Selection of pioneer plants for repairing limestone high and steep slopes in North China
-
摘要:
为了遴选出适合于华北地区高陡岩质边坡生态修复的先锋植物，采用地境再造技术在济南石灰岩地区建立了2个高陡边坡生态修复试验场，试验栽植落叶、常绿及藤本类植物共14种，并对2个试验场植物的成活率和生长状况进行长期监测。在对长期监测数据分析的基础上采用综合评价指数法建立植物适宜性评价模型，并以此为依据遴选出适合于高陡岩质边坡修复的先锋植物。研究表明：常绿植物优选侧柏、圆柏及大叶扶芳藤作为先锋植物；落叶植物优选刺槐、黄栌、连翘为先锋植物；藤本类植物爬山虎因其成活率高且生长速率快，可在短期对高陡岩壁有效覆盖，优选作为先锋植物。
Abstract:In order to select pioneer plants suitable for ecological restoration of high and steep rock slopes in North China, two high-and-steep slope ecological restoration test sites were established in the limestone area of Jinan by using the technology of landscape reconstruction. The sites planted a total of 14 kinds of deciduous plants, evergreens and lianas, whose survival rate and growth status were monitored for a long period of time. The data collected was analyzed by the plant suitability evaluation model and the result is displayed in the form of the comprehensive evaluation index. According to the result, in the group of evergreens, Platycladus orientalis, juniper and fufangteng are the preferred pioneer plants; in the group of deciduous plants, Robinia pseudoacacia, Cotinus japonicus and Forsythia suspensa are the preferred ones; the vine creeper has a high survival rate and fast growth rate which can effectively cover high-and-steep rock walls in a short time. It is the preferred pioneer plant in the group of lianas.
-
-
表 1 评价因子、权值及分级指标
Table 1. Evaluation factors、weights and grading indicators
评价因子 权值 分级指标 成活率 X1=0.375 优（5），良（4），中（3），差（1） 高度年均增长率 X2=0.250 优（5），良（4），中（3），差（1） 基径年均增长率 X3=0.125 优（5），良（4），中（3），差（1） 冠幅年均增长率 X4=0.250 优（5），良（4），中（3），差（1） 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 评价因子取值表
Table 2. Values of evaluation factors
评价因子 植物分类 优（5） 良（4） 中（3） 差（1） 成活率P/% − P>85 70<P≤85 60<P≤70 P≤60 高度年均增长率K高/% 常绿植物 K高>15 12<K高≤15 10<K高≤12 K高≤10 落叶植物 K高>25 20<K高≤25 15<K高≤20 K高≤15 藤本类植物 K高>20 15<K高≤20 10<K高≤15 K高≤10 基径年均增长率K基/% 常绿植物 K基>35 30<K基≤35 25<K基≤30 K基≤25 落叶植物 K基>30 25<K基≤30 20<K基≤25 K基≤20 藤本类植物 K基>15 12<K基≤15 10<K基≤12 K基≤10 冠幅年均增长率K冠/% 常绿植物 K冠>25 20<K冠≤25 15<K冠≤20 K冠≤15 落叶植物 K冠>40 35<K冠≤40 30<K冠≤35 K冠≤30 藤本类植物 − − − −
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 章丘试验场植物综合评价指数表
Table 3. Comprehensive evaluation index of plants in Zhangqiu experimental field
植物
分类植物
名称评价因子 B 质量分数M 所属
级别B1 B2 B3 B4 常绿植物 侧柏 1.875 1.25 0.625 1.00 4.750 95.0 I 大叶扶芳藤 1.875 1.25 0.375 0.00 3.500 70.0 II 白皮松 1.875 0.75 0.125 1.00 3.750 75.0 III 落叶植物 黄栌 1.875 1.00 0.625 1.25 4.750 95.0 I 刺槐 1.875 1.25 0.625 1.25 5.000 100.0 I 连翘 1.500 1.00 0.125 0.75 3.375 67.5 II 丁香 1.125 0.75 0.375 1.00 3.250 65.0 III 藤本类植物 爬山虎 1.500 1.25 0.625 0.00 3.375 67.5 II 凌霄 0.375 1.25 0.500 0.00 2.125 42.5 IV 紫藤 0.375 1.25 0.625 0.00 2.250 45.0 IV 注：B1成活率分值；B2高度年均增长率分值；B3基径年均增长率分值；B4冠幅年均增长率分值。
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 平阴试验场植物综合评价指数表
Table 4. Comprehensive evaluation index of plants in Pingyin experimental field
植物分类 植物名称 评价因子 B 质量分数M 所属
级别B1 B2 B3 B4
常绿植物侧柏 1.875 1.25 0.625 1.00 4.750 95.0 I 圆柏 1.875 1.25 0.625 1.25 5.000 100.0 I 大叶扶芳藤 1.875 1.25 0.625 0.00 3.750 75.0 II
落叶植物黄栌 1.500 1.00 0.625 1.25 4.375 87.5 I 火炬树 1.500 0.25 0.500 0.25 2.500 50.0 IV 刺槐 1.500 1.00 0.625 1.00 4.125 82.5 I 连翘 1.875 0.75 0.375 0.50 3.500 70.0 II 藤本类植物 金银花 1.125 1.25 0.625 0.00 3.000 60.0 III 小叶扶芳藤 0.375 0.75 0.625 0.00 1.750 35.0 IV 爬山虎 1.500 1.25 0.625 0.00 3.375 67.5 II 注：B1成活率分值；B2高度年均增长率分值；B3基径年均增长率分值；B4冠幅年均增长率分值。
