中国地质环境监测院
中国地质灾害防治工程行业协会
主办

加权信息量模型在云南澜沧县滑坡危险性评价中的应用

吴兴贵, 王宇栋, 王蓝婷, 丁梓逸. 加权信息量模型在云南澜沧县滑坡危险性评价中的应用[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2024, 35(3): 119-128. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202210013
引用本文: 吴兴贵, 王宇栋, 王蓝婷, 丁梓逸. 加权信息量模型在云南澜沧县滑坡危险性评价中的应用[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2024, 35(3): 119-128. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202210013
WU Xinggui, WANG Yudong, WANG Lanting, DING Ziyi. Hazard assessment of landslides in Lancang County, Yunnan Province based on weighted information value model[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2024, 35(3): 119-128. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202210013
Citation: WU Xinggui, WANG Yudong, WANG Lanting, DING Ziyi. Hazard assessment of landslides in Lancang County, Yunnan Province based on weighted information value model[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2024, 35(3): 119-128. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202210013

加权信息量模型在云南澜沧县滑坡危险性评价中的应用

详细信息
    作者简介: 吴兴贵(1997—),女,重庆南川人,安全工程专业,硕士,主要从事地灾规划方面的研究。E-mail:2839666766@qq.com
    通讯作者: 王宇栋(1973—),男,云南昆明人,有色冶金专业,博士,副教授,主要从事地灾规划、大数据挖掘与安全可视化方面的研究。E-mail:584772219@qq.com
  • 中图分类号: P642.22

Hazard assessment of landslides in Lancang County, Yunnan Province based on weighted information value model

More Information
  • 云南澜沧县位于滇西经向构造带中,在构造运动强烈,人类活动日益增加背景下,滑坡灾害发育,人民生命财产受到严重威胁,因此,对该区域进行滑坡危险性评价研究具有重要意义。以澜沧县滑坡数据为基础,选取高程、坡度、坡向、地层岩性、距断层距离、植被覆盖度、距道路距离、降雨量共8个评价因子,构建滑坡危险性评价指标体系。基于熵权法与信息量耦合模型,利用ArcGIS地理空间分析对研究区滑坡危险进行定性、定量评价并分区。结果显示:高危险区面积占17.91%,较高危险区占37.91%,中危险区占25.94%,低危险区占18.25%。经检验评价结果合理,加权信息量模型适用于滑坡危险性评价。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  研究区位置与滑坡灾害点分布

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  滑坡危险评价因子分级图

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  指标分级与滑坡相对点密度柱状图

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  滑坡危险性分区图

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  危险性评价结果的ROC曲线

    Figure 5. 

    表 1  数据来源

    Table 1.  Summary of data source

    数据名称数据来源数据名称数据来源
    滑坡灾害点澜沧县地质灾害详查DEM数据地理空间数据云
    地质图全国地质资料馆降雨量中国气象数据网
    道路数据91卫图助手植被覆盖数据地理空间数据云
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  指标统计计算结果

