基于DEM数据预处理的小流域泥石流防治工程效果分析

渠敬凯, 杨为民, 申俊峰, 张春山, 万飞鹏, 马思琦, 徐传成, 唐海兵. 基于DEM数据预处理的小流域泥石流防治工程效果分析——以漳县方家沟泥石流为例[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2024, 51(4): 206-219. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202211068
引用本文: 渠敬凯, 杨为民, 申俊峰, 张春山, 万飞鹏, 马思琦, 徐传成, 唐海兵. 基于DEM数据预处理的小流域泥石流防治工程效果分析——以漳县方家沟泥石流为例[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2024, 51(4): 206-219. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202211068
QU Jingkai, YANG Weimin, SHEN Junfeng, ZHANG Chunshan, WAN Feipeng, MA Siqi, XU Chuancheng, TANG Haibing. Analysis of debris flow engineering treatment effect based on DEM data preprocessing in small watershed: A case study of Fangjiagou debris flow, Zhangxian County[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2024, 51(4): 206-219. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202211068
Citation: QU Jingkai, YANG Weimin, SHEN Junfeng, ZHANG Chunshan, WAN Feipeng, MA Siqi, XU Chuancheng, TANG Haibing. Analysis of debris flow engineering treatment effect based on DEM data preprocessing in small watershed: A case study of Fangjiagou debris flow, Zhangxian County[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2024, 51(4): 206-219. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202211068

基于DEM数据预处理的小流域泥石流防治工程效果分析

  • 基金项目: 第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究项目(2019QZKK0902)
详细信息
    作者简介: 渠敬凯(1998—),男,硕士研究生,主要从事地质灾害、成因矿物学等方面研究。E-mail:qujingkai113@163.com
    通讯作者: 杨为民(1965—),男,博士,研究员,主要从事地质灾害、构造地质等方面科研。E-mail:snon_72@163.com
  • 中图分类号: P694;P642.5

Analysis of debris flow engineering treatment effect based on DEM data preprocessing in small watershed: A case study of Fangjiagou debris flow, Zhangxian County

More Information
  • 2013年7月22日岷县—漳县6.6级地震后,漳县方家沟爆发泥石流。为减轻泥石流的潜在危害,2015年在沟内修建了三级拦挡坝和排导槽,以调节泥石流峰值流量,减轻对下游堆积扇保护对象的威胁。当前研究区防治工程是基于前期泥石流发育特征所设计,未来防治效果有待检验。在野外调查的基础上,采用双线性插值法精细化处理DEM数据,结合高精度遥感影像,重新构建了方家沟小流域的拦挡坝以及地形模型,运用FLO-2D软件模拟分析了不同降水概率条件下方家沟泥石流的运动特征和危险性,以评价方家沟泥石流防治工程治理效果。结果表明:随着降雨强度的逐渐增大,拦挡坝对于泥石流的停淤能力逐渐增强,泥石流均未越过拦挡坝;泥石流流速限制效率达到了80.1%,大大弱化了泥石流冲击破坏能力;泥石流高危险区面积降低了约45.34%,有效地减小了泥石流的影响范围。综上所述,在构建方家沟拦挡坝的模拟条件下泥石流拦挡工程治理效果显著,研究成果可为类似小流域泥石流拦挡工程可行性检验提供借鉴。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  方家沟泥石流发育特征及流域地质略图

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  结合遥感影像精细处理DEM前后TIN数据对比图

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  漳县地区年降雨量频率拟合曲线

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  50年一遇、100年一遇及200年一遇降水频率下主沟及支沟泥石流流量概化过程曲线

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  有无拦挡工程条件下不同降雨频率泥石流泥深对比

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  不同降雨频率下拦挡坝坝前100 m范围内泥深变化

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  有无拦挡工程条件下不同降雨频率泥石流流速对比

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  有无拦挡坝条件下泥石流流速变化曲线及地形剖面线

    Figure 8. 

    图 9  有无防治工程的不同降雨频率下堆积区危险性分区

    Figure 9. 

