内蒙古东乌珠穆沁旗查干哈达音亨嘎高温型强过铝质花岗岩年代学、地球化学特征及其地质意义

贺瑾瑞; 郭丽; 郝春燕; 徐吉祥; 邹滔; 宋庆伟; 冉淑红; 程素珍; 张翊超; 何付兵

内蒙古东乌珠穆沁旗查干哈达音亨嘎高温型强过铝质花岗岩年代学、地球化学特征及其地质意义

1.
北京市地质研究所, 北京 100120

2.
中煤集团山西华昱能源有限公司, 山西朔州 036900

3.
北京市地质调查研究院, 北京 100195

4.
北京矿产地质研究院, 北京 100012

5.
中国地震局地质研究所, 北京 100029

基金项目:
中国地质调查局项目《内蒙古1:5万巴彦塔拉等四幅区域地质调查》（编号：基[2010]矿评01-09-04）

详细信息

作者简介: 贺瑾瑞(1984-), 男, 硕士, 高级工程师, 从事区域地质调查工作。E-mail:laurry@qq.com

通讯作者: 何付兵(1980-), 男, 博士, 高级工程师, 从事区域地质调查工作。E-mail:hefubing14@126.com

中图分类号: P588.12⁺1;P597⁺.3

收稿日期: 2017-10-19

修回日期: 2017-12-12

刊出日期: 2018-06-25

Geochronology and geochem-ical characteristics of the Chaganhadayinhengga strongly peraluminous granites in East Ujimqin Banner of Inner Mongolia and their geological significance

1.
Beijing Institute of Geology, Beijing 100120, China

2.
Chinacoal Group Shanxi Huaju Energy Co., LTD, Shuozhou 036900, Shanxi, China

3.
Beijing Institute of Geological Survey, Beijing 100195, China

4.
Beijing Institute of Geology for Mineral Resources, Beijing 100012, China

5.
Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China

More Information

Corresponding author: HE Fubing, hefubing14@126.com

Received Date: 19 October 2017

Revised Date: 12 December 2017

Publish Date: 25 June 2018

摘要

摘要:
内蒙古东乌珠穆沁旗查干哈达音亨嘎强过铝质岩体位于华北板块与西伯利亚板块之间的中亚-蒙古造山带中东段的兴蒙褶皱带，主要岩石类型为含石榴子石二云母二长花岗岩。基于锆石U-Pb同位素定年、地球化学分析和构造环境判别，结合区域对比，认为查干哈达音亨嘎岩体源区可能与变质泥岩部分熔融有关，晚古生代，强过铝质花岗岩形成之前，二连—东乌旗一带已经发生了碰撞造山作用，之后为后碰撞-造山后的伸展扩张时期。经研究确定，查干哈达音亨嘎岩体为鲜有报道的石炭纪—早二叠世具有典型后碰撞特征的高温型强过铝质S型花岗岩类。
- S型花岗岩 /
- 高温型 /
- 锆石U-Pb年龄 /
- 后碰撞 /
- 内蒙古东乌珠穆沁旗
Abstract:
The Chaganhadayinhengga strongly peraluminous granites in East Ujimqin Banner of Inner Mongolia are located in the Xing-Meng fold belt along the central and eastern section of Central Asia-Mongolia orogenic belt between the North China plate and the Siberia plate. The main rock type is garnet-bearing two-mica monzonitic granite. Based on zircon U-Pb isotopic dating, geochemical analysis and tectonic environment discrimination in combination with regional correlation, the authors have reached the following conclusions:The source area of the Chaganhadayinhengga rock mass might have been related to the partial melting of meta-morphosed mudstone; during Late Paleozoic period, before the formation of strong peraluminous granite, even Erlian-East Ujimqin Banner area underwent collisional orogeny, and then after collision, the evolution entered into the post orogenic extension-expan-sionl period. Studies show that the Chaganhadayinhengga rock mass belongs to the Carboniferous-Early Permian typical post colli-sional high temperature type peraluminous granites rarely reported by previous researchers.
- S type granitoids /
- high temperature type /
- zircon U-Pb age /
- post collisional /
- East Ujimqin Banner