    Table 2.  Statistical calculation results of indicators

    因子因子二级属性滑坡点个数栅格数量信息量相对点密度归一化XiHiWi
    高程/m492~1 099201 224 511−0.0760.9270.1960.9210.174
    1 099~1 366332 536 591−0.3030.7380.156
    1 366~1 623542 684 0740.1331.1420.241
    1 623~1 910581 991 0790.5031.6530.350
    1 910~2 53061 268 180−1.3150.2690.057
    坡度/(°)0~10241 453 076−0.0650.9370.1710.9840.034
    10~20753 730 5520.1321.1410.208
    20~30473 223 642−0.1890.8270.151
    30~40201 114 8200.0181.0180.186
    >405182 3450.4421.5560.284
    坡向181 267 813−0.2160.8060.1020.9670.072
    东北381 404 8530.4291.5350.195
    91 199 159−0.8530.4260.054
    东南141 116 898−0.3410.7110.090
    291 195 8080.3191.3760.175
    西南251 283 1200.1011.1060.140
    西141 112 242−0.3360.7140.091
    西北241 124 5420.1921.2110.154
    地层岩性松散岩(土)体391 1360.6251.8680.3060.9110.197
    软弱岩层7197 9430.6972.0070.329
    较软弱岩层302 174 744−0.2450.7830.128
    较坚硬岩层1286 776 3270.0701.0720.176
    坚硬岩层3464 285−1.0030.3670.060
    距断裂距离/m0~1 000441 912 2600.2671.3060.2820.9710.065
    1 000~2 000291574 1530.0441.0460.226
    2 000~3 000161 187 454−0.2680.7650.165
    3 000~4 0008917 368−0.7030.4950.107
    >4 000744 113 2000.0211.0210.220
    植被覆盖度0~0.1933900 9950.7322.0790.3290.8970.228
    0.19~0.45451 291 0110.6821.9780.313
    0.45~0.66381 846 6660.1551.1680.185
    0.66~0.84412 895 125−0.2190.8040.127
    0.84~0.1142 770 638−1.2490.2870.045
    距道路距离/m0~50019480 3540.8092.2450.3580.9500.111
    500~1 00011458 2800.3091.3620.217
    1 000~1 5007433 124−0.0860.9170.146
    1 500~2 0006413 798−0.1950.8230.131
    >2 0001287 918 879−0.0860.9170.146
    降雨量/mm1 212.3~1 313.2411 166 2330.6911.9950.3560.9470.119
    1 313.2~1 382.0351 524 1280.2651.3030.233
    1 382.0~1 435.2271 962 908−0.2480.7810.139
    1 435.2~1 485.8382 637 049−0.2010.8180.146
    1 485.8~1 545.5302 414 117−0.3490.7050.126
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  分区统计结果

    Table 3.  Statistical results of zoning

    危险性等级面积/km2面积
    比例/%
    滑坡点
    /个
    滑坡点
    比例/%
    滑坡相对
    点密度
    高危险区1549.7217.918449.122.74
    较高危险区3280.7737.916336.840.97
    中危险区2244.9325.941911.110.43
    低危险区1579.7618.2552.920.16
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    李益敏,袁静,蒋德明,等. 基于GIS的西南高山峡谷区滑坡风险性评价—以怒江州泸水市为例[J]. 西北师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,57(6):94 − 102. [LI Yimin,YUAN Jing,JIANG Deming,et al. Risk assessment of landslide disasters in alpine canyon area based on GIS:Taking Lushui City,Nujiang Prefecture as an example[J]. Journal of Northwest Normal University (Natural Science),2021,57(6):94 − 102. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    LI Yimin, YUAN Jing, JIANG Deming, et al. Risk assessment of landslide disasters in alpine canyon area based on GIS—taking Lushui City, Nujiang Prefecture as an example[J]. Journal of Northwest Normal University (Natural Science), 2021, 57(6): 94-102. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [2]

    屠水云,张钟远,付弘流,等. 基于CF与CF-LR模型的地质灾害易发性评价[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2022,33(2):96 − 104. [TU Shuiyun,ZHANG Zhongyuan,FU Hongliu,et al. Geological hazard susceptibility evaluation based on CF and CF-LR model[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2022,33(2):96 − 104. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2022.02-12

    TU Shuiyun, ZHANG Zhongyuan, FU Hongliu, et al. Geological hazard susceptibility evaluation based on CF and CF-LR model[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2022, 33(2): 96-104. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2022.02-12

    [3]

    杨华阳,许向宁,杨鸿发. 基于证据权法的九寨沟地震滑坡危险性评价[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2020,31(3):20 − 29. [YANG Huayang,XU Xiangning,YANG Hongfa. The Jiuzhaigou co-seismic landslide hazard assessment based on weight of evidence method[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2020,31(3):20 − 29. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2020.03.03

