地质灾害风险评估在国土空间规划中的应用

马红娜, 刘江, 冯卫, 王化齐, 李彦娥, 孙巧银. 2023. 地质灾害风险评估在国土空间规划中的应用——以陕北榆林高西沟为例. 西北地质, 56(3): 223-231. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2023058
引用本文: 马红娜, 刘江, 冯卫, 王化齐, 李彦娥, 孙巧银. 2023. 地质灾害风险评估在国土空间规划中的应用——以陕北榆林高西沟为例. 西北地质, 56(3): 223-231. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2023058
MA Hongna, LIU Jiang, FENG Wei, WANG Huaqi, LI Yan’e, SUN Qiaoyin. 2023. Application of Geological Hazard Risk Assessment in Territorial Space Planning: A Case Study of Gaoxigou Village in Yulin City of Northern Shaanxi Province. Northwestern Geology, 56(3): 223-231. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2023058
Citation: MA Hongna, LIU Jiang, FENG Wei, WANG Huaqi, LI Yan’e, SUN Qiaoyin. 2023. Application of Geological Hazard Risk Assessment in Territorial Space Planning: A Case Study of Gaoxigou Village in Yulin City of Northern Shaanxi Province. Northwestern Geology, 56(3): 223-231. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2023058

地质灾害风险评估在国土空间规划中的应用

  • 基金项目: 中国地质调查局项目“丝绸之路境内段(新疆)资源环境承载能力监测评价”(DD20221731),西安市科技产业化计划项目“自然资源综合监管与监测预警系统研发”(XA2020-RGZNTJ-0061)联合资助
详细信息
    作者简介: 马红娜(1979−),女,高级工程师,主要从事水工环地质调查工作。E−mail:54459589@qq.com
    通讯作者: 刘江(1985−),男,副研究员,主要从事水工环地质调查工作。E−mail:liujiang689@163.com
  • 中图分类号: P642

Application of Geological Hazard Risk Assessment in Territorial Space Planning: A Case Study of Gaoxigou Village in Yulin City of Northern Shaanxi Province

More Information
  • 榆林市米脂县高西沟村位于黄土高原丘陵沟壑区,属于地质灾害多发区,因此,考虑地质灾害风险的国土空间规划具有极其重要的意义。笔者基于地质灾害调查数据,选取坡度、坡向、地质灾害发育密度等评价指标,采用信息量模型以斜坡单元进行危险性评价,在此基础上叠加承灾体易损性进行定量风险评价,划定地质灾害风险分区。利用ArcGIS将地质灾害风险区划与现状功能区叠加,将高西沟重构为4个国土空间分区:地质灾害中风险–生活居住区、地质灾害低风险–生态功能区、地质灾害低风险–农业生产区和沟谷区,并提出国土空间优化策略。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  研究区水系图

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  研究区地貌图

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  陕北榆林高西沟崩塌隐患示意图

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  高西沟地质灾害危险性评价指标图

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  高西沟地质灾害危险性分区图

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  高西沟地质灾害风险区划图

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  高西沟地质灾害风险区划图(局部放大)

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  高西沟现状功能分区图

    Figure 8. 

    图 9  基于地质灾害风险区划的国土空间分区图

    Figure 9. 

    表 1  信息量值对应危险性等级及灾点分布的对比表

    Table 1.  Comparison of information value corresponding to risk grade and disaster point distribution

    危险性
    等级
    信息
    量值
    面积
    (km2
    面积所
    占比例(%)
    崩塌
    数(个)
    崩塌所
    占比例(%)
    危险性中2.401~6.0150.85020.892076.9
    危险性低0~2.4010.93222.90623.1
    危险性极低−2.171~02.13352.4000
    沟谷区00.1553.8100
    总计4.0710026100
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  高西沟地质灾害风险评价结果表