HTML全文

图 1 内蒙古东乌珠穆沁旗地区大地构造位置和地质简图(角图据参考文献[33])

Figure 1.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 含石榴子石二云母二长花岗岩手标本(a)及镜下(正交偏光)照片(b)

Figure 2.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 含石榴子石二云母二长花岗岩典型锆石阴极发光(CL)图像及年龄(Ma)

Figure 3.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 含石榴子石二云母二长花岗岩(D4029-TW1)锆石U-Pb谐和图及年龄直方图

Figure 4.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 A/CNK-A/NK图解(a)^[39]和SiO₂-K₂O图解(b)^[40]

Figure 5.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 稀土元素球粒陨石标准化配分型式图(a)^[42]和微量元素原始地幔标准化蛛网图(b)^[43]

Figure 6.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 Zr-TiO₂(a)和SiO₂-P₂O₅(b)判别图解

Figure 7.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 S型花岗岩Rb/Sr-Rb/Ba图解^[14]

Figure 8.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 含石榴子石二云母二长花岗岩单颗粒锆石U-Th-Pb激光烧蚀法测年数据(D4029-TW1)

Table 1. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Th-Pb data of garnet-bearing two-mica monzonitic granites

测点编号	含量/10^-6			Th/U	同位素比值								同位素年龄/Ma
测点编号	²⁰⁶Pb	²³²Th	²³⁸U	Th/U	²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb	1σ	²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U	1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U	1σ	²⁰⁸Pb/²³²Th	1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb	1σ	²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U	1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U	1σ	²⁰⁸Pb/²³²Th	1σ	谐和度
D4029- TW1-01	161	464	842	0.55	0.0524	0.0015	0.0475	0.0007	0.346	0.012	0.0152	0.0003	305.6	53.7	299.4	4.2	301.5	9.1	304.9	6.3	99%
D4029- TW1-02	99	336	515	0.65	0.0528	0.0014	0.0475	0.0004	0.344	0.010	0.0152	0.0002	305.6	61.1	298.9	2.7	300.1	7.4	304.9	4.3	99%
D4029- TW1-03	251	434	1323	0.33	0.0523	0.0011	0.0477	0.0006	0.347	0.010	0.0146	0.0003	283.4	37.0	300.4	3.6	302.5	7.4	292.0	5.1	99%
D4029- TW1-04	395	562	1993	0.28	0.0494	0.0011	0.0486	0.0006	0.333	0.009	0.0147	0.0003	189.0	33.3	306.2	3.5	292.1	7.1	295.2	6.5	95%
D4029- TW1-05	48	157	250	0.63	0.0588	0.0032	0.0485	0.0009	0.390	0.022	0.0149	0.0006	479.7	75.0	305.2	5.5	334.0	16.0	299.9	11.1	90%
D4029- TW1-06	162	414	847	0.49	0.0651	0.0016	0.0473	0.0007	0.429	0.015	0.0171	0.0003	772.2	55.6	297.9	4.3	362.5	10.3	343.5	6.8	80%
D4029- TW1-07	144	619	740	0.84	0.0549	0.0016	0.0472	0.0005	0.360	0.012	0.0151	0.0003	409.3	44.4	297.4 0	3.3	312.1	8.8	303.6	5.8	95%
D4029- TW1-08	462	416	2460	0.17	0.0572	0.0014	0.0471	0.0009	0.374	0.013	0.0214	0.0004	498.2	25.9	297.0	5.4	322.9	9.3	427.9	8.5	91%
D4029- TW1-09	210	406	1079	0.38	0.0531	0.0012	0.0472	0.0006	0.347	0.009	0.0156	0.0004	344.5	40.7	297.6	3.5	302.7	7.0	312.4	7.1	98%
D4029- TW1-10	182	502	969	0.52	0.0632	0.0020	0.0465	0.0004	0.398	0.012	0.0168	0.0002	716.7	166.7	293.3	2.7	340.1	8.4	336.3	4.9	85%
D4029- TW1-11	229	445	1128	0.39	0.0818	0.0022	0.0494	0.0007	0.545	0.014	0.0281	0.0010	1328. 7	58.3	310.6	4.4	441.8	9.2	560.4	19.3	65%
D4029- TW1-12	166	334	763	0.44	0.0564	0.0017	0.0508	0.0008	0.395	0.013	0.0159	0.0003	450.1	52.8	319.4	5.0	338.1	9.7	318.8	6.4	94%
D4029- TW1-13	403	448	1966	0.23	0.0533	0.0007	0.0469	0.0005	0.346	0.006	0.0158	0.0002	346.4	26.9	295.2	2.8	301.6	4.9	317.0	4.5	97%
D4029- TW1-14	164	378	733	0.52	0.0539	0.0013	0.0506	0.0005	0.378	0.010	0.0161	0.0002	361.2	56.5	318.3	2.8	325.4	7.5	323.4	4.9	97%
D4029- TW1-15	253	537	1168	0.46	0.0584	0.0015	0.0485	0.0006	0.395	0.013	0.0156	0.0003	538.9	51.9	305.4	3.9	338.3	9.3	313.4	5.2	90%