    表 1  有无防治工程的50年一遇、100年一遇以及200年一遇降雨条件下泥石流特征表

    Table 1.  The characteristics of debris flow under the conditions of 50-year event, 100-year event and 200-year event rainfall with and without prevention projects, respectively

    降雨频率 拦挡坝
    (有/无)
    泥深/m 泥石流总方量 堆积面积
    /(104 m3)
    威胁民宅面积
    /(104 m3)
    淤埋省道
    (是/否)
    最大泥深 差值 平均厚度 差值 体积/(104 m3) 差值/(104 m3) 变化量/%
    50年一遇降雨 6.47 1.17 0.76 0.27 31.58 −6.27 −19.8 41.44 9.08
    7.64 1.03 25.31 24.64 0
    100年一遇降雨 7.03 4.44 0.95 0.75 46.29 −7.95 −17.2 47.76 10.08
    11.47 1.70 38.34 27.20 0
    200年一遇降雨 7.45 7.22 1.15 0.97 66.48 −6.88 −10.3 57.92 10.92
    14.67 2.12 59.60 30.96 0
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  有无防治工程的不同降雨频率下不同泥石流流速占比

    Table 2.  Different debris flow velocity ratio with and without ptrevention project under different rainfall frequencies

    降雨频率 拦挡坝
    (有/无)
    ≤0.5 m/s 0.5~1.5 m/s 1.5~2.75 m/s 2.75~4.0 m/s
    面积
    /(104 m2
    占比/% 变化率/% 面积
    /(104 m2
    占比/% 变化率/% 面积
    /(104 m2
    占比/% 变化率/% 面积
    /(104 m2
    占比/% 变化率/%
    50年一遇降雨 12.48 30.12 −52.48 15.92 38.42 −30.09 9.92 23.94 −33.87 3.12 7.53 −67.31
    5.93 24.07 11.13 45.17 6.56 26.62 1.02 4.14
    100年一遇降雨 9.31 19.09 −41.14 19.84 40.69 −37.70 13.32 27.32 −41.44 6.29 12.90 −75.20
    5.48 20.15 12.36 45.44 7.80 28.68 1.56 5.74
    200年一遇降雨 11.56 19.96 −54.67 18.28 31.56 −25.38 19.84 34.25 −47.38 8.24 14.23 −80.10
    5.24 16.93 13.64 44.06 10.44 33.72 1.64 5.30
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  泥石流危险性分区标准

    Table 3.  Debris flow hazard zoning index

    危险性 堆积深度/m 逻辑关系 堆积深度与流速乘积
    ≥1.5 OR ≥1.5
    (0.5,1.5) AND (0.5,1.5)
    [0.01,0.5] AND [0.1,0.5]
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4  50年一遇、100年一遇以及200年一遇降雨条件下有无防治工程泥石流危险区统计

    Table 4.  Statistical values of debris flow risk area with and without prevention and control engineering under the conditions of 2%, 1% and 0.5% rainfall frequencies, respectively

    降雨频率 拦挡坝
    (有/无)
    危险区总面积
    /(104 m2
    危险区
    减少比例/%
    高危险区 中危险区 低危险区
    面积/(104 m2 占总面积比例/% 面积/(104 m2 占总面积比例/% 面积/(104 m2 占总面积比例/%
    50年一遇降雨 19.28 33.06 4.92 25.52 8.24 42.74 6.12 31.74
    28.8 9.72 33.75 9.56 33.19 9.52 33.06
    100年一遇降雨 22.44 36.32 8.08 36.01 7.8 34.76 6.56 29.23
    35.24 14.8 42.00 11.6 32.92 8.84 25.09
    200年一遇降雨 25.88 41.13 10.8 41.73 7.52 29.06 7.56 29.21
    43.96 19.76 44.95 17.0 38.67 7.2 16.38
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    陈昊东. 定西市漳县地质灾害发育特征及风险评价[J]. 资源信息与工程,2022,37(2):50 − 52. [CHEN Haodong. Development feature and risk assessment of geological hazards in Zhangxian County of Dingxi City[J]. Resource Information and Engineering,2022,37(2):50 − 52. (in Chinese with English abstract)] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5391.2022.02.015

