中国地质环境监测院
中国地质灾害防治工程行业协会
主办

四川美姑拉马阿觉滑坡复活特征与影响因素分析

王伟, 王卫, 戴雄辉. 四川美姑拉马阿觉滑坡复活特征与影响因素分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2022, 33(4): 9-17. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202202021
引用本文: 王伟, 王卫, 戴雄辉. 四川美姑拉马阿觉滑坡复活特征与影响因素分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2022, 33(4): 9-17. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202202021
WANG Wei, WANG Wei, DAI Xionghui. Analysis of reactivated characteristics and influencing factors of the Lamajue landslide in Meigu County of Sichuan Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2022, 33(4): 9-17. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202202021
Citation: WANG Wei, WANG Wei, DAI Xionghui. Analysis of reactivated characteristics and influencing factors of the Lamajue landslide in Meigu County of Sichuan Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2022, 33(4): 9-17. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202202021

四川美姑拉马阿觉滑坡复活特征与影响因素分析

详细信息
    作者简介: 王 伟(1987-),男,四川内江人,岩土工程专业,硕士研究生,工程师,主要从事地质灾害防治等方面的研究工作。E-mail:562879893@qq.com
    通讯作者: 王 卫(1967-),女,河南郑州人,地质工程专业,副教授,主要从事地质灾害防治等方面的研究。E-mail:wwei@cdut.edu.cn
  • 中图分类号: P642.27

Analysis of reactivated characteristics and influencing factors of the Lamajue landslide in Meigu County of Sichuan Province

More Information
  • 工程建设的扰动成为老滑坡复活的重要因素,老滑坡复活反过来影响了工程建设及其安全运营。四川美姑拉马阿觉滑坡属于前缘复活的巨型老滑坡,通过现场监测和数值模拟手段,对滑坡复活变形特征与影响因素进行了分析,结果表明:(1)降雨及人类工程活动是诱发老滑坡复活的主要因素,复活滑坡位于老滑坡体前缘,滑坡蠕滑变形的体积约为255.6×104 m3;(2)滑坡体呈刚性滑动,表现出单滑面及岩质滑坡的特征,且滑动面大体位于基覆界面位置;(3)经过前后两期治理,抗滑桩阻挡滑体的效果明显,滑体稳定性得到了明显提高,目前滑体变形趋于稳定,可以满足电力设施正常工作的稳定性要求。文中的研究是基于工程实例开展的,其研究成果为滑坡的稳定性评价、防治工程设计、治理后工程效果评价提供一定的理论依据。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  滑坡全貌

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  滑坡工程地质平面图及其监测系统布置图

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  滑坡1-1'工程地质剖面图

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  JK02滑体深部位移曲线

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  CX02滑体深部位移曲线

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  CX05滑体深部位移曲线

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  滑坡地下水位与降雨-时间关系曲线

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  三维计算模型网格图

    Figure 8. 

    图 9  桩结构单元及网格图

    Figure 9. 

    图 10  滑坡体各剖面位移云图

    Figure 10. 

    图 11  滑坡体各剖面正应力云图

    Figure 11. 

    图 12  数值计算的JK02位移曲线

    Figure 12. 

    表 1  前、后期监测系统监测时间及施工时间表

    Table 1.  Pre-and post-monitoring system monitoring time and construction schedule

    编号开始日期结束日期抗滑桩施工完成日期
    前期监测JK022008年4月7日2009年5月5日2008年6月1日
    后期监测CX022012年7月27日2013年6月9日2013年2月11日
    CX052012年7月24日2013年7月26日
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  数值计算参数取值

    Table 2.  Numerical calculation parameter value

    岩土体名称重度/
    (kN·m−3)
    弹性模量/
    MPa
    泊松比黏聚力/
    kPa
    内摩擦角/
    (°)
    滑体23.10180
    20
    0.284.024
    滑带23.100.3311.312
    滑床26.8067000.25218034
    抗滑桩25.00280000.20
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    孙东,殷志强,李大猛,等. 美姑河流域地质构造对大型滑坡孕育的控制作用[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2019,30(6):49 − 58. [SUN Dong,YIN Zhiqiang,LI Dameng,et al. Development of the large-scale landslides controlled by geological structures in Meigu River basin[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2019,30(6):49 − 58. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2019.06.07