    YANG Huayang, XU Xiangning, YANG Hongfa. The Jiuzhaigou co-seismic landslide hazard assessment based on weight of evidence method[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2020, 31(3): 20-29. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2020.03.03

    [4]

    管新邦. 云南省滑坡地质灾害危险性评价研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2018

    GUAN Xinbang. Study on risk assessment of landslide geological hazards in Yunnan Province[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining & Technology, Beijing, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [5]

    孙长明,马润勇,尚合欣,等. 基于滑坡分类的西宁市滑坡易发性评价[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2020,47(3):173 − 181. [SUN Changming,MA Runyong,SHANG Hexin,et al. Landslide susceptibility assessment in Xining based on landslide classification[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2020,47(3):173 − 181. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    SUN Changming, MA Runyong, SHANG Hexin, et al. Landslide susceptibility assessment in Xining based on landslide classification[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2020, 47(3): 173-181. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [6]

    温鑫,范宣梅,陈兰,等. 基于信息量模型的地质灾害易发性评价—以川东南古蔺县为例[J]. 地质科技通报,2022,41(2):290 − 299. [WEN Xin,FAN Xuanmei,CHEN Lan,et al. Susceptibility assessment of geological disasters based on an information value model:A case of Gulin County in southeast Sichuan[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2022,41(2):290 − 299. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    WEN Xin, FAN Xuanmei, CHEN Lan, et al. Susceptibility assessment of geological disasters based on an information value model: a case of Gulin County in Southeast Sichuan[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2022, 41(2): 290-299. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [7]

    申怀飞,董雨,杨梅,等. 基于AHP与信息量法的甘肃省滑坡易发性评估[J]. 水土保持研究,2021,28(6):412 − 419. [SHEN Huaifei,DONG Yu,YANG Mei,et al. Assessment on landslide susceptibility in Gansu Province based on AHP and information quantity method[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(6):412 − 419. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2021.06.034

    SHEN Huaifei, DONG Yu, YANG Mei, et al. Assessment on landslide susceptibility in Gansu Province based on AHP and information quantity method[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(6): 412-419. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2021.06.034

    [8]

    孙滨,祝传兵,康晓波,等. 基于信息量模型的云南东川泥石流易发性评价[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2022,33(5):119 − 127. [SUN Bin,ZHU Chuanbing,KANG Xiaobo,et al. Susceptibility assessment of debris flows based on information model in Dongchuan,Yunnan Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2022,33(5):119 − 127. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202204003

    SUN Bin, ZHU Chuanbing, KANG Xiaobo, et al. Susceptibility assessment of debris flows based on information model in Dongchuan, Yunnan Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2022, 33(5): 119-127. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202204003

    [9]

    杜国梁,杨志华,袁颖,等. 基于逻辑回归-信息量的川藏交通廊道滑坡易发性评价[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2021,48(5):102 − 111. [DU Guoliang,YANG Zhihua,YUAN Ying,et al. Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Sichuan-Tibet traffic corridor using logistic regression-information value method[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2021,48(5):102 − 111. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    DU Guoliang, YANG Zhihua, YUAN Ying, et al. Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Sichuan-Tibet traffic corridor using logistic regression-information value method[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2021, 48(5): 102-111. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [10]

    王夏林,严宝文. 基于熵权的可拓理论在地灾危险性评价中的应用[J]. 人民长江,2012,43(21):70 − 74. [WANG Xialin,YAN Baowen. Application of entropy weight based extension theory in risk assessment of geological hazards[J]. Yangtze River,2012,43(21):70 − 74. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4179.2012.21.019

    WANG Xialin, YAN Baowen. Application of entropy weight based extension theory in risk assessment of geological hazards[J]. Yangtze River, 2012, 43(21): 70-74. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4179.2012.21.019

    [11]