    CHEN Haodong. Development feature and risk assessment of geological hazards in Zhangxian County of Dingxi City[J]. Resource Information and Engineering, 2022, 37(2): 50 − 52. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5391.2022.02.015

    [2]

    杨志华, 吴瑞安, 郭长宝, 等. 川西巴塘断裂带地质灾害效应与典型滑坡发育特征[J]. 中国地质,2022,49(2):355 − 368. [YANG Zhihua, WU Ruian, GUO Changbao, et al. Geo-hazard effects and typical landslide characteristics of the Batang fault zone in the western Sichuan[J]. GEOLOGY IN CHINA,2022,49(2):355 − 368. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    YANG Zhihua, WU Ruian, GUO Changbao, et al. Geo-hazard effects and typical landslide characteristics of the Batang fault zone in the western Sichuan[J]. GEOLOGY IN CHINA, 2022, 49(2): 355 − 368. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [3]

    崔鹏. 我国泥石流防治进展[J]. 中国水土保持科学,2009,7(5):7 − 13. [CUI Peng. Advances in debris flow prevention in China[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,7(5):7 − 13. (in Chinese with English abstract)] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3007.2009.05.002

    CUI Peng. Advances in debris flow prevention in China[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 7(5): 7 − 13. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3007.2009.05.002

    [4]

    谢涛,徐小林,陈洪凯. 泥石流拦挡坝研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2017,28(2):137 − 145. [XIE Tao,XU Xiaolin,CHEN Hongkai. Review and trends on debris dam research[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2017,28(2):137 − 145. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    XIE Tao, XU Xiaolin, CHEN Hongkai. Review and trends on debris dam research[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2017, 28(2): 137 − 145. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [5]

    刘军友. 基于不同方法的泥石流活动强度对比研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京),2021. [LIU Junyou. Comparative study of debris flow activity intensity based on different methods-a case study of Eryang River Basin in Minxian County,Gansu Province[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences (Beijing),2021. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LIU Junyou. Comparative study of debris flow activity intensity based on different methods-a case study of Eryang River Basin in Minxian County, Gansu Province[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [6]

    SHEN Wei,WANG Dongpo,HE Siming,et al. Numerical assessment of the impeding effect of check dams in the Hongchun debris flow gully,Sichuan Province,China[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,2020,79(6):2833 − 2845. doi: 10.1007/s10064-020-01755-5

    [7]

    丛凯,李瑞冬,毕远宏. 基于FLO-2D模型的泥石流治理工程效益评价[J]. 西北地质,2019,52(3):209 − 216. [CONG Kai,LI Ruidong,BI Yuanhong. Benefit evaluation of debris flow control engineering based on the FLO-2D model[J]. Northwestern Geology,2019,52(3):209 − 216. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    CONG Kai, LI Ruidong, BI Yuanhong. Benefit evaluation of debris flow control engineering based on the FLO-2D model[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2019, 52(3): 209 − 216. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [8]

    杜雪剑,孙书勤,赵峥,等. 基于FLO-2D模型的红椿沟泥石流工程治理效果研究[J]. 地球与环境,2016,44(3):376 − 381. [DU Xuejian,SUN Shuqin,ZHAO Zheng,et al. Research on engineering control effect on Hongchun gully debris based on FLO-2D model[J]. Earth and Environment,2016,44(3):376 − 381. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    DU Xuejian, SUN Shuqin, ZHAO Zheng, et al. Research on engineering control effect on Hongchun gully debris based on FLO-2D model[J]. Earth and Environment, 2016, 44(3): 376 − 381. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [9]

    郑定国. 基于FLO-2D的矿渣型泥石流危险性分区研究[D]. 西安:长安大学,2018. [ZHENG Dingguo. Study on risk zoning of slag debris flow based on FLO-2D[D]. Xi’an:Changan University,2018. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    ZHENG Dingguo. Study on risk zoning of slag debris flow based on FLO-2D[D]. Xi’an: Changan University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [10]

