中国地质环境监测院
中国地质灾害防治工程行业协会
主办

四川名山白马沟危岩体稳定性评价与落石轨迹分析

张永海, 谢武平, 罗忠行, 翟世斌. 四川名山白马沟危岩体稳定性评价与落石轨迹分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2022, 33(4): 37-46. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202202045
引用本文: 张永海, 谢武平, 罗忠行, 翟世斌. 四川名山白马沟危岩体稳定性评价与落石轨迹分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2022, 33(4): 37-46. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202202045
ZHANG Yonghai, XIE Wuping, LUO Zhongxing, ZHAI Shibin. Stability evaluation and rockfall trajectory analysis of the Baimagou dangerous rock mass in Mingshan County of Sichuan Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2022, 33(4): 37-46. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202202045
Citation: ZHANG Yonghai, XIE Wuping, LUO Zhongxing, ZHAI Shibin. Stability evaluation and rockfall trajectory analysis of the Baimagou dangerous rock mass in Mingshan County of Sichuan Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2022, 33(4): 37-46. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202202045

四川名山白马沟危岩体稳定性评价与落石轨迹分析

详细信息
    作者简介: 张永海(1967-),男,湖南澧县人,学士,高级工程师,主要从事岩土工程、地质灾害防治工程、生态修复工作。E-mail:1677089903@qq.com
    通讯作者: 翟世斌(1984-),男,甘肃榆中人,学士,高级工程师,主要从事岩土工程、地质灾害防治工程工作。E-mail:810497913@qq.com
  • 中图分类号: P642.21;TU94+3.2

Stability evaluation and rockfall trajectory analysis of the Baimagou dangerous rock mass in Mingshan County of Sichuan Province

More Information
  • 危岩体是指由结构面切割形成的在一定诱发因素下失稳破坏的岩体,其作为常见的自然地质灾害之一,严重影响山区人类生命财产安全。对危岩体的勘查、稳定性评价、风险评价是地质灾害预防的研究难题。受人类工程活动影响,名山县新店镇白马沟内存在多处危岩体。通过对国内外研究文献的查阅分析并结合白马沟危岩体的分布特征、发育特征、崩塌落石运动特性进行分析与研究,初步总结出了白垩系上统灌口组(K2g)危岩体的形成、分布规律及成灾机理,并对该区4个危岩体利用Rockfall 进行数值模拟计算,计算其运动速度及运动轨迹,计算岩石弹跳高度及距离等。为此类工程地质条件下的的危岩体稳定性评价及运动轨迹的分析提供参考,同时对于崩塌危岩体灾害预防与减灾技术研究有积极意义 。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  危岩带分布全貌照片

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  各危岩体形态照片

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  危岩带分布立面示意图

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  节理裂隙玫瑰花图和节理裂隙极点图

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  各危岩体赤平投影图

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  倾倒式危岩稳定性计算模型(危岩体重心在支点内侧)[14]

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  坠落式危岩计算模型(后缘有陡倾裂隙)[15]

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  危岩体崩落轨迹图

    Figure 8. 

    图 9  W2-1危岩体

    Figure 9. 

    图 10  W3-1危岩体

    Figure 10. 

    图 11  W4-1危岩体

    Figure 11. 

    图 12  W4-2危岩体

    Figure 12. 

    表 1  危岩体稳定性定性评价统计表

    Table 1.  Statistical table for qualitative evaluation of stability of dangerous rock mass

    编号体积
    /m3
    破坏
    模式
    稳定性评价
    天然工况暴雨工况地震工况
    W2-1危岩体250.8坠落基本稳定欠稳定欠稳定
    W3-1危岩体37.3坠落基本稳定欠稳定欠稳定
    W4-1危岩体270.3坠落基本稳定欠稳定欠稳定
    W4-2危岩体53.9倾倒基本稳定欠稳定欠稳定
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  勘查区岩石力学性质指标

    Table 2.  Mechanical property indexes of rocks in the exploration area

    岩土名称天然容重/
    (kN·m−3
    天然抗压
    强度
    /MPa
    抗拉强度
    /MPa
    黏聚力
    (饱和)
    /MPa
    内摩擦角(饱和)
    /(°)
    承载力特征值
    /kPa
    基底摩擦系数
    强风化泥质粉砂岩22.0*14.3*0.20*3.5*35.0*4500.40
      注:上述表中*根据地方经验取值。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  各危岩单体稳定性计算统计表