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 张进德,郗富瑞. 我国废弃矿山生态修复研究[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(21):7921 − 7930. [ZHANG Jinde,XI Furui. Study on ecological restoration of abandoned mines in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(21):7921 − 7930. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] 李富平,贾淯斐,夏冬,等. 石矿迹地生态修复技术研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 金属矿山,2021(1):168 − 184. [LI Fuping,JIA Yufei,XIA Dong,et al. Study status and development trends of ecological restoration techniques in abandoned quarry[J]. Metal Mine,2021(1):168 − 184. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] 张进德,田磊,裴圣良. 矿山水土污染与防治对策研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2021,48(2):157 − 163. [ZHANG Jinde,TIAN Lei,PEI Shengliang. A discussion of soil and water pollution and control countermeasures in mining area of China[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2021,48(2):157 − 163. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] 成少平,谷海红,宋文,等. 基于遥感信息的矿区生态扰动监测研究—以迁安市为例[J]. 金属矿山,2021(5):182 − 189. [CHENG Shaoping,GU Haihong,SONG Wen,et al. Study on the ecological disturbance monitoring in mining area based on remote sensing information:taking Qian’an City as an example[J]. Metal Mine,2021(5):182 − 189. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] 张海珍,王琳,聂清莉. 基于干扰理论的重庆市关闭煤矿废弃地生态修复策略与方法研究[J]. 矿业安全与环保,2020,47(4):122 − 126. [ZHANG Haizhen,WANG Lin,NIE Qingli. Study on the ecological restoration strategy and method of closed coal mine wasteland in Chongqing based on interference theory[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection,2020,47(4):122 − 126. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] 王娜,田磊,文可戈,等. 基于遥感技术的矿山生态修复调查研究—以冀东铁矿为例[J]. 金属矿山,2021(10):192 − 198. [WANG Na,TIAN Lei,WEN Kege,et al. Mine environment investigation and research based on remote sensing technology:A case study of the Jidong iron mine[J]. Metal Mine,2021(10):192 − 198. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] 李建中. 经济下行压力下的生态修复产业化问题研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2020,47(1):181 − 184. [LI Jianzhong. Study on the industrialization of ecological restoration under the downward pressure of economy[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2020,47(1):181 − 184. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] 刘育平,关凤峻. 论矿山生态修复的投融资模式[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2020,47(3):194 − 197. [LIU Yuping,GUAN Fengjun. Discussion on the investment and financing mode of mine ecological restoration[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2020,47(3):194 − 197. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 顾晓薇,张延年,张伟峰,等. 大宗工业固废高值建材化利用研究现状与展望[J]. 金属矿山,2022(1):2 − 13. [GU Xiaowei,ZHANG Yannian,ZHANG Weifeng,et al. Research status and prospect of high value building materials utilization of bulk industrial solid waste[J]. Metal Mine,2022(1):2 − 13. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.19614/j.cnki.jsks.202201001
[10] 喻永祥,何伟,李勇,等. 雪浪山横山寺西侧顺层岩质高边坡变形破坏机理与治理方案分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2020,31(2):33 − 43. [YU Yongxiang,HE Wei,LI Yong,et al. Stability evaluation and treatment measure study of high bedding rock slope on the west side of Hengshan Temple in Xuelang Mountain[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2020,31(2):33 − 43. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 张家明,陈积普,杨继清,等. 中国岩质边坡植被护坡技术研究进展[J]. 水土保持学报,2019,33(5):1 − 7. [ZHANG Jiaming,CHEN Jipu,YANG Jiqing,et al. Advances in biological protection of rock slopes in China[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,33(5):1 − 7. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 喻永祥,郝社锋,蒋波,等. 基于聚氨酯复合基材的岩质边坡客土生态修复试验研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2021,48(2):174 − 181. [YU Yongxiang,HAO Shefeng,JIANG Bo,et al. An experimental study of the ecological restoration of rock slope based on polyurethane composite-based materials[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2021,48(2):174 − 181. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 叶珊珊,张进德,潘莉,等. 基于“绿色矿山”的矿区生态环境成本核算—以华北平原某矿区为例[J]. 金属矿山,2019(4):168 − 174. [YE Shanshan,ZHANG Jinde,PAN Li,et al. Ecological environmental cost accounting of mining area based on the green mine:A case from a mining area in the North China plain[J]. Metal Mine,2019(4):168 − 174. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] 刘建,彭府华,王春毅,等. 