中国地质环境监测院
中国地质灾害防治工程行业协会
主办

吕梁山区黄土物理性质力学参数区域分布特征

钱法桥, 邓亚虹, 慕焕东, 唐亚明, 宋焱勋, 李艳杰, 山聪. 吕梁山区黄土物理性质力学参数区域分布特征[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2022, 33(2): 61-70. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2022.02-08
引用本文: 钱法桥, 邓亚虹, 慕焕东, 唐亚明, 宋焱勋, 李艳杰, 山聪. 吕梁山区黄土物理性质力学参数区域分布特征[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2022, 33(2): 61-70. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2022.02-08
QIAN Faqiao, DENG Yahong, MU Huandong, TANG Yaming, SONG Yanxun, LI Yanjie, SHAN Cong. Distributive characteristics of physical and mechaniscal parameters of the loess soils in Lüliang mountainous area[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2022, 33(2): 61-70. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2022.02-08
Citation: QIAN Faqiao, DENG Yahong, MU Huandong, TANG Yaming, SONG Yanxun, LI Yanjie, SHAN Cong. Distributive characteristics of physical and mechaniscal parameters of the loess soils in Lüliang mountainous area[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2022, 33(2): 61-70. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2022.02-08

吕梁山区黄土物理性质力学参数区域分布特征

  • 基金项目: 中国地质调查局地质调查项目(DD20190642);陕西省教育厅科学研究计划专项项目(20JK0801);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划一般项目(2022JQ-289)
详细信息
    作者简介: 钱法桥(1997-),男,重庆云阳人,硕士研究生,主要从事地质灾害防灾减灾及地震工程方面的研究。 E-mail:2020226080@chd.edu.cn
    通讯作者: 唐亚明(1973-),女,湖南永州人,博士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事地质灾害调查与研究工作。E-mail:272738908@qq.com
  • 中图分类号: P642.13+1; P694

Distributive characteristics of physical and mechaniscal parameters of the loess soils in Lüliang mountainous area

More Information
  • 黄土因其特殊的物理力学性质及工程特性,在外界环境影响下易引发诸如黄土崩塌、滑坡、泥流等地质灾害。因此,研究黄土土性参数区域性分布特征对地质灾害防灾减灾具有重要意义。以吕梁山区L1黄土地层为研究对象,在野外调查、代表性点位取样的基础上,对研究区内133个取样点340组黄土试样进行黄土土性参数室内试验,获得其土性参数;基于所得数据,通过统计分析及ArcGIS软件平台,分析研究区内L1黄土地层土性参数分布特征。结果表明:黏粒含量、天然含水率、孔隙比、黏聚力、内摩擦角的分布在南北方向上具有较好的规律性,山脉东西两侧规律略有不同。另外,黏粒含量、天然含水率、黏聚力、湿陷系数的区域分布规律较为明显,内摩擦角区域分布上较为离散。研究结果为从土性特征方面对地质灾害易发性评价提供基础数据支撑。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  研究区取样点分布图

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  吕梁山脉东西两侧L1黄土地层黏粒含量分布

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  吕梁山脉东西两侧L1黄土地层天然含水率分布

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  吕梁山脉东西两侧L1黄土地层孔隙比分布

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  吕梁山脉东西两侧L1黄土地层黏聚力分布

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  吕梁山脉东西两侧L1黄土地层内摩擦角分布

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  吕梁山区L1黄土地层黏粒含量区域分布

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  吕梁山区L1黄土地层天然含水率区域分布

    Figure 8. 

    图 9  吕梁山区L1黄土地层黏聚力区域分布

    Figure 9. 

    图 10  吕梁山区L1黄土地层内摩擦角区域分布

    Figure 10. 

    图 11  吕梁山区L1黄土地层湿陷系数区域分布

    Figure 11. 

