Process and characteristics of “7·5” Huangniba gully debris flow in Muli County of Sichuan Province and and prevention suggestions
-
摘要:
2021年7月5日项脚沟七条支沟在连日降雨的情况下相继暴发泥石流灾害，因群测群防体系的高效运转，避免了20户118人因灾伤亡和1421万元的经济损失，实现了成功避险。黄泥巴沟是暴发泥石流的支沟之一，流域面积14.47 km2，此次灾害中冲出物规模12×104m3，损毁房屋数间。黄泥巴沟在2020年“3·28”森林火灾中地表植被焚毁严重，导致其泥石流孕灾环境发生剧烈变化，在鲜有泥石流活动的背景下，于2020年和2021年数次暴发泥石流灾害。通过实地调查，得出发生剧烈变化的泥石流孕灾环境和沟口外村寨旧有布局格式之间的矛盾是导致下坪子村受灾严重的关键原因，然后推断整个灾害过程：先前暴发的泥石流冲出物堵塞村寨中部沟渠，随后流出的山洪因无法顺畅排泄而发生大面积漫流，导致村寨所受损失倍增。首要的治理措施是修建一条连接沟口与主河的排导槽并重新规划村寨布局，使泥石流可以顺畅的排泄到主河之中并且使村寨建筑远离泥石流的直进范围。最后分析了此次群防群测体系的成功实践，总结经验以供参考。
Abstract:On July 5, 2021, debris flow disasters broke out in the seven branch ditches of Xiangjiao gully under the condition of consecutive days of rain. Due to the efficient operation of the mass prediction and disaster prevention system, 20 households with 118 casualties and 14.21 million yuan of economic losses were avoided. Huangniba gully was one of the tributaries of debris flow outbreaks, with a drainage are of 14.47 km2. The scale of the debris flow flushed out objects was 12×104 m3, and several houses were damaged. During the "3·28" forest fire in 2020, the surface vegetation in Huangniba gully was severely burned, which led to dramatic changes in its debris flow disaster-pregnant environment. In the background of few debris flow activities in Huangniba gully, debris flow disasters broke out several times in 2020 and 2021. Through field investigation, it was concluded that the contradiction between the drastically changed disaster-pregnancy environment of the debris flow and the old layout of the villages was the key reason for the serious disaster in Xiapingzi Village. The entire disaster process is as follows: after the debris flow blocked the internal ditches of the village, the outflowing mountain torrents were not able to be discharged smoothly, causing a large area of flooding, which caused doubled the losses to the village. The primary treatment measures were to build a drainage channel connecting the ditch mouth and the main river and re-plan the layout of the village, so that the debris flow can be smoothly discharged into the main river and the village buildings were kept away from the direct range of the debris flow. Finally, the successful practice of the mass people monitoring and prevention system was analyzed, and the experience was summarized for reference.
-
-
表 1 黄泥巴沟流域山坡坡度分级统计
Table 1. The slope classification statistics of Huangniba gully
项目 山坡坡度/（°） 合计 <15 15～25 25～35 ＞35 地表面积/km2 1.42 4.22 4.98 3.85 14.47 所占比例/% 9.8 29.1 34.4 26.7 100 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 沟道断面尺寸表
Table 2. Channel section size table
断面名称 宽度/m 深度/m 断面1 4 3.5 断面2 9 4.2 断面3 9.5 4.8 断面4 10.2 3.8
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 形态调查法计算结果
Table 3. Calculation results of the morphological survey method
参数 Q/（m3·s−1） A/m2 V/（m·s−1） nc R/m I 取值 70.988 15.6 4.458 0.1 1.381 0.129
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 黄泥巴沟梯形排导槽设计表
Table 4. The parameters of the trapezoidal drainage canal for Huangniba gully
参数 Q
/（m3·s−1）M I b
/mD10
/mmD50
/mmh
/m取值 70.99 6.95 0.074 3.52 1.175 20.58 3.28
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 暴雨致凉山木里项脚沟流域7条支沟齐发泥石流1246人安全转移[N].四川省应急管理厅官网之新闻动态[2021-07-08].
Heavy rain caused debris flows in 7 branch ditches of the Xiangjiao Valley in Liangshan[N].The official website of the Sichuan Provincial Department of Emergency Management[2021-07-08].