    Table 3.  Stability calculation statistics of each dangerous rock mass

    编号体积/m3破坏模式稳定系数安全系数稳定性评价
    天然暴雨地震天然暴雨地震
    W2-1250.8坠落1.3331.1981.1911.4基本稳定欠稳定欠稳定
    W3-137.3坠落1.2361.1921.1961.4基本稳定欠稳定欠稳定
    W4-1270.3坠落1.3361.1921.1931.4基本稳定欠稳定欠稳定
    W4-253.9倾倒3.3261.2561.1921.3稳定欠稳定欠稳定
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4  各危岩体坡段参数的取值

    Table 4.  Values of slope parameters of dangerous rock mass

    危岩体
    编号
    坡段岩性法向阻尼
    系数Rn
    切向阻尼
    系数Rt
    滚动摩擦
    系数
    滚动摩擦
    角/(°)
    W2-1强风化泥质粉砂岩0.350.850.4835
    W3-1强风化泥质粉砂岩0.350.850.4835
    W4-1强风化泥质粉砂岩0.350.850.4835
    W4-2强风化泥质粉砂岩0.350.850.4835
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 5  各危岩体运动路径与弹跳高度、总动能、速度的关系表

    Table 5.  Relationship between movement path of each dangerous rock body and jumping height, total kinetic energy and speed

    编号运动距离/m弹跳高度(max)/m总动能(max)/kJ速度(max)/(m·s−1备注
    W2-1初始水平运动距离X=2.71.51.51.7图9 (a)(b)(c)
    X=3.5
    X=4.1
    运动终点距离X=4.5
    W3-1初始水平运动距离X=3.41.51.281.5图10(a)(b)(c)
    X=3.8
    X=4.2
    运动终点距离X=4.7
    W4-1初始水平运动距离X=3.21.21.31.57图11(a)(b)(c)
    X=4.2
    X=5.0
    运动终点距离X=5.8
    W4-2初始水平运动距离X=2.81.51.331.62图12(a)(b)(c)
    X=3.3
    X=3.9
    运动终点距离X=4.4
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    胡显明,晏鄂川,杨建国,等. 巫溪南门湾危岩体稳定性分区研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2011,19(3):397 − 403. [HU Xianming,YAN Echuan,YANG Jianguo,et al. Stability assessment of unstable rock blocks at nanmenwan in Wuxi County[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2011,19(3):397 − 403. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2011.03.016

    [2]

    MANZELLA I,LABIOUSE V. Qualitative analysis of rock avalanches propagation by means of physical modelling of non-constrained gravel flows[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering,2008,41(1):133 − 151. doi: 10.1007/s00603-007-0134-y

    [3]

    ZAMBRANO O M. Large rock avalanches:A kinematic model[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering,2008,26(3):283 − 287. doi: 10.1007/s10706-007-9164-1

    [4]

    DORREN L K A,MAIER B,PUTTERS U S,et al. Combining field and modelling techniques to assess rockfall dynamics on a protection forest hillslope in the European Alps[J]. Geomorphology,2004,57(3/4):151 − 167.

    [5]

    CROSTA G B,AGLIARDI F. A methodology for physically based rockfall hazard assessment[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences,2003,3(5):407 − 422. doi: 10.5194/nhess-3-407-2003

    [6]

    何宇航,裴向军,梁靖,等. 基于Rockfall的危岩体危险范围预测及风险评价—以九寨沟景区悬沟危岩体为例[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2020,31(4):24 − 33. [HE Yuhang,PEI Xiangjun,LIANG Jing,et al. Risk assessment and range prediction of dangerous rockmass based on rockfall:A case study of the Xuangou Collapse[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2020,31(4):24 − 33. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [7]

    程宇,张健,陈进,等. 贵州纳雍骔岭镇危岩带稳定性及危害范围分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2019,30(4):9 − 15. [CHENG Yu,ZHANG Jian,CHEN Jin,et al. Analysis on stability and hazard zone of dangerous rock mass in Zongling Town,Nayong of Guizhou Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2019,30(4):9 − 15. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [8]

