中国地质环境监测院
中国地质灾害防治工程行业协会
主办

基于突变理论的湟水河流域崩滑易发性评价

李彬, 周金喜, 吴钶桥, 马建全, 祁汉文. 基于突变理论的湟水河流域崩滑易发性评价[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2023, 34(6): 116-126. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202212009
引用本文: 李彬, 周金喜, 吴钶桥, 马建全, 祁汉文. 基于突变理论的湟水河流域崩滑易发性评价[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2023, 34(6): 116-126. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202212009
LI Bin, ZHOU Jinxi, WU Keqiao, MA Jianquan, QI Hanwen. Assessment of landslide susceptibility in the Huangshui River Basin based on catastrophe theory[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2023, 34(6): 116-126. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202212009
Citation: LI Bin, ZHOU Jinxi, WU Keqiao, MA Jianquan, QI Hanwen. Assessment of landslide susceptibility in the Huangshui River Basin based on catastrophe theory[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2023, 34(6): 116-126. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202212009

基于突变理论的湟水河流域崩滑易发性评价

  • 基金项目: 2021 年青海省“高端创新人才”拔尖人才计划(青人才[2021]12号);青海省科技计划项目(2019-KY-01)
详细信息
    作者简介: 李 彬(1984-),男,地质资源与地质工程专业,博士研究生,高级工程师,主要从事地质灾害相关工作。E-mail:55094925@qq.com
    通讯作者: 马建全(1984-),男,地质工程专业,博士,讲师,主要从事地质灾害相关工作。E-mail:273838145@qq.com
  • 中图分类号: P642.21;P642.22

Assessment of landslide susceptibility in the Huangshui River Basin based on catastrophe theory

More Information
  • 湟水河流域是黄河上游重要支流,是青海省政治经济文化中心,也是全省地质灾害高发区域。流域内灾害种类多,发生频率高,经济损失和人员伤亡较大。流域内地质灾害分布有一定地域特征,通过对湟水河流域地形地貌、地质岩组、地质构造、水文气象、人类工程活动分析,构建了地质灾害易发性划分标准,将湟水河流域崩滑灾害易发性分为极高易发区、高易发区、中易发区、低易发区、极低易发区5个等级。基于MATLAB编程的突变级数理论平台,充分考虑了各评价因子的内在关系,将单点灾害危险性评价扩展到区域灾害易发性评价。通过ROC对评价结果验证表明,该方法准确率高,可为地质灾害防治提供理论支持。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  突变模型系统

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  突变级数法流程图

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  基于突变级数理论的易发性平台开发流程图

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  湟水河流域崩滑灾害分布图

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  湟水河流域崩滑灾害易发分区图

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  预定义平台界面及属性

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  读取数据并绘图

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  湟水河流域栅格单元突变级数计算图

    Figure 8. 

    图 9  易发性评价因子归一化图

    Figure 9. 

    图 10  基于突变理论的湟水河流域易发性模型ROC精度验证结果

    Figure 10. 

    表 1  初等突变类型

    Table 1.  Primary mutation types

    类型 控制变量 势函数 归一化公式
    折迭型 1
    尖点型 2
    燕尾型 3
    蝴蝶型 4
    注:x为状态变量,即中间层C1C2······C6uvwt为控制变量,即最底层D1D2······D12
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  湟水河流域崩滑灾害危险度评价逐层结构模型

    Table 2.  Layer-by-layer structure model for landslide hazard assessment in the Huangshui River Basin

    目标层 突变模型 准则层 突变模型 中间层 突变模型 最底层
    灾害点
    危险度(
    尖点型 地质
    因素(
    蝴蝶型 地貌( 折迭型 地貌(
    地形( 蝴蝶型 坡度(
    高程(
    平面曲率(
    剖面曲率(
    工程地质岩组( 折迭型 工程地质岩组(
    地质构造( 折迭型 距离断层(
    环境
    因素(
    尖点型 水文气象( 燕尾型 参率平均降水量(
    距离水系(
    TWI
    人类工程活动( 尖点型 距离公路(
    距离城镇(
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  评价因子无量纲处理结果表