    [2]

    殷志强,孙东,张瑛,等. 美姑河流域滑坡时空展布及成生机制研究[J]. 第四纪研究,2018,38(6):1358 − 1368. [YIN Zhiqiang,SUN Dong,ZHANG Ying,et al. Study on spatial temporal distribution characteristics and forming mechanism of landslides in the Meigu River basin[J]. Quaternary Sciences,2018,38(6):1358 − 1368. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11928/j.issn.1001-7410.2018.06.04

    [3]

    魏昌利,张瑛,冯文凯,等. 泯江上游槽谷曲流段大型古滑坡成因与复活性分析—以松潘县元坝子古滑坡为例[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2018,45(6):141 − 149. [WEI Changli,ZHANG Ying,FENG Wenkai,et al. Formation mechanism and reactivation analyses of large ancient landslides in the meandering trough valley of the upper Minjiang River:A case study of the Yuanbazi ancient landslide in Songpan County[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2018,45(6):141 − 149. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [4]

    吴瑞安,马海善,张俊才,等. 金沙江上游沃达滑坡发育特征与堵江危险性分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2021,48(5):120 − 128. [WU Ruian,MA Haishan,ZHANG Juncai,et al. Developmental characteristics and damming river risk of the Woda landslide in the upper reaches of the Jinshajiang river[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2021,48(5):120 − 128. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202104036

    [5]

    黄达,匡希彬,罗世林. 三峡库区藕塘滑坡变形特点及复活机制研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2019,46(5):127 − 135. [HUANG Da,KUANG Xibin,LUO Shilin. A study of the deformation characteristics and reactivation mechanism of the Outang landslide near the Three Gorges Reservoir of China[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2019,46(5):127 − 135. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.2019.05.17

    [6]

    张彦锋,铁永波,白永健,等. 云南永善县上坝老滑坡复活机制及新滑坡稳定性分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2020,31(3):41 − 49. [ZHANG Yanfeng,TIE Yongbo,BAI Yongjian,et al. Reactivation mechanism of the old landslide and stability analysis of the new landslide in Shangba,Yongshan County of Yunnan Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2020,31(3):41 − 49. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [7]

    窦晓东,张泽林. 甘肃舟曲垭豁口滑坡复活机理及成因探讨[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2021,32(2):9 − 18. [DOU Xiaodong,ZHANG Zelin. Mechanism and causal analysis on the Yahuokou landslide reactivation and causes(Zhouqu County,Gansu,China)[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2021,32(2):9 − 18. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.02.02

    [8]

    张永双,吴瑞安,郭长宝,等. 古滑坡复活问题研究进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展,2018,33(7):728 − 740. [ZHANG Yongshuang,WU Ruian,GUO Changbao,et al. Research progress and prospect on reactivation of ancient landslides[J]. Advances in Earth Science,2018,33(7):728 − 740. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2018.07.0728

    [9]

    YIN Y P,HUANG B L,WANG W P,et al. Reservoir-induced landslides and risk control in Three Gorges project on Yangtze River,China[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering,2016,8(5):577 − 595. doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.08.001

    [10]

    黄润秋. 20世纪以来中国的大型滑坡及其发生机制[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(3):433 − 454. [HUANG Runqiu. Large-scale landslides and their sliding mechanisms in China since the 20th Century[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2007,26(3):433 − 454. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2007.03.001

    [11]

    王恭先, 许峻岭, 刘光代, 等. 滑坡学与滑坡防治技术[M]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2004

    WANG Gongxian, XU Junling, LIU Guangdai, et al. Landslide science and landslide control technology[M]. Beijing: China Railway Publishing House, 2004. (in Chinese)

    [12]

    殷志强. 黄河上游因人工加载和降雨引发的虎头崖滑坡[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2014,25(4):10. [YIN Zhiqiang. Hutouya landslide caused by artificial loading and rainfall in the upper reaches of the Yellow Rive[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2014,25(4):10. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2014.04.003