    翟龙. 北京市南窖小流域泥石流危险性评价与工程治理效果研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京),2021. [ZHAI Long. Risk assessment of debris flow in Nanjiao small watershed in Beijing and study on engineering control effect[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences,2021. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    ZHAI Long. Risk assessment of debris flow in Nanjiao small watershed in Beijing and study on engineering control effect[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [11]

    唐得胜. 基于FLO-2D模型的不同频率泥石流数值模拟研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学,2014. [TANG Desheng. Numerical simulation of debris flow with different frequencies based on FLO-2D model[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology,2014. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    TANG Desheng. Numerical simulation of debris flow with different frequencies based on FLO-2D model[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [12]

    王高峰, 高幼龙, 姚亚辉, 等 . 甘肃省白龙江流域降雨型潜在泥石流危险性预报模型[J]. 中国地质,2022,49(3):732 − 748. [WANG Gaofeng, GAO Youlong, YAO Yahui, et al. Prediction model of potential debris flow hazard of rainfall type in Bailong River Basin, Gansu Province[J]. Geology in China,2022,49(3):732 − 748. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    WANG Gaofeng, GAO Youlong, YAO Yahui, et al. Prediction model of potential debris flow hazard of rainfall type in Bailong River Basin, Gansu Province[J]. Geology in China, 2022, 49(3): 732 − 748. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [13]

    贺娟,王晓松. 基于HEC-RAS及HEC-GeoRAS的溃坝洪水分析[J]. 水利水运工程学报,2015(6):112 − 116. [HE Juan,WANG Xiaosong. Analysis of dam-break flood based on HEC-RAS and HEC-GeoRAS[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering,2015(6):112 − 116. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    HE Juan, WANG Xiaosong. Analysis of dam-break flood based on HEC-RAS and HEC-GeoRAS[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2015(6): 112 − 116. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [14]

    曹鹏举,程三友,林海星,等. DEM在构造地貌定量分析中的应用与展望[J]. 地质力学学报,2021,27(6):949 − 962. [CAO Pengju,CHENG Sanyou,LIN Haixing,et al. DEM in quantitative analysis of structural geomorphology:application and prospect[J]. Journal of Geomechanics,2021,27(6):949 − 962. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    CAO Pengju, CHENG Sanyou, LIN Haixing, et al. DEM in quantitative analysis of structural geomorphology: application and prospect[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2021, 27(6): 949 − 962. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [15]

    武广臣,刘艳,赵琴霞. 格网DEM的几种插值方法实践[J]. 辽宁科技学院学报,2012,14(1):40 − 41. [WU Guangchen,LIU Yan,ZHAO Qinxia. Several interpolation algorithms of grid DEM[J]. Journal of Liaoning Institute of Science and Technology,2012,14(1):40 − 41. (in Chinese with English abstract)] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-3723.2012.01.015

    WU Guangchen, LIU Yan, ZHAO Qinxia. Several interpolation algorithms of grid DEM[J]. Journal of Liaoning Institute of Science and Technology, 2012, 14(1): 40 − 41. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-3723.2012.01.015

    [16]

    王耀革,王鑫,朱长青. 基于双线性内插规则格网DEM地形误差模型[J]. 测绘科学技术学报,2007,24(6):419 − 421. [WANG Yaoge,WANG Xin,ZHU Changqing. A terrain error model of grid DEM based on bilinear polynomial[J]. Journal of Geomatics Science and Technology,2007,24(6):419 − 421. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    WANG Yaoge, WANG Xin, ZHU Changqing. A terrain error model of grid DEM based on bilinear polynomial[J]. Journal of Geomatics Science and Technology, 2007, 24(6): 419 − 421. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [17]