    周苏华,付宇航,徐智文,等. 基于主客观赋权法的福建省地质灾害易发性评价[J]. 安全与环境学报,2022,23(9):3204 − 3214. [ZHOU Suhua,FU Yuhang,XU Zhiwen,et al. Evaluation of geological disaster susceptibility in Fujian Province based on subjective and objective weighting method[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment,2022,23(9):3204 − 3214. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Zhou Suhua, Fu Yuhang, Xu Zhiwen, et al. Evaluation of geological disaster susceptibility in Fujian Province based on subjective and objective weighting method [J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2022: 1-12. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [12]

    KHATUN M,HOSSAIN A T M S,SAYEM H M,et al. Landslide susceptibility mapping using weighted-overlay approach in rangamati,Bangladesh[J]. Earth Systems and Environment,2023,7(1):223 − 235. doi: 10.1007/s41748-022-00312-2

    [13]

    CHEN W,CHAI H C,SUN X Y,et al. A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio,statistical index and weights-of-evidence models in landslide susceptibility mapping[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences,2016,9(3):204. doi: 10.1007/s12517-015-2150-7

    [14]

    刘福臻,王灵,肖东升,等. 基于模糊综合评判法的宁南县滑坡易发性评价[J]. 自然灾害学报,2021,30(5):237 − 246. [LIU Fuzhen,WANG Ling,XIAO Dongsheng,et al. Evaluation of landslide susceptibility in Ningnan County based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters,2021,30(5):237 − 246. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    LIU Fuzhen, WANG Ling, XIAO Dongsheng, et al. Evaluation of landslide susceptibility in Ningnan County based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2021, 30(5): 237-246. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [15]

    罗亮,宋国虎,唐良琴,等. 白龙江武都区段泥石流分布规律及其危险性评价[J]. 人民长江,2022,53(5):135 − 142. [LUO Liang,SONG Guohu,TANG Liangqin,et al. Debris flow distribution law and risk analysis in Wudu section of Bailong River[J]. Yangtze River,2022,53(5):135 − 142. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    LUO Liang, SONG Guohu, TANG Liangqin, et al. Debris flow distribution law and risk analysis in Wudu section of Bailong River[J]. Yangtze River, 2022, 53(5): 135-142.(in Chinese with English abstract)

    [16]

    崔阳阳. 基于不同评价单元的滑坡易发性评价方法研究—以陕西省洛南县为例[D]. 西安: 西安科技大学, 2022

    CUI Yangyang. Study on evaluation method of landslide susceptibility based on different evaluation units: A case study of Luonan County, Shaanxi Province[D]. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Science and Technology, 2022. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [17]

    汤国安, 刘学军, 闾国年.数字高程模型及地学分析的原理与方法[M]. 科学出版社, 2005

    TANG Guoan, LIU Xuejun, LU Guonian. Principles and methods of digital elevation model and geoscience analysis[M]. Science Press, 2005. (in Chinese )

    [18]

    朱晓霞,张力,杨树文. 降雨引发的兰州黄土滑坡时空规律分析和临界降雨量预测[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2019,30(4):24 − 31. [ZHU Xiaoxia,ZHANG Li,YANG Shuwen. Characteristics of rainfall-induced loess landslides and their threshold rainfall in Lanzhou[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2019,30(4):24 − 31. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2019.04.04

    ZHU Xiaoxia, ZHANG Li, YANG Shuwen. Characteristics of rainfall-induced loess landslides and their threshold rainfall in Lanzhou[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2019, 30(4): 24-31. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2019.04.04

    [19]

    韩玲,张庭瑜,张恒. 基于IOE和SVM模型的府谷镇滑坡易发性分区[J]. 水土保持研究,2019,26(3):367 − 372. [HAN Ling,ZHANG Tingyu,ZHANG Heng. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on IOE and SVM model in Fugu Town[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(3):367 − 372. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    HAN Ling, ZHANG Tingyu, ZHANG Heng. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on IOE and SVM model in Fugu town[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 26(3): 367-372. (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • 加载中

(5)

(3)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  260
  • PDF下载数:  37
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2022-10-11
修回日期:  2023-04-11
录用日期:  2023-05-04
刊出日期:  2024-06-25

目录