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 主量、微量和稀土元素含量及特征参数

Table 2. Major, trace element and REE composition for garnet-bearing two-mica monzonitic granites

含量	D4029-H1	D4142-H1	D4140-H1	D4139-H1	D4137-H1	D4136-H1	D4135-H1
SiO₂	75.57	74.73	74.24	74.8	74.18	75.11	75.69
TiO₂	0.051	0.033	0.042	0.044	0.053	0.061	0.039
Al₂O₃	13.59	14	13.78	13.8	13.69	13.52	13.65
Fe₂O₃	1.29	1.59	1.7	1.42	1.73	1.72	1.1
FeO	0.9	1.15	1.2	0.8	0.8	0.85	1
MnO	0.11	0.12	0.081	0.078	0.022	0.126	0.073
MgO	0.09	0.061	0.083	0.099	0.11	0.103	0.067
CaO	0.42	0.37	0.36	0.46	0.42	0.51	0.37
Na₂O	4.11	4.18	3.9	4.08	3.68	3.66	3.76
K₂O	4.34	4.06	4.35	3.94	4.88	4.21	4.21
P₂O₅	0.12	0.12	0.25	0.12	0.092	0.12	0.129
烧失量	0.22	0.5	1.01	0.93	0.94	0.69	0.9
总量	100.8	100.9	100.9	100.5	100.5	100.6	100.9
K₂O+Na₂O	8.45	8.24	8.25	8.02	8.56	7.87	7.97
K₂O/Na₂O	1.06	0.97	1.12	0.97	1.33	1.15	1.12
A/CNK	1.112	1.172	1.17	1.168	1.131	1.175	1.196
刚玉(C)	1.65	2.33	2.6	2.28	1.82	2.3	2.54
SI	0.84	0.55	0.74	0.96	0.99	0.98	0.66
AR	4.04	3.69	3.8	3.57	4.08	3.56	3.63
σ43	2.2	2.14	2.18	2.02	2.35	1.93	1.94
DI	93.62	92.52	92.65	92.72	93	91.93	93.18
Sc	4.58	5.72	4.18	4.43	3.05	3.58	3.96
Cr	17	15.5	20.1	23.9	23.6	16.2	12.6
Co	0.796	1.04	1.89	1.34	1.52	1.59	0.841
Ni	2.19	3.7	4.76	3.78	3.99	4.97	2.77
Rb	312	348	290	255	208	229	304
Nb	13	14.9	10.4	12.6	6.34	6.5	8.19
Ta	2.68	1.56	1.56	1.79	0.561	1.26	1.9
Th	6.63	8.42	7.73	7.78	6.29	5.58	6.07
Ba	35.6	19.6	60.4	62.9	63.3	87.1	35.4
Sr	19.1	10.9	25.9	35.1	36.5	36.5	14.8
