福建泰宁何宝山-长兴地区脉状金矿床断裂构造系统研究

郭树仁. 福建泰宁何宝山-长兴地区脉状金矿床断裂构造系统研究[J]. 地质与资源, 2021, 30(1): 37-44. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2021.01.005
引用本文: 郭树仁. 福建泰宁何宝山-长兴地区脉状金矿床断裂构造系统研究[J]. 地质与资源, 2021, 30(1): 37-44. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2021.01.005
GUO Shu-ren. STUDY ON THE FAULT SYSTEM OF HEBAOSHAN-CHANGXING VEIN GOLD DEPOSITS IN TAINING COUNTY, FUJIAN PROVINCE[J]. Geology and Resources, 2021, 30(1): 37-44. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2021.01.005
Citation: GUO Shu-ren. STUDY ON THE FAULT SYSTEM OF HEBAOSHAN-CHANGXING VEIN GOLD DEPOSITS IN TAINING COUNTY, FUJIAN PROVINCE[J]. Geology and Resources, 2021, 30(1): 37-44. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2021.01.005

福建泰宁何宝山-长兴地区脉状金矿床断裂构造系统研究

详细信息
    作者简介: 郭树仁(1992-), 男, 硕士, 主要从事地质矿产勘查和地质灾害研究工作, 通信地址广东省佛山市禅城区卫国路43号, E-mail//277157398@qq.com
  • 中图分类号: P618.51

STUDY ON THE FAULT SYSTEM OF HEBAOSHAN-CHANGXING VEIN GOLD DEPOSITS IN TAINING COUNTY, FUJIAN PROVINCE

  • 以何宝山和长兴脉状金矿床为研究对象,意在找到多级断裂构造与成矿关联,解决制约本区深部及外围找矿难题.基于矿田构造调研和室内多元信息研究分析,总结了控矿构造框架中多级断裂对不同规模成矿单元的控矿特征,建立了构造格架.主要成果如下:1)坳上-南溪及叶家断裂,为矿分布区控岩控矿构造,控制矿田的空间展布;2)朱溪、大马圩断裂,为何宝山矿田控岩控矿构造,控制矿床的空间分布;3)北东向、北西向断裂,为主要的控矿(导矿)断裂,属成矿期构造,控制矿带产出位置;4)北东东、北西向断裂,属成矿期赋矿断裂,控制矿体产出;5)朱溪、大马圩断裂为脉状金矿床边界断裂,外围成矿规模及品位锐减;6)矿体受加里东期侵入岩接触带和北东东、北西向构造控制明显,在断裂构造复合部位、不同岩性接触部位和产状变化明显处,均可能是成矿有利部位可做为找矿构造标志.

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  华南构造格架及武夷成矿带地质简图(据文献[4-5]修编)

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  中三叠世泰宁地区与何宝山金矿田构造应力机制图

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  中侏罗世—早白垩世武夷成矿带中部与何宝山金矿田构造应力机制图

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  何宝山金矿田控矿构造格架示意图

    Figure 4. 

  • [1]

    余心起, 吴淦国, 张达, 等. 北武夷地区逆冲推覆构造的特征及其控矿作用[J]. 地质通报, 2008, 27(10): 1667-1677. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD200810010.htm

    Yu X Q, Wu G G, Zhang D, et al. Thrust Nappe structure and its ore-controlling effects in the North Wuyi area, China[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2008, 27(10): 1667-1677. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD200810010.htm

    [2]

    黄春鹏. 福建省金矿成矿特征和成矿预测研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2003.

    Huang C P. Research on the metallogenic characteristics and forecast of gold deposits in Fujian Province, China[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2003.