    殷志强,徐永强,陈红旗,等. 2013年甘肃岷县-漳县Ms6.6级地震地质灾害展布特征及主控因素研究[J]. 第四纪研究,2015,35(1):88 − 99. [YIN Zhiqiang,XU Yongqiang,CHEN Hongqi,et al. Study on the distribution characteristics of geohazards and the causative tectonic of the Minxian-Zhangxian Ms6.6 earthquake on 22 July,2013,Gansu,China[J]. Quaternary Sciences,2015,35(1):88 − 99. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    YIN Zhiqiang, XU Yongqiang, CHEN Hongqi, et al. Study on the distribution characteristics of geohazards and the causative tectonic of the Minxian-Zhangxian Ms6.6 earthquake on 22 July, 2013, Gansu, China[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 2015, 35(1): 88 − 99. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [18]

    田颖颖,许冲,徐锡伟,等. 2013年岷县漳县Ms6.6地震滑坡特征参数分析[J]. 地震工程学报,2013,35(4):761 − 767. [TIAN Yingying,XU Chong,XU Xiwei,et al. Analysis of parameters of landslides triggered by the Minxian-Zhangxian Ms6.6 earthquake[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal,2013,35(4):761 − 767. (in Chinese with English abstract)] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0844.2013.04.761

    TIAN Yingying, XU Chong, XU Xiwei, et al. Analysis of parameters of landslides triggered by the Minxian-Zhangxian Ms6.6 earthquake[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 2013, 35(4): 761 − 767. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0844.2013.04.761

    [19]

    郑文俊,袁道阳,何文贵,等. 甘肃东南地区构造活动与2013年岷县—漳县MS6.6级地震孕震机制[J]. 地球物理学报,2013,56(12):4058 − 4071. [ZHENG Wenjun,YUAN Daoyang,HE Wengui,et al. Geometric pattern and active tectonics in Southeastern Gansu Province:discussion on seismogenic mechanism of the Minxian-Zhangxian MS6.6 earthquake on July 22,2013[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2013,56(12):4058 − 4071. (in Chinese with English abstract)] doi: 10.6038/cjg20131211

    ZHENG Wenjun, YUAN Daoyang, HE Wengui, et al. Geometric pattern and active tectonics in Southeastern Gansu Province: discussion on seismogenic mechanism of the Minxian-Zhangxian MS6.6 earthquake on July 22, 2013[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 56(12): 4058 − 4071. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.6038/cjg20131211

    [20]

    胡璐锦,王亮,陶坤旺. 基于不同地貌类型的DEM内插算法分析与选择[J]. 测绘与空间地理信息,2012,35(12):202 − 206. [HU Lujin,WANG Liang,TAO Kunwang. The analysis and choice of DEM interpolation algorithm based on different landform[J]. Geomatics & Spatial Information Technology,2012,35(12):202 − 206. (in Chinese with English abstract)] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5867.2012.12.074

    HU Lujin, WANG Liang, TAO Kunwang. The analysis and choice of DEM interpolation algorithm based on different landform[J]. Geomatics & Spatial Information Technology, 2012, 35(12): 202 − 206. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5867.2012.12.074

    [21]

    张腾腾. 1∶10000 DEM精细化处理方法及其应用效果分析[J]. 北京测绘,2021,35(2):212 − 216. [ZHANG Tengteng. 1∶10 000 DEM fine processing method and its application effect analysis[J]. Beijing Surveying and Mapping,2021,35(2):212 − 216. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    ZHANG Tengteng. 1∶10 000 DEM fine processing method and its application effect analysis[J]. Beijing Surveying and Mapping, 2021, 35(2): 212 − 216. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [22]

    BERTOLO P,WIECZOREK G F. Calibration of numerical models for small debris flows in Yosemite Valley,California,USA[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences,2005,5(6):993 − 1001. doi: 10.5194/nhess-5-993-2005

    [23]

    O’BRIEN J S. FLO-2D Reference manual version 2009[R]. Arizona:FLO-2D software,Inc,2009.