    Table 2.  Risk assessment results of geological hazards in Gaoxigou

    风险源
    编号
    发生
    概率P(L)
    到达
    概率P(T:L)
    承灾体
    时空概率P(T)
    财产易
    损性V(prop)
    人员易
    损性V(D)
    承灾体价值
    E(万元)
    财产年损失
    R(prop)(万元/a)
    单人年死亡
    概率P(LoL)
    1号10−41.00.6250.50.2600.00191.25×10−5
    2号10−31.00.6250.60.3300.01131.88×10−4
    3号10−41.00.6250.50.31000.00311.88×10−5
    4号10−31.00.6250.60.3200.00751.88×10−4
    5号10−31.00.6250.60.3500.01881.88×10−4
    6号10−31.00.6250.70.3150.00661.88×10−4
    7号10−41.00.6250.50.2400.00131.25×10−5
    8号10−31.00.6250.70.3600.02631.88×10−4
    9号10−31.00.6250.60.5800.03003.13×10−4
    10号10−41.00.6250.50.3900.00281.88×10−5
    11号10−41.00.6250.30.2300.00061.25×10−5
    12号10−31.00.6250.60.5800.03003.13×10−4
    13号10−41.00.6250.40.2850.00211.25×10−5
    14号10−41.00.6250.50.2900.00281.25×10−5
    15号10−31.00.6250.60.5800.03003.13×10−4
    16号10−41.00.6250.50.2500.00161.25×10−5
    17号10−41.00.6250.50.2160.00051.25×10−5
    18号10−31.00.6250.60.3180.00681.88×10−4
    19号10−41.00.6250.50.3400.00131.88×10−5
    20号10−41.00.6250.50.2300.00091.25×10−5
    21号10−41.00.6250.50.2150.00051.25×10−5
    22号10−41.00.6250.50.2380.00121.25×10−5
    23号10−31.00.6250.60.3400.01501.88×10−4
    24号10−31.00.6250.70.3800.03501.88×10−4
    25号10−41.00.6250.50.2150.00051.25×10−5
    26号10−41.00.6250.50.2850.00271.25×10−5
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    冯凡, 唐亚明, 潘学树, 等. 不同尺度下地质灾害风险评价方法探讨—以陕西吴堡县为例[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2022, 33(2): 115-124

    FENG Fan, TANG Yaming, PAN Xueshu. et al. An Attempt of Risk Assessment of Geological Hazards in Different Scales: A Case Study in Wubao County of Shaanxi Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2022, 33(2): 115-124.

    [2]

    冯旭, 王凯, 毛其智, 等. 国土空间规划体系下的乡村空间规划方法—基于规划与治理的一体化视角[J]. 城市规划, 2022, 46(11): 21-31

    FENG Xu, WANG Kai, MAO Qizhi, et al. Rural spatial planning methods in the territorial planning: from an integrated perspective of planning and governance[J]. City Planning Review, 2022, 46(11): 21-31.

    [3]

    姬永涛, 王鲜, 郝业, 等. 基于斜坡单元的陕西省城镇地质灾害风险调查评价-以西安市蒋村街道为例[J]. 灾害学, 2022, 37(4): 000-000

    JI Yongtao, WANG Xian, HAO Ye, et al. Investigation and Evaluation of Urban Geological Hazard Risk Based on Slope Unit in Shaanxi Province: A Case Study of Jiangcun Sub-district in Xi’an City[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2022, 37(4): 000-000.

    [4]

    李畅. 基于生态环境保护的乡村发展规划策略[J]. 林业调查规划, 2022, 47(4): 170-174

    LI Chang. Rural development planning strategy based on ecological environment protection[J]. Forest Inventory and Planning, 2022, 47(4): 170-174.

    [5]

    李冠宇, 李鹏, 郭敏, 等. 基于聚类分析法的地质灾害风险评价-以韩城市为例[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2021, 21(25): 10629-10638

    LI Guanyu, LI Peng, GUO Min, et al. Application of Cluster Analysis Method in Geological Hazard Risk Assessment: A Case Study of Hancheng City[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2021, 21(25): 10629-10638.

    [6]

    卢全中, 彭建兵, 赵发锁. 地质灾害风险评估(价)研究综述[J]. 灾害学, 2003, 18(4): 59-63

    LU Quanzhong, PENG Jianbing, ZHAO Fasuo. A Review of Geological Hazard Risk Assessment[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2003, 18(4): 59-63.

    [7]

    马云飞, 邹芳, 徐海燕. 基于地质灾害风险评价的衡东县国土空间管制研究[J]. 地理信息世界, 2020, 27(6): 14-20

    MA Yunfei, ZOU Fang, XU Haiyan, et al. Land Space Control of Hengdong County Based on Geological Hazard Risk Assessment[J]. Geomatics World, 2020, 27(6): 14-20.

    [8]

    齐信, 唐川, 陈州丰, 等. 地质灾害风险评价研究[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2012, 21(5): 33-40

    QI Xin, TANG Chuan, CHEN Zhoufeng, et al. Research of Geohazards Risk Assessment[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2012, 21(5): 33-40.

    [9]

    邱维蓉, 吴帮玉, 潘学树, 唐亚明. 几种聚类优化的机器学习方法在灵台县滑坡易发性评价中的应用[J]. 西北地质, 2020, 53(1): 223-233

    QIU Weirong, WU Bangyu, PAN Xueshu, TANG Yaming. Application of Several Cluster-optimization-based Machine Learning Methods in Evaluation of Landslide Susceptibility in Lingtai County[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2020, 53(1): 223-233.

    [10]

    唐亚明, 冯卫, 毕银强, 毕俊擘. 基于风险评价的黄土滑坡分类及特征[J]. 地质通报, 2015, 34(11): 2092-2099

    Tang Ya-ming, Feng Wei, Bi Yin-qiang, Bi Jun-bo. The classification and features of loess landslide based on risk assessment [J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2015, 34(11): 2092-2099.