    [3]

    陈国建. 福建泰宁何宝山金矿田成矿规律与找矿预测[J]. 福建地质, 2016, 35(1): 46-54. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJDZ201601005.htm

    Chen G J. The metallogensis and prospecting prediction of Hebaoshan gold ore field, Taining county, Fujian Province[J]. Geology of Fujian, 2016, 35(1): 46-54. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJDZ201601005.htm

    [4]

    舒良树. 华南构造演化的基本特征[J]. 地质通报, 2012, 31(7): 1035-1053. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201207004.htm

    Shu L S. An analysis of principal features of tectonic evolution in South China Block[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2012, 31(7): 1035-1053. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201207004.htm

    [5]

    姜耀辉, 陈鹤年, 陈三元. 闽西北三种新的金矿成因类型及地质特征[J]. 矿产与地质, 2000, 14(4): 209-214. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KCYD200004000.htm

    Jiang Y H, Chen H N, Chen S Y. Geological characteristics and three new genesises of gold ore deposit in north-west Fujian province[J]. Mineral Resources and Geology, 2000, 14(4): 209-214. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KCYD200004000.htm

    [6]

    Wang Y J, Fan W M, Sun M, et al. Geochronological, geochemical and geothermal constraints on petrogenesis of the Indosinian peraluminous granites in the South China Block: A case study in the Hunan Province[J]. Lithos, 2007, 96(3/4): 475-502. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024493706003033

    [7]

    于津海, 魏震洋, 王丽娟, 等. 华夏地块: 一个由古老物质组成的年轻陆块[J]. 高校地质学报, 2006, 12(4): 440-447. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2006.04.004

    Yu J H, Wei Z Y, Wang L J, et al. Cathaysia block: A young continent composed of ancient materials[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2006, 12(4): 440-447. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2006.04.004

    [8]

    刘锐, 张利, 周汉文, 等. 闽西北加里东期混合岩及花岗岩的成因: 同变形地壳深熔作用[J]. 岩石学报, 2008, 24(6): 1205-1222. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200806006.htm

    Liu R, Zhang L, Zhou H W, et al. Petrogenesis of the Caledonian migmatites and related granites in northwestern Fujian province, south China: syn-deformational crustal anatexis[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2008, 24(6): 1205-1222. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200806006.htm

    [9]

    陈国建, 张伟波, 刘江涛. 福建省泰宁县何宝山金矿床长兴岩体锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb年龄及其地质意义[J]. 中国地质, 2015, 42(2): 547-555. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201502014.htm

    Chen G J, Zhang W B, Liu J T. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating and geological features of Changxing intrusion in the Hebaoshan gold deposit, Taining County, Fujian Province[J]. Geology in China, 2015, 42(2): 547-555. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201502014.htm

    [10]

    张芳荣, 舒良树, 王德滋, 等. 华南东段加里东期花岗岩类形成构造背景探讨[J]. 地学前缘, 2009, 16(1): 248-260. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200901034.htm

    Zhang F R, Shu L S, Wang D Z, et al. Discussions on the tectonic setting of Caledonian granitoids in the eastern segment of South China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2009, 16(1): 248-260. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200901034.htm

    [11]

    刘锐. 华夏地块前海西期地壳深熔作用——以浙闽地区为例[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学, 2009.

    Liu R. Pre-hercynian crustal anatexis in the Cathaysia block: A case study from Zhejiang and Fujian provinces[D]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences, 2009.

    [12]

    梅勇文. 武夷地区成矿地质条件与主要矿产分布规律[J]. 江西地质科技, 1996, 23(4): 151-160. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXZK199604000.htm

    Mei Y W. Metallogenic geological conditions and distribution of main mineral resources in Wuyi area[J]. Geological Science and Technology of Jiangxi, 1996, 23(4): 151-160. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXZK199604000.htm

    [13]

    宋美佳. 华南早古生代与早中生代陆内构造演化[D]. 南京: 南京大学, 2017.

    Song M J. Early Paleozoic and early Mesozoic intracontinental tectonic evolution in South China[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University, 2017.

