积层 0.25 0.85 含块石土崩积层 0.3 0.8
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 陈洪凯, 唐红梅, 王林峰. 危岩崩塌演化理论及应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009
CHEN Hongkai, TANG Hongmei, WANG Linfeng. Evolution theory and application of dangerous rock collapse [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2009. （in Chinese）
[2] 陈国宝. 易崩落危岩的调查与防治[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,1999,27(3):17 − 18. [CHEN Guobao. Investigation and controlling measures for the rock dangerous to cave[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,1999,27(3):17 − 18. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.1999.03.005
[3] 庞伟军,杨昊天,李元彪. 青海合群峡202省道边坡危岩发育特性研究[J]. 工程勘察,2015,43(12):7 − 12. [PANG Weijun,YANG Haotian,LI Yuanbiao. Study on development characteristics of dangerous rocks along slopes of the 202 provincial road in Hequn gorge of Qinghai[J]. Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying,2015,43(12):7 − 12. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] 肖瞳. 重庆市万州区三峡库区某危岩稳定性分析[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学（北京）, 2019
XIAO Tong. Stability analysis of a dangerous rock in Three Gorges dam area, Wanzhou District, Chongqing[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2019. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[5] 冯亮. 中硐河两岸边坡危岩体发育特征及稳定性评价[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2016
FENG Liang. Mechanism of destuction and stability evaluation of unstable rock mass at Zhongdong River’s both sides[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[6] 周小飞,曹红娟. 湖南通道播阳镇楼团滑坡发育特征及稳定性分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2020,31(5):48 − 53. [ZHOU Xiaofei,CAO Hongjuan. Development characteristics and stability analysison the Loutuan landslide in Boyang Town,Tongdao County,Hunan Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2020,31(5):48 − 53. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] 孙自强,焦姗. 岩质边坡崩塌地质特征及稳定性分析[J]. 煤炭技术,2019,38(5):84 − 87. [SUN Ziqiang,JIAO Shan. Stability analysis and prevention of rock slope collapse[J]. Coal Technology,2019,38(5):84 − 87. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.13301/j.cnki.ct.2019.05.028
[8] SHI Chong,YANG Bo,ZHANG Yiping,et al. Application of discrete-element numerical simulation for calculating the stability of dangerous rock mass:A case study[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics,2020,20(12):1 − 11.
[9] 孙琪皓,马凤山,刘港,等. G109国道拉萨—羊八井段喀努纳危岩体变形破坏模式及稳定性分析[J]. 工程地质学报,2021,29(2):495 − 507. [SUN Qihao,MA Fengshan,LIU Gang,et al. Deformation failure mode and stability analysis of kanuna unstable rock mass in Lhasa-yangbajing section of G109 national highway[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2021,29(2):495 − 507. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2019-093
[10] 谢全敏,夏元友. 危岩块体稳定性的综合评价方法分析[J]. 岩土力学,2002,23(6):775 − 777. [XIE Quanmin,XIA Yuanyou. Comprehensive assessment method of stability of critical rock-block mass and its application[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2002,23(6):775 − 777. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2002.06.024
[11] 周游, 黄静美, 谢红强. 西南地区某高速公路边坡危岩体稳定可靠性评价[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2020, 16（增刊2）: 1022 − 1029
ZHOU You, HUANG Jingmei, XIE Hongqiang. Reliability evaluation for slopes in highway of southwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2020, 16（Sup 2）: 1022 − 1029. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[12] 王金艳,王雅敬,杨滢智,等. 贵州喀斯特地区地质灾害防治对策研究:以铜仁市为例[J]. 铜仁学院学报,2017,19(3):87 − 89. [WANG Jinyan,WANG Yajing,YANG Yingzhi,et al. Study on the prevention countermeasures of geological hazards in Guizhou karst areas:Taking Tongren City as an example[J]. Journal of Tongren University,2017,19(3):87 − 89. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9639.2017.03.022
[13] 宋同清,彭晚霞,杜虎,等. 中国西南喀斯特石漠化时空演变特征、发生机制与调控对策[J]. 生态学报,2014,34(18):5328 − 5341. [SONG Tongqing,PENG Wanxia,DU Hu,et al. Occurrence,spatial-temporal dynamics and regulation strategies of karst rocky desertification in southwest China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2014,34(18):5328 − 5341. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] 郭振春. 贵州地质灾害的主要类型和诱因及其预防建议[J]. 贵州地质,2003,20(2):103 − 105. [GUO Zhenchun. Major types of geological hazards and predisposition in Guizhou and its preventive suggestion[J]. Guizhou Geology,2003,20(2):103 − 105. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5943.2003.02.010
[15] 高杨,贺凯,李壮,等. 西南岩溶山区特大滑坡成灾类型及动力学分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2020,47(4):14 − 23. [GAO Yang,HE Kai,LI Zhuang,et al. An analysis of disaster types and dynamics of landslides in the southwest karst mountain areas[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2020,47(4):14 − 23. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] 冉文明,龙昭腾. 松桃县地质灾害特征、成因及防治[J]. 魅力中国,2020(9):362. [RAN Wenming,LONG Zhaoteng. Characteristics,causes and prevention of geological disasters in Songtao County[J]. Charming China,2020(9):362. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17] 冉文明, 王万迁, 穆启超, 等. 松桃县大路镇和平社区长冲组滑坡及崩塌防治工程勘查报告[R]. 贵州: 贵州省地质矿产勘查开发局一O一地质大队, 河南: 河南省地质矿产勘查开发局第一地质矿产调查院, 2019.