V	2.75	3.9	5.52	7.05	8.36	17.6	7.23
Zr	44.5	53.1	62.1	61.9	51.6	56.8	43.4
Hf	2.52	3.58	3.16	3.1	2.5	2.66	2.63
K	36012.77	33689.36	36095.74	32693.62	40493.62	34934.04	34934.04
P	523.94	523.94	1091.55	523.94	401.69	523.94	563.24
Ti	306	198	252	264	318	366	234
Rb/Sr	16.335	31.927	11.197	7.265	5.699	6.274	20.541
Rb/Ba	8.764	17.755	4.801	4.054	3.286	2.629	8.588
Sr/Ba	0.537	0.556	0.429	0.558	0.577	0.419	0.418
Zr/Hf	17.659	14.832	19.652	19.968	20.64	21.353	16.502
Zr/Th	6.712	6.306	8.034	7.956	8.203	10.179	7.15
La	4.52	3.45	6.19	5.94	6.15	6.88	3.83
Ce	10.8	9.01	14.9	12.5	13.4	15.4	9.28
Pr	1.38	1.24	1.86	1.66	1.66	1.96	1.19
Nd	5.65	5.22	7.41	7.1	6.27	6.56	4.61
Sm	2.05	2.25	2.71	2.77	1.81	1.92	1.51
Eu	0.093	0.021	0.115	0.269	0.128	0.213	0.077
Gd	1.95	2.17	2.2	3.74	1.81	1.69	1.25
Tb	0.483	0.611	0.58	0.992	0.457	0.367	0.259
Dy	2.73	3.29	3.32	5.83	2.83	2.3	1.69
Ho	0.441	0.521	0.559	1.15	0.514	0.404	0.243
Er	1.2	1.38	1.74	3.71	1.6	1.21	0.651
Tm	0.217	0.248	0.336	0.67	0.308	0.252	0.137
Yb	1.43	1.59	2.5	4.81	2.34	1.68	1.08
Lu	0.206	0.211	0.367	0.747	0.345	0.251	0.142
Y	15.2	17.2	16	31.6	15	12.3	7.21
ΣREE	33.15	31.21	44.79	51.89	39.62	41.09	25.95
LREE	24.49	21.19	33.19	30.24	29.42	32.93	20.5
HREE	8.66	10.02	11.6	21.65	10.2	8.15	5.45
LREE/HREE	2.83	2.11	2.86	1.4	2.88	4.04	3.76
(La/Yb)_N	3.16	2.17	2.48	1.23	2.63	4.1	3.55
δEu	0.14	0.03	0.14	0.26	0.21	0.35	0.17
δCe	1.03	1.05	1.05	0.94	0.99	1	1.04
注：主量元素含量单位为%，微量和稀土元素含量为10^-6

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(55)