    Table 3.  Dimensionless processing results of evaluation factors

    点号
    10.2770.1730.2160.9920.8990.3650.7120.4230.9930.1790.9230.954
    20.2770.0560.4890.9190.9180.4700.7730.6210.7990.2680.8090.974
    30.2770.2410.8810.9010.9830.4700.8720.6790.9500.1220.9820.949
    40.1810.3560.4290.2910.4160.3650.6740.6480.8750.4990.9000.941
    50.2770.6630.7740.5910.4380.3650.7790.7010.8500.0570.9870.899
    1 1710.1810.4750.5950.5940.6520.3650.8760.0620.8610.2090.8130.991
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4  湟水河流域崩滑灾害点危险度计算结果表

    Table 4.  Calculation results of landslide hazard at various points in the Huangshui River Basin

    灾害点序号 灾害点危险度
    1 0.961506589
    2 0.962988553
    3 0.96876408
    4 0.954702401
    5 0.965770092
    1171 0.958959487
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 5  崩滑灾害危险性评价指标划分标准

    Table 5.  Division standard of landslide hazard evaluation index

    突变级数0~0.883>0.883~0.901>0.901~0.916>0.916~0.943
    风险等级轻度危险中度
    危险
    重度
    危险
    极度
    危险
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 6  崩滑灾害危险性评价结果

    Table 6.  Risk assessment results of rockfall disasters

    灾害点编号 突变级数 危险性评价
    (突变结果)
    1 0.961506589 极度危险
    2 0.962988553 极度危险
    3 0.968764080 极度危险
    4 0.954702401 极度危险
    5 0.965770092 极度危险
    1 171 0.958959487 极度危险
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 7  突变理论模型危险性分区统计表

    Table 7.  Statistical table of hazard zoning using catastrophe theory model

    序号崩滑灾害
    易发分区
    面积/km2占比/%
    1极低易发区152.680.90
    2低易发区1 912.6111.80
    3中易发区3 862.1323.99
    4高易发区5 511.4434.23
    5极高易发区4 661.7928.95
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 8  AUC值评判依据

    Table 8.  Criteria for AUC value evaluation

    AUC>0.9~1>0.8~0.9>0.7~0.8>0.6~0.70.5~0.6
    评判标准相当好很好极差
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    刘传正,陈春利. 中国地质灾害成因分析[J]. 地质论评,2020,66(5):1334 − 1348. [LIU Chuanzheng,CHEN Chunli. Research on the origins of geological disasters in China[J]. Geological Review,2020,66(5):1334 − 1348. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    LIU Chuanzheng, CHEN Chunli. Research on the origins of geological disasters in China[J]. Geological Review, 2020, 665): 13341348. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [2]

    宋盛渊,王清,潘玉珍,等. 基于突变理论的滑坡危险性评价[J]. 岩土力学,2014,35(增刊2):422 − 428. [SONG Shengyuan,WANG Qing,PAN Yuzhen,et al. Evaluation of landslide susceptibility degree based on catastrophe theory[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2014,35(Sup 2):422 − 428. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    SONG Shengyuan, WANG Qing, PAN Yuzhen, et al. Evaluation of landslide susceptibility degree based on catastrophe theory[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2014, 35(Sup 2): 422 − 428. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [3]

    尚志海,蔡文慧,欧先交,等. 基于突变理论的梅州市地质灾害灾度评估[J]. 安全与环境工程,2014,21(3):55 − 59. [SHANG Zhihai,CAI Wenhui,OU Xianjiao,et al. Geological hazard degree assessment of Meizhou City based on catastrophe theory[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering,2014,21(3):55 − 59. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    SHANG Zhihai, CAI Wenhui, OU Xianjiao, et al. Geological hazard degree assessment of Meizhou City based on catastrophe theory[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2014, 213): 5559. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [4]