    表 1  黄土土性参数室内试验类型一览表

    Table 1.  List of laboratory test types of loess parameters

    试验类型数量/个试验类型数量/个
    颗分试验286密度试验289
    含水率试验289液塑限试验272
    比重试验270固结试验220
    直剪试验241常规三轴试验185
    渗透试验209湿陷性试验212
    动三轴试验57环剪试验36
    崩解试验20流变试验50
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  吕梁山脉东侧L1黄土地层常规物理性质指标数据

    Table 2.  Data of physical properties of L1 loess strata in eastern Lüliang mountains

    编号市县名取样点数黏粒含量/%含水率/%密度/(g·cm−3比重孔隙比/%饱和度/%塑限/%液限/%塑性指数液性指数
    1临汾市(尧都区)19.5902.7521.3842.6540.9717.52418.00029.69511.695−1.304
    2洪洞县211.8508.4531.4832.6400.93224.19718.22528.77310.548−1.010
    3汾西县28.8309.0601.4362.6631.02123.53519.75033.57513.825−0.770
    4灵石县111.24015.8901.5642.6500.96443.69918.65032.28013.630−0.202
    5交口县512.36611.5621.3322.7181.28024.58915.88033.20017.360−0.273
    6孝义市27.8007.3361.3872.6421.04618.59518.45032.13313.683−0.827
    7汾阳县19.0703.6151.4972.6880.86011.29614.70030.42515.725−0.705
    8文水县312.55512.9301.3132.6631.29725.61116.72032.33015.630−0.271
    9清徐县15.4907.7701.4692.6310.93021.97715.70030.59014.890−0.533
    10交城县211.9309.0611.4362.6721.03623.62417.21030.77013.570−0.601
    11古交市116.62015.9611.4322.6191.12137.29618.55046.39027.840−0.093
    12娄烦县25.79511.2571.6732.6630.77940.65017.42530.49313.068−0.413
    13岚县16.7204.9701.4582.6580.91314.46515.70025.72010.020−1.071
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  吕梁山脉西侧L1黄土地层常规物理性质指标数据

    Table 3.  Data of physical properties of L1 loess strata in western Lüliang mountains

    编号市县名取样点数黏粒含量/%含水率/%密度/(g·cm−3比重孔隙比/%饱和度/%塑限/%液限/%塑性指数液性指数
    1河津市215.73515.1401.4002.6951.21633.44518.61034.53515.900−0.235
    2乡宁县713.1628.0401.4022.6811.07220.26417.40332.76315.358−0.816
    3吉县1110.86210.2391.4902.6590.97728.15421.60732.43410.826−1.104
    4蒲县57.3948.6421.4522.6691.00622.20818.97832.93813.960−0.758
    5大宁县58.3868.5431.5562.6290.83726.78220.90831.66610.758−1.201
    6隰县49.1188.5621.4292.6461.01522.59320.72831.41010.683−1.155
    7永和县712.5607.6181.4032.6151.01319.91917.80031.06713.300−0.701
    8石楼县138.9238.0891.5052.6260.90124.99815.35731.45716.100−0.543
    9中阳县114.59010.4401.3702.7681.23123.46725.75032.6206.870−2.229
    10柳林县68.56810.3451.5182.6790.95229.52019.86330.70410.841−0.941
    11离石区28.9159.0311.5432.6430.86727.49017.88529.83511.950−0.764
    12方山县26.70013.1781.5772.6780.92738.87016.70028.89012.090−0.451
    13临县129.0599.1831.5342.6650.90227.64716.92429.94513.023−0.690
    14兴县86.9438.8451.3942.7041.11721.15014.01331.01317.005−0.405
    15岢岚县16.5908.8001.4302.7361.08222.25917.16029.12012.000−0.699
    16保德县35.5606.6401.4672.6720.94318.59314.35028.71214.382−0.578
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4  吕梁山脉东侧L1黄土地层其他土性参数试验数据

    Table 4.  Data of other parameters of L1 loess strata in eastern Lüliang mountains

    编号市县名取样点数压缩系数/MPa−1压缩模量/MPa内摩擦角/(°)黏聚力/kPa湿陷系数渗透系数/(cm·s−1
    1临汾市(尧都区)10.15713.07637.08522.7111.42E-013.31E-04
    2洪洞县20.7662.78933.35016.6592.35E-027.60E-05
    3汾西县20.12916.77630.64823.7275.75E-021.90E-04
    4灵石县10.14313.79330.19228.7751.30E-029.97E-05
    5交口县50.16712.06027.46725.5332.18E-029.31E-06
    6孝义市20.6187.60030.36526.8405.01E-023.30E-04
    7汾阳县10.14013.33332.81043.5567.18E-026.80E-04
    8文水县30.6075.86129.95533.0966.12E-021.38E-04
    9清徐县10.2248.62127.57022.9624.60E-02
    10交城县20.12921.84331.37731.6071.35E-029.43E-05
    11古交市11.3571.58039.4004.8805.72E-021.91E-04
    12娄烦县20.15211.82730.56032.8002.83E-028.26E-05
    13岚县10.2437.87421.71024.4659.78E-022.61E-04
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 5  吕梁山脉西侧L1黄土地层其他土性参数试验数据