    [24]

    郑鑫,杨涛,师鹏飞,等. 缺资料地区日降雨空间插值方法研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电,2017(3):13 − 16. [ZHENG Xin,YANG Tao,SHI Pengfei,et al. Research on daily precipitation interpolation methods in data-lacking areas[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower,2017(3):13 − 16. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    ZHENG Xin, YANG Tao, SHI Pengfei, et al. Research on daily precipitation interpolation methods in data-lacking areas[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2017(3): 13 − 16. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [25]

    杨涛,唐川,常鸣,等. 基于数值模拟的小流域泥石流危险性评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(1):197 − 204. [YANG Tao,TANG Chuan,CHANG Ming,et al. Hazard assessment of debris flow in small watershed based on numerical simulation[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2018,27(1):197 − 204. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    YANG Tao, TANG Chuan, CHANG Ming, et al. Hazard assessment of debris flow in small watershed based on numerical simulation[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2018, 27(1): 197 − 204. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [26]

    侯圣山,曹鹏,陈亮,等. 基于数值模拟的耳阳河流域泥石流灾害危险性评价[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2021,48(2):143 − 151. [HOU Shengshan,CAO Peng,CHEN Liang,et al. Debris flow hazard assessment of the Eryang River watershed based on numerical simulation[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2021,48(2):143 − 151. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    HOU Shengshan, CAO Peng, CHEN Liang, et al. Debris flow hazard assessment of the Eryang River watershed based on numerical simulation[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2021, 48(2): 143 − 151. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [27]

    吴季寰,张春山,杨为民,等. 基于熵权变异系数融合算法和FLO-2D的朱家沟流域泥石流危险性评价[J]. 自然灾害学报,2022,31(1):81 − 91. [WU Jihuan,ZHANG Chunshan,YANG Weimin,et al. Risk assessment of debris flow in Zhujiagully watershed based on entropy weight coefficient of variation fusion algorithm and FLO-2D[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters,2022,31(1):81 − 91. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    WU Jihuan, ZHANG Chunshan, YANG Weimin, et al. Risk assessment of debris flow in Zhujiagully watershed based on entropy weight coefficient of variation fusion algorithm and FLO-2D[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2022, 31(1): 81 − 91. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [28]

    王裕宜,詹钱登,韩文亮,等. 粘性泥石流体的应力应变特性和流速参数的确定[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2003,14(1):9 − 13. [WANG Yuyi,ZHAN Qiandeng,HAN Wenliang,et al. Stress-strain properties of viscous debris flow and determination of volocity parameter[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2003,14(1):9 − 13. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    WANG Yuyi, ZHAN Qiandeng, HAN Wenliang, et al. Stress-strain properties of viscous debris flow and determination of volocity parameter[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2003, 14(1): 9 − 13. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [29]

    魏周杨. 小流域暴雨洪水计算方法分析及应用[J]. 甘肃水利水电技术,2018,54(5):11 − 13. [WEI Zhouyang. Analysis and application of storm flood calculation method in small watershed[J]. Gansu Water Resources and Hydropower Technology,2018,54(5):11 − 13. (in Chinese)]

    WEI Zhouyang. Analysis and application of storm flood calculation method in small watershed[J]. Gansu Water Resources and Hydropower Technology, 2018, 54(5): 11 − 13. (in Chinese)

    [30]

    邱恩喜,王彬,孙希望,等. 四川甘洛自勒沟泥石流运动特征及预测防治效果研究[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报,2023,43(5):934 − 945. [QIU Enxi,WANG Bin,SUN Xiwang,et al. Study on the movement characteristics and predicted prevention effect of debris flow in zile valley,Ganluo,Sichuan[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering,2023,43(5):934 − 945. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    QIU Enxi, WANG Bin, SUN Xiwang, et al. Study on the movement characteristics and predicted prevention effect of debris flow in zile valley, Ganluo, Sichuan[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2023, 43(5): 934 − 945. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [31]

    唐勤,陈兴长,柳金峰,等. 云南省德钦县直任龙曲泥石流治理工程防治效果研究[J]. 防灾减灾学报,2022,38(4):36 − 44. [TANG Qin,CHEN Xingzhang,LIU Jinfeng,et al. Effect evaluation of control projects of debris flow in zhirenlongqu,Deqin County,Yunnan Province[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Reduction,2022,38(4):36 − 44. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    TANG Qin, CHEN Xingzhang, LIU Jinfeng, et al. Effect evaluation of control projects of debris flow in zhirenlongqu, Deqin County, Yunnan Province[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Reduction, 2022, 38(4): 36 − 44. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [32]