    刘晓宇,樊智勇,吴疆. 土质滑坡地表倾斜变形特征与基于MEMS的倾斜变形监测技术初探[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2020,31(6):69 − 77. [LIU Xiaoyu,FAN Zhiyong,WU Jiang. Characteristics of surface tilt deformation of soil landslide and preliminary study on tilt deformation monitoring technology based on MEMS[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2020,31(6):69 − 77. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    LIU Xiaoyu, FAN Zhiyong, WU Jiang. Characteristics of surface tilt deformation of soil landslide and preliminary study on tilt deformation monitoring technology based on MEMS[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2020, 316): 6977. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [5]

    刘晓宇,任光明,刘彬,等. 基于突变理论的滑坡危险性评价[J]. 西华大学学报(自然科学版),2020,39(2):95 − 99. [LIU Xiaoyu,REN Guangming,LIU Bin,et al. Analysis of landslide hazard based on mutation series method[J]. Journal of Xihua University (Natural Science Edition),2020,39(2):95 − 99. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    LIU Xiaoyu, REN Guangming, LIU Bin, et al. Analysis of landslide hazard based on mutation series method[J]. Journal of Xihua University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 392): 9599. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [6]

    文畅平,陈毅,肖宏彬,等. 基于突变级数法的岩溶塌陷危险性评价[J]. 中国科技论文,2016,11(13):1539 − 1543. [WEN Changping,CHEN Yi,XIAO Hongbin,et al. Evaluation of karst collapse Risks based on catastrophe progression method[J]. China Sciencepaper,2016,11(13):1539 − 1543. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    WEN Changping, CHEN Yi, XIAO Hongbin, et al. Evaluation of karst collapse Risks based on catastrophe progression method[J]. China Sciencepaper, 2016, 1113): 15391543. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [7]

    梁桂兰,徐卫亚,何育智,等. 突变级数法在边坡稳定综合评判中的应用[J]. 岩土力学,2008,29(7):1895 − 1899. [LIANG Guilan,XU Weiya,HE Yuzhi,et al. Application of catastrophe progression method to comprehensive evaluation of slope stability[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2008,29(7):1895 − 1899. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    LIANG Guilan, XU Weiya, HE Yuzhi, et al. Application of catastrophe progression method to comprehensive evaluation of slope stability[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008, 297): 18951899. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [8]

    王思齐. 基于突变级数法的勉县堆积层滑坡稳定性分析研究[D]. 西安:西安科技大学,2019. [WANG Siqi. Stability analysis of Mianxian accumulated layer landslide based on catastrophe progression method[D]. Xi’an:Xi’an University of Science and Technology,2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    WANG Siqi. Stability analysis of Mianxian accumulated layer landslide based on catastrophe progression method[D]. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Science and Technology, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [9]

    李文广. 考虑降雨入渗影响的非饱和土边坡突变失稳的研究[D]. 西安:西安建筑科技大学,2004. [LI Wenguang. Study on abrupt instability of unsaturated soil slope considering the influence of rainfall infiltration[D]. Xi’an:Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology,2004. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    LI Wenguang. Study on abrupt instability of unsaturated soil slope considering the influence of rainfall infiltration[D]. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, 2004. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [10]

    易靖松,王峰,程英建,等. 高山峡谷区地质灾害危险性评价——以四川省阿坝县为例[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2022,33(3):134 − 142. [YI Jingsong,WANG Feng,CHENG Yingjian,et al. Study on the risk assessment of geological disasters in alpine valley area:A case study in Aba County,Sichuan Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2022,33(3):134 − 142. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    YI Jingsong, WANG Feng, CHENG Yingjian, et al. Study on the risk assessment of geological disasters in alpine valley area: A case study in Aba County, Sichuan Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2022, 333): 134142. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [11]

    许泰,鄂崇毅,蒋兴波,等. 永登县苦水镇潜在地质灾害时空分布特征及易发性与危险性分区评价[J]. 科学技术与工程,2021,21(33):14081 − 14092. [XU Tai,E Chongyi,JIANG Xingbo,et al. Temporal and spatial distribution and divisional evaluation of susceptibility and risk of the potential geological hazards in Kushui Town,Yongdeng County[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2021,21(33):14081 − 14092. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    XU Tai, E Chongyi, JIANG Xingbo, et al. Temporal and spatial distribution and divisional evaluation of susceptibility and risk of the potential geological hazards in Kushui Town, Yongdeng County[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2021, 2133): 1408114092. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [12]