    Table 5.  Data of other parameters of L1 loess strata in western Lüliang mountains

    编号市县名取样点数压缩系数/MPa−1压缩模量/MPa内摩擦角/(°)黏聚力/kPa湿陷系数渗透系数/(cm·s−1
    1河津市20.4764.11228.38543.9158.50E-035.64E-05
    2乡宁县70.6427.88832.58534.3925.50E-021.14E-04
    3吉县110.26214.30629.43726.6665.97E-027.32E-05
    4蒲县50.16815.11029.99231.0552.54E-021.20E-04
    5大宁县50.2247.41031.78820.7164.82E-021.22E-04
    6隰县40.4627.37731.11818.7055.14E-027.15E-05
    7永和县70.23017.31717.40515.6153.37E-029.96E-05
    8石楼县130.23114.83420.02016.9452.93E-021.32E-04
    9中阳县10.9821.01832.9306.2807.55E-021.07E-04
    10柳林县60.4368.42131.03213.7243.81E-028.63E-05
    11离石区20.3984.80920.45211.3104.68E-021.11E-04
    12方山县20.4074.93832.5506.5404.86E-027.72E-05
    13临县120.24017.67530.80214.5431.34E-028.03E-05
    14兴县80.2198.93828.58740.8934.70E-03
    15岢岚县10.14613.4071.04E-02
    16保德县30.12521.88727.89030.0403.80E-02
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 6  黄土湿陷性分类

    Table 6.  Loess collapsibility classification

    分类名称分类标准黄土湿陷程度
    非湿陷性黄土δs < 0.015无湿陷性
    湿陷性黄土0.015 ≤ δs ≤0.03湿陷性轻微
    0.03 < δs ≤ 0.07湿陷性中等
    δs > 0.07湿陷性强烈
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    刘东生. 黄土与环境[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2002,22(4):7 − 12. [LIU Dongsheng. Loess and environment[J]. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences Edition),2002,22(4):7 − 12. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [2]

    高国瑞. 兰州黄土显微结构和湿陷机理的探讨[J]. 兰州大学学报,1979,15(2):123 − 134. [GAO Guorui. Study of the microstructures and the collapse mechanism in loess soil from Lanzhou[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University,1979,15(2):123 − 134. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [3]

    高国瑞. 黄土显微结构分类与湿陷性[J]. 中国科学,1980,10(12):1203 − 1208. [GAO Guorui. Classification and collapsibility of loess[J]. Scientia Sinica,1980,10(12):1203 − 1208. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [4]

    雷祥义. 黄土的显微结构与古气候的关系[J]. 地质论评,1989,35(4):333 − 341. [LEI Xiangyi. The relations between microfabrics of loess and paleoclimate in China[J]. Geological Review,1989,35(4):333 − 341. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.1989.04.006

    [5]

    丁仲礼, 孙继敏, 刘东生. 联系沙漠-黄土演变过程中耦合关系的沉积学指标[J]. 中国科学(D辑: 地球科学),1999,29(1):82 − 87. [DING Zhongli, SUN Jimin, LIU Dongsheng. A sedimentological proxy indicator linking changes in loess and desert in the quaternary[J]. Science in China (Series in D),1999,29(1):82 − 87. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [6]

    李同录, 张辉, 李萍, 等. 不同沉积环境下马兰黄土孔隙分布与土水特征的模式分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2020,47(3):107 − 114. [LI Tonglu, ZHANG Hui, LI Ping, et al. Mode analysis of pore distribution and soil-water characteristic curve of Malan loess under different depositional environments[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2020,47(3):107 − 114. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [7]

    李萍, 李同录. 黄土物理性质与湿陷性的关系及其工程意义[J]. 工程地质学报,2007,15(4):506 − 512. [LI Ping, LI Tonglu. Relation between loess collapsibility and physical properties and its engineering significance[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2007,15(4):506 − 512. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2007.04.013

    [8]

    WEN B P, YAN Y J. Influence of structure on shear characteristics of the unsaturated loess in Lanzhou, China[J]. Engineering Geology,2014,168:46 − 58. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.10.023

    [9]

