Hydrocarbon accumulation process in the Structure Y of Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin and its implications for feature exploration
-
摘要:
为了给Y构造下一步评价决策提供成藏支撑，打破勘探瓶颈，本文利用已钻井油气分布特征，综合平衡剖面、多指标油气源综合对比、流体包裹体、盆地模拟等技术研究了Y构造成藏过程。结果表明：Y构造23 Ma—现今共经历3期成藏，最终导致花港组下段聚集规模最大，中间的花港组上段为“过路成藏”，而龙井组以上油气藏小而散；“北强南弱”的挤压机制控制了油气“北富南贫”的总体格局；龙井运动形成的横张断层是控制花港组上段及以上油气纵向分布格局的关键；第一个成藏期内构造中北部花港组下段发育古油藏的局部构造是寻找甜点的有利方向。
Abstract:In order to support the next cycle of hydrocarbon resource evaluation and decision making process for the structure Y in the East China Sea Shelf Basin so as to break the bottleneck of future exploration, the hydrocarbon accumulation process of the structure Y was studied by means of balanced sections, multi-index comprehensive correlation of oil and gas sources, fluid inclusions and basin simulation. Results show that the structure has suffered three stages of hydrocarbon accumulation since 23 Ma, which eventually leads to the largest accumulation of hydrocarbon in the lower part of the Huagang Formation. The upper part of the Middle Huagang Formation only has hydrocarbon accumulated while it passes by the structure, and the reservoirs above the Longjing Formation are small and occasionally filled by oil and gas. The compression framework, which is “strong in north and weak in south”, controls the overall distribution pattern which is “rich in north and poor in south”; the transverse tensional fault formed by the Longjing movement is the key to control the vertical distribution pattern of oil and gas in the sequence of the upper Huagang Formation and above. Paleo-reservoirs in the lower part of Huagang Formation formed during the first reservoir forming period are the favorable direction for finding new sweet spots.
-
-
表 1 Y构造综合油源对比
Table 1. Comprehensive oil source correlation for structure Y
井号 层位 样品类型 二萜含量 γ蜡烷指数 Ts/Tm C27-C28-C29分布型式 Pr/Ph Y4井 花港组 泥岩 低 0.34 1.22 “L”型 0.16 Y4井 花港组 油 高 0.45 0.55 反“L”型 4.7 Y4井 花港组 油 高 0.48 0.61 反“L”型 5.2 T气田 平湖组 油 高 0 0.37 反“L”型 5.5 T气田 平湖组 泥岩 高 0.17～0.38 0.33～0.43 反“L”型 3.02～6.29 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 杨丽娜, 陈琳琳, 汤健, 等. 东海西湖凹陷玉泉构造成藏分析[J]. 海洋石油, 2013, 33(2):54-58 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2336.2013.02.054
YANG Lina, CHEN Linlin, TANG Jian, et al. Analysis of HC accumulation in Yuquan structure of Xihu Depression at East China Sea [J]. Offshore Oil, 2013, 33(2): 54-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2336.2013.02.054
[2] 苏奥, 陈红汉, 王存武, 等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷油气成因及成熟度判别[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(5):521-527 doi: 10.11698/PED.2013.05.02
SU Ao, CHEN Honghan, WANG Cunwu, et al. Genesis and maturity identification of oil and gas in the Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(5): 521-527. doi: 10.11698/PED.2013.05.02
[3] 刘建, 张文慧, 高翠欣, 等. 准南霍玛吐背斜带天然气成因类型及来源[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2016, 36(3):135-141
LIU Jian, ZHANG Wenhui, GAO Cuixin, et al. Genetic type and source of the natural gas in HUO-MA-TUO articline zone in the southern Junggar Basin [J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2016, 36(3): 135-141.
[4] 刘文汇, 徐永昌. 煤型气碳同位素演化二阶段分馏模式及机理[J]. 地球化学, 1997, 28(4):359-366
LIU Wenhui, XU Yongchang. A two-stage model of carbon isotopic fractionation in coal-gas [J]. Geochimica, 1997, 28(4): 359-366.
[5] 李宁, 覃军, 江瀚, 等. 西湖凹陷T气田油气分布特征与主控因素[J]. 断块油气田, 2017, 24(3):329-332
LI Ning, QIN Jun, JIANG Han, et al. Hydrocarbon distribution features and its main controlling factors of T gas field, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Fault-block Oil & Gas Field, 2017, 24(3): 329-332.
[6] 李居云, 姜波, 屈争辉, 等. 东海西湖凹陷构造演化及控煤作用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2016, 44(5):22-27 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2016.05.004
LI Juyun, JIANG Bo, QU Zhenghui, et al. Tectonic evolution and control of coal in Donghai Xihu Sag [J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2016, 44(5): 22-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2016.05.004
[7] 张远兴, 叶加仁, 苏克露, 等. 东海西湖凹陷沉降史与构造演化[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2009, 33(2):215-223 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2009.02.004
ZHANG Yuanxing, YE Jiaren, SU Kelu, et al. The burial history and evolution of Xihu Depression [J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2009, 33(2): 215-223. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2009.02.004
[8] 郭真, 刘池洋, 田建锋. 东海盆地西湖凹陷反转构造特征及其形成的动力环境[J]. 地学前缘, 2015, 22(3):59-67
GUO Zhen, LIU Chiyang, TIAN Jianfeng. Structural characteristics and main controlling factors of inversion structures in Donghai Xihu Depression [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2015, 22(3): 59-67.
[9] 胡梦颖, 李三忠, 戴黎明, 等. 西湖凹陷中北部反转构造动力学机制的数值模拟[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2017, 37(4):151-166
HU Mengying, LI Sanzhong, DAI Liming, et al. Numerical dynamic modeling of tectonic inversion in the northeastern Xihu Sag [J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2017, 37(4): 151-166.