RAN Wenming, WANG Wanqian, MU Qichao, et al. Investigation report on landslide and collapse prevention project of Changchong formation in Heping Community, Dalu Town, Songtao County[R]. Guizhou: Guizhou Provincial Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of 101 Geological Brigade, Henan: No. 1 Institute of Geological & Mineral Resources Survey of Henan, 2019.(in Chinese)
[18] 范可,冯佐海,王翔,等. 桂林市岩质崩塌发育特征与影响因素[J]. 自然灾害学报,2019,28(2):169 − 182. [FAN Ke,FENG Zuohai,WANG Xiang,et al. Development of rockfalls in Guilin and its influencement factors[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters,2019,28(2):169 − 182. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] 田正国,程温鸣,卢书强,等. 三峡库区滑坡崩塌发育的控制与诱发因素分析[J]. 资源环境与工程,2013,27(1):50 − 55. [TIAN Zhengguo,CHENG Wenming,LU Shuqiang,et al. Control and triggering factors analysis of landslides and rockfalls in the Three Gorges Reservoir area[J]. Resources Environment & Engineering,2013,27(1):50 − 55. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1211.2013.01.010
[20] 胡厚田. 崩塌与落石[M]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 1989
HU Houtian. Collapse and rockfall [M]. Beijing: China Railway Publishing House, 1989. （in Chinese）
[21] 赵宪民. 三河口拱坝建基岩体特征及坝肩稳定研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2013
ZHAO Xianmin. Study on caracteristics of foudation rock and abutment stability of sanhekou arch dam[D]. Xi’an: Changan University, 2013. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[22] 黄波林,殷跃平,李滨,等. 三峡工程库区岩溶岸坡岩体劣化及其灾变效应[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2020,47(4):51 − 61. [HUANG Bolin,YIN Yueping,LI Bin,et al. Rock mass deterioration and its catastrophic effect of Karst bank slope in the Three Gorges Project Reservoir area[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2020,47(4):51 − 61. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] 杨秀元,孙强,晏鄂川,等. 基于实测的望霞W1危岩体失稳动态过程分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2014,41(1):96 − 100. [YANG Xiuyuan,SUN Qiang,YAN Echuan,et al. A study of the failure process of the Wangxia dangerous rockmass W1 based on site-monitoring[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2014,41(1):96 − 100. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] 王朋,贾洪彪,马淑芝,等. 梳妆台危岩体稳定性评价及落石运动特征研究[J]. 安全与环境工程,2022,29(4):139 − 146. [WANG Peng,JIA Hongbiao,MA Shuzhi,et al. Stability evaluation and rockfall movement characteristics of unstable rock block in Shuzhuangtai[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering,2022,29(4):139 − 146. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] 龚芯磊. 岩质边坡稳定性分析研究: 以贵州铜仁地区某库区边坡为例[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2018
GONG Xinlei. The research of rock slope stability analysis: Take the slope of a reservoir in Tongren area of Guizhou Province as an example[D]. Xi’an: Changan University, 2018. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[26] 胡显明,晏鄂川,杨建国,等. 巫溪南门湾危岩体稳定性分区研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2011,19(3):397 − 403. [HU Xianming,YAN Echuan,YANG Jianguo,et al. Stability assessment of unstable rock blocks at Nanmenwan in Wuxi County[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2011,19(3):397 − 403. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2011.03.016
[27] 黄海宁,巨能攀,黄健,等. 郑万高铁宜万段边坡危岩崩落破坏特征[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2020,47(3):164 − 172. [HUANG Haining,JU Nengpan,HUANG Jian,et al. Caving failure characteristic of slope rockfall on Yiwan section of the Zhengzhou—Wanzhou high-speed railway[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2020,47(3):164 − 172. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.201906053
[28] 韩振华,陈鑫,王学良,等. 四川罗家青杠岭崩塌风险的定量评价研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2017,25(2):520 − 530. [HAN Zhenhua,CHEN Xin,WANG Xueliang,et al. Risk assessment for Luojia Qinggangling rockfall[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2017,25(2):520 − 530. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2017.02.032
[29] 吴朋宇,张志红,戴福初,等. 顺层岩质边坡溃屈变形机制及失稳判定方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2022,52(2):517 − 525. [WU Pengyu,ZHANG Zhihong,DAI Fuchu,et al. Buckling deformation mechanism and instability judgment method of bedding rock slope[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2022,52(2):517 − 525. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30] 何宇航,裴向军,梁靖,等. 基于Rockfall的危岩体危险范围预测及风险评价—以九寨沟景区悬沟危岩体为例[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2020,31(4):24 − 33. [HE Yuhang,PEI Xiangjun,LIANG Jing,et al. Risk assessment and range prediction of dangerous rockmass based on Rockfall:A case study of the Xuangou collapse[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2020,31(4):24 − 33. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31] 王栋,王剑锋,李天斌,等. 西南山区某铁路隧道口高位落石三维运动特征分析[J]. 地质力学学报,2021,27(1):96 − 104. [WANG Dong,WANG Jianfeng,LI Tianbin,et al. Analysis of three-dimensional movement characteristics of rockfall:A case study at a railway tunnel entrance in the southwestern mountainous area, China[J]. Journal of Geomechanics,2021,27(1):96 − 104. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32] 张永海,谢武平,罗忠行,等. 四川名山白马沟危岩体稳定性评价与落石轨迹分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2022,33(4):37 − 46. [ZHANG Yonghai,XIE Wuping,LUO Zhongxing,et al. Stability evaluation and rockfall trajectory analysis of the Baimagou dangerous rock mass in Mingshan County of Sichuan Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2022,33(4):37 − 46. (in Chinese with English abstract)
-
图(8)
表(7)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1248
- PDF下载数: 56
- 施引文献: 0