The new stratigraphic evidence for structural reconstruction of strike-slip shifting of two sides of Tanlu fault
-
摘要:
郯庐断裂被认为是大型左行走滑断裂带以来，经多年研究已成为研究程度相当高的构造带。因其两盘构造复位依据粗略，长期存在争议。对断裂两盘构造复位所提出的地层新依据，来自怀远运动推进方向的独特性，现已查明，它是一次由南向北逐次推进的翘板式差异性抬升，三山子组南北向巨型白云质地层穿时体，实为该运动推进全程的完整沉积记录。三山子组底界南部从张夏组顶面→中部从寒武系顶面→北部从亮甲山组顶面依次有序升高，从而在张夏组与下马家沟组之间的不同时期地层，出现了毗邻不同岩相带南北相间，同一岩相带东西延伸的现象。经地层与岩相特征的对比分析，郯庐断裂两盘间，大连与莒县-新泰、白山-本溪与唐山原分别为东西一线2个时期不同深水槽盆的中心带。这2个构造复位的地层标志层层位准确，厚度不大且特征鲜明。据其复位断层两盘经向（南北）错距，南部（大别山-苏鲁超高压变质带）500km，据地层依据的错距中部440km，北部210~310km，表明断层东盘盘内有南小北大的推覆缩距。
Abstract:Tanlu fault zone have been studied for several years and have become high research level tectonic belt since it was believed to be a large sinistral strike-slip fault. This paper provides a new stratigraphic evidence on structural reconstruction of two sides of the fault, which seems to have resulted from peculiar marching direction of Huaiyuan movement. According to identification, Sanshanzi Formation as a large-scale dolomitic diachronous stratum distributed from south to north resulted from the diverse uplift with warped plate style from south to north by Huanyuan movement, and completely recorded the whole pushing process. The lower boundary of Sanshanzi Formation orderly started to rise, and successively overlay the top surface of Zhangxia Formation (Middle Cambrian), Fengshang Formation (Upper Cambrian) and Liangjiashan Formation (Lower Ordovician) from southern part to central part, then to northern part, which caused different adjacent lithofacies in south-north direction and the same lithofacies extended ineast-westdirection between Zhangxia Formation and Xiamajiagou Formation. Two sides of the Tanlu fault (Dalian and Juxian, Xintai; Baixian, Benxi and Tangshan) were central zones of two deep-water trough basins, as shown by contrastive analysis of stratigraphic and lithofacies characteristics. The two key beds with small thickness have accurate horizon and obvious characteristics for structural reconstruction. The staggered distance of two sides of the reset fault is 500km in the southern part (Dabie Mountain-Sulu ultrapressure metamorphic belt), the staggered distance of the central partis 440km, and that of the northern part is 210-310km, which indicates that the overthrust shortening distance is small in the southern part and is large in the northern part on the eastern wall of the fault.
-
-
表 1 毗邻郯庐断裂带各主要地点间经向（南北）距离
Table 1. The north-south distance between the main points adjacent to Tanlu fault zone
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 远离郯庐断裂带各重要地点间经向（南北）距离
Table 2. The north-south distance between the main points far away from Tanlu fault zone
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 徐嘉炜.郯庐断裂带的平移运动及其意义[C]//国际质交流学术论文集(Ⅰ).北京: 地质出版社, 1980, 1: 129-142.
[2] 葛肖虹, 马文璞.中国区域大地构造学教程[M].北京:地质出版社, 2014.
[3] 陈丕基.郯庐断裂巨大平移的时代与格局[J].科学通报, 1988, (4):289-293. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000001999073
[4] 段吉业, 安素兰, 刘鹏举, 等.华北板块东部寒武纪地层、动物群及古地理[M].香港:雅园出版社, 2005.
[5] 段吉业, 曹成润, 段冶, 等.华北板块东部早古生代动物群、沉积相及地层多重划分[M].北京:科学出版社, 2015.
[6] 乔秀夫.对郯庐断裂巨大平移之质疑[J].地质评论, 1981, 27(3):222-224. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000000370873
[7] 汤加富, 许卫.郯庐断裂南段并无巨大平移——来自安徽境内的证据[J].地质评论, 2002, 48(5):449-456. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzlp200205001
[8] 葛肖虹, 马文璞, 刘俊来, 等.对中国大陆构造格架的讨论[J].中国地质, 2009, 36(5):949-965 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2009.05.001
[9] 王鸿祯, 杨森楠, 刘本培, 等.中国及邻区构造古地理和生物古地理[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社, 1990.
[10] 安太庠, 马文璞.中朝地台的中奥陶统-下石炭统及其古地理和构造含意[J].地球科学, 1993, 18(6):777-791. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000000260272
[11] 徐嘉炜.中国东部中生代平移断裂的变格作用[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版), 1986, 8(3):20-30. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/324902
-
图(2)
表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 494
- PDF下载数: 3
- 施引文献: 0