    [11]

    唐亚明, 张茂省, 薛强. 一种大比例尺的滑坡风险区划方法-以延安市区黄土滑坡风险评价为例[J]. 地质通报, 2011, 30(1): 166-172

    Tang Ya-ming, Zhang Mao-sheng, Xue Qiang. Landslide risk assessment methods and flow on a large scale-A case study of loess landslide risk assessment in Yan’an urban district, Shaanxi, China [J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011, 30(1): 166-172.

    [12]

    万成伟, 宋代军. 可持续的乡村振兴规划建设模式—基于海峡两岸的案例比较[J]. 城市规划, 2022, 46(6): 90-102

    WAN Chengwei, SONG Daijun. Sustainable planning and construction mode of rural revitalization: based on the comparative study of cases between ZHEJIANG and TAIWAN provinces[J]. City Planning Review, 2022, 46(6): 90-102.

    [13]

    王颖, 王志一, 纪轶群. 北京地质灾害风险评价研究[J]. 首都师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 43(3): 54-61

    WANG Ying, WANG Zhiyi, JI Yiqun. Risk Assessment of Geological Hazards in Beijing[J]. Journal of Capital Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2022, 43(3): 54-61.

    [14]

    吴树仁, 石菊松, 张春山, 等. 滑坡风险评估理论与技术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012

    WU Shuren, SHI Jusong, ZHANG Chunshan, et al. Theory and Technique of Landslide Risk Assessment[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2012.

    [15]

    解明礼, 巨能攀, 刘蕴琨, 等. 崩塌滑坡地质灾害风险排序方法研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2021, 48(5): 184-192

    XIE Mingli, JU Nengpan, LIU Yunkun, et al. A Study of the Risk Ranking Method of Landslides and Collapses[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2021, 48(5): 184-192.

    [16]

    许创智, 岳连雄, 赵文川, 等. 陕西省榆林市米脂县地质灾害详细调查报告[R]. 西安: 中国人民武装警察部队黄金第五支队, 2016

    XU Chuangzhi, YUE Lianxiong, ZHAO Wenchuan, et al. Detailed Investigation Report of Geological Disaster in Mizhi County, Yulin City, Shaanxi Province[R]. Xi’an: the Fifth Gold Detachment of Chinese People’s Armed Police Force, 2016.

    [17]

    徐继维, 张茂省, 范文. 地质灾害风险评估综述[J]. 灾害学, 2015, 30(4): 130-134

    XU Jiwei, ZHANG Maosheng, FAN Wen. A Review of Geological Hazard Risk Assessment[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2015, 30(4): 130-134.

    [18]

    杨柳, 牟鑫亮, 李晨, 等. 延安市宝塔区地质灾害风险评价[J]. 山地学报, 2020, 38(5): 679-690

    YANG Liu, MOU Xinliang, LI Chen, et al. Geological Hazard Risk Assessment of Baota District in Yan’an City[J]. Mountain Research, 2020, 38(5): 679-690.

    [19]

    杨淞月, 翁茂芝, 田华. 等. 湖北省鹤峰县城区滑坡地质灾害风险评价[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2021, 28(1): 144-155

    YANG Songyue, WENG Maozhi, TIAN Hua, et al. Landslide Risk Evaluation in the Rrban Area in Hefeng County, Hubei Province[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2021, 28(1): 144-155.

    [20]

    张茂省, 唐亚明. 地质灾害风险调查的方法与实践[J]. 地质通报, 2008, 27(8): 1205-1216

    ZHANG Maosheng, TANG Yaming. Risk Investigation Method and Practice of Geohazards [J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2008, , 27(8): 1205-1216.

    [21]

    张茂省, 薛强, 贾俊, 等. 山区城镇地质灾害调查与风险评价方法及实践[J]. 西北地质, 2019, 52(2): 125-135

    ZHANG Maosheng, XUE Qiang, JIA Jun, et al. Methods and Practices for the Investigation and Risk Assessment of Geo-hazards in Mountainous Towns[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2019, 52(2): 125-135.

    [22]

    周超, 常鸣, 徐璐, 等. 贵州省典型城镇矿山地质灾害风险[J]. 武汉大学学报·信息科学版, 2020, 45(11): 1782-1791

    ZHOU Chao, CHANG Ming, XU Lu, et al. Geological Hazard Risk of Mines in Typical Towns of Guizhou Province[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2020, 45(11): 1782-1791.

    [23]

    AGS. Landslide Risk Management Practice Note[S]. Australian Geomechanics Society, 2008, In press.

    [24]

    Fell R, Ho K K S, Lacasse S, et al. A framework for landslide risk assessment and management[A]. Hungr O, Fell R, Couture R, et al. Landslide Risk Management[C]. The International Conference on Landslide Risk Management, Vancouver, Canada, 2005.

  • 加载中

(9)

(2)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1337
  • PDF下载数:  48
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2022-09-13
修回日期:  2023-04-11
录用日期:  2023-04-11
刊出日期:  2023-06-20

目录