    [14]

    舒良树, 卢华复, 贾东, 等. 华南武夷山早古生代构造事件的40Ar/39Ar同位素年龄研究[J]. 南京大学学报(自然科学), 1999, 35(6): 26-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJDZ199906002.htm

    Shu L S, Lu H F, Jia D, et al. Study of the 40Ar/39Ar isotopic age for the Early Paleozoic tectonothermal event in the Wuyishan region, South China[J]. Journal of Nanjing University (Natural Sciences), 1999, 35(6): 26-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJDZ199906002.htm

    [15]

    Yao W H, Li Z X, Li W X, et al. Corrigendum to "Post-kinematic lithospheric delamination of the Wuyi-Yunkai orogen in South China: evidence from ca. 435Ma high-Mg basalts"[J]. Lithos, 2012, 154: 115-129. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2012.06.033

    [16]

    Xia Y, Xu X S, Zou H B, et al. Early Paleozoic crust-mantle interaction and lithosphere delamination in South China Block: evidence from geochronology, geochemistry, and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopes of granites[J]. Lithos, 2014, 184-187: 416-435. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2013.11.014

    [17]

    Tong J N, Yin H F. The lower Triassic of South China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2002, 20(7): 803-815. doi: 10.1016/S1367-9120(01)00058-X

    [18]

    舒良树, 周新民, 邓平, 等. 南岭构造带的基本地质特征[J]. 地质论评, 2006, 52(2): 251-265. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP200602017.htm

    Shu L S, Zhou X M, Deng P, et al. Principal geological features of Nanling tectonic belt, South China[J]. Geological Review, 2006, 52(2): 251-265. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP200602017.htm

    [19]

    Sun T, Zhou X M, Chen P R, et al. Strongly peraluminous granites of Mesozoic in eastern Nanling Range, southern China: Petrogenesis and implications for tectonics[J]. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 2005, 48(2): 165-174. doi: 10.1360/03YD0042

    [20]

    徐先兵, 张岳桥, 贾东, 等. 华南早中生代大地构造过程[J]. 中国地质, 2009, 36(3): 573-593. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI200903009.htm

    Xu X B, Zhang Y Q, Jia D, et al. Early Mesozoic geotectonic processes in South China[J]. Geology In China, 2009, 36(3): 573-593. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI200903009.htm

    [21]

    郭春丽, 郑佳浩, 楼法生, 等. 华南印支期花岗岩类的岩石特征、成因类型及其构造动力学背景探讨[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2012, 36(3): 457-472. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK201203022.htm

    Guo C L, Zheng J H, Lou F S, et al. Petrography, genetic types and geological dynamical settings of the Indosinian Granitoids in South China[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2012, 36(3): 457-472. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK201203022.htm

    [22]

    Wang Y J, Fan W M, Cawood P A, et al. Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic constraints on multiple mantle domains for Mesozoic mafic rocks beneath the South China Block hinterland[J]. Lithos, 2008, 106(3/4): 297-308.

    [23]

    Wang Y J, Zhang Y H, Fan W M, et al. Structural signatures and 40Ar/39Ar geochronology of the Indosinian Xuefengshan tectonic belt, South China Block[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2005, 27(6): 985-998. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191814105000714

    [24]

    陈润生, 林东燕, 江剑丽. 福建早侏罗世火山作用的动力学机制及大地构造学意义探讨[J]. 福建地质, 2008, 27(2): 156-165. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJDZ200802009.htm

    Chen R S, Lin D Y, Jiang J L. Dynamical mechanism and tectonics significance of early Jurassic volcanism in Fujian Province[J]. Geology of Fujian, 2008, 27(2): 156-165. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJDZ200802009.htm

    [25]

    李建华. 华南中生代大地构造过程[D]. 北京: 中国地质科学院, 2013.

    Li J H. Mesozoic tectonic processes in South China[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, 2013.

    [26]

    李晔. 华南东南部早白垩世演化及其地质意义: 来自长乐-南澳地区变质和岩浆作用的启示[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学, 2015.

    Li Y. The early Cretaceous evolution of SE China and its tectonic implications: insights from magmatism and metamorphism in Changle-Nan'ao Metamorphic Belt[D]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences, 2015.

  • 加载中

(4)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  452
  • PDF下载数:  32
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2019-09-18
修回日期:  2019-12-04
刊出日期:  2021-02-28

目录