多级框架锚索与微型抗滑桩群组合加固边坡技术[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2020,31(2):87 − 93. [LIU Jian,PENG Fuhua,WANG Chunyi,et al. Application of slope reinforcement technology of combination of multi-level lattice beams with pre-stressed anchor cable and anti-slide micropiles[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2020,31(2):87 − 93. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] 范明明,裴向军,杜杰,等. 改性糯米灰浆的室内研究及在九寨沟钙华地质裂缝修复中的应用[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2020,47(4):183 − 190. [FAN Mingming,PEI Xiangjun,DU Jie,et al. A laboratory study of modified glutinous rice mortar and its application to repair travertine geological cracks in Jiuzhaigou[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2020,47(4):183 − 190. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] 宋建伟,刘硕,袁运许,等. 铁尾矿植被混凝土配制及其植物适宜性研究[J]. 金属矿山,2021(8):170 − 177. [SONG Jianwei,LIU Shuo,YUAN Yunxu,et al. Study on the preparation of iron tailings vegetation concrete and its plant suitability[J]. Metal Mine,2021(8):170 − 177. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17] 宋京雷,何伟,郝社锋,等. 岩质边坡表层黏性客土抗裂特性试验研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2021,48(3):144 − 149. [SONG Jinglei,HE Wei,HAO Shefeng,et al. An experimental study of the anti-cracking characteristics of foreign-clay based on rock slope[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2021,48(3):144 − 149. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] 贺军亮,韦锐,李丽,等. 基于时间序列植被指数资料的承德市植被覆盖时空演变分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2020,47(6):91 − 98. [HE Junliang,WEI Rui,LI Li,et al. Temporal and spatial evolution of vegetation cover in Chengde based ontime series NDVI data[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2020,47(6):91 − 98. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] 汪芳琳,宋火保,王风芹. 升金湖湿地生物多样性及其保护对策研究[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版),2020,22(4):120 − 124. [WANG Fanglin,SONG Huobao,WANG Fengqin. Study on biodiversity characteristics of Shengjin Lake wetland and its conservation strategies[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology (Natural Sciences Edition),2020,22(4):120 − 124. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1980.2020.04.024
[20] 迟晓杰,谷海红,李富平,等. 重金属污染土壤植物修复效果评价方法—高光谱遥感[J]. 金属矿山,2019(1):16 − 23. [CHI Xiaojie,GU Haihong,LI Fuping,et al. Evaluation method for phytoremediation effect of heavy metal contaminated soil:Hyperspectral remote sensing[J]. Metal Mine,2019(1):16 − 23. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] 祝琨. 矿山土地复垦不同压实密度土壤中菌根作用机理及生态效应研究[J]. 矿业安全与环保,2021,48(4):28 − 32. [ZHU Kun. Study on mycorrhizal mechanism and ecological effect of different compaction density soil in mine land reclamation[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection,2021,48(4):28 − 32. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] 张沛沛,余洋. 采煤沉陷对土壤团聚体及其有机碳的影响[J]. 金属矿山,2020(12):203 − 209. [ZHANG Peipei,YU Yang. Effects of coal mining subsidence on soil aggregates and organic carbon[J]. Metal Mine,2020(12):203 − 209. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] 唐志尧,刘鸿雁. 华北地区植物群落的分布格局及构建机制[J]. 植物生态学报,2019,43(9):729 − 731. [TANG Zhiyao,LIU Hongyan. Distribution patterns and assembly mechanisms of plant communities in North China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2019,43(9):729 − 731. (in Chinese) doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2019.0248
[24] 徐恒力,孙自永,马瑞. 植物地境及物种地境稳定层[J]. 地球科学,2004,29(2):239 − 246. [XU Hengli,SUN Ziyong,MA Rui. Plant below-ground habitat and stable layer of plant species in habitat[J]. Earth Science,2004,29(2):239 − 246. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] 尚红,梁彩彤,任姿洁,等. 3种耐逆植物在济南山体生态修复中的应用[J]. 安徽农业科学,2018,46(35):188 − 190. [SHANG Hong,LIANG Caitong,REN Zijie,et al. Application of three kinds of adverse-resistant plants in mountain ecological restoration in Jinan[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences,2018,46(35):188 − 190. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2018.35.058