[1]	Shand S J.Eruptive Rock[M]. Murby London, 1927:1-230.
[2]	Pitcher W S. Granite type and tectonic environment[C]//K Hsu. Mountain Building Processes. London, Academic Press, 1983: 19-40.
[3]	Pearce J A, Harris N B W, Tindle A G. Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rock[J].J.Petrol., 1984, 25:956-983. doi: 10.1093/petrology/25.4.956
[4]	Miller C F. Are strongly peraluminous magmas derived from politic sedimentary sources?[M]. Journal of Geology, 1985, 93: 673-689.
[5]	Miller C F, Bradfish L J.An inner cordilleran belt of muscovite-ber-ing plutons[J].Geology, 1980, 8(9):412-416. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1980)8<412:AICBOM>2.0.CO;2
[6]	Zen E A.Aluminium enrichment in silicate melts by fractional crys-tallization:some mineralogical and petrographic constraints[J]. Jour-nal of Petrology, 1986, 27:1095-1117. doi: 10.1093/petrology/27.5.1095
[7]	Barbarin B, Didier J.Genesis and evolution of mafic magmatic enclaves through various types of interaction between coevalfelsic and mafic magmas[J]. Trans.R.Soc. Edinbuegh Earth. Sci., 1992, 83:145-153. doi: 10.1017/S0263593300007835
[8]	Barbarin B.Genesis of the two main types of peraluminous granit-oids[J]. Geology, 1996, 24:295-298. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1996)024<0295:GOTTMT>2.3.CO;2
[9]	Barbarin B A. Review of the relation ships between granitoid types, their origins and their geodynamic environments[J]. Lithos, 1999, 46(3):605-626. doi: 10.1016/S0024-4937(98)00085-1
[10]	邓晋福, 赵海玲, 莫宣学, 等.白云母-二云母花岗岩形成与陆内俯冲作用[J].地球科学, 1994, 19(2):139-147. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/94035X/199402/1308927.html
[11]	Patino Douce A E.Experiment algeneration of hybrid silicicmelts by reaction of high Albasalt with metamorphic rocks[J].Geophys. Res., 1995, 100:623-639.
[12]	Patino Douce A E.Generation of metaluminous A typegranites by low-pressure melting of calcalkaline granitoids[J].Geology, 1997, 25:743-746. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0743:GOMATG>2.3.CO;2
[13]	Cottin J Y, Lorand J P, Agrinier P, et al. Isotopic(O.Sr.Nd) and trace element geochemistry of the Laouni Layeredint rusions (PanAfrican belt, Hoggar, Algeria):evidence for post-collisional conti-nental tholeiitic magmas variably contaminated by continental crust[J].Lithos, 1998, 45:197-222. doi: 10.1016/S0024-4937(98)00032-2
[14]	Sylvester P J.Post-collisional strongly peraluminous granites[J].lith-os, 1998, 45:29-44.
[15]	Chappell B W.Aluminium saturation in I-and S-type granites and the characterization of factionated haplogranites[J].Lithos, 1999, 46:535-552. doi: 10.1016/S0024-4937(98)00086-3
[16]	San deman H A, Clarke A H.Glass-rich, cordierit e-biotite Rhyoda-cite, Valle Ninahuisa, Puno, SE peru:petrological evidence for hy-bridization of "Lachlan S-type" and potas sicmafic magmas[J].Pet-rol., 2003, 44:355-385.
[17]	Healy B, Collins W J, Richards S W.A hybrid origin for Lachl an Stype granites:the Murrum bidgee Bath olith example[J].Lithos., 2004, 78:197-216. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2004.04.047