    陈洪凯,王蓉,唐红梅. 危岩研究现状及趋势综述[J]. 重庆交通学院学报,2003,22(3):18 − 22. [CHEN Hongkai,WANG Rong,TANG Hongmei. Review of current situation and trend of dangerous rock research[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University,2003,22(3):18 − 22. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [9]

    陈洪凯,唐红梅. 危岩主控结构面强度参数计算方法[J]. 工程地质学报,2008,16(1):37 − 41. [CHEN Hongkai,TANG Hongmei. Method for calculating strength parameters of structural planes controlling the rock block stablity[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2008,16(1):37 − 41. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2008.01.008

    [10]

    王在泉,张黎明,贺俊征. 岩石边坡工程块体系统稳定性预测、监测与控制[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(10):1658 − 1661. [WANG Zaiquan,ZHANG Liming,HE Junzheng. Stability prediction,monitoring and control of key block system in rock slope engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2004,23(10):1658 − 1661. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2004.10.013

    [11]

    陈昌彦,王思敬,沈小克. 边坡岩体稳定性的人工神经网络预测模型[J]. 岩土工程学报,2001,23(2):157 − 161. [CHEN Changyan,WANG Sijing,SHEN Xiaoke. Predicting models to estimate stability of rock slope based on artificial neural network[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2001,23(2):157 − 161. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2001.02.006

    [12]

    董好刚,陈立德,黄长生. 三峡库区云阳—江津段危岩形成的影响因素及稳定性评价[J]. 工程地质学报,2010,18(5):645 − 650. [DONG Haogang,CHEN Lide,HUANG Changsheng. Influence factors and stability assessment of dangerous rocks in Yunyang-Jiangjin on Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2010,18(5):645 − 650. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2010.05.006

    [13]

    刘传正. 重庆武隆鸡尾山危岩体形成与崩塌成因分析[J]. 工程地质学报,2010,18(3):297 − 304. [LIU Chuanzheng. Mechanism analysis on the Jiweishan rockfall disaster happened in Wulong,Chongqing,June 5,2009[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2010,18(3):297 − 304. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2010.03.002

    [14]

    陈洪凯,鲜学福,唐红梅,等. 危岩稳定性分析方法[J]. 应用力学学报,2009,26(2):278 − 282. [CHEN Hongkai,XIAN Xuefu,TANG Hongmei,et al. Stability analysis method for perilous rock[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics,2009,26(2):278 − 282. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [15]

    周根郯. 坠落式危岩稳定性计算方法的比较法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 34(5): 122 − 126;

    ZHOU Gentan. Comparison method of calculation methods of falling dangerous rock stability[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 34(5): 122 − 126. ( in Chinese with English abstract)

    [16]

    张帅,罗永健. 基于Rockfall模拟的高陡岩质建筑边坡孤石滚落防治方法探讨[J]. 广东土木与建筑,2019,26(2):54 − 57. [ZHANG Shuai,LUO Yongjian. Discussion on prevention and control method of rockfalling of high and steep rock slope based on Rockfall simulation[J]. Guangdong Architecture Civil Engineering,2019,26(2):54 − 57. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [17]

    陈洪凯, 唐红梅, 叶四桥, 等. 三峡库区危岩发育链式机理及失稳运动路径研究[C]//第八次全国岩石力学与工程学术大会论文集, 2004

    CHEN Hongkai, TANG Hongmei, YE Siqiao, et al. Study on chain mechanism of dangerous rock development and instability movement path in the Three Gorges Reservoir area[C]//Proceedings of the Eighth National Academic Conference on Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004. ( in Chinese with English abstract)

    [18]

    刘卫华. 高陡边坡危岩体稳定性、运动特征及防治对策研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2008

    LIU Weihua. Study on stability, movement characteristics and countermeasures of potential unstable rock mass in high-steep slope[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2008. (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • 加载中

(12)

(5)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1438
  • PDF下载数:  42
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2022-02-24
修回日期:  2022-04-02
录用日期:  2022-04-25
刊出日期:  2022-08-25

目录