[26] 武朝菊,李建东. 浅析济南地区破损山体治理规划设计中植物配置的应用原则[J]. 山东林业科技,2008,38(2):94 − 95. [WU Zhaoju,LI Jiandong. Analysis on the application principles of plant configuration in the treatment planning and design of damaged mountain in Jinan area[J]. Journal of Shandong Forestry Science and Technology,2008,38(2):94 − 95. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2724.2008.02.039
[27] 王荷生. 华北植物区系的演变和来源[J]. 地理学报,1999,54(3):213 − 223. [WANG Hesheng. The evolution and sources of North China's flora[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,1999,54(3):213 − 223. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.1999.03.003
[28] 柴永福,许金石,刘鸿雁,等. 华北地区主要灌丛群落物种组成及系统发育结构特征[J]. 植物生态学报,2019,43(9):793 − 805. [CHAI Yongfu,XU Jinshi,LIU Hongyan,et al. Species composition and phylogenetic structure of major shrublands in North China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2019,43(9):793 − 805. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2018.0173
[29] 张杨,冯文新,董宏炳,等. 高陡岩质边坡覆绿植物生态需水量计算[J]. 安全与环境工程,2019,26(6):23 − 28. [ZHANG Yang,FENG Wenxin,DONG Hongbing,et al. Calculation of ecological water demand of reforestation plants in high-steep rock slopes[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering,2019,26(6):23 − 28. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30] 白冰珂,赵国红,尹峰,等. 高陡岩质边坡覆绿植物成活的生态因子分析—以安庆市大龙山集贤关为例[J]. 安全与环境工程,2019,26(5):33 − 39. [BAI Bingke,ZHAO Guohong,YIN Feng,et al. Ecological factor analysis of vegetation restoration on the high and steep rock slope:Taking jixianguan,Dalongshan,Anqing City as an example[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering,2019,26(5):33 − 39. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31] 周华健,冯文新,赵国红,等. 黄栌在高陡岩质边坡覆绿中的环境适应特征[J]. 湖南师范大学自然科学学报,2019,42(5):60 − 64. [ZHOU Huajian,FENG Wenxin,ZHAO Guohong,et al. Environmental adaptation characteristics of cotinus coggygria in high and steep rock slopes greening[J]. Journal of Natural Science of Hunan Normal University,2019,42(5):60 − 64. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32] 许由才. 47年生红豆树人工林生长量与林下植物多样性研究[J]. 林业勘察设计,2016,36(3):86 − 89. [XU Youcai. Study on the growth of 47-year-old red bean plantation and the diversity of underforest plants[J]. Forestry Prospect and Design,2016,36(3):86 − 89. (in Chinese)
[33] 刘大川,周磊,武建军. 干旱对华北地区植被变化的影响[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2017,53(2):222 − 228. [LIU Dachuan,ZHOU Lei,WU Jianjun. Drought impacts on vegetation changes in North China[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science),2017,53(2):222 − 228. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34] 李金航,徐程扬,朱济友,等. 黄栌幼苗在持续干旱胁迫环境中的表型适应对策[J]. 西北林学院学报,2019,34(2):28 − 34. [LI Jinhang,XU Chengyang,ZHU Jiyou,et al. Phenotypic adaptation strategy of cotinus coggygria seedlings in continuous drought environments[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2019,34(2):28 − 34. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35] 黄安文,林立,秦坤蓉,等. 基于综合评价指数法的城市道路植物配置模式评价及优化研究—以自贡市城市建成区为例[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版),2021,43(3):156 − 166. [HUANG Anwen,LIN Li,QIN Kunrong,et al. Research on evaluation and optimization of the allocation model of urban road plants based on the comprehensive evaluation index method:A case study of the urban built-up area of Zigong City[J]. Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science Edition),2021,43(3):156 − 166. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36] 韩轶华,刘艳红. 基于综合评价指数法的城市道路绿化植物景观配置评价研究—以运城市盐湖区为例[J]. 林业调查规划,2019,44(3):213 − 219. [HAN Yihua,LIU Yanhong. Evaluation for plant landscape configuration of urban road based on comprehensive evaluation index method:A case study of Yanhu District in Yuncheng City[J]. Forest Inventory and Planning,2019,44(3):213 − 219. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3168.2019.03.039
-
图(5)
表(4)
计量
- 文章访问数: 666
- PDF下载数: 26
- 施引文献: 0