[2] WONDZELL S M,KING J G. Postfire erosional processes in the Pacific Northwest and Rocky Mountain regions[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2003,178(1/2):75 − 87.
[3] 殷万清,曹希超,胡卸文,等. 木里县项脚沟火后泥石流发育特征及应急处置对策[J]. 地质灾害与环境保护,2021,32(1):12 − 17. [YIN Wanqing,CAO Xichao,HU Xiewen,etal. Development characteristics of post-fire debris flow and emergency response measures in Xiangjiao township,Muli[J]. Journal of Geological Hazards and Environment Preservation,2021,32(1):12 − 17. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4362.2021.01.002
[4] 李潇. 木里成功避险群发性泥石流灾害[N]. 凉山新闻网讯, 2021-07-06
LI Xiao. Muli successfully avoided mass debris flow disasters[N]. Liangshan News Network News, 2021-07-06. （in Chinese）
[5] PROCHASKA A B,SANTI P M,HIGGINS J D. Debris basin and deflection berm design for fire-related debris-flow mitigation[J]. Environmental and Engineering Geoscience,2008,14(4):297 − 313. doi: 10.2113/gseegeosci.14.4.297
[6] CANNON S H,GARTNER J E,WILSON R C,et al. Storm rainfall conditions for floods and debris flows from recently burned areas in southwestern Colorado and southern California[J]. Geomorphology,2008,96(3/4):250 − 269.
[7] 崔鹏,杨坤,陈杰. 前期降雨对泥石流形成的贡献:以蒋家沟泥石流形成为例[J]. 中国水土保持科学,2003,1(1):11 − 15. [CUI Peng,YANG Kun,CHEN Jie. Relationship between occurrence of debris flow and antecedent precipitation:Taking the Jiangjia gully as an example[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,1(1):11 − 15. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3007.2003.01.005
[8] 陈景武. 云南东川蒋家沟泥石流暴发与暴雨关系的初步分析[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1985
CHEN Jingwu. Preliminary analysis on the relationship between Jiangjiagou debris flow and heavy rain in Dongchuan, Yunnan[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1985. （in Chinese）
[9] 薛宁波, 马清文, 王成华. 地质灾害易发山区群测群防体系与突发性灾害预警[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2008, 6（增刊 1）: 12 − 15
XUE Ningbo, MA Qingwen, WANG Chenghua. System of operated by mass people and warning of sudden outbrust hazards in geological hazards mountainous area[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 6（Sup 1）: 12 − 15. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[10] 游勇. 泥石流排导槽水力最佳断面[J]. 山地学报,1999,17(3):255 − 258. [YOU Yong. Optimal hydraulic condition of debris flow drainage canal[J]. Journal of Mountain Research,1999,17(3):255 − 258. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2786.1999.03.012
[11] 游勇, 柳金峰, 欧国强. 泥石流常用排导槽水力条件的比较[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2006, 25（增刊1）: 2820 − 2825
YOU Yong, LIU Jinfeng, OU Guoqiang. Comparison of hydraulic conditions among usual debris flow drainage canal[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 25（Sup 1）: 2820 − 2825. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[12] YOU Yong,LIU Jinfeng,CHEN Xingzhang,et al. Debris flow formation conditions and optimal characteristics of drainage canal following Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences,2012,65(4):1005 − 1012. doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1024-x
[13] 邸雪颖,陶玉柱. 火后泥石流研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报,2013,24(8):2383 − 2392. [DI Xueying,TAO Yuzhu. Research progress in post-fire debris flow[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2013,24(8):2383 − 2392. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2013.0396
[14] 庞伟军,常刚,苟海瑞,等. 甘肃肃南县长达坂沟泥石流成灾机理和防治措施建议[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2018,29(2):29 − 34. [PANG Weijun,CHANG Gang,GOU Hairui,et al. Disaster mechanism of debris flow of Changdaban gully in Sunan County of Gansu Province and suggstions for its prevention[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2018,29(2):29 − 34. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2018.02.05
[15] 文强,胡卸文,刘波,等. 四川丹巴梅龙沟“6·17”泥石流成灾机理分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2022,33(3):23 − 30. [WEN Qiang,HU Xiewen,LIU Bo,et al. Analysis on the mechanism of debris flow in Meilong valley in Danba County on June 17,2020[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2022,33(3):23 − 30. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2022.03-03
-
图(12)
表(4)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1115
- PDF下载数: 67
- 施引文献: 0