    熊木齐,郭富赟,崔志杰,等. 甘肃省武都区马槽沟泥石流特征及其治理工程效应[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2015,51(6):831 − 836. [XIONG Muqi,GUO Fuyun,CUI Zhijie,et al. Analysis of mitigation strategies in Macaogou debris flow valley,Wudu,Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences),2015,51(6):831 − 836. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    XIONG Muqi, GUO Fuyun, CUI Zhijie, et al. Analysis of mitigation strategies in Macaogou debris flow valley, Wudu, Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 2015, 51(6): 831 − 836. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [33]

    刘波,胡卸文,何坤,等. 西藏洛隆县巴曲冰湖溃决型泥石流演进过程模拟研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2021,48(5):150 − 160. [LIU Bo,HU Xiewen,HE Kun,et al. Characteristics and evolution process simulation of the Baqu gully debris flow triggered by ice-lake outburst in Luolong County of Tibet,China[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2021,48(5):150 − 160. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LIU Bo, HU Xiewen, HE Kun, et al. Characteristics and evolution process simulation of the Baqu gully debris flow triggered by ice-lake outburst in Luolong County of Tibet, China[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2021, 48(5): 150 − 160. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [34]

    徐林荣,韩征,苏志满,等. 泥石流流速横向分布特征与防治工程结构优化[J]. 岩土力学,2012,33(12):3715 − 3720. [XU Linrong,HAN Zheng,SU Zhiman,et al. Research on lateral distribution features of debris flow velocity and structural optimization of prevention and control works[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2012,33(12):3715 − 3720. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    XU Linrong, HAN Zheng, SU Zhiman, et al. Research on lateral distribution features of debris flow velocity and structural optimization of prevention and control works[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(12): 3715 − 3720. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [35]

    曹鹏,侯圣山,陈亮,等. 基于数值模拟的群发性泥石流危险性评价——以甘肃岷县麻路河流域为例[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2021,32(2):100 − 109. [CAO Peng,HOU Shengshan,CHEN Liang,et al. Risk assessment of mass debris flow based on numerical simulation:an example from the Malu River Basin in Min County[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2021,32(2):100 − 109. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    CAO Peng, HOU Shengshan, CHEN Liang, et al. Risk assessment of mass debris flow based on numerical simulation: an example from the Malu River Basin in Min County[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2021, 32(2): 100 − 109. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [36]

    铁永波,张宪政,卢佳燕,等. 四川省泸定县Ms6.8级地震地质灾害发育规律与减灾对策[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2022,49(6):1 − 12. [TIE Yongbo,ZHANG Xianzheng,LU Jiayan,et al. Characteristics of geological hazards and it’s mitigations of the Ms6.8 earthquake in Luding County,Sichuan Province[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2022,49(6):1 − 12. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    TIE Yongbo, ZHANG Xianzheng, LU Jiayan, et al. Characteristics of geological hazards and it’s mitigations of the Ms6.8 earthquake in Luding County, Sichuan Province[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2022, 49(6): 1 − 12. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [37]

    王奎,岳方伟,朱力军. 甘肃陇南市武都区小水沟泥石流治理防治工程[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2010,21(3):46 − 51. [WANG Kui,YUE Fangwei,ZHU Lijun. Engineering treatment for debris flow at Xiaoshui Gully,in Puchi Town,Wudu District,Longnan City[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2010,21(3):46 − 51. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    WANG Kui, YUE Fangwei, ZHU Lijun. Engineering treatment for debris flow at Xiaoshui Gully, in Puchi Town, Wudu District, Longnan City[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2010, 21(3): 46 − 51. (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • 加载中

(9)

(4)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  634
  • PDF下载数:  60
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2022-11-23
修回日期:  2023-03-21
录用日期:  2023-03-22
刊出日期:  2024-07-15

目录