    李怡飞,刘延国,梁丽萍,等. 青藏高原高山峡谷地貌区地质灾害危险性评价——以雅江县为例[J]. 水土保持研究,2021,28(3):364 − 370. [LI Yifei,LIU Yanguo,LIANG Liping,et al. Assessment on hazard of geological disasters in alpine and canyon landforms of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau:A case study of Yajiang County[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(3):364 − 370. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    LI Yifei, LIU Yanguo, LIANG Liping, et al. Assessment on hazard of geological disasters in alpine and canyon landforms of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: A case study of Yajiang County[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 283): 364370. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [13]

    杜晓晨,陈莉,陈廷芳. 基于GIS的凉山州德昌县滑坡危险性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(5):1206 − 1215. [DU Xiaochen,CHEN Li,CHEN Tingfang. Hazard assessment of landslide in Dechang County of Liangshan state based on GIS[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2020,29(5):1206 − 1215. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    DU Xiaochen, CHEN Li, CHEN Tingfang. Hazard assessment of landslide in Dechang County of Liangshan state based on GIS[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2020, 295): 12061215. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [14]

    李信,薛桂澄,柳长柱,等. 基于信息量模型和信息量-逻辑回归模型的海南岛中部山区地质灾害易发性研究[J]. 地质力学学报,2022,28(2):294 − 305. [LI Xin,XUE Guicheng,LIU Changzhu,et al. Evaluation of geohazard susceptibility based on information value model and information value-logistic regression model:A case study of the central mountainous area of Hainan Island[J]. Journal of Geomechanics,2022,28(2):294 − 305. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    LI Xin, XUE Guicheng, LIU Changzhu, et al. Evaluation of geohazard susceptibility based on information value model and information value-logistic regression model: A case study of the central mountainous area of Hainan Island[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2022, 282): 294305. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [15]

    王伟,袁雯宇,邹丽芳,等. 基于滑坡敏感性评价的库区水动力型滑坡区域综合预警研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2022,41(3):479 − 491. [WANG Wei,YUAN Wenyu,ZOU Lifang,et al. Comprehensive regional-scale early warning of water-induced landslides in reservoir areas based on landslide susceptibility assessment[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2022,41(3):479 − 491. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    WANG Wei, YUAN Wenyu, ZOU Lifang, et al. Comprehensive regional-scale early warning of water-induced landslides in reservoir areas based on landslide susceptibility assessment[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2022, 413): 479491. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [16]

    吴润泽,胡旭东,梅红波,等. 基于随机森林的滑坡空间易发性评价——以三峡库区湖北段为例[J]. 地球科学,2021,46(1):321 − 330. [WU Runze,HU Xudong,MEI Hongbo,et al. Spatial susceptibility assessment of landslides based on random forest:A case study from Hubei section in the Three Gorges Reservoir area[J]. Earth Science,2021,46(1):321 − 330. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    WU Runze, HU Xudong, MEI Hongbo, et al. Spatial susceptibility assessment of landslides based on random forest: A case study from Hubei section in the Three Gorges Reservoir area[J]. Earth Science, 2021, 461): 321330. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [17]

    李翠漫,许贵林,卢远. 广西桂东南区域崩岗关键影响因子及敏感性研究[J]. 长江科学院院报,2020,37(3):131 − 136. [LI Cuiman,XU Guilin,LU Yuan. Key influencing factors and susceptibility of collapse gully in southeast Guangxi,China[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute,2020,37(3):131 − 136. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    LI Cuiman, XU Guilin, LU Yuan. Key influencing factors and susceptibility of collapse gully in southeast Guangxi, China[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2020, 373): 131136. (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • 加载中

(10)

(8)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  524
  • PDF下载数:  38
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2022-12-22
修回日期:  2023-07-28
录用日期:  2023-09-06
刊出日期:  2023-12-25

目录