[18]	Trumbull R B, Harris C, Frindt S, et al.Oxygen and neodymium isotope evidence for source diversity in Cretaceous an orogenic granites from Namibia and implications for A-type granite gen-esis[J]. Lithos, 2004, 73(1):21-40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283575635_Characterization_and_origin_of_the_Taishanmiao_aluminous_A-type_granites_Implications_for_Early_Cretaceous_lithospheric_thinning_at_the_southern_margin_of_the_North_China_Craton
[19]	李锦轶, 张进, 杨天南, 等.北亚造山区南部及其毗邻地区地壳构造分区与构造演化[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2009, 39(4):584-605. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-CCDZ200904002.htm
[20]	张万益, 聂凤军, 江思宏, 等.内蒙古东乌珠穆沁旗岩浆活动与金属成矿作用[M].北京:地质出版社, 2007:1-120.
[21]	王治华, 葛良胜, 孙磊, 等.内蒙古1017高地银多金属矿床地质地球化学特征及成因探讨[J].矿物岩石, 2015, 3:27-38. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-KCDZ2014S1288.htm
[22]	胡朋, 聂凤军, 赫英, 等.内蒙古沙麦岩体:正ε_Nd(t)值的过铝质花岗岩[J].岩石学报, 2006, 22(11):781-790.
[23]	张万益. 内蒙古东乌珠穆沁旗岩浆活动与金属成矿作用[D]. 中国地质科学院博士学位论文, 2008: 22-24.
[24]	刘建峰, 迟效国, 张兴洲, 等.内蒙古西乌旗南部石炭纪石英闪长岩地球化学特征及其构造意义[J].地质学报, 2009, 83(3):365-376. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dizhixb200903006
[25]	徐佳佳, 赖勇, 崔栋, 等.内蒙古前进场岩体岩石学与锆石U-Pb年代学研究[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 48(4):617-628. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-BJDZ201405008.htm
[26]	张玉清, 许立权, 康小龙, 等.内蒙古东乌珠穆沁旗京格斯台碱性花岗岩年龄及意义[J].中国地质, 2009, 36(5):988-995. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90050X/200905/32176234.html
[27]	何付兵, 徐吉祥, 谷晓丹, 等.内蒙古东乌珠穆沁旗阿木古楞复式花岗岩体时代、成因及地质意义[J].地质论评, 2013, 59(6):1150-1164. http://www.oalib.com/paper/4884796
[28]	王治华, 常春郊, 王梁, 等.内蒙古1017高地银多金属矿床⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar年龄及地质意义[J].地球化学, 2013, 42(6):589-598.
[29]	程银行, 李艳锋, 李敏, 等.内蒙古东乌旗碱性侵入岩的时代、成因及地质意义[J].地质学报, 2014, 88(11):2086-2096. http://www.oalib.com/paper/4875210
[30]	程银行, 李敏, 张天福, 等.西伯利亚板块东南缘晚古生代伸展体制新证据:东乌旗角闪辉长岩年代学及地球化学研究[J].地质学报, 2015, 89(2):262-271.
[31]	杨俊泉, 张素荣, 刘永顺, 等.内蒙古东乌旗莫合尔图石炭纪闪长岩的发现:来自锆石U-Pb年代学的证据[J].现代地质, 2014, 28(3):472-477. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-KWYS201303015.htm
[32]	李可, 张志诚, 冯志硕, 等.兴蒙造山带中段北部晚古生代两期岩浆活动及其构造意义[J].地质学报, 2015, 89(2):272-288. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95080X/201502/664015627.html
[33]	洪大卫, 黄怀曾, 肖宜君, 等.内蒙古中部二叠纪碱性花岗岩及其地球动力学意义[J].地质学报, 1994, 68(3):219-230. http://www.oalib.com/paper/4874630
[34]	Liu Y S, Gao S, Hu Z C, et al. Continental and oceanic crust recy-cling-induced melt-peridotite interactions in the Trans-North Chi-na orogen:U-Pb dating, Hf isotopes and trace elements in zircons fran mantle Xenoliths[J]. Journal of Petrology, 2009, 51:537-571.
[35]	Ludwig K R.Users manual for Isoplot/EX(Rev.2.49):Ageochrono-logical toolkit for Microsoft Exec[J].Berkeley Geochronology Cen-ter Special Pulication, 2001:1-55.
[36]	吴元保, 郑永飞.锆石成因矿物学研究及其对U-Pb年龄解释的制约[J].科学通报, 2004, 49(16):1589-1604. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2004.16.002
[37]	Williams I S, Buick A, Cartwright I.An extended episode episode of early Mesoproterozic metamorphic fluid flow in the Reynold Re-gion, central Australia[J].Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 1996, 14:29-47.