    [13]

    杜飞,任光明,夏敏,等. 地震作用诱发老滑坡复活机制的数值模拟[J]. 山地学报,2015,33(2):233 − 239. [DU Fei,REN Guangming,XIA Min,et al. Numerical simulation of ecurrence mechanism of old landslide under earthquake loading[J]. Mountain Research,2015,33(2):233 − 239. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000030

    [14]

    周平根. 滑坡监测的指标体系与技术方法[J]. 地质力学学报,2004,10(1):19 − 26. [ZHOU Pinggen. Indicator system and techniques of landslide monitoring[J]. Journal of Geomechanics,2004,10(1):19 − 26. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2004.01.003

    [15]

    杨建. 柳洪拉马阿觉滑坡形成机制初步探讨[J]. 水电站设计,1995,11(1):41 − 44. [YANG Jian. Preliminary study on the formation mechanism of Lamajue landslide in Liuhong[J]. Design of Hydroelectric Power Station,1995,11(1):41 − 44. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [16]

    宋亚伟,王卫,赵德庆. 拉马古滑坡前部局部复活变形特征及成因分析[J]. 山西建筑,2008,34(31):14 − 15. [SONG Yawei,WANG Wei,ZHAO Deqing. Analysis on deformation characteristics and reasons of revival local front of fossil landslide in Lama[J]. Shanxi Architecture,2008,34(31):14 − 15. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6825.2008.31.008

    [17]

    四川美姑河水电开发有限公司营地及220KV联合开关站地质勘察报告[R]. 西昌: 四川凉山地质勘察施工公司, 2006

    Geological Investigation Report on the camp and 220 KV joint switch station of Sichuan Meigu River Hydropower Development Co. Ltd[R]. Xichang: Sichuan Liangshan Geological Survey and Construction Company, 2006. (in Chinese)

    [18]

    四川美姑河水电开发有限公司营地滑坡治理工程施工图设计报告[R]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2008

    Design report on construction drawing of landslide treatment project in the camp of Sichuan Meigu river hydropower development Co. Ltd[R]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2008. (in Chinese)

    [19]

    四川美姑河水电开发有限公司营地滑坡体监测报告[R]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2009

    Monitoring report on landslide in the camp of Sichuan Meigu river hydropower development Co. Ltd[R]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2009. (in Chinese)

    [20]

    凉山220KV美姑河开关站扩建工程滑坡治理施工图设计报告[R]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2011

    Design report on construction drawing of landslide control for extension project of 220 KV Meigu river switchgear station in Liangshan[R]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2011. (in Chinese)

    [21]

    凉山220KV美姑河开关站扩建工程滑坡体监测报告[R]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2013

    Monitoring report on landslide of 220 KV Meigu river switch station extension project in Liangshan[R]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2013. (in Chinese)

    [22]

    陈新泽,唐辉明,杨有成,等. 基于FLAC3D强度折减法滑坡三维稳定性研究—以三峡库区白果树古滑坡群为例[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2008,35(2):24 − 29. [CHEN Xinze,TANG Huiming,YANG Youcheng,et al. 3D analysis of landslide stability based on strength reduction FLAC3D:Taking Baiguoshu paleo-landslide group in the Three Gorges Reservoir area as example[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2008,35(2):24 − 29. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3665.2008.02.005

    [23]

    WANG W, LI T B, WANG L S. The design of anti-slide pile and the interaction between anti-slide pile and slip mass[C]//Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Engineering Geology in Developing Countries, 2002.

    [24]

    沈军辉,孙宝俊,靳晓光,等. 位移监测在滑坡评价预测中的应用[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版),2002,32(5):813 − 817. [SHEN Junhui,SUN Baojun,JIN Xiaoguang,et al. Application of displacement monitoring in appraising and forecasting landslide[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition),2002,32(5):813 − 817. (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • 加载中

(12)

(2)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  482
  • PDF下载数:  20
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2022-02-19
修回日期:  2022-05-30
录用日期:  2022-06-29
刊出日期:  2022-08-25

目录