[10] 何将启. 东海西湖凹陷构造-热历史分析[D]. 同济大学博士学位论文, 2004.
HE Jiangqi. Tectono-thermal history of Xihu Depression, East China Sea[D]. Doctor Dissertation of Tongji University, 2004.
[11] 蔡华, 张建培, 唐贤君. 西湖凹陷断裂系统特征及其控藏机制[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(10):18-26 doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2014.10.003
CAI Hua, ZHANG Jianpei, TANG Xianjun. Characteristics of the fault systems and their control on hydrocarbon accumulation in the Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(10): 18-26. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2014.10.003
[12] 谢月芳, 陈敏娟, 王坚勇. 东海西湖凹陷浙东中央背斜带中南部油气成藏规律与晚期剪切断层的关系探讨[J]. 海洋石油, 2002(2):8-13 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2336.2002.02.002
XIE Yuefang, CHEN Minjuan, WANG Jianyong. Pattern of oil and gas accumulation in the south and middle part of Zhedong Central Anticline area [J]. Offshore Oil, 2002(2): 8-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2336.2002.02.002
[13] 熊斌辉, 王春红, 张锦伟, 等. 西湖凹陷龙井运动特征[J]. 中国海上油气, 2008, 20(2):77-81 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1506.2008.02.002
XIONG Binhui, WANG Chunhong, ZHANG Jinwei, et al. Longjing movement characteristics in Xihu Sag [J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2008, 20(2): 77-81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1506.2008.02.002
[14] 刘可禹, 鲁雪松, 桂丽黎, 等. 储层定量荧光技术及其在油气成藏研究中的应用[J]. 地球科学, 2016, 41(3):373-384
LIU Keyu, LU Xuesong, GUI Lili, et al. Quantitative fluorescence techniques and their applications in hydrocarbon accumulation studies [J]. Earth Science, 2016, 41(3): 373-384.
[15] 刘金水, 唐健程. 西湖凹陷低渗储层微观孔隙结构与渗流特征及其地质意义--以HY构造花港组为例[J]. 中国海上油气, 2013, 25(2):18-23
LIU Jinshui, TANG Jiancheng. Mircoscopic pore texture and percolation features in the low permeability reservoirs and their geological significance in Xihu Sag: A case of Huagang Formation in HY structure [J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2013, 25(2): 18-23.
[16] 张武, 徐发, 徐国盛, 等. 西湖凹陷某构造花港组致密砂岩储层成岩作用与孔隙演化[J]. 成都理工大学学报: 自然科学版, 2012, 39(2):122-129
ZHANG Wu, XU Fa, XU Guosheng, et al. Diagenesis and pore evolution of Huagang Formation tight sandstone reservoirs in a structure of Xihu Depression in East China Sea Basin [J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology: Science & Technology Edition, 2012, 39(2): 122-129.
[17] 孙相灿, 杨传胜, 于兴河, 等. 冀中坳陷深县凹陷古近系碎屑岩储层成岩作用及成岩演化序列分析[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2014, 34(2):135-142
SUN Xiangcan, YANG Chuansheng, YU Xinghe, et al. Diagenesis and diagenetic sequence of Paleogene sandstone reservoir in Shenxian Depression, Jizhong Sub-Basin [J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2014, 34(2): 135-142.
[18] 纪友亮, 高崇龙, 刘玉瑞, 等. 高邮凹陷阜一段油气充注对储层物性演化的影响[J]. 同济大学学报: 自然科学版, 2015, 43(1):133-139
JI Youliang, GAO Chonglong, LIU Yurui, et al. Influence of hydrocarbon charging to the reservoir property in 1st member of funning formation in Gaoyou Depression [J]. Journal of Tongji University: Natural Science, 2015, 43(1): 133-139.
[19] 宋世骏, 柳益群, 郑庆华, 等. 含凝灰质致密油层成岩作用与原油充注特点: 以鄂尔多斯盆地西北部长4+5段为例[J]. 地质科技情报, 2018, 37(5):54-62
SONG Shijun, LIU Yiqun, ZHENG Qinghua, et al. Diagenesis and oil filling characteristics of tuffaceous tight reservoir: a case study of Chang 4+5 member in Northwest of Ordos Basin [J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2018, 37(5): 54-62.
[20] 孟元林, 潘雪梅, 吴河勇, 等. 松辽盆地北部中浅层含油饱和度和孔隙度的关系与油气侵位对成岩作用的抑制[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2010, 29(1):11-16 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2802.2010.01.002
MENG Yuanlin, PAN Xuemei, WU Heyong, et al. Porosity and oil saturation correlation and diagenetic retardation of sandstone by hydrocarbon emplacement in the Shallow-Middle strata of the Northern Songliao Basin [J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2010, 29(1): 11-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2802.2010.01.002
[21] 张守鹏, 李博. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷示烃成岩作用及其演化特征[J]. 古地理学报, 2018, 20(6):1043-1052 doi: 10.7605/gdlxb.2018.06.077
ZHANG Shoupeng, LI Bo. Diagenesis and evolution characteristics of hydrocarbon-traced minerals in Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay basin [J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2018, 20(6): 1043-1052. doi: 10.7605/gdlxb.2018.06.077
[22] 夏青松, 黄成刚, 陆江. 沉积盆地中油气充注与储集层成岩作用的响应关系[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2019, 41(2):185-196 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6561.2019.02.005
XIA Qingsong, HUANG Chenggang, LU Jiang. Response relationship between hydrocarbon charging and diagenesis of reservoirs in sedimentary basin [J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2019, 41(2): 185-196. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6561.2019.02.005
-
图(9)
表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1456
- PDF下载数: 3
- 施引文献: 0