[38]	Belousova E A, Griffin W L, Oreilly S Y.Igneous zircon:trace ele-ment composition as indicator of source rock type[J].Contribution to Mineralogy and Petrology, 2002, 143:602-622. doi: 10.1007/s00410-002-0364-7
[39]	Maniar P D, Piccolip M.Tectonic discrimination of granitoids[J]. Bulletin of the GeologicalSociety of America, 1989, 101(5):635-643. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1989)101<0635:TDOG>2.3.CO;2
[40]	Peccerillo A, Taylor S R.Geochemistry of Eocene calcalkaline volca-nic rocks from the Kastamonu area, northern Turkey[J]. Contribu-tions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1976, 58(1):63-81. doi: 10.1007/BF00384745
[41]	史长义, 鄢明才, 池清华.中国花岗岩类化学元素丰度[M].北京:地质出版社, 2008:1-124.
[42]	Boynton W V. Geochemistry of the rare earth elements:meteorite studies[M]. Amsterdam:Elservier, 1984:63-114.
[43]	Mcdonough W F, Sun S S, Ringwood A E, et al.Potassium, rubidium, and cesium in the earth and moon and the evolution of the mantle of the earth[J].Geochimicaet CosmochimicaActa, 1992, 56(3):1001-1012. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(92)90043-I
[44]	肖庆辉, 邓晋福, 马大铨, 等.花岗岩研究思维与方法[M].北京:地质出版社, 2002:1-294.
[45]	Chappell B W, White A J R.Two constrasting granite type[J].Pacif-ic Geology, 1974, 8:173-174. http://faculty.uml.edu/Nelson_Eby/Research/A-type%20granites/Chappell%20and%20White%20S%20and%20I%20type%20granites.pdf
[46]	肖庆辉.当代地质科学前沿研究领域[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社, 1993:145-153.
[47]	陈斌, 赵国春, Wilde S.内蒙古苏尼特左旗南两类花岗岩同位素年代学及其构造意义[J].地质论评, 2001, 47(4):361-366. http://doi.wanfangdata.com.cn/10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.2001.04.005
[48]	石玉若, 刘敦一, 张旗, 等.内蒙古苏左旗地区闪长-花岗岩类SHRIMP年代学[J].地质学报, 2004, 78(6):789-799. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200406009.htm
[49]	石玉若, 刘敦一, 张旗, 等.内蒙古苏左旗白音宝力道Adakite质岩类成因探讨及其SHRIMP年代学研究[J].岩石学报, 2005, 21(01):145-152. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-KYDH201401002.htm
[50]	Jian P, Krner A, Windley B F, et al. Carboniferous and Cretaceous mafic-ultramafic massifs in inner Mongolia(China):A SHRIMP zircon and geochemical study of the previously Presumed integral "Hegenshan ophiolite"[J]. Lithos, 2012, 142:48-66.
[51]	薛怀民, 郭利军, 侯增谦, 等.中亚-蒙古造山带东段的锡林郭勒杂岩:早华力西期造山作用的产物而非古老陆块?锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年代学证据[J].岩石学报, 2009, 25(8):2001-2010.
[52]	薛怀民, 郭利军, 侯增谦, 等.大兴安岭西南坡成矿带晚古生代中期未变质岩浆岩的SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年代学[J].岩石矿物学杂志, 2010, 29(6):811-823.
[53]	施光海, 刘敦一, 张福勤, 等.中国内蒙古锡林郭勒杂岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年代学及意义[J].科学通报, 2003, 48(20):2187-2192. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2003.20.017
[54]	程银行, 滕学建, 辛后田, 等.内蒙古东乌旗狠麦温都尔花岗岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年龄及其地质意义[J].岩石矿物学杂志, 2012, 31(3):323-334. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLX200001005.htm
[55]	Zhang Z C, Li J F, Tang W H, et al. Geochronology and Geochemis-try of the Eastern Erenhotophiolitic complex:Implications for the tec-tonic evolution of the Inner Mongolia-Daxinganling Orogenic Belt[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2015, 97:279-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2014.06.008