    慕焕东, 邓亚虹, 李荣建, 等. 砂粒含量对砂质黄土力学性质影响试验研究[J]. 水利与建筑工程学报,2018,16(6):36 − 39. [MU Huandong, DENG Yahong, LI Rongjian, et al. Experimental study on effects of sand content on sandy loess mechanical properties[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering,2018,16(6):36 − 39. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1144.2018.06.007

    [10]

    袁中夏, 赵未超, 叶帅华, 等. 含水量对黄土边坡稳定性的影响[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2019,30(3):37 − 43. [YUAN Zhongxia, ZHAO Weichao, YE Shuaihua, et al. Influence of water content on loess slope stability[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2019,30(3):37 − 43. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [11]

    刘钊钊, 钟秀梅, 张洪伟, 等. 典型地貌区原状黄土孔隙细观特征研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2019,46(2):148 − 155. [LIU Zhaozhao, ZHONG Xiumei, ZHANG Hongwei, et al. Research on pore microscopic characteristics of undisturbed loess in typical geomorphologies[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2019,46(2):148 − 155. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [12]

    鲁拓, 唐亚明, 李喜安, 等. 马兰黄土孔隙分形特征与渗透性关系[J]. 科学技术与工程,2021,21(19):8138 − 8144. [LU Tuo, TANG Yaming, LI Xi’an, et al. Relationship between pore fractal characteristics and permeability of Malan loess[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2021,21(19):8138 − 8144. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2021.19.038

    [13]

    杨泽, 蔺晓燕, 李同录, 等. 陇东黄土的物理力学性质指标统计分析[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版),2021,23(1):111 − 114. [YANG Ze, LIN Xiaoyan, LI Tonglu, et al. Statistical analysis of physical and mechanical properties of longdong loess[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology (Natural Sciences Edition),2021,23(1):111 − 114. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [14]

    张卜平, 朱兴华, 成玉祥, 等. 黄土潜蚀机理及其致灾效应研究综述[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2021,32(6):41 − 52. [ZHANG Buping, ZHU Xinghua, CHENG Yuxiang, et al. A review on loess subsurface-erosion mechanism and it's hazard effects[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2021,32(6):41 − 52. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [15]

    张玲玲, 龙建辉, 邢鲜丽, 等. 冻融循环作用下吕梁地区马兰黄土性质研究[J]. 太原理工大学学报,2021,52(4):557 − 563. [ZHANG Lingling, LONG Jianhui, XING Xianli, et al. Study on the properties of Malan loess in Lüliang area under freeze-thaw cycles[J]. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology,2021,52(4):557 − 563. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [16]

    TANG Y M, BI Y Q, GUO Z Z, et al. A novel method for obtaining the loess structural index from computed tomography images: A case study from the Lüliang mountains of the loess plateau (China)[J]. Land,2021,10(3):291. doi: 10.3390/land10030291

    [17]

    宋拴萍. 吕梁市离石区地质灾害概况及防治建议[J]. 山西建筑,2014,40(35):78 − 79. [SONG Shuanping. The geological disaster situation and prevention suggestion of Lishi District in Lüliang[J]. Shanxi Architecture,2014,40(35):78 − 79. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6825.2014.35.043

    [18]

    薛强, 唐亚明, 白轩. 吕梁山区大宁县城地质灾害破坏模式及风险管控[J]. 山地学报,2021,39(1):151 − 162. [XUE Qiang, TANG Yaming, BAI Xuan. Failure modes and risk control of geohazards in the county town of Daning in the Lüliang mountains, China[J]. Mountain Research,2021,39(1):151 − 162. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [19]

    黄虎城. 山西主要地质灾害分布规律和影响因素研究[J]. 能源与环保,2020,42(1):87 − 90. [HUANG Hucheng. Study on distribution law and influence factors of main geological disasters in Shanxi Province[J]. China Energy and Environmental Protection,2020,42(1):87 − 90. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [20]

    王鹏, 闫治利. 山西省地质灾害总体特征与分布规律研究[J]. 山西煤炭,2018,38(1):20 − 22. [WANG Peng, YAN Zhili. General features and distribution of geological disasters in Shanxi Province[J]. Shanxi Coal,2018,38(1):20 − 22. (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • 加载中

(11)

(6)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1062
  • PDF下载数:  30
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2022-02-22
修回日期:  2022-03-22
录用日期:  2022-03-22
刊出日